User talk:Gabriel VanHelsing

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Babel user information
en-2
ru-4
bg
Users by language
VG-2
bitmap‑2
PH-2
UTC+3This user's timezone is UTC+3.


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gabriel VanHelsing!

-- 06:18, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:George Patton 19.png[edit]

{{File:George Patton 19.png}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:13, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:George Patton 21.jpg[edit]

{{File:George Patton 21.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:George Patton 20.gif[edit]

{{File:George Patton 20.gif}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:George Patton 16.jpg[edit]

{{File:George Patton 16.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:George Patton 14.jpg[edit]

{{File:George Patton 14.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:George Patton 12.jpg[edit]

{{File:George Patton 12.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:George Patton 10.jpg[edit]

{{File:George Patton 10.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:George Patton 8.jpg[edit]

{{File:George Patton 8.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:George Patton 7.jpg[edit]

{{File:George Patton 7.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:15, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:George Patton 3.jpg[edit]

{{File:George Patton 3.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:15, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:George Patton 2.jpg[edit]

{{File:George Patton 2.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:15, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:George Patton & Russians.jpg[edit]

{{File:George Patton & Russians.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 08:18, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lucian Truscott 1.jpg[edit]

{{File:Lucian Truscott 1.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:42, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lucian Truscott 2.jpg[edit]

{{File:Lucian Truscott 2.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:42, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lucian Truscott 3.jpg[edit]

{{File:Lucian Truscott 3.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:42, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lucian Truscott 6.jpg[edit]

{{File:Lucian Truscott 6.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:42, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lucian Truscott 7.jpg[edit]

{{File:Lucian Truscott 7.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:42, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lucian Truscott 8.jpg[edit]

{{File:Lucian Truscott 8.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:42, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lucian Truscott 9.jpg[edit]

{{File:Lucian Truscott 9.jpg}} LX (talk, contribs) 08:43, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Please read Commons:Licensing#License information. You need to provide enough source information so that others can verify the copyright status of your uploads. "Internet" is not a verifiable source. Please provide the exact source address. For files tagged with {{PD-USGov-Military-Army}}, the source page must clearly show that the photograph was taken by a member of the U.S. army (and not by a journalist, for example). Please address the problems with your existing uploads before adding more files. LX (talk, contribs) 08:47, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you the same too. You can not simply upload everything you found on a google image search for "George Patton" with the claim that it is created by the U.S. federal government just because the depicted person worked for the U.S. federal government. Thats not how it works, all your uploads are trash, a clear evidence that the photo was created by an employee of the U.S. Federal Government/Army is missing in all cases, other evidences, such as a (first)publication date of the photo are also missing. --Martin H. (talk) 09:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:George Patton 3.jpg}} Martin H. (talk) 10:10, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories tip[edit]

Hi. Thanks for your work. Note, however that Category:Happiness is a subcategory of Category:Joy; so you generally shouldn't add both categories to an image (unless you think it illustrates an aspect of joy other than happiness or vice versa). Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

{{Autotranslate}} CategorizationBot (talk) 22:41, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for Barnstar[edit]

My pleasure to help you. Thanx a lot for Barnstar :-) --Dэя-Бøяg 22:57, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

По поводу категорий Transparent background и Stub icons[edit]

Здравствуйте. По-моему, очевидно, что не все иконки из второй категории имеют прозрачный фон, поэтому мне непонятно включение вами второй категории в первую и связанная с ней чистка файлов. Предлагаю организовать категорию Category:Stub icons with transparent background. Ain92 (talk) 17:55, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Wriging Nib Gray Down Left.png[edit]

{{File:Wriging Nib Gray Down Left.png}} Lymantria (talk) 05:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Wriging Nib Gray Left.png[edit]

{{File:Wriging Nib Gray Left.png}} Lymantria (talk) 05:43, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Wriging Nib Gray Up.png[edit]

{{File:Wriging Nib Gray Up.png}} Lymantria (talk) 05:43, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Wriging Nib Gray Down Right.png[edit]

{{File:Wriging Nib Gray Down Right.png}} Lymantria (talk) 05:43, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Gabriel VanHelsing. You have new messages at Lymantria's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

File source is not properly indicated: File:Floweret 6 Red.svg[edit]

{{File:Floweret 6 Red.svg}} High Contrast (talk) 18:14, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flower Ornament Coloured.svg[edit]

{{File:Flower Ornament Coloured.svg}} High Contrast (talk) 18:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Floral ornaments[edit]

I have talked back (http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHigh_Contrast&action=historysubmit&diff=61377295&oldid=61377171). The point is if these files are your own work. Let's finish this issue on my talk page. --High Contrast (talk)

I have now reverted you twice on an incorrect change at File:Seattle Public Library ref desk 2A.jpg. Category:Computer art is there for the artwork near the top of the picture, as mentioned in the description of the image. You have now twice removed that and added Category:Interiors which is redundant to Category:Library interiors. If you have some reason for the change you are making, please explain either here or on the file's talk page. However, please do not simply make the same change a third time. - Jmabel ! talk 01:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I asked, please let's discuss either here or on the file's talk page (rather than scatter part of the discussion to my talk page). You can always use {{Tb}} on someone's talk page if you need to draw their attention to your talk page. But, I promise you, I now have your talk page on my watchlist, and I won't fail to notice a response here.
I recommend that if you want to clean up Category:Computer art, and appropriate categories don't already exist, you should create appropriate subcategories and categorize images more specifically as appropriate. I don't have a concrete suggestion for the subcategories, but certainly Category:Interiors, the substitution you made, communicates nothing about the nature of the art - or even that there is an artwork in the photo - and is therefore less useful than what it replaces. A big poorly sorted category is still more useful than no category.
Quite a few of the things you mention on my talk page - computer icons, electronic musical instruments, etc. have categories of their own. However, this image shows a set of computer monitors being used for a continually changing, artistic display of activity on a library's computer systems. I cannot think of a more appropriate term for that than computer art. If you can, great, go for it. However, the fact that most of the content in the category belonged elsewhere does not mean that all of it does: clearly Category:Computer art is not a metacategory, useful only to classify other categories (like Category:Art by medium, so some images are likely to fall directly in the category. - Jmabel ! talk 07:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reccommendations.
Category:Computer art installations is the most aprropriate title of a category where can be placed images such as File:Seattle Public Library ref desk 2A.jpg. The right term is given in the description of that file. --Gabriel VanHelsing (talk) 11:32, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good choice. I have no problem with that. - Jmabel ! talk 16:50, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please dont remove Categories[edit]

Just an example: [1] --McZusatz (talk) 22:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{Autotranslate}}

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:21, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

{{File:Friendship Never Ends E.jpg}} Teemeah (talk) 10:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[[:Lower-quality version of File:1857 Arkady Nikitin-Portrait of Ivan Turgenev.jpg.:Template:Autotranslate|{{File:Turgenev 1857 by Nikitin.jpg}}]] Besides, {{Cc-zero}} may only be used for works explicitly made available under that license, which cannot be the case here, simply because Creative Commons was founded in 2001, long after the painting in question existed and its author died. In this particular case {{PD-old-100}} should be used instead. --Shruggy (talk) 12:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Sea Patrol Logo3.jpg}} Martin H. (talk) 20:21, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Sea Patrol Logo1.jpg}} Martin H. (talk) 20:21, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Sea Patrol Logo7.jpg}} Martin H. (talk) 20:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Sea Patrol Logo6.jpg}} Martin H. (talk) 20:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Sea Patrol Logo5.jpg}} Martin H. (talk) 20:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Pensacola Wings of Gold pwog-titleE.jpg}} Martin H. (talk) 20:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Pensacola Wings of Gold pwog-title.jpg}} Martin H. (talk) 20:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Ognyan Minchev 03.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 09:52, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Ognyan Minchev 02.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 09:53, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Ognyan Minchev 01.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 09:54, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Ognyan Minchev 04.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 09:54, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

{{Autotranslate}} High Contrast (talk) 09:56, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Haralan Alexandrov 2012.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 09:57, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Ivan Kostov 2011 in the Parlaiment 1.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 09:58, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Ivan Kostov 2011 in the Parlaiment.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 10:01, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Ivan Kostov 2011 conference.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 10:01, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Ivan Kostov 1997.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 10:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Ivan Kostov 2011.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 10:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:E Daynov 2012 01.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 10:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Pensacola Wings of Gold pwog-title E1.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 10:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Pensacola Wings of Gold pwog-title E1.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 10:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:E Daynov 2012 02.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 10:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Pensacola Wings of Gold pwog-titleN.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 10:03, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Pensacola Wings of Gold pwog-title E2.jpg}} High Contrast (talk) 10:03, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

{{Autotranslate}} High Contrast (talk) 10:03, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Sea Patrol Logo6.jpg}} 188.104.119.163 16:09, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{Lucretius2}}

{{File:Viardot by Sokolov 1843.jpg}} Shakko (talk) 11:57, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{File:Erkan Umut 4 (flipped).jpg}} Movietech (talk) 10:36, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am the owner of that picture flipped. Please delete this picture (File:Erkan_Umut_4_(flipped).jpg). Does it look a serious film set picture?--Movietech (talk) 23:48, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Johnny English Text Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

January (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Petar Mladenov.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Petar Mladenov.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 16:45, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Pay attention to copyright
File:Roman Kissiov.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 03:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blaga-Dimitrova-1980s.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 03:15, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


File:Blaga Dimitrova Youn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 03:20, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

File:Execution of the Assasins.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anonimski (talk) 21:42, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Domenico Trezzini C 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

VladVD (talk) 14:59, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Domenico Trezzini.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

vlsergey (talk) 12:35, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Domenico Trezzini C 02.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Domenico Trezzini C 02.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Domenico Trezzini C 02.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

vlsergey (talk) 16:21, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarajevo Place of the Assassination.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anonimski (talk) 22:37, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Atanas Burov F.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Stefan4 (talk) 15:09, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black-Hand Seal 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zoupan (talk) 01:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nikola Pashich Photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zoupan (talk) 08:57, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gavrilo Princip's Arrest1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zoupan (talk) 22:54, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarajevo Trial of Assassins1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zoupan (talk) 07:13, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vasil Levski's Affidavit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

50.182.173.130 02:57, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Computer_inscriptions has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 08:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:I Vasov4 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Лорд Бъмбъри (talk) 18:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:I Vasov4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Лорд Бъмбъри (talk) 18:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Simone Weil 07.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Simone Weil 07.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Simone Weil 07.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Discasto talk 15:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evlogi Georgiev1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Спас Колев (talk) 12:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evlogi Georgiev2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Спас Колев (talk) 12:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simone Weil 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 09:39, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish 09:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 17:18, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Computer-generated_examples has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 07:59, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Train Silhouette R.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:49, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Train Silhouette L.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Historical_images_with_transparent_background has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 07:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Domenico Trezzini.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kaganer (talk) 23:31, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Droste effect origin has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:19, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 05:50, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dragutin Dimitrijevic Apis3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Milićević (talk) 13:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Notrealname1234 (talk) 01:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]