User talk:Fingalo/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Skriðuklaustur01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 12:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)


File:Skriðukloster02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 13:05, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Skriðukloster03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 13:08, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Stykkisholmur 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 13:15, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Stykkisholmur 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 13:25, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Djupivogur church 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 19:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Grindavik Kirche 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 11:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Grindavik Kirche 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 11:35, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Deletion Discussions

Hi. I suggest you take a look at Threshold of originality or en:Threshold of originality. Not everything that exists can be and is protected by copyright. We currently do not have specific rules on Iceland, but the assumption used for most other countries most likely applies here to: It needs a certain originality (artistic or creative work) for something to be protected by copyright. Ordinary buildings, which every architect can do and which share a common architecture fail to archieve that. --PaterMcFly (talk) 12:00, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Ja, das gilt für "Häuser von der Stange". Aber bei größeren Gebäuden werden bereits in den Proportionen, der Fassadengestaltung und der Anordnung "schöpferische Leistungen" verlangt. Die Tatsache, dass jeder Architekt sowas erstellen kann, hat mit der Schöpfungshöhe nichts zu tun - alle studieren Architektur. Fingalo (talk) 12:25, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Außerdem, wenn die Community den Bauwerken die Schöpfungshöhe abspricht, dann bleibt's halt. Fingalo (talk) 12:36, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Einige sind sicher Grenzfälle, aber z.B. das ist doch wirklich etwas ganz gewöhnliches, oder? --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Weiß nicht so recht. Die Fassadengestaltung durch die Fensteranordnung ist sooo gewöhnlich nicht. Um nicht missverstanden zu werden: Ich will nicht "fundamentalistisch" Bilder vertreiben. Wenn aber bei einem Bauwerk der Architekt namentlich genannt wird, oder der Architekt auf seiner Internetseite das Bauwerk als eigene Leistung besonders aufführt, dann ist das für mich schon ein Indiz, dass das nicht als "von der Stange" angesehen wird. Ein Löschantrag ist ein Diskussionsforum. Ich rette die Bilder, die ich vorschlage, auf die deutsche WP, zB. Siglingastofnun. Dort erhalten sie nach einer Weile einen bedingten Löschungsvermerk für den Fall, dass sie hier behalten werden, z.B. hier. Dann werden sie halt wieder gelöscht. Fingalo (talk) 13:22, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Aha, Ok, dann verstehen wir uns hier schon eher. Deine Reihenlöschanträge gegen isländische Bauten sahen für mich zunächst leider schon wie Löschtrollerei aus. Da hätte ich wohl vorher einen Blick auf deine Benutzerseite und restlichen Beiträge werfen sollen, sorry. --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:30, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Ich räume gerade mal die Kategorie Island auf, stelle für die rechtswidrigen bilder Löschanträge und bereinige und vervollständige die Kategorisierungen, da ich selbst viele Bilder dort auf meinen jährlichen Besuchen mache. Übrigens: Ein typisches Beispiel, wo auch ich bei einem größeren Bauwerk mangelnde Schöpfungshöhe anerkenne, ist in Category:Psychiatric Hospitals in Iceland zu sehen. Gegen Löschtrollerei spricht auch, dass eine Reihe meiner eigenen Bilder darunter ist, die ich in Unkenntnis der Rechtslage hier hochgeladen hatte. Fingalo (talk) 10:51, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


File:Lambafell 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 11:13, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Lambafell 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 11:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Lambafell 09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 11:18, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Lambafell 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 11:28, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Lambafell 11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 11:42, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für's Retten. Im ersten Fall halte ich den Löschantrag für totalen Schwachsinn - wieso soll man in Frankreich keine Panoramen fotografieren und veröffentlichen dürfen? - beim zweiten scheint es wirklich so ein ubskures Gesetzt zu geben. Deswegen wurden auch schon meine Bilder von der Halgrimskirche gelöscht. Wenn Du es für sinnvoll halten solltest, daß ich die noch mal in die deutsche WikiPedia einstelle (rette), kann ich das auch gerne machen. Allerdings befürchte ich, daß auch hier die Rechtslage nicht anders ist und sie auch hier entfernt werden müßten, oder? Andreas Tille (talk) 11:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Frankreich kennt keine Panoramafreiheit. Ich bin nur zufällig darauf gestoßen. Die Hallgrimskirchenbilder habe ich bereits hierhin gerettet. Guck mal, ob Deine dabei sind. Gegebenenfalls rufe sie auf und kontrolliere die Angaben. Übrigens gilt das Schutzlandprinzip, d.h. es gilt das Recht des Landes der Veröffentlichung. Und hier gilt die Panoramafreiheit. Commons ist aber international. Fingalo (talk) 11:25, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Ich verstehe nicht mal den Begriff "Panoramafreiheit" und die sich daraus ergebenden Implikationen bezüglich des besagten Bildes erschließen sich mir auch nicht. Meine gelöschten Islandbilder sind nicht mit bei Deiner Rettungsaktion - aber ich werde sie bei Gelegenheit mal dort hinzufügen. Andreas Tille (talk) 08:09, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Guck einfach mal unter Panoramafreiheit Fingalo (talk) 11:04, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Ich habe mal mein erstes Bild [1] nach de.w.o hochgeladen. Leider funktioniert es nicht (oder nicht so), die Templates von commons.wikimedia.org für die Beschreibung zu verwenden und das Anlegen einer Template ist mir auch nicht gelungen. Hast Du eine Ahnung, wie ich meine übliche Template auch in der deutschen Wikipedia verwenden kann? Andreas Tille (talk) 13:51, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Nö, ich versteh von sowas nix. Fingalo (talk) 14:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Landsbókasafn01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 15:01, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Town hall Reykjavik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 18:15, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Háteikskirkja02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 11:30, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi, bitte frag den Original-Autor oder denjenigen, der das Bild transferiet hat, und nicht mich als Autor des Tools, das benutzt wurde. --Magnus Manske (talk) 15:06, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Der sitzt auf flickr, wo ich nicht angemeldet bin. Und Salvor habe ich auch benachrichtigt. Fingalo (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Ingolfur02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 19:07, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Ingólfur01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 19:21, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Reykholt 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 19:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Löschanträge

Hallo, bitte prüfe bei den Grafiken von [[[User:Dipl-ing-metaller]] bei denen du einen Lösch-Baustein eingefügt hast, die angegebenen Links auf die Originalquelle. --Cepheiden (talk) 18:22, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Sie sind alle hier zu finden. Fingalo (talk) 18:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Auf Unterseiten, ich weiß, aber du hast überall "http://www.obeko.de/pages/de/technologien/thermisches-spritzen.php / http://www.obeko.de/media/ThermSpritzen/ThermSpritzen3.png" angegeben. --Cepheiden (talk) 18:29, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Schäm. Copy and paste --- Fingalo (talk) 18:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Bild-Lizenzen Löschanträge

Bild-Lizenzen

Hallo, meine neuen Bilder in Commons wurden von dir angemahnt. Die Bilder stammen wirklich von mir, ich betreue die Website von obeko und habe die Grafiken selbst erstellt. Ich habe auch ausdrücklich die Erlaubnis, die Bilder für Wikipedia zu verwenden, um die Artikel zu illustrieren. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dipl-ing-metaller Bitte hilf mir, was nun zu tun ist. --Dipl. Ing. Metallveredelung und Beschichtungen (talk) 07:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Da bin ich überfragt. Aber wende dich mit Deinem Problem am besten hierhin. Da wird das bereits diskutiert. Fingalo (talk) 07:30, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Reykholt 08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Fingalo (talk) 15:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Einar Jonsson01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fingalo (talk) 19:32, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Einar Jonsson05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fingalo (talk) 19:47, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Einar Jónsson02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fingalo (talk) 19:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Perlan_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:53, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Two things:

A very minor point:

"Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland," is the opposite of what you want to say. "Until" means "up to the time of" or "before the specified time".

You might say,

"Image is only free for non-commercial use beginning 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland."
thanks Fingalo (talk)

or,

"Iceland's FOP law prohibits commercial use until 70 years after the death of the architect."

More important, have you thought about becoming an Administrator? I am recruiting admins because we are falling behind in closing DRs and need help. I see that you have a good depth and breadth of experience. If you would like this, I would be happy to help with the process.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:13, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

No. I can't english. Fingalo (talk) 19:25, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
English is not required. We have Administrators whose English is weaker than yours.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:43, 18 October 2010 (UTC)


File:07Tirana_Universitaet_Teresa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 11:22, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Skua pictures question

Hi there, thanks for your lovely skua photos from Iceland. I do have a question about File:Skua 2.jpg and File:Skua 4.jpg, though. It seems as if the skua is displaying territorial behaviour and attacking the person in the picture. However, I wasn't there, so I can't say for sure. Would you be able to add a brief explanation? --Ranveig (talk) 16:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

De er riktig. Den kommer flygende dyp fra bagsiden og stiger umiddelbar bag hode opp. En gang sette jeg meg på huk. Skua komm for dyp. Plutselig stå jeg opp og kunne røre ved buken. (Unnskyld min dårlig norsk). Fingalo (talk) 17:19, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Hallo. Beim Bild File:Quedlinburg Neue Straße.jpg fällt mir eine Verzerrung auf: das Bild scheint am unteren Bildrand nach links "wegzurtuschen". Hast du da irgendwas nachbearbeitet oder wie kommt diese Verzerrung zustande? --Quedel (talk) 19:55, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Das kommt wohl vom starken Weitwinkel. Ich werde es geraderücken. Fingalo (talk) 10:18, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:Arnarstapi 7.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Fingalo (talk) 14:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Ísafjörður 33.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fingalo (talk) 10:24, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Skrúður 05.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fingalo (talk) 14:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Das hätte der Rotatebot auch für Dich erledigt. Ab Version 1.18 erfolgt das Drehen automatisch aus den Exif-Daten. Grüße -- RE rillke questions? 15:20, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Immer hört man etwas Neues! :-) Fingalo (talk) 15:22, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Ich hab noch eins falsch hochgeladen. Der Bot findet das offenbar nicht, und in deinem Link ist ein Rotatebot nicht zu finden! Also mach ichs wieder wie bisher zu Fuß. Fingalo (talk) 15:50, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Einfach {{rotate|90}} auf die Dateibeschreibungsseite setzen. Dann landet es in einer Kategorie, die der Bot ca. 2x täglich absucht. -- RE rillke questions? 16:09, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Au wei, da soll einer drauf kommen. Ich hab's mal gemacht. Fingalo (talk) 16:17, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Ich dachte, Du hättest es gemerkt. Den Link habe ich oben hingesetzt, um zu zeigen, dass wir es noch mit MediaWiki 1.17 zu tun haben. -- RE rillke questions? 16:51, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Nö, hatte ich nicht. Als ich sah, dass das bild quer lag, bin ich sofort auf die Originaldatei gegangen, hab sie gedreht und drübergeladen, ohne noch weiter auf den Seiteninhalt zu achten. Und nachher dachte ich, wer weiß, wann der Bot da irgendwas macht. Hiwe auf Commons ist man ja nicht so schnell, wie man an den abgeschlossenen Löschdiskussionen sieht, die dann noch nach einem Monat und später zu sehen sind. Fingalo (talk) 16:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Wir bekommen täglich meist mehr als 100 Löschanträge. Und das sind meist nur die strittigen Sachen. Gelöscht werden täglich sicherlich über 400 Dateien. Die meisten kümmern sich gar nicht um ihre uploads geschweige das Urheberrecht. Was nicht sofort ausgemistet wird liegt dann auf unserer Müllhalde. Am 5. Juni muss was besonders passiert sein, da ist die Müllhalde 100x größer als üblich. -- RE rillke questions? 17:13, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Ja, in letzter Zeit geht's deutlich rascher. Die Hallgrímskirche hat Monate da gestanden, obgleich es sich bei den (inzwischen gelöschten) Bildern um klare Urheberrechtsverletzungen gehandelt hat, bis ich irgendeinen Admin mal darauf hingewiesen habe. Da waren sie alle weg. Aber manchmal geht's halt auch in die Hose, so bei einem Bild meines Sohnes, das ebenfalls eine URV darstellt, weil es in Island keine Panoramafreiheit gibt. Ich hab' das Bild auf de.WP gerettet. In der Diskussion dachten die Diskutanten, es gehe um die beiden Figürchen vor dem Museum und lehnten ab. Der Admin entschied auch so. Aber um die ging's gar nicht, sondern um das Museum selbst, das der Bildhauer für sich entworfen hatte. Neuauflage der Debatte wurde nicht zugelassen. Naja - mir ist's egal. Früher gab's unter den Löschrichtlinien eine Option, eine ganze Gruppe en bloc zu löschen. Finde ich nicht mehr. Währe bei der Category:Einar Jónsson angebracht. Alle Bilder - außer das letzte aus USA - wurden in Reykjavík vor seinem Museum gemacht. Sie sind alle auf de.WP gerettet. Manchmal passiert mir das jetzt noch, wenn ich zu spät das zu späte Todesdatum ergoogle. Diese alle sind klare URV's. Ich habe sie selbst hochgeladen zu einer Zeit, als ich von den isländischen Sonderbestimmungen noch nichts wusste. Jetzt ist's mir zu mühsam, bei jedem das Formular da auszufüllen. Vielleicht nehme ich mal - weil's klar ist - {{copyvio}}. Das ist einfacher. Aber danke für die Erläuterungen. Fingalo (talk) 18:40, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Sieh' mal auf meine Seite User talk:Rillke/AjaxMassDelete.js. Wenn Du JavaScript aktiviert hast, kannst Du es ganz leicht installieren. (Die Grafik oben rechts anklicken.) Danach gehst Du einfach zu der Kategorie und drückst den Knopf "perform batch task" und dann auf weiter. Dann kommt ein großer Kasten. Da wählst Du einfach ganz oben "select all", gibst eine Begründung ein und weiter und fertig. Kann ich auch machen. -- RE rillke questions? 18:48, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Weil ich es gerade sehe: Die Version zu austesten hat noch einige Fehler und kann Kategorien noch nicht handeln. -- RE rillke questions? 19:17, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Und das wird nicht funtionieren oder Du legst Dir eine Kopie in Deinem BNR an. -- RE rillke questions? 19:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Irgendwie bekam ich das Kästchen erst mal nicht, sondern nur die Javascriptzeile. un dann heißt es: "Script asks for the contributor. Make sure you spell him/ her correctly", also habe ich mich da eingetragen. Jetzt habe ich das Kästchen, da kommen aber nur meine eigenen Bilder. Wenn ich "einfach zur Kategorie gehe, da ist kein Knopf "perform batch task". Wieso auch. Ich glaube, das ganze ist dermaßen umständlich, dass ich zu Fuß schneller damit durch bin, als mit der richtigen Installation des Programms. Fingalo (talk) 19:28, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Du musst lediglich die letzte Änderung rückgängig machen zur Kategorie gehen und Please purge your browser’s cache. (You only need to do it once.)
Operating
system

Browser
Microsoft Windows or Linux macOS
Internet Explorer Press Ctrl+F5
Mozilla Firefox Hold down  Shift while clicking Reload
(or press Ctrl+F5 or Ctrl+ Shift+R)
Press  Cmd+R (reload page) or
 Cmd+ Shift+R (reload page and rewrite cache)
Opera Press Ctrl+F5 or  Shift+F5
Konqueror
Apple Safari Hold down  Shift+Alt while clicking Reload
Press Ctrl+R Press  Cmd+ Option+E (clear browser cache)
or  Cmd+R (update)
Chrome Press Ctrl+F5 or  Shift+F5
or hold down  Shift while clicking Reload
Press  Cmd+F5 or  Shift+F5
or hold down  Shift while clicking Reload

.

Aber wie gesagt das kann ich auch machen, wenn Du einverstanden bist. -- RE rillke questions? 19:31, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Natürlich bin ich einverstanden. Nur das letzte Bild nicht, denn das ist ok. Fingalo (talk) 19:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Hier ist der LA. -- RE rillke questions? 19:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Sehr schön, aber die Uploader sind nicht informiert. Bei dreien bin ichs nicht (das sind die untersten in der Liste). (Außerdem informiere ih mich immer selbst, um den Erfolg zu überwachen) und Benutze {{delete|reason=Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the artist's death per [[COM:FOP#Iceland]].}} als Begründung. Hab's auf meiner Userseite hinterlegt.Fingalo (talk) 19:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Ja das muss ich noch in meinem Script implementieren. Wenn es um die Uploads eines Benutzers geht, wird er auch benachrichtigt. -- RE rillke questions? 19:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

ok. Dann Danke und gute Nacht. Fingalo (talk) 20:00, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Ich fliege jetzt nach Tromsø auf eine Tagung und komme erst Montag wieder. Dann werde ich mich um die Benachrichtigungen kümmern - wenn die Dateien dann noch da sind. Fingalo (talk) 04:08, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Ich bin gleich im Urlaub aber die drei Benutzer sind seit gestern benachrichtigt. -- RE rillke questions? 08:42, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi, du schreibst, alle Bilder wären nach de-WP "gerettet. Ich vermisse aber den "Konungur Atlantis", ehemals File:Einar Jónsson20.jpg. Kannst du bitte nochmal schauen, ob der wirklich auf de-WP vorhanden ist? Grüße --h-stt !? 13:04, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Oh weh, die habe ich doch tatächlich geschlabbert! Fingalo (talk) 15:47, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Soll ich einen Admin fragen, ob er sie transferieren oder temporär entlöschen soll? Und welche? siehe auch: User_talk:Rillke/Discuss/2011#Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_uploaded_by_Category:Einar_J.C3.B3nsson -- RE rillke questions? 16:39, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Sag mir doch bitte, welche Bilder außer der 20 fehlen. Ich bin in beiden Projekten Admin und kann alles wiederherstellen und transferieren. Hast du einen Überblick, welche der Bilder gerettet sind und ob ich bei mehr als dem einen nochmal ran muss? Grüße --h-stt !? 08:39, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Ich hätt' schwören können, alle gerettet zu haben. Warum nur 2, weiß ich jetzt nicht mehr. Aber alle, die in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Category:Einar Jónsson verzeichnet sind, müssten nach de:Kategorie:Datei:Skulptur in Island. Fingalo (talk) 11:28, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

auf der Arbeitsliste Fehlende Bilder sind die bilder 11, 20, 25 und 33 aufgetaucht, die also zumindest nicht unter dem selben namen auf de verfügbar sind. --Akkakk (talk) 18:04, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Auch unter keinem anderen Namen. Wenn's Probleme bereitet ... ich bin im Oktober wieder in Reykjavík und kann die Skulpturen noch mal aufnehmen. Fingalo (talk) 11:52, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Nein, du musst nichts neu fotografieren. Nur kurz Bescheid sagen ob nach deinem Wissen noch mehr als die vier Bilder 11, 20,25 und 33 fehlen. Dann können wir alle fehlenden mit ein paar Mausklicks wieder herstellen. Grüße --h-stt !? 08:59, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Hab' ich doch am 30. August, 4 Edits weiter oben. Fingalo (talk) 09:32, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Hallo, gute Nachrichten: Saibo hat sich die Mühe gemacht, die Dateien zu transferieren. Stehen die Skulpturen/ Bauten alle in Island? (Kategorisierung) -- RE rillke questions? 22:54, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Bei de:Datei:EinarJonssonEarth.jpg müssen wir noch wisssen wo das Ding steht. Öffentlich? Im Park? Bitte einfach in die Dateibeschriebung schreiben. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:41, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Bitte auch bei de:Datei:EinarJonsson04.jpg und de:Datei:SculpturEinarJonsson.jpg - und eigentlich bei allen in de:Kategorie:Datei:Skulptur von Einar Jónsson in Island - es muss klar sein, dass die Skulptur den Anforderungen der deutschen Panoramafreiheit genügt - also hier insbensodere, dass die Skulpturen öffentlich zugänglich (nicht in Privatpark, Museum) stehen. Danke. Und das nächste Mal bitte aufpassen. ;) Denn: So wirklich rentieren tut sich das Verschieben nicht. Ich habe ca. 2,5 Stunden hochgeladen (5,4 Minuten pro Bild) und dafür mit Rillke zusammen ca. 1h ein Script gebastelt, damit es schneller geht. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:04, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Vielen Dank. Die Skulpturen stehen alle in einem öfentlich zugänglichen Museumspark vor dem Museum. Sie stehen alle in Island, Reykjavík. EinarJonssonEarth ist freigestellt, aber auch im Park. Es ist die gleiche Skulptur wie Einar_Jónsson06.jpg. Fingalo (talk) 07:33, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Alles klar. Ich habe noch etwas die Syntax korrigiert.
Übrigens: Der korrekte HTML-Code für einen Zeilenumbruch heißt <br /> - nicht </br>. Der Schrägstrich muss hinten hin. :-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 22:13, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Knarrarosviti 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fingalo (talk) 22:06, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Reykholt 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fingalo (talk) 12:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)