User talk:Filnik/Archive4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:800px-Rotterdam Overschie A13.jpg[edit]

I have that now corrected is that well so??

deprecated function in your monobook.js[edit]

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Conselho Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia.jpg[edit]

Sorry, I've made a mistake when I've put the licence. I've corrected the licence. Could you remove 'invalid licence' of the image? Or how I could remove it? Thanks --Mwaldeck 19:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi, I came here for results of the file I'd uploaded Olzhas.jpg, I skanned the photo from the authors book. Doesn't it sound a licence? And also I have a heavy fog on my head on fiil out my licence on board, could you help me, please? Ongalgan (talk) 04:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --Mwaldeck 18:24, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:Email[edit]

Hi Filnik, have You looked at them? Special:Undelete/Image:So_What.jpg, Special:Undelete/Image:So_What.Idolbild.jpg, Special:Undelete/Image:Jesper_Jelse.jpg, is a band, it looks like derivative work, (the last two scanned from a magazine). Why would he upload that from a magazine if he is the one on the picture (Jesper Jelse). P.S. He uploaded that again: [1]. Special:Contributions/JesperJelse Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 11:20, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Filnik, I was completely sure that you had asked me because of wanting to know why. That is perfectly ok, please don't worry (I don't bite nor peck). I think Special:Contributions/JesperJelse should be deleted too. Thanks, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 12:43, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mineralogistes-Revista-MineralUp.jpg[edit]

Sorry, I forgot to insert that this image is from MIenral Up Magazine. I am co-editor of this magazine and photo are from us. I will change details. Thank you for your message. --Joan Rosell 12:05, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My rfA[edit]

Thankyou for your support on my RfA. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CP Ships[edit]

Your bot raised a question about whether the image I've recently uploaded is properly documented.

In my view, it makes sense to establish a context. Each of the articles written about these ships have photographs or artwork which were considered to be from the public domain up through the 1922 Empress of Canada, for which no images have been found as yet. The following is a list of ships added to the Canadian Pacific Steamships fleet in the early years of the 20th century:

__________________

The image in question is postcard artwork created in Canada for this Canadian company -- specifically, an image of the SS Empress of China. In the points which follow, I wonder if a sufficiently clear case is made for the image to remain on Wikipedia?

  • 1. QUESTIONED: Postcard artwork of RMS Empress of China (1891) from Simplon (UK) is not identified as being specifically out-of-copyright; rather, the web site claims all material is covered under copyright. In the context established at #2 and #3 below, I am persuaded that Simplon's claim was over-broad in regard to the specific image which is now posted with the Wikipedia article RMS Empress of China (1891).
  • 2. NO DISPUTE: Photograph of RMS Empress of Japan (1891) from the City of Vancouver Archives is in the public domain: This Canadian work is in the public domain in Canada because its copyright has expired due to one of the following: (a) it was subject to Crown copyright and was first published more than 50 years ago, or (b) it was not subject to Crown copyright, and the creator died more than 50 years ago. Please see en:WP:PD#Canadian images: Yousuf Karsh
  • 3. NO DISPUTE: Photograph of RMS Empress of India (1891) from the E. Chambré Hardman Archive in Liverpool is identified by the curators as "out-of-copyright" or public domain. In this instance, the public domain is construed by Wikipedia to mean that this image (or other media file) is in the public domain because its copyright has expired ... [which] applies to ... Canada ... and those countries with a copyright term of life of the author plus 70 years."
  • I noticed that some other editor on the English Wikipedia uploaded postcard artwork of RMS Empress of Asia (1913); and I think that image from the Simplon web site is adequately documented.

If I need to do something more or different, please help me understand what I need to do now and what I will need to do in the future so that I will avoid causing questions like yours to arise. --Ooperhoofd 01:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dragoon picture[edit]

G'day Filnik, your bot is requesting source information for the Dragoon.jpg pigeon picture. I blanked it for deletion as there was an existing image (of a different type of dragoon) that kept coming up on the Wikipedia article I was creating. I don't need two images and I've now uploaded the same file to Dragoon pigeon.jpg so if you can delete the old one for me that would be great please. Gdmanning 23:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

cenacho[edit]

Cenacho, que eres un cenacho. The image "Morrón de la Launilla" is mine, I personally take that photo in Sierra de Gador 2 years ago, so I don't need any licence. No se si me entiendes, sino aprende Español y te lo digo en Castellano.

Or[edit]

or you could get that damn new uploadpage to work and not delete all the detailed text I wrote in the description, without letting the backspace work to get it back and let me put it in the old way... Røed 20:51, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


new interface for flickr uploading[edit]

The new upload interface is giving me nightmares. the old ones was better. it was a single step easy way for me.. hope some one will help. --Challiyan 17:35, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

seconda cinta[edit]

Ciao, abbi pazienza se la questione è ingarbugliata, ma temo molto tempo sia passato. L'immagine Image:Seconda cinta Lucca.JPG (foto fatta da me; non ricordo affatto cosa ho inserito ma in genere dichiaro esplicitamente di essere l'autore dell'immagine) pare sia stata cancellata, ho letto la giustificazione ma non ci ho capito un gran che. Immagino non sia possibile recuperarla (io no ho più il file, vedrò se lo ritrovo nei meandri del computer), peccato. Mikils 15:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Port of Hendaye.JPG[edit]

You removed the image of Port of Hendaye because of licensing reasons. Maybe I chose the wrong choice of lisence, but I made the foto myself and I don't want to have the rights of it. I hope you can put the image back knowing this information? --Joost van Os 21:30, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

para onde eu mando? (portugues) Guzzzz 03:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


You found on Google.com, but not in high definition, and where I send the license?Guzzzz 04:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i think you delete my Fray Richard Godoy´s article pictures. Even though i didn´t take them i have the permission from the one who did. What can i do?? Thanks, --Paulinalgh 17:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Paulinalgh[reply]

New photo of rare Penstemon to page[edit]

Hi, I am more a photographer and less computer savy. I uplloaded a picture to Wikimedia Commons called Penstemon haydenii.jpg it is found here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Penstemon_haydenni.jpg

What I was trying to do was simply add another picture to this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penstemon as one of the thumbnails with resulting link. I took this picture with my Nikon F3 film camera and had the negatives converted to digital at a local lab. This plant was on the Endangered Species act, and is only found in the sandhills of Nebraska and one spot in Wyoming, in it's entirety. Just trying to contibute, but seems I have added a separate link in the page on the Penstemons that I was only trying to add to.

Any help in this? Pehaps someone else could add the appropriate tags? I have the original picture, negative and digital images here at my home in Michigan.

Thank you!

Vernon Jenewein Vljenewein 22:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)~


Image:School Board for London.jpg[edit]

I need help with this file. It was uploaded from english wikipedia, which, by the way, has changed the category tag from GDFL to GDFL images with disclaimers. Disclaiming what? I see from the explanation that a disclaimer may be for example a warning sign such as "play at your own risk". I can also imagine that a photo of something may be a risk to the security of a nation (i.e. from the army), but I do not understand what the original uploader is actually disclaiming.--Sandivas 20:35, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArGee[edit]

The vase I put in Commons, The Luck of Edenhall, is from a handout available to all visitors. I did overlook that it says on page 3 "By R J Charleston, Ceramics Department". Whether he took the pictures or merely asembled them, along with the copy, the notes do not say.

As to the handout, anyone can obtain one and that seems to me to put it in the public domain.Argee (talk) 23:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Imob[edit]

Ciao Fil! Scusa se rompo pure di qua, ma approfitto dei tuoi "tastini" e della tua maggiore esperienza qui - io sono una niubba da queste parti ;) Ho trovato delle immagini in possibile violazione di copyright da http://imob.venezia.it ovvero Image:Imob logo.jpg e Image:Tessera imob.jpg‎ . Le licenze sono messe alla cavolo e di immagini mastico poco, ma mi puzzano un po'. Buona serata :) --LaPizia (talk) 18:35, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bot Script[edit]

Hi Filnik, I have been using your Checkimages.py script on my bot and it really is a great idea and an even better script, but I just noticed a small flaw with it, now on Commons, when anyone uses the upload form the form automatically adds this template ({{ImageUpload}} which is now being used to track which upload form the Image was uploaded with and sort them into these two cats 1, and 2) to the Image page , so even if the Image doesn't have a license on it, that template fools the bot's script into thinking that there is a license tag and then the bot moves on saying that the Images is OK. I was wondering if there was any possible way to program the bot to be able to ignore that template, I am only an intermediate Python Programmer but I was thinking that something along the lines that is used in the welcome.py script that is used to skip users that are automatically created as part of SUL might work here to skip {{ImageUpload}} as part of the Template scan on the Image pages. If that's just no possible I understand that Python has its limits and that will just have to be. Thanks in advance and All the Best, --Mifter (talk) 17:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Again :), I was just wondering if you could send me the new copy of the Checkimages.py with {{ImageUpload}} on the list of templates to be ignored so that I can run my bot (MifterBot) with the the new version and to make it more effective in tagging new Images for deletion, you could just e-mail me the code by Special:EmailUser, just post the code to my talk page, or just update the master at Botwiki:Python:Checkimages.py so that I can run the new version on my bot :). Thanks in Advance and All the Best, --Mifter (talk) 23:08, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Licences for Images[edit]

Hi Filnik, I am copying and translating articles on German railways from German wikipedia to English wikipedia. Most of the images are fine - they are in Wikipedia Commons, but some don't work. So I copied 2 examples into my own files and uploaded them to Wiki Commons with the information provided on the originals. Both seemed to have an 'open' licence, one with the caveat that you had to quote state the author's name. I thought I had done this correctly, but the 'bot' has said 

"There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you."

The images concerned are 'Krauss-Helmholtz-Lenkgestell.svg' and 'Bavarian GtL 4/4 no. 98886 2.jpg'. Help! Bermicourt(talk) 18:52, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Roba da bot[edit]

Caro Filnik,

scusa se rompo, ma si tratta di un lavoro sporco. Accortomi con mesi di ritardo che il Commonist aveva caricato le pagine di questo libro con una descrizione "sbagliata" (un'immagine di esempio: Image:Alfieri - Catilina 018.jpg) ho cominciato a correggerle oggi e dopo un po' di edit mi sono chiesto se un bot avrebbe potuto compiere lo stesso lavoro facilmente. Di fatto si tratta di sostituire il wikitesto presente nella descrizione delle immagini della categoria sopradetta con 

{{Information
|Description=Scan from the book ''La congiura catilinaria e la Guerra giugurtina di C. Sallustio Crispo e L'Eneide di P. Virgilio Marone tradotte da Vittorio Alfieri'', printed in 1903.
|Source=Xerox (photo)copy of the original book
|Date=
|Author=[[User:OrbiliusMagister|]]
|Permission={{PD-old}}
|other_versions=
}}

[[Category:Della congiura di Catilina]]

Se si può fare bene, altrimenti lo farò io manina con molta calma. Grazie comunque per l'attenzione e per qualunque cenno di risposta tu abbia voglia di darmi... - εΔω 15:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Prinzenhöhle[edit]

Pictures are from German Wikipedia. I wrote it. Links are here: [2] [3] If it is not allowed to copy them you can delete, but I have no time for further dicussion. Your rules are stupid--Bonio (talk) 08:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category license tags[edit]

Hi. I've been removing Category:License tags from some templates you recently tagged. The reason is that they aren't license tags per se but rather are source tags embedding proper license tags (such as PD-old). /Lokal_Profil 23:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Richiesta di lavoro per il tuo bot[edit]

Come chiesto in Commons Bar e girato a te avrei da svuotare dei contenuti una categoria per rimetterli in un'altra ma salvando comunque la prima. Si può evitare il lavoro a mano?--Threecharlie (talk) 00:32, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, ho capito che eri impegnato altrove e con un po' di pazienza ho fatto il lavoro a mano :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 15:17, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ref: Image:LINEA A MR.jpg - Image:Premetro Map3.jpg[edit]

Hello Filnik, in regards to above files, I've added license already to both Wikimedia Commons files.

There may also be a problem, first off all, I'm author in both Spanish and English Wikipedia, secondly, I've uploaded to Wikimedia Commons duplicate files from Wikipedia, my mistake!, tough there seems to be triplicate files, I'm new @ Wikimedia Commons and didn't realize, I'll be off line for several weeks and i hope files from either Commons or Wikipedia will not be deleted since they may each active in some Articles.

Here files in question:


Totally confused Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 05:41, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requests?[edit]

Hi, I just manually went through the categories starting at Category:Malvaceae, it started as an interesting task due to two different definitions of where to go from there. That was a few days ago though.

I have a list of galleries which have lists of images which could or should or it wouldn't hurt much if they did (depending on what you read and where) have the gallery name applied as a category name.

Do you have wiki-software that can do this and would you use it to do that?

Thank you -- carol (talk) 16:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Difference in browsers[edit]

Hi there Filnik, i dont know whether you have got this question before but have you seen the difference in the upload form between say Firefox and IE? It astounds me that i think Commons might have a bias towards the Mozilla browser. Say if you want to upload you own work, with Mozilla basically everything is set up for you in the form of drop down menus and ? marks while in IE it gives you nothing. A little bias dont you think? :P Roadrunnerz45 (talk) 01:37, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Please tag your images

Hi! Could you tell me how to remove images? I'd like to remove two of my images (Whitesideslong & TSP Kit), but I don't know how. Beliving that they will be removed, I didn't tag them. Bujany (talk) 23:46, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Airolo.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Airolo.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ChrisiPK (talk) 22:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

lol[edit]

whats going on with your bot?? Regards, abf /talk to me/ 08:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ooops! I did it again![edit]

caro Filnik,

l'ho fatto di nuovo! Ho sbagliato a scrivere il nome di categoria in un upload di 324 immagini... temo che non ce la farei a correggerle a manina prima della prossima glaciazione, mentre il tuo macinino personale dovrebbe cavarsela in un attimo...

Le immagini in questione sono quelle della Category:Le poesie di Catullo tradotte da Enzo Rapisardi.

solo che Rapisardi di nome fa Mario! ho avuto un momento di follia...

tali immagini dovrebbero dunque essere sotto la Category:Le poesie di Catullo tradotte da Mario Rapisardi, che vado or ora creare così siamo a posto.

Scusa ancora se ti rompo. - εΔω 16:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Mi correggo: per motivi a me sconosciuti il commonist mi ha caricato solo sedici immagini. Quelle posso correggerle a mano in pochi minuti. ✓ Done, Scusa il disturbo. - εΔω 16:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


Image:Chartres Cathedral North Porch Right Bay Right Jamb Pedestals 2007 08 31.jpg[edit]

Hi, please take a look at this edit of your bot. This image is perfectly licensed but your bot is nevertheless tagging the image and dropping me a message. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chartres Cathedral North Porch Right Bay Left Jamb Left Column Base 2007 08 31.jpg[edit]

Please stop your bot, it is happening again. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for Image:Stamp of Principate de Trinidad.jpg. I have not noticed, that the information was not displayed. Сдобников А. (talk) 12:13, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:François de Voltaire.jpg[edit]

I just put the information regarding licensing and source the work is public domain so what else you need? please tell --Baz452285177 (talk) 03:42, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Audi r8 white.jpg[edit]

Hello, is it ok like this for this image Image:Audi r8 white.jpg? dangy545

Distribuição borboleta-coruja, Casa Buraqueira[edit]

Excuse I am Brazilian, I do not know English very well, hope you will understanding, that is those images, they were edited of other found in Wikipédia. It is that I only cut the parts I needed, and later I will put the link for them. -- Minzinho MR 18h58mim 02 de Agosto de 2008 (BRA)

Image:Fatiga de materiales.JPG[edit]

Quest'immagine era una copia di Image:Curva wohler.jpg che però era disponibile solo per Wikipedia italiano, ora l'ho portato su Commons e dato che l'immagine Image:Fatiga de materiales.JPG è una copia di qualità minore e che ho gia spostato tutti i collegamenti in entrata, ti volevi chiedere se potevi cancellarla--A7N8X (talk) 19:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:KatzeTakiti.jpg[edit]

Ready, I wrote the description, because i saw that was the only problem. Thanks!!! Katze Canciola (talk) 14:11, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Image[edit]

{{Helpme}}

I'm trying to load an and relate it to an article image how do I go about it?Richardlord50 (talk) 13:57, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How do you make a new version of an image on commons?--RayquazaDialgaWeird2210 (talk) 14:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cancel my user[edit]

Can you cancel my users? 

 Caricator (talk) 14:44, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk italiana[edit]

Be se è così,per cambiare l'utenza devo diventare un vandalo?

--Caricator (talk) 17:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Adminpedia-en.png[edit]

Hello Filnik, I guess you're the one who translated the original German text Relevanz ist relativ as Notability is notable. If this wasn't intentional … don't know, could be, of course ;-) … hmm, it isn't really accurate, and part of the gag is lost therefore. "Realativ" means "relative" or "comparative". Perhaps you can change this word? --:bdk: 21:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So Notability is notable what should become? ;-) Sorry but it's not that clear from your words :-) Bye, --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 12:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It should be "Notability is relative" or "Notability is comparative". The original wordplay in German (straight translation: "Relevance is relative") won't work that good in English, or? I think this is due to the fact that we use different terms for related concepts – WP:Notability vs. WP:Relevanzkriterien ("criteria for relevance"). Anyway, if "notability is notable" sounds funny and ironic in English too … well, it's not the original meaning, but you can also leave it as it is, of course. I just wondered about the (from my point of view) strange translation ;-) --:bdk: 18:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Istruzioni per l'uso[edit]

come faccio però a cambiare l'utenza?

--Caricator (talk) 10:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC) P.S.sì,intendevo cambiare l'utenza grazie.[reply]

"Public domain by author" template?[edit]

I'm getting complaints from User:Filbot, apparently because Image:Creation_Evidence_Museum.jpg and Image:Creation_Evidence_Museum_Original.jpg use text instead of a template to declare a public domain license. The problem is that I can't find a template that applies - the images are released to public domain by their author, who isn't me, so I can't use PD-self. What is the right template so Filbot will leave me alone, please? --GRuban (talk) 20:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, found it. I think. :-) --GRuban (talk) 20:56, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kennedy High School (Los Angeles).jpg[edit]

What do I need to do to validate this photo? (Filbot sent me a template about it.) Regret Tenenbaum (talk) 04:00, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need help with a cathegory.[edit]

Hellooo...

I need something, but i can't help my self. If it's easy, just tell me where can i find the instructions. There's a cathegory named "Mexico City", with some sub-cathegories. I need a new one. I need a sub-cathegory named "Colonia Roma". There are a bunch of pics of that place, and I´m going to upload more. I'm also writting the article in es:wikipedia and i want to make the mention of the sub-cathegory in commons.

Thanks.

Love it! Thank you very very much!

Katze Canciola (talk) 18:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MTMU.jpg[edit]

Thanks for deletion--ScorpianPK (talk) 17:11, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Debt1929-50fr.jpg[edit]

I don't understand what's wrong. I just uploaded that picture, and I've only explained in the description what's on the picture. I found it on the English wiki, and it's available on commons too, here [4]. The description is not better on that page, so either you have to erase both of them, or you can explain me the problem so I can work it out. Thanks. Jonathan71 (talk) 11:45, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SE-Wikiquote SQ.jpg[edit]

Would you mind deleting Image:SE-Wikiquote SQ.jpg, I uploaded it but I made a mistake in the text and uploaded Image:Simple English Wikiquote - Selected quote.jpg as a new one. I added a deletion tag to it, but I thought I'd ask you anyway. Thanks -- American Eagle (talk) 19:30, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done by Ahonc. -- American Eagle (talk) 19:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot[edit]

said me what the photo Plaza de toros de Pedro Muñoz 1998.jpg need template. We want to delete these photo because I upload a new version: Plaza de toros de Pedro Muñoz (1998).jpg. If you are a administrator or bibliotecary (My commons knowledge is very small) delete the first photo. Thanks!. Bye. --Thor8 (talk) 10:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bar wikiproyecto simuladores de vuelo 1.gif[edit]

i want to eraase this image, how? (my english is hoorible)(Quiero eleminar esta foto) --Numenor 90 (talk) 19:59, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dobra Hunedoara.jpg[edit]

If I understand correctly, the problem is that I did not indicate the author's real name. Now, I don't have the faintest idea about ro:Utilizator:Krokodilu's real name. In this case, shouldn't I transfer her/his pictures at all into Commons, or should I ask her/his name? --Oguszt (talk) 21:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RCW38.jpg[edit]

Think the problem is now resolved...CC SA 3.0 license added

Lars Lindberg Christensen (talk) 14:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Reims - Caserne Neufchatel - quartier des Hussards.jpg[edit]

I apologize. I made a mistake; I dont know the copyright. I didn't success to delete it. Could you please explain how to delete or delete it Thx in advance Regards --Thcollet (talk) 15:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cranio aves mariñas.jpg[edit]

Je pense que le problème est résolu. Merci pour votre veille. Elvire (talk) 20:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:B.patronus.JPG[edit]

I have a description and a PD-Self license for this image. Please tell me what else to do so that it will not be deleted.

Image:Blason big.gif[edit]

Moïen ] - --Bernard Piette (talk) 10:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Salut , le fichier peut-être supprimé - --Bernard Piette (talk) 13:21, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image: Paintings by Eduard Alexander Hilverdink[edit]

Hi, the copyrightholder/painter died over 70 years ago (in fact, he died 117 years ago): Eduard Alexander Hilverdink (born 1846- died 1891), Amsterdam, Netherlands was a Dutch painter. So the pictures are in the public domain. Could you please remove the <copyvio> tag? Thanks. It's about these two pictures: Image:Eduard Alexander Hilverdink Huis van Rembrandt.jpg and Image:Hilverdink Jodenbuurt.jpg. They are both in the public domaine. Your bot was wrong I'm afraid. Tasja (talk) 21:47, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can find the paintings/pictures in: category: Eduard Hilverdink

Image:NGV.jpg & Image:NGV, Melbourne.jpg[edit]

Hi Filink

Thanks for your message posted to my talk page. I believe Image:NGV.jpg has been removed and that is OK. Currently, I have the Image:NGV, Melbourne.jpg still remaining in my gallery page, which should meet the criteria of speed deletion due to visual distorted image by my original uploading to the Wikimedia Commons.

Thanks in advance--Donaldytong (talk) 11:01, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DualSportBMW1200GSSuzukiDRZ400.jpg[edit]

I created the image, the description is in English and I grant a {{GFDL}} liscense. Thanks Cadams7649 (talk) 23:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rovine di un vecchio mulino Tursi.jpg[edit]

Ho sistemato, errore nel caricamento, grazie per la segnalazione ;) / fixed, error loading, thanks for reporting ;) Zeuslnx (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I created a page called "Jopo" on wikipedia.fr and added a picture called "Velo Jopo.jpg". I set the license to "PD-Self" but it is not yet displayed on the webpage. Do you know why?

Benoit

"Bot: Marking newly uploaded untagged file" for a not newly uploaded file[edit]

I just noticed at the help pages of es.wikipedia that one of its images had been deleted 10 months ago!


The steps leading to it where the following:

I hope it has been fixed a long time ago, but it's worth reporting. Why did Filbot tag as a newly uploaded file an image lastly uploaded more than a year before?

It was trivial for me to check the deleted revisions and find out the mistake, but without knowing the image contents, the no license delete reason is just a bit odd for image used on the help tutorial, undiscernible on a normal page. How many images could have been wrongly deleted this way? If CommonsDelinker had been running, I wouldn't have noticed it. It's sad enough that nobody noticed the red link and requested to remove it, where hopefully -being an admin involved- it would have been discovered.

Platonides (talk) 22:57, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. In fact, I took a look at the code when reporting, and saw that it did changed a lot. If somebody knew about it, that would have been the bot author, so we should probably close as 'LIKELY FIXED' :) The bot notified the first uploader, but he stopped editing more than a year before.
Maybe the wrong cases could be found using SELECT ar_title,ar_timestamp FROM archive WHERE ar_user=185196 and ar_namespace=6 and ar_comment='Bot: Requesting source information.'; SELECT log_title,log_timestamp FROM logging WHERE log_namespace=6 and log_type='upload';, sorting the results and then looking the cases where the timestamp difference is too high.
Platonides (talk) 15:38, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Scusi. I stopped after the first paragraph to look the tables, did other things and looks I reset the locale when resuming. Now it should be more legible for you :) Platonides (talk) 16:37, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I should have put the fields in the other order (timestamp, title) that would make easier the sorting. You would now place have both lists sorted by timestamp (add a SORT BY <timestamp field>?) and iterate (with a script!) throught the Filbot edits verifying there is a matching upload in the other list. Perhaps I should bug DaB to get a toolserver account myself :P Platonides (talk) 14:08, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's why I used ar_title,ar_timestamp FROM archive. It's just retrieving the deleted FilBot edits. Platonides (talk) 18:08, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Filnik, I see your comment in my user page. Thanks for your contribution, I'm just learning and your comments are useful to know more. See you Writer28 (talk)

Image:Bryn Celli Ddu 04 977.PNG[edit]

Check its talk page, i want it deleted. I accidentally uploaded it with the wrong file name. Please delete it. Thanks. Ijanderson977 (talk) 13:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problem adding photo license[edit]

Filnik- I read your information about my photo and I am still confused, new to Wiki and trying to digest so much. I took the photo, and really dont care if it is used somewhere else. I dont understand where the template {{PD-Self}} should go with my photo. Thanks for your assistance. Mike PS-I am computer illiterate. Yakin669

Unrecognised comment[edit]

Please note that this comment is invisible and will never be seen by a human: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Purodha&diff=cur This is an automated reaction after a comment was added to an unattended user page. Read the page for further advice.

Wappen Waldbach.jpg[edit]

Hi, you gave me a message about Image:Wappen Waldbach.jpg, so it seem, with technical references without any human readable text. Please do not ask me. I only uploaded the image from the Wikipedia in German language to Commons. I copied the entire description page with all templates expanded (since otherwise it would not work here) and all relative links appropriately substituted. My goal was to use the image in the Wikipedia of Ripuarian languages. I added a link to the description page of the original upload. If you have questions about the image, please follow this path, and ask there.

The description pages says: The image is PD with restricted usability according to Austrian law. Since this applies worldwide via the Berne treaty, I did not hesitate to upload it. Greetings --Purodha Blissenbach (talk) 13:40, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Debian-multimedia logo.xcf[edit]

The image opens okay on my computer, I dont understand why isnt working. I create the file with GIMP.

AHow.JPG[edit]

The image is a picture i took myself of a postage stamp i have. Do I need something else to make it public?

Image:Sanh bao tang Louvre 001.JPG[edit]

Help me to delete this image, I donot want to publish it any more. Newone (talk) 04:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply] 

WHY? 118.71.181.152 04:13, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Immagini da cancellare[edit]

Ciao Fil! Ci sarebbe da cancellare qualche immagine doppione che ho caricato per sbaglio... Visto che sono troppo pigro per capire come segnalare la cosa, me le cancelleresti tu? Te le elenco sotto... Grazie! --Giac83 19:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Filnik/Archive4&oldid=37308793"