User talk:Сдобников А.
Please give images better names[edit]
I noticed you've uploaded some images and I thought I should turn your attention to a common error.
Please give uploaded images meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the image is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename each image with an intuitive name that describes the image itself. Thanks, and happy editing! Platonides 17:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- OK. Has corrected. Сдобников А. 18:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Yablochkov_1.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Yablochkov_1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 07:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- This image is taken from English Wikipedia. The author is unknown and has died more 70 years ago, so this image {{PD-old}} Сдобников А. 08:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Сегодня одна румынка из Баден-Вюртембурга загрузила новые "Бычьи головы". Причем одна - 1862 года. Что это такое? Мы, кажется, об этом у себя в статье не писали. Кроме того, она записала поверх марки в 40 парале новый файл - с худшим изображением и гашением. Думаю, надо залить на новую страницу предыдущий файл. Пусть будут оба изображения. Может, потом добавить к нам в статью новые картинки? --Michael Romanov 18:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Марка 1862 года выпущена после создания Королевства Румыния. Она объединяет в себе гербы Валахии (орёл) и Молдавии (бычья голова). К "Бычьим головам" Молдавии эта марка отношения уже не имеет. Сдобников А. 18:53, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
User name[edit]
Может, на Складе тебе лучше быть записанным латинскими буквами? --Michael Romanov 00:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- А смысл? Сдобников А. 14:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Хозяин - барин. :) --Michael Romanov 16:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Просто после моей попытки транслейтироваться, у меня перестала работать ссылка на мою галерею, а это весьма не удобно. :) Сдобников А. 17:16, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Хозяин - барин. :) --Michael Romanov 16:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Провизории.Ру[edit]
Видел? --Michael Romanov 18:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- А вот еще клоны:
- http://www.ru.volgota.com/index.php/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F:%D0%A4%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%8F
- http://wiki.traditio.ru/index.php/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F:%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%87%D1%82%D0%B0
- Оба отсекаются спам-фильтром Викимедии. --Michael Romanov 18:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Жалкие обрубки статей, в наглую сворованные. Сдобников А. 19:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ага. А у нас, смотрю, новый наблюдатель из Киева появился. --Michael Romanov 20:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Да, причём сразу с места в карьер. :) Сдобников А. 20:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ага. А у нас, смотрю, новый наблюдатель из Киева появился. --Michael Romanov 20:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Жалкие обрубки статей, в наглую сворованные. Сдобников А. 19:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Интересная информация. Может, отдельные "страны" выделять с помощью == ==? --Michael Romanov 20:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Это пока черновик, я ещё подумаю, как её оформить. Возможно, что и так. Сдобников А. 20:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Пане Сдобников, чи не могли б Ви описати рік марки, бо я не зміг визначити. Мабуть ,ви більший філятеліст і краще знаєтесь на цьому.--Albedo-ukr 20:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Це 1960 рiк, вже додав :) Сдобников А. 22:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Dubasov_I.I.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Dubasov_I.I.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ~ putnik 05:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- Флаг Вам в руки, господа удалисты. Сдобников А. 09:51, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Telegraphstamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Nickpo 04:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:05, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- No problem :-) --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 18:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Stamps of Hervam[edit]
see Commons:Deletion requests/Stamps of Hervam --Butko (talk) 10:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Привет, Андрей! Хорошо бы нам и этот паровоз в статью загнать. Только грузи на всякий случай в ВП, потому что у меня есть сомнения. --Michael Romanov (talk) 01:03, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
CPU[edit]
До сих пор мы не так указывали ЦФА - CPA. Не забывай, пожалуйста. И еще не используй точек внутри названий. Потом викификатор по умолчанию делает в этих случаях автоматический пробел, и картинка в ВП уже не отображается. --Michael Romanov (talk) 03:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Czechoslovakian stamps[edit]
I noticed that you changed the text on the Category:Stamps of Czechoslovakia page from no PD to all stamps being PD. Could you tell me where there is a verifiable source for the Czech stamps being PD? I was told they are not PD, but have no source for either info. The current Commons info I find seems to only refer to Czech Republic only. Cheers Ww2censor (talk) 02:09, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Лента ордена Жукова.[edit]
Добрый день! Только сегодня обратил внимание, лента ордена жукова перевёрнута. Должны быть цвета бело-сине-красные, а на рисунке наооборот красно-сине-белые.
«Лента к ордену Жукова - шелковая муаровая шириной 24 мм, по краям две полосы золотистого цвета шириной 6 мм каждая, в центре - три полосы: белая, синяя и красная по 4 мм каждая»
С уважением, Kornilov S. (talk) 19:57, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте! Дело в том, что по геральдическим законам чтение эмблем происходит зеркально, то есть не слева-направо, а справа-налево, так что лента изображена правильно. В подтверждение своим словам даю вот эту ссылку. С уважением, Сдобников А. (talk) 20:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Геральдические правила мне известны, но, боюсь, что те кто составлял описание... Логичнее предположить что цвета должны соответствовать гос. флагу.
Например: «Левая половина ленты красного цвета. На правой половине ленты — пять продольных равных по ширине чередующихся полос: три чёрного и две оранжевого цвета и по краям — по одной узкой оранжевой полосе шириной 1 мм. Медаль номера не имеет.» А лента то изображается как? Слева от смотрящего... Сравните. Или я запутался окончательно, или всё таки... Kornilov S. (talk) 14:27, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
http://www.planki.ru/empty.html Kornilov S. (talk) 14:30, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Согласен, каталог несомненный АИ. Так что сейчас переделаю. Сдобников А. (talk) 15:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Спасибо! Kornilov S. (talk) 20:11, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Zelenko_E.I.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. |
AVRS (talk) 13:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- С чего там PD-old? --AVRS (talk) 17:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 16:16, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Former house Ashliman.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Former house Ashliman.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Former house Ashliman.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Dogad75 (talk) 19:17, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Poplawski.Stanislaw.01.JPG[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Poplawski.Stanislaw.01.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Poplawski.Stanislaw.01.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
PlanespotterA320 (talk) 05:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Deutsche Bundespost - Bedeutende Deutsche - Albertus Magnus - 5 Pfennig.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adamant1 (talk) 12:58, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 13:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 18:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Russia stamp A.A.Sobchak 2002 3.25r.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 11:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Quick1984 (talk) 06:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)