User talk:Felix Koenig/Archive/2010

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosta Dome 2009-RZ-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo --Carschten 17:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC) Comment with a very little step left, the photo would have a better symmetry...--Jebulon 17:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, right, but a very little step left, there was a busy road... Felix Koenig 10:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Azure Window Gozo 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 18:57, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church near Selmun Palace-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the best light but well taken --Ianare 01:00, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dingli 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 17:19, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kraftwerk Walheim 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments For me a good QI image! --Alchemist-hp 20:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re my vote: It was a joke, as I had made clear. I know what Kraftwerk means. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GKN Pano 1-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Carschten 13:41, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathausturm Worms 2009-Carschten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice quality --Carschten 10:25, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church St Julians-Carschten2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 08:44, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Tower Malta 2009-2-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Makele-90 22:52, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staatstheater Mainz 2010 timm1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 08:48, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kraftwerk Marbach Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough, though sharpness is borderline. --Cayambe 14:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MHKW Mannheim-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good picture --Ong-Bak 17:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Datumsangabe auf Commons

Hallo!

Bitte in Commons die Datumsangabe wie folgt angeben: JAHR-MONAT-TAG => Beispiel: 2000-10-11 für den 11. Oktober 2000. Dies ist hinsichtlich der Internationalisierung von Commons höchst wünschenswert. Hier habe ich es bereits bei einem deiner Bilder umgesetzt. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 06:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In Ordnung, danke für den Hinweis. Werde ich zukünftig so machen. Grüße, -- Felix König ✉ 16:11, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kraftwerk Marbach III 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Felix Koenig/Archive!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image:-Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant 20JUL2010-FK.jpg was uncategorized on 23 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Beweisfoto Windsurfingzentrum.JPG was uncategorized on 24 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Xyz near Grüneggalm.JPG was uncategorized on 21 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

QI

Danke für die Unterstützung hier, aber ich persönlich vermeide solche Situationen unmittelbarer gegenseitiger promotion, weil das möglicherweise nach Cliquenwirtschaft aussehen könnte. Bilder von MBDortmund z.B. bewerte ich nur sehr selten, obwohl man die eigentlich fast immer nach kurzer Überprüfung positiv abhaken kann - wir kennen uns halt persönlich, das überlasse ich deshalb gern anderen :-) -- smial (talk) 14:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC) (der an sich selbst nicht so wild auf Bapperln ist, es aber halt für notwendig hält, hin und wieder mal ein eigenes aus unterschiedlichen Bereichen vorzustellen, um als Bewerter auch ernstgenommen zu werden) [reply]

Nachklapp: Hast du mal ein anderes Objektiv an der Kamera ausprobiert und ein paar Testaufnahmen gemacht, um herauszufinden, woran die partiellen Unschärfen liegen könnten, die auf manchen deiner Bilder auftreten? -- smial (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe nur deshalb abgestimmt, weil ich bei meinem Bild vorbeigeschaut habe, nicht aus Sympathie. Aber wenn du das nicht so gerne hast, kann ich es zukünftig lassen, wenn du möchtest. Zur Feststellung der Herkunft der Unschärfe habe ich mal ein kariertes Blatt Papier fotografiert, wie mir es Alchemist empfohlen hatte, demnach ist es auf einer Seite ein plötzlicher, kein fließender Übergang. Woher das kommt, weiß ich immer noch nicht, scheint aber in irgendeiner Form bei allen Objektiven aufzutreten. Grüße, -- Felix König ✉ 16:15, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bei allen Linsen? Urgs. Das klingt nach einem dejustierten Sensor oder einem verzogenen/dejustierten Kamerabajonett. Hast du noch Garantie auf dem teil? So lange knipst du damit doch noch nicht, oder? --smial (talk) 20:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Öhm, seit Mai 2009. Über ein Jahr ist es also schon her, da müsste ich mich über die Garantie informieren. Wenn, dann ist das Üroblem aber schon seit dem ersten Tag vorhanden. Grüße, -- Felix König ✉ 10:25, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nun, das würde ja für einen Qualitätsmangel und gegen eine Beschädigung durch den Benutzer sprechen. Sowas kann ja passieren und dafür gibt es ja den Garantiekram. -- smial (talk) 13:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dann müsste ich aber schauen, ob da noch ne Garantie drauf ist. Ich kümmere mich mal darum, denn inzwischen bin ich mir sicher, dass es nicht an mir liegen kann und dass die Unschärfe einen technischen Grund hat. Grüße, -- Felix König ✉ 13:26, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Römerturm Haigerloch 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --kallerna 12:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dateiversionen-Revertieren

Zum Dateiversionen-Revertieren kannst du übrigens einfach auf den "zurücksetzen"-Link links in der Tabelle klicken. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 17:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Habe ich doch, wüsste such nicht, wie das anders geht. Viele Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 08:44, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosskirche Haigerloch 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not absolutely perfect in every technical manner, but very good composition, and lighting. -- Smial 13:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosshof Hohentübingen-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments distortion on the left side, please correct vertical lines, perhaps use shift-n --Mbdortmund 13:05, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the comment, now corrected by Regi51. -- Felix Koenig 14:19, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK now --Mbdortmund 09:20, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kraftwerk Altbach-2 2010-2-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weißabgleich verschoben in Richtung Blau, wenn ich richtig geguckt habe, ist das Teil aus Alu und sollte eher grau aussehen, ansonsten sehr schön --Mbdortmund 21:19, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Jein, die Oberfläche ist spiegelnd. Ich schwöre jedenfalls, dass die Farben so absolut authentisch sind. -- Felix Koenig 08:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK --Mbdortmund 10:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eberhard Gienger 2010 crop.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments das Portrait ist gut, nur der obere Hintergrund stört, haste mal nen Beschnitt versucht? --Mbdortmund 21:22, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Would benefit from a tighted crop; the area on the right, notably, is distracting and brings nothing. Rama 08:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I cropped a bit, I hope it's better. -- Felix Koenig 09:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
klar besser --Mbdortmund 10:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heizkraftwerk Pforzheim 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit dark but otherwise good and useful. Please add geocode. --Iotatau 13:39, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosshof Liebenstein 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Nice place, QI --Archaeodontosaurus 13:02, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haigerloch 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Haneburger 06:56, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Papierfabrik Gemmrigheim 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments okay --Carschten 13:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gyrocopter 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good --Carschten 10:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Wernau-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments not 100% sharp, but nice composition --Carschten 09:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North American AT-6D.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI. Yann 08:48, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gyrocopter Löchgau 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI. Interesting vehicle for avoiding traffic jam... ;o) Yann 08:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cessna 182N Skylane.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to me. Rama 21:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cessna 192N Skylane Löchgau.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 09:03, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhofsturm Stuttgart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI. Yann 14:56, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stiftskirche Stuttgart 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could do with sharpening, but generally good. Mattbuck 21:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neue PRIS-Codes 09/2010

Hey Felix, gibt wieder neue PRIS-Codes. Muss es leider hier schreiben, da ich erst mal das Wiki wieder vom Server runter habe, da ich mir einen eigenen zusammenbaue, deshalb wird ke-wiki vorerst nicht erreichbar sein. Jedenfalls hier die neuen Codes:

* CHINA                           -  CN -  72 - TIANWAN-3               - PWR   - PL - 1000 -      -   .  .     -   .  .     *
* CHINA                           -  CN -  73 - TIANWAN-4               - PWR   - PL - 1000 -      -   .  .     -   .  .     *
* CHINA                           -  CN -  74 - TIANWAN-5               - PWR   - PL - 1000 -      -   .  .     -   .  .     *
* CHINA                           -  CN -  75 - TIANWAN-6               - PWR   - PL - 1000 -      -   .  .     -   .  .     *
* RUSSIAN FEDERATION              -  RU - 167 - LENINGRAD 2-4           - PWR   - PL - 1085 - 1170 -   .  .     -   .  .     *
* RUSSIAN FEDERATION              -  RU - 170 - BALTIISK-1              - PWR   - PL - 1082 - 1170 - 01.04.2011 -   .  .     *
* RUSSIAN FEDERATION              -  RU - 171 - BALTIISK-2              - PWR   - PL - 1082 - 1170 -   .  .     -   .  .     *
* RUSSIAN FEDERATION              -  RU - 175 - KOLA 2-1                - PWR   - PL - 1094 - 1170 -   .  .     -   .  .     *
* RUSSIAN FEDERATION              -  RU - 176 - KOLA 2-2                - PWR   - PL - 1094 - 1170 -   .  .     -   .  .     *
* RUSSIAN FEDERATION              -  RU - 177 - CENTRAL-1               - PWR   - PL - 1115 - 1199 -   .  .     -   .  .     *
* RUSSIAN FEDERATION              -  RU - 178 - CENTRAL-2               - PWR   - PL - 1115 - 1199 -   .  .     -   .  .     *

Grüße ChNPP (talk) 11:40, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Na wunderbar, das ist ja wirklich wieder viel Interessantes. Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 12:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naja, mich stört nur das Baltiisk im PRIS anstatt Kaliningrad im PRIS. Was mir aber sehr entgegen kommt sind die Leistungen der Anlagen anhand der man bereits feststellen kann, was für ein Reaktor zum Einsatz kommt, wobei mir die ungleichen Zahlen auch nicht wirklich gefallen. Ob bei Tianwan das 1000 MW bei Block fünf und sechs korrekt ist, bin ich mir nicht sicher. Jedenfalls fahre ich dieses Wochehende vielleicht nach Temelín, werde da bestimmt ein paar Bilder schießen. Mein Vater ist aktuell auf Usedom und hat schon ein paar Bilder von Greifswald gemacht, is ja nicht weit von dort. Vielleicht kann ich ihn ja überreden, dass er sich anmeldet und die Bilder hochlädt. Grüße ChNPP (talk) 13:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nachtrag: mal kurz Achtung, ist mir gerade aufgefallen, beim Kernkraftwerk Süd-Ural Block eins und zwei, werden nun die neuen Reaktordaten gelistet, also nicht mehr als FBR, sondern als PWR mit einer Bruttoleistung von 1199 MWe, also ein WWER-1200/392M. Die Nettoleistung entspricht noch den alten Reaktoren. Wollte dich nur wegen den jetzt nicht mehr ganz belegten Daten in der Wikipedia darauf hinweisen, vielleicht schaust du da mal vorbei. bei weiteren Änderungen informiere ich dich, wenn du möchtest. Grüße ChNPP (talk) 12:02, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan Bautista.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good technical quality with a nice blue sky. Alofok 16:40, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de la Concepción Agaete 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think it is OK for QI though it needs some perspective correction. The composition is OK. The photo is highly informative.--MrPanyGoff 22:26, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro Pérez Galdós 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. CA in trees--Lmbuga 19:34, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Santa María de Guía.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 18:05, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Las Palmas 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Da wär ich jetzt gern.... --Mbdortmund 17:24, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pico de Gáldar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QA--Mbz1 15:09, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portal Kirche Arucas 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Albertus teolog 16:24, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church Gáldar 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good image... and the moon adds to its value :-) --Pouts31 23:14, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neckarwestheim NPP 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and useful. Alofok 15:15, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche La Aldea de San Nicolás.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, the cars aren't annoing. Alofok 18:32, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church Ingenio 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Needs a perspective correction right IMO--Jebulon 16:09, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It was already corrected, now I corrected a bit more. -- Felix Koenig 16:46, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support still some small distortions, but I like the quality and the view at the church. QI imo --Carschten 16:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cemetery Telde.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs a perspective correction ?--Jebulon 22:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure. I think so too, but the result of ShiftN wasn't better than the original. -- Felix Koenig 10:37, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support good imo --Carschten 15:26, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parador Cruz de Tejeda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments some little CAs, but overall good --Carschten 16:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windmill Puerto de las Nieves.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 11:20, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Großbottwar B-3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Technically not 100% perfect but this image good enough to meet the QI criteria. --High Contrast 18:50, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shopping Center in Maspalomas 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok to me. --Cayambe 18:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuppel Kirche Ingenio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice church --Pudelek 18:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Monument Huerto de las Flores.JPG

I'm sorry I'll have you send it by e-mail and not pay directly. To let you choose. But I wanted to save the poem ... Best Regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It's a nice rework, but I don't like it to be uploaded over the original because it doesn't show the reality. But maybe upload as a derivative work and a separate QIC? Sincerely, -- Felix König ✉ 18:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Institut für klassische Archäologie Tübingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 15:43, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue Columbus, Las Palmas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good... except for the name: Cristobal Colón :-). --Cayambe 15:45, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portal St. Anna Haigerloch 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Albertus teolog 07:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelische Kirche Haigerloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Alofok 17:39, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadttheater Baden 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 17:35, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church Bad Liebenzell 2010-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Chmee2 08:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GKN pano2 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Alofok 18:46, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance Museo de Pérez Galdós.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, with some acceptable chromatic aberration. --Cayambe 14:01, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Solarantrieb Elektrischer Weidezaun.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:45, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge Jardín Canario.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I miss something left, but otherwise very good. --Jebulon 22:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Extra 300LP Löchgau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhof Ilsfeld 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --Lmbuga 19:21, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caves Gran Canaria.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Lauffen 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Clear, sharp and good image. Please geocode. --Cayambe 06:57, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beschriftung Strommast.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments tolles Bild --Carschten 19:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ilsfeld Pano.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 14:15, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

49 - 50

Good evening! See pls. --Vizu (talk) 21:29, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but what's that? -- Felix König ✉ 16:31, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

50 degrees monument in Kharkov. --Vizu (talk) 18:17, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. (Sorry, I don't speak Russian and the generation of thumbnails has problems temporarily.) Very interesting. -- Felix König ✉ 18:58, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchturm Winzerhausen 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI IMHO. — Jagro 16:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konferenz- und Medienzentrum Hohenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 07:17, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kläranlage Ilsfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. Please, geocode. --Cayambe 14:54, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bauhof Ilsfeld 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Carschten 18:28, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tafel 49. Breitengrad Großbottwar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and useful--Jebulon 22:36, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Großbottwar neu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Pko 17:48, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brunnenfigur Bönnigheim 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 18:51, 1 November 2010 (UTC) Maybe St George and the Dragon ? Beide brauchen ein bissschen luft, rechts und links...Tight crop, IMO...--Jebulon 22:40, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Klar, ich hätte schon noch ein bisschen nicht vorhandenen Himmel hinzuerfinden können (und es würde auch nicht auffallen). Aber für nötig hielt ich es nicht. -- Felix Koenig 16:34, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochwasserrückhaltebecken Großbottwar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments unspectacular and good --Carschten 19:49, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Hohenstein 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI as for me.--Vizu 18:45, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eingang Landtag Rheinland-Pfalz.jpg

Hello Felix Koenig.
Congratulations for your images.
Maybe will you be happy to have a look here. Your picture is much better than the other one of the same place in this page, IMO. I made a french translation of your file page with links to the french WP, and added some other categories. Gruesse aus Paris.--Jebulon (talk) 16:28, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup pour utiliser mon image et la tradiction. Grüße aus Neckarwestheim, -- Felix König ✉ 16:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Öltanks Heilbronn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 14:50, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eingang Landtag Rheinland-Pfalz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very rose, very good. Shame of the car !--Jebulon 15:49, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turm Cyriakuskirche Bönnigheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments typischer Konstruktionsfehler in spitzen Turmhelmen, etwa File:Schwerte-00038.JPG --Mbdortmund 13:36, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchturm Baden NÖ-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Noisy sky! --Kirua 10:53, 6 November 2010 (UTC) Yes, but every blue sky looks noisy IMO. Good enough for QI--Jebulon 17:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pestsäule Baden 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Please notice there is a special category for this monument, maybe you could add your picture in it ?--Jebulon 00:57, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohenstein 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok to me. --Cayambe 15:46, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turm Kirche Agüimes-CN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. A geocode would add. Please don't forget to categorize the pics, then your (QI) image is more visible, and it is more useful for projects and users ! Done, I tried something for you, as examples, but they are surely other interesting categories.--Jebulon 17:53, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done added coordinates :) --Carschten 18:26, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hafen Mgarr.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition, nice picture. The background is not on perfect focus but that was probably not possible. -- Alvesgaspar 19:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort St. Angelo 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --V-wolf 17:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bildbeschreibung File:Mercedes-Benz SLR Stirling Nuss.JPG

Hallo, "Stirling Nuss"? Das soll doch sicher Stirling Moss heißen? --Berthold Werner (talk) 19:10, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ich muss mal als Angriff gegen mich selbst Dieter Nuhr zitieren ;-) Wenn keine Ahnung hat, einfach mal Fresse halten.
Ja, du hast natürlich recht. Ich hatte nur das Schild gelesen, das hieß für mich Nuss und ich habe den Mist einfach mal ohne weitere Recherche so hochgeladen. Danke für deine Aufmerksamkeit und für den Hinweis, ich habe den Fehler korrigiert. -- Felix König ✉ 18. Nov. 2010, 20:21

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windmill Puerto de las Nieves 2010 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok now. --Cayambe 20:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hessischer Landtag 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Works for me.--V-wolf 18:29, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portal Veitskirche Flein 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Noy outstanding subject, bud good quality--Jebulon 21:43, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Schladming 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good Picture. Very bad categorization. Then almost useless, and it is a pity.--Jebulon 22:58, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heizkraftwerk Nord Mannheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Stark, nice perspective. — Daniel Case 06:07, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marbach III power plant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photograph; deserves the QI status. --High Contrast 14:44, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turm Burg Wildeck.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dünen von Maspalomas.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steirischer Bodensee 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A little diffuse but nice composition altogether, imo. --Bartiebert 20:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gedenktafel Helfenberg

Hallo.
I tried this. Es scheint mir ein bisschen besser zu sein. I've upload it as a derivative work of yours. Please feel free to use it as you like. No worries if you dislike. Danke.--Jebulon (talk) 21:45, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I like the rework very much, thank you, but I'm not sure whether it is realistic or not. By chance, I was there encore une fois yesterday and tried to photograph it another time (with snow! ;-) ); maybe I will upload a new picture which could be better. -- Felix König ✉ 19:55, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was my problem. Is the stone tending to "blue", or tending to "grey" ? You know, me not ! I'll be happy to see the next version with snow ! Guten Abend. --Jebulon (talk) 17:59, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've not enough time to upload it soon, so maybe it will last till weekend. -- Felix König ✉ 19:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded the new version now. Sincerely, -- Felix König ✉ 19:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roque Bentaiga 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Could you please geocode ?--Jebulon 14:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochwasserrückhaltebecken Großbottwar 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nothing wrong with this. --Avenue 13:37, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Königsbau Stuttgart reworked2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice Alofok 14:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Popeye Village 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great shot. --Murdockcrc 18:57, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glass Bottom Ferry Puerto Rico GC 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments WB is a bit off. Please fix it --Carschten 18:06, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Kam mir eigentlich nicht so vor, aber ich habe noch etwas daran gebastelt. -- Felix Koenig 19:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC) Besser.--Jebulon 23:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reblandhallen Neckarwestheim 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not sexy at all, but QI and useful. Could be better categorized IMO.--Jebulon 01:09, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neckartor Kirchheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good, but shame on the car --Carschten 20:35, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument Puerto de las Nieves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments As technical quality and composition it meets the criteria for QI, imo. MrPanyGoff 16:12, 20 December 2010 (UTC)...but needs really a better caption. Useless image without identifications (these men ? the sculptor ?), information (why this staue here ?), geocode (Where is it ?)...--Jebulon 16:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cenobio de Valerón 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 11:26, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unit Heilbronn power plant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good quality --Carschten 13:33, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall Großbottwar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dorfkirche Oberstenfeld 2010 H25P.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK to me. --Cayambe 17:07, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BASF Ludwigshafen part.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Please add geotag- --Cayambe 18:49, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Saalfelden 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think that this photo satisfies the QI criteria.--MrPanyGoff 14:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church St Julians 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quintinskirche Mainz 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dschwen 23:36, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]