User talk:Eusebius/Archives/2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sarcophage du Maréchal Lyautey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anacridium aegyptium (Egyptian grasshopper).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Fulfills criteria. I prefer the natural light. Lycaon (talk) 07:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

1. Grasshopper November 2008-3.jpg: 0
2. Acrididae grasshopper-2.jpg: +1 <--
=>
Image:Grasshopper November 2008-3.jpg: Declined.
Image:Acrididae grasshopper-2.jpg: Promoted. <--
--Eusebius (talk) 07:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

•  Oppose inferior in resolution --Milseburg (talk) 11:24, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent for me! Very good image und very often used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:51, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Less detailed --LexKurochkin (talk) 08:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support This is much more detailed at review size. We are supposed to be judging these images in terms of how they would be used in articles, which is as thumbnails. "Inferior in resolution" is not a valid reason to oppose a file that is larger and more detailed at review size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Thumbnail or not, both are excellent, FPs anyway. But here, the contrast between the colours is more attractive. Besides, the grasshopper is looking into the camera, as if he knew what's going on. --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:47, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Better light here and per others for the support. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:00, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Better lighting and composition. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:00, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Scores:

 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Acrididae grasshopper-2.jpg: +5, -2 (current VI within same scope) <--
 2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Egyptian grasshopper (Anacridium aegyptium) on crab apple (Malus sylvestris) Corfu.jpg: +2, -3

 =>
 File:Acrididae grasshopper-2.jpg: Promoted. Remains as VI. <--
 File:Egyptian grasshopper (Anacridium aegyptium) on crab apple (Malus sylvestris) Corfu.jpg: Declined. 

--Milseburg (talk) 12:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 21 October 2023 (UTC)