Well, even if I do 200 a day, (then I would do nothing else) I don't think we will get the list down by ourselves. :(
Do you notice other people helping correct mistakes? We can invite them to help us as well. They especially don't have to be admins - they just have to know what they're doing. :) I'll make a post on the mailing list. I think no one really reads the village pump anyway, sigh... pfctdayelise (translate?) 16:24, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please block User:Daniol for a week or so. He is insulting me on my discussion page because I have restored the deletion and no source warnings on his discussion page:
Привет. Я по поводу Image:Donetsk-ticked-2.jpg и подобных. Получается я не могу выкладывать в коммонс отсканированные или сфотографированные лично билеты? А если будет фотка, на которой несколько билетов лежат на столе? И как быть, например, с афишами, значками и т.п.? --Butko09:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ещё такой вопрос: Есть ли такой инструмент для Коммонс, который может показать какие из изображений загруженных мной впоследствии были удалены? --Butko08:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Следят, но вполне вероятно, что просто руки не добрались. В английской Википедии я видел несколько снимков, на которые совсем не в тему был поставлен {{PD-UA-exempt}} - тут всё зависит от фантазии загружающего :-).
Мне кажется, лучше всего в этой ситуации обратится к украинским юристам и желательно к руководству клуба. По идее должен быть государственный реестр зарегистрированных торговых марок (или хотя бы их список с датами, номерами регистрации) - в белорусском законе он упоминается. --EugeneZelenko15:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree completely. He is already doing a lot of useful work with tagging images and talking to new users which is great. He has no Commons: namespace edits though (no Village pump). But I think it's not so important. I will wait a little bit and then I will ask him. My nomination of NeilsF is still on COM:A and I think he will have a better chance if I only have one nomination at a time ;) --pfctdayelise (translate?) 15:45, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I had asked for Intelliworks permission to use their image in the article I am writing on them. They have granted permission to use their logo under GPL. What should I do now? Upload the content again?
Honeyuee
Thank you for voting in my RfA. I do agree to your comments and it was mainly becuse I don't trust my english writing skills that I did apply now, I didn't wannt to do a lot of machine-like editing just to get a bunch of editcount. What I'm good at and willing to do is to revive diffrent forms of delitions (even if I belive my writing in english is en-2 do I belive my understandning is en-4). But I realise that I scholud have showed that I actualy also is able to write and be good att that sort of metawork to, becuse in the things I like to do much communication is also need to be done. I would intend to show this if I don't onlyckly is going away for the next 5 days. But thank you for your reply and what I have learnt from it. /Grön06:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, recently Image:Ukrainian Stamp Fifa World Cup.jpg has been uploaded ([1]). The image claims to be PD-stamp according to Ukranian law. This seems to me like a reupload of Ukrainian_Stamp_Fifa_Wold_Cup.jpg, deleted by User:Thuresson due to FIFA 2006 world cup logo. I advised him and he sent me to you as you probably know better than us if this stamp can stay on commons or not. (is the stamp PD? can Ukrainia give to public domain a derivateve work of a logo?)
it's called "Bad Old Ones". See e.g. [2]. I created a template, {{Delete assist}} which should be put on subcats of 'Unknown'. I just put it on the month-level ones, if you want to put it on day-level ones you're welcome to. It will just automatically create the link to Bad Old Ones for that category.
It's good if you want to delete "easy" cases that aren't being used anywhere. :) There's also a 'safe delete' option which creates a backup copy on the toolserver. However Brion is working on undeletion of images at the moment and it might be fixed permanently very soon!
Hi, recently you tagged "missing essential source information" this photo I uploaded 5 days ago... How do I fix that ? What do I have to add to the description so that there is enough information ? In fact, one of my friends (fr:Utilisateur:Kiddo) took the photo and I simply uploaded it... FF7Sephiroth14:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Perspektive Deutschland Zufriedenheit nach Region Beispiel 2005 2006.jpg[edit]
Hi and thank you for letting me know about the missing license info on the above mentioned image. I tried to add the license info today, but somehow could not find a posibility to change the license info of an already uploaded impage in Commons.
Concerning the picture itself, I have taken it out of an official press kit (being allowed to be distributed freely) from the organisers of this survey. The image refers to an online poll called Perspektive Deutschland in German Wikipedia. Could you let me know, how I actually amend the license info for the picture? Sorry, for such basic nagging stuff,... Schiehallion09:02, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi!
You corrected my pic "Florfliege-Makro.jpg" last days...
BUT I like to have the ||Category:Chrysopidae|| category in it because otherwise it's not in the siutable place unter the commons button (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Chrysopidae) - so could you please do that??? because i dont know how to do it better than i had done it and it had worked well the way i had done it.
Thanks.
I saw this tagged as NLD, however I didn't entirely understand your rationale for labeling it such, as the uploader did give a licence (I'll admit that I'm more accustomed to the licenesing system of WikipediA the Commons, so I might have missed something). 68.39.174.23822:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's more likely that this images come form website (== copyvio). If uploader claimed to be author, he/she could upload better resolution. If better resolution will not be provided, this image will be deleted. --EugeneZelenko02:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I’m confused about this licenses thing. Pubic domain is not a part of GNU free documentation licenses? I’m all ready read about GNU in Wiki, but there are so many documents and I can make a correct idea. Which is the correct permission in this case? (I’m not an English writer user, so be lenient with me)--Scuellar04:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
К сожалению изпользование изображении болгарских купюр в Википедии невозможно. Конечно есть другие материалы, незащитимые авторским правом по правилам болгарского закона. Т.е. шаблон нужен, но неприложим для данного случая. С поздравом, Zlatko + (talk)11:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
1. нормативни и индивидуални актове на държавни органи за управление, както и официалните им преводи;
Если какой-то государственный закон или постановление данного министерства содержит изображение, то последнее является исключением.
2. идеи и концепции;
Аналогично если данная идея включает в себе какое-то изображение, то оное являясь частью идеи/концепции незащитимо.
3. фолклорни творби;
Фольклорные мотивы (скажем в рубахах) ...
4. новини, факти, сведения и данни.
А вот это может получить довольно много толковании - например всё содержание данного сервера возможно интерпретировать как данные ...
В том то и вся проблема, что это не единственный закон, который интерпретируем по разному. -- Zlatko + (talk)15:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Если Вас не затрудняет, я бы отдал предпочтение удалению главной буквы в словосочетании «могли бы Вы» и заменой гораздо лучшей буковкой «т». С поздравом, Zlatko + (talk)14:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! I've got tremendous problems categorizing my work since I don't understand, how the categorizing-tool works. I uploades that image recently to the terraforming-article in the German wiki. Then I wanted to make the image accessable to other users in the wikimedia commons. I still can't find it here searching by the keyword "Terraforming", but I replaced the image I already had in the german wiki by this one… Can you help me categorizing it?
Thanks a lot, Rokkon
I'm gonna upload from this site several pictures about proteins, like this one or something like that. But previously, I need to be certain that I'm able to do it. That site is by a group of American public laboratories (see here) working with public funds (the list of all the US National Agencies is on the bottom of the homepage)... I think that all their works are released in PD, but I'm not sure, because it's not written clearly. Can you help me? Thanks! --Giac! - (Tiago is here)15:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm new around here. and just trying to get the hang of it. I'm a grandmother. I don't think you've got too many of those around. I'm afraid I'm rather slow at catching on but I'm getting there with a bit of help. Whenever I go looking for the art objects I want on Wikimedia commons, I find all these things that are filed under weird names, or seem to be all out on their lonesome or have some anomally like
Art of Austria
Art of Belgium
Art of Canada
Danish Art
Art of Egypt
So I never know what to do with anything. Or exactly how to do it.
And categories that I expect to exist under a particular heading, don't! I spose people just make up the categories as they go along. It doesn't suit my relatively tidy mind.
So with the Four Martyrs of Westminster Abbey, I simply visited the various sites that I thought might want my pic, Martin Luther King Jnr, Bishop Romero and so on, and dropped the pic into the right place. So it's alreday been used four times.
Now I'm going to have to find things to do with my Chartres Cathedral sculpture and Windows, windows from Canterbury Cathedral, and the odd pulpit or three from Belgium. The pulpits ought to stay together as a group, but they ought also be at the churches that the belong to. Do your categories allow for something to appear at various places?
Hello, can you specifiy what is unclear about the copyright status of this image? It says right below the licensing tag where it is taken from and that the copyright holder (in other words, the person responsible for the site) did not mind it being used under the circumstances we require it to be licensed under. What licensing information is missing? --Chlämens19:18, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You claim that the source is not being given, even though it is ([4]). On this website, the copyright info states that: "In general, and unless otherwise indicated, we allow you to reproduce, transmit and distribute parts of this content for non-profit purposes as long as you identify the source as www.celtia.info.", that is not enough for Commons, so I e-mailed them and asked if the map could be used under our acceptable licenses which includes as the third point "Commercial use of the work must be allowed". I assume the creator of the map read this and responded by writing back "yes, it's fine"; if you want to check this you can also e-mail them at info@celtia.info. What I should have done is specify that the source has to be given, and I fixed that now. --Chlämens09:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This file is my photo, and it will be only used in my user page in es:Usuario:R2D2Art2005, but I don´t know which kind of license I need to use, if I authorise to be used anywhere. (English is not my primary language, and I may not express properly) --R2D2Art200521:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The image of the Yu-Gi-Oh card I uploaded was made my me. I wrote the wording and made the image in the middle myself, so it isn't copyrighted.
879(CoDe)17:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
as per Commons talk:Administrators, I am asking all admins to subscribe to commons-l, a mailing list for Wikimedia Commons policy and project discussion. Since many admins are only on Commons infrequently, this is a good way to alert people about important happenings. The mailing list is nominally multilingual, but predominantly English.
If you are already subscribed to commons-l, I apologize for bothering you, and you are free to ignore this message. If you don't want to use your regular e-mail account, feel free to leave me a message, and I can send you a GMail invite. Traffic on the mailing list is relatively low, and we do not expect admins to read all messages to the list, but it would be nice if you could check on it at least every few weeks. Thanks for your time,--Eloquence23:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I did it already. However I didn't received messages from this mailing list yet, so I don't sure I did everything correct :-). --EugeneZelenko14:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have updown a new picture to replace old one. But the new picture does not replace on display. Would you please give some help on it? Is that my problem on operation? --9old902:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The bot was a little too persistent. It is being restored again. The B list is stable, so there should be no further retries. Just to make sure though- I killed the entry in its control list. -Mak01:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello EugeneZelenko, could you please have a look at the talk_page of this user. I have the impression that the user does not understand what we are talking about. Could you be so kind and write some words in ru ? Thu --- gildemax09:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You said "category for all images, gallery pages for selected images". If that is true, could you tell me the "correct" way of structuring this? --Chochopk04:15, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Привет. Глянь пожалуйста на мое небольшое исследование относительно Stamp/Ukraine а также User talk:Yakudza. Полагаю, что в Беларуси несмотря на это утверждение ситуация аналогична. Я давно обратил внимание на схожесь многих украинских и русских законов, как будто их писали под копирку. Убедился еще раз в этом после небольшого поиска. См. :
Не являются объектами авторского права ... государственные символы и знаки [5]
почтовая марка - государственный знак почтовой оплаты...[6] --Yakudza
Насколько помню твои замечания, на Украине был легальный прецедент на эту тему. К сожалению, я не юрист и не знаю, был ли соответствующий прецедент в Белоруссии. Я пробовал задать этот вопрос на http://www.belpost.by, но на него, к сожалению, не ответили. С другой стороны, марки USPS (госпочты в США) с 1978 года охраняются авторскими правами.
Например, авторские права на официальные изображения гербов городов и районов принадлежат Комитету по архивам и делопроизводству при Совмине РБ («Гербы і сцягі гарадоў і раёнаў Беларусі» ISBN985-01-0530-5).
Действительно, есть существенные различия между украинским и белорусским законом. В Украине изображения гербов городов и районов (символіка територіальних громад) в общественном достоянии, а Белоруссии об этом в законе ничего не сказано. Но относительно почтовых марок, как мне кажется, хотя я тоже не юрист, имеется довольно четкое указание в приведенных выше цитатах. Я полагаю, что можно еще проконсультироваться на форуме commons или может здесь --Yakudza06:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Относительно фото архитектурных и др. объектов (если я правильно понял вопрос). Где-то в английской википедии вычитал, что фотографии двумерных объектов не считаются творческим актом, поэтому авторские права на такие фото не распространяются. Фотографии же трехмерных объектов - творческий акт, поэтому эти фотографии, также охраняются авторским правом. Охрана прав трехмерных объектов заключается в том, что их нельзя копировать в пространстве, т.е. воспроизводить скульптуру, здания и т.д. Фотографирование же копированием в этом случае не считается. Ситуация с белорусским законодательством должна быть аналогичным, т.к. Беларусь подписывала такие же международные конвенции по защите авторских прав, как и большенство других стран. --Yakudza21:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I forgot to add that i take the image in my last trip to Sri Lanka and Maldive islands and that is licensed GFDL, as the rest of the images loaded, and others in next future. I cut slighty this particular image because the head of the guide was in the bottom.
jolle16:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am already quite tired of petty and repetitive arguments so I am cutting back what I do here, I don't think b'crat/CU are very fun, just more hassle really. What happened to User:Ausir? I think we should harass the existing ones more, first. pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:12, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that bureaucrat position is just more responsibilities... Unfortunately it's looks like we doesn't have around anybody to harass :-) :-( --EugeneZelenko14:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, they've all gone away, weird. What's wrong with your communication skills?? I really think you should run! Seriously, people know you are active and dedicated and trustworthy. You don't have to be perfect, but you do have to be able to admit when you've made a mistake, so I think you'll be a shoo-in. Please run!!! pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. Last night I left a message for Fred Chessplayer proposing that he let me nominate him. I have been leaving messages on the other wikis for bureaucrats even including Andre who seems to be excessively grumpy these days. So far, nothing. I agree with briana- it is weird.
We need two active bureaucrats- I encourge you folks to encourage Fred to accept.
Привет! Товарищ упорно очищает свою страницу обсуждения и болезненно реагирует, когда я прошу его не делать этого. Стоит ли мне настаивать, или оставить его в покое? --Panther17:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If this is discussion about naming, let him clear it. Ignoring and clearing warnings about copyrights matters is much worse crime. --EugeneZelenko18:31, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I forgot to add the GFDL self tag - sorry! Oh yes, I will leave the no licence tag there just in case I'm not allowed to take it off. Thanks! Typhoonchaser14:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As you wrote me, my image will become deleted, if I do nothing. I have always big problems to put an image into wiki commons. My English isn't so good, that I can understand all (for example permission).
Is it possible that you do the rest for my image? I took that foto when he was sitting on the bank of substitutes during a football match. I took the foto with my camera. That's all I can say. Eastfrisian15:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and thanks for your guide.
I newly redistributed some pix I had uploaded to en:wiki before and categorize them in unavailable categories that I think they are necessary to be created. Does it matter?
thanks agian.
--Soroush Mesry09:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have somehow managed to upload without copyright or description (I was sure I did it, but it is my first day so....) I wasable to add the description, but can not figure out how to modify the copyright. Please help
Hello. I am definite that on the moment of uploading the file (actually i had to upload it several times, because of minor corrections), I stated that it is "own work", provided under "GFDL content created by the uploader" and I chose this same license from the drop-down menu. The file was created by me for the needs of the article on Coordinates in the Bulgarian wikipedia here, as were several other images: Spherical-coordinates.png, Spherical-coordinates-1.png. I believe that with the correction just made and the present explanations, the image will not be removed from the commons database. As far as the change of the file format, okay, I will have it in mind. But, can you please explain me what makes this beneficial difference? Thank you. --Spiritia20:25, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)
Hi again. Because the Russian Village Pump isn't active, and you are the only active Russian speaker I know, I will have to ask for another service: Explain copyrights to user:Квитрон. He already uploaded the same copyrighted images twice. I have now had to block him.
I've had the oddest request from a journalist so far... This journalist is looking for "attractive" wikipedians from the Russian Wikipedia and from African languages.
Bastique suggested I contact you about possibly locating people from the ru.wp who might be considered "attractive". Do you have any suggestions on how I might do so? - Amgine03:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Привет! Подскажи, пожалуйста, какое всё-таки принято решение по таким изображениям. Я честно пытался продраться через переписку в commons-i, но конечного решения так там и не нашёл. Судя по CommonsTicker их всё-таки удаляют, но мне хотелось бы знать, насколько это одобренная практика. --Panther07:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
У меня полное уважения к вам и вашим снимкам, тем не менее мы же не пишем Невский Проспект, Ленинград или Калининская Облать с ятьми и ижицами... А также даты у нас тоже ни остают на 13 дней, хотя энциклопедии действительно пользуютья ОБЕИМИ формами. --Kuban kazak16:33, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Тем не менее, в любой энциклопедии современная форма будет пред историчиской. Может быть усилия приложем чтобы дать один стандарт всему а не воевать. --Kuban kazak16:38, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Согласен, но на описаниях Рождества Христова в Википедии дата будет стоять наврено 7-го а не 25-го так? А то что до 90-го снимок сделан в Ленинграде, согласен, но когда в Белорусии Мiнск был Meнском, может к снимкам до 30-х годов это относиться... пожалуста, при этом снимки до 17-го можно сделать Минскъ. А можно просто оставить всюду Минск и Мiнск. То же самое к пр-ту Фр.Скорина, сейчас это пр-т Независимости.--Kuban kazak16:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Могут, а могут и нет, в ближайшие пять лет я этого НИКАК не предвижу, увы :-). А использовать устаревшие именования, действительно создают путанницу. Но если использовать вашу логику, почему бы не вернуть всюду Ленинград, а может еще Петроград, авось переименуют? Тоже самое с Минском. А про Мiнск Менск мне нитак важно, только что-то мне говорит что я не последний который будет править фотографии...--Kuban kazak16:57, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi EugeneZelenko! You changed the description in the Category Climate diagrams from Weissrussland (the german name) to Belarus. Why? Don't get me wrong, I'm not complainig, only asking to understand! My intention was to sort the countries by their german name, cause all diagrams are in german. I would be happy if you give me an answer! 8) --Hedwig in Washington19:01, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Care to explain this action. Did you try to talk to the user if you think he was mistaken? Or, did you just assume bad faith and enjoyed being able to block the user? Or was it something else? I am puzzled. --Irpen22:05, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I didn't have time for details explanations, but I think block message was clear enough.
There is a difference between an action of a newbie of whom you should have assumed good faith and an action of an experienced admin who explains resorting to straight execution without even an attempt to talk by being "to busy". The "don't bite the newbies" policy is there for a reason. DDima's spree was indeed not a good idea for which he already apologized. We can be sure that his error won't be repeated but harsh block will remain now in his block log forever and nothing can be done to undo this damage. Your careless abuse of your privileges jutified by "being to busy to talk" is less excusable than DDima's honest mistake because expectation from the admin's behavior to exemplify the best standards are much higher. I will personally go over DDima's contribution and will check the images he erroneously retagged. And I hope you will be more careful in the future with using the tools the community entrusted for you to use wisely to its benefit. --Irpen21:25, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Blocking is a serious matter and should never be applied due to "lack of time" or other reasons of perceived self-importance. A warning or even a polite explanation would have achieved the same result. I would appreciate your unblocking a user, even if it is symbolical, and apologize to him for acting too harshly. On my end, I emailed him explaining the licensing policies. --Irpen18:08, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
At first, it's not matter of self-importance. I'll apologize for blocking, but I expect apologies from this user for creating unnecessary job for other. Thank you for you help with explaining Commons policies. --EugeneZelenko18:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I do note it. I have about 3 or 4 photos from the above website used in various places in EN Wikipedia. If this is free content, then we could have more photos of leaders, places, events that the Commons would be happy about. User:Zscout370(Return fire)18:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Howdy,
First of all thank You for uploading the images. As for the account I don't really edit much on wikipedia, never the less thanks for the invitation. And I'd like to wish luck overthrowing the Łukašenkas regime. Žyvie Biełaruś! --212.76.33.12420:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think the church in Image:Russia-Sergiev Posad-Church1-1.jpg might be the one shown at the bottom of this page. In English we would call it St. Elias Church.
Anyway, the changes I made are very simple to carry out using Gimp, a free graphics program. You might want to try it out, if you have a photo which is too dark or too bright. Balcer17:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I'm not good in computer graphics and art (I don't feel which adjustment will be good which will not), so I prefer if people with better knowledge in this area will do adjustments. Again, thank you for your help. --EugeneZelenko17:06, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
My knowledge of computer graphics is very basic, but some things are really easy to do with Gimp and related programs. If I can do it, anybody can :). Don't be afraid to experiment. You can always upload improved versions of the image. So, as long as you keep the original, you can do no harm.
The coin pictures look great to me. Why do you want to remove the background? It is of course possible to do this, but I am not sure I can do it well enough so that the image quality does not suffer. Balcer17:42, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot. I added the translations into the article. My main goal is to get Hero of Belarus to an FA (again) and I just want to be sure that everything is right. (If Hero of Belarus gets back to FA, it will be the 5th Belarusian FA on English Wikipedia) User:Zscout370(Return fire)08:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You left a message on my Talk page alerting me that the image might be deleted because I had not stated the ownership. The summary on the Image page clearly shows that I stated that I drew the image myself and I also selected the GFDL license option. What more does it take? If I drew it myself then I certainly owned the copyright ... that should be obvious, should it not? If there is soem other wording you deem absolutely necessary, let me know ... but I must say that what I already said should be sufficient.
Thank you for your support on my RFA. Now that I have been promoted, I promise to be as hardworking and fair with the admin tools as I have been with the other areas here on Commons. See you around and happy editing. Zzyzx1115:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thank you for the communication.
I thought I had said the source of the picture, but I'm not able to write the terms of use for content from the page. I mean, the file was copyrighted, but I don't know how to write it in Image details. Please answer to me.--Nase15:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Здравствуй! Помоги пожал'ста - этот участник загружает те же самые изображения уже пятый или шестой раз. Если моя память не сдохла совсем, загрузка проходит каждый раз с разным лицензом (а может быть проскочит). -- Zlatko + (talk)15:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Так как я слежу за Последними правками в бг.уики, увидел твое появление сию же минуту ;) Дела у нас с статьей "Стара Загора" так плохи, что наш самый активный администратор поднял белый флаг. Это тот же самый, который заблокировал и редактировал ее во время блокировки. А Crawer является уроженцем города и видимо склонен обойти практически все, чтобы статья о городе была самой-самой-<чего-то>. -- Zlatko + (talk)10:48, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt that this guy is author of image. Of course he/she could use it as fair use. So you could do the same on Croatian Wikipedia (if allowed). --EugeneZelenko20:28, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think giving file upload bots a bot flag shouldn't be very difficult. As long as the bot is working properly and there are categories, I would appove them. If something goes wrong they can always be blocked later, IMO the bot flag is not a very big deal. Commons:Bots only says that bots have to be requested at COM:A - I definitely don't think they have to meet the same requirements as administrators!! cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 01:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, earlier today you deleted this promotional photograph. In the image description there was a contact e-mail address for the record company. Could you please post that address so that I can attempt to secure a rights release for the promo material? Spasibo ˉanetode╦╩07:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
These old versions (1024px and 800px) have important mistake (wrong prepared panorama) and I would like to remove them, but I don't know how to do that.
I beg you next time do not delete pics, but ad conversation page for statening if it is or is not for deletion. And why didi you delete the marxist pic of Chernenko. It can stay, as well as Andropov. Beacus eit is CC, and it is not color and big like the las one. --Edgar Allan Poe17:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's official Soviet portrait (same as old color version) without any relation to marxists.org (except you take this image from there). So stop believe in Sci-fi and please follow Commons:Licensing. If you'll not follow Commons:Licensing, you'll be blocked. It's your choice. --EugeneZelenko17:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Godm is that an official portrait. NO. It is a copy, bw, hi res, and bigger and wider. It is from marxists and under CC. so it can stay. --Edgar Allan Poe17:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You were advised several times to not commit copyrights violations on Commons. Please start listen to other people, or you'll face consequences. --EugeneZelenko17:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The image "psicosis.jpg" is mine.I has altered some aspects,but the work is mine!! it is my work!!!Look at the photograms from the end,that photograms included me,they are not from image.
Добрий день, поясніть будь ласка, як завантажувати фото якщо кожне фото видаляється через «авторські права» ? Наприклад, в російській вікіпедії не видаляють ідентичне зображення, або в англійській, а тут це відбувається ?! Не хочу летіти в бан, дякую. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xmilkygrapes (talk • contribs) 08:29, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
( http://www.paragraf22.com/pravo/zakoni/zakoni-d/2.htm ). А вот с переводами дела непросты. Если нужна только маленкая часть етого монументального труда, то я попропую перевести. -- Zlatko + (talk) 14:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Support :) --Panther 08:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Please check the image uploads - see 
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Image:Ukrainian_Stamp_Fifa_World_Cup.jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Greengreen.gif){kind=link}
Bo-rhein-sieg 17:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
. Thanks for the warning and sorry for any incovencience. Lugusto • ҉ 16:33, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the vote --Tarawneh 00:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
