User talk:ErfgoedBot/2012

Template:Kulturdenkmal Bayern

Hallo, ich sehe gerade, dass du viele Bilder mit Kulturdenkmal Bayern|xxx ergänzt. Dieses Template ist aber gar nicht angelegt und Denkmäler werden eigentlich mit

This is a picture of the Bavarian Baudenkmal (cultural heritage monument) with the ID xxx (Wikidata)

gekenzeichnet. Legst du da noch was neues an? Auch ist es üblich, wenn es eine Kategorie zu dem Denkmal mit mehreren Bildern gibt, nur die Category als Baudenkmal so zu kennzeichnen. Sonst wird es ein wenig unübersichtlich und die Bilder tauchen dann auch mehrfach auf. Ist quasi "ein weisser Schimmel" :) --Derzno (talk) 12:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Bitte sofort stoppen und erst mal nachdenken!! --Rufus46 (talk) 16:28, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Wer immer diesen Bot gestartet hat: Hältst du es für sinnvoll, alle bayerischen Baudenkmalbilder mit einem Rotlink zu verzieren? Bitte stoppen. --Rufus46 (talk) 16:40, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Habe User:Multichill, dem Betreiber des Bots, auf seiner Diskussionsseite mal auf holländisch geschrieben. Hoffe, dass er das Problem so schneller begreift und so bald wie möglich in den Griff bekommt. Gruß --Janericloebe (talk) 01:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Looks like someone added the wrong template in the configuration. I'll have a look at it. Multichill (talk) 09:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you --Rufus46 (talk) 12:35, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

As already mentioned, I'm not very happy with this patch due to the fact that the category above is related to Baudenkmal Bayern. At the bottom end we will double and blow up the pictures in the Baudenkmal Bayern section, only my 2 cents. --Derzno (talk) 09:45, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Romania

Your bot is making mistakes in adding categories. I have found, at some of my photos, loaded at wikilovesmonuments, the category: Historical monuments in Iaşi county, although they are in Cluj-Napoca, and have the template for historical monuments in Cluj county. Some of them were corrected today, by me. Please supervise the bot or do not use it anymore. Thanks.Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk)

Bots don't make mistakes, humans do. File:CatedralaSfMihail (27).JPG -> CJ-II-m-A-07469 -> ro:Lista monumentelor istorice din județul Cluj - C -> ro:Categorie:Monumente istorice din județul Iași -> Category:Historical monuments in Iași County. You probably want to fix that. Multichill (talk) 23:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Not only that. All the photos that have the template CJ have the same problem they must be switched from Iași to Cluj county.Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk)

Would have been nice if someone would have helped fix that on the Romanian Wikipedia. I fixed it myself and that will cause the bot to recategorize the images in the right category. Multichill (talk) 08:53, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

there are small incaccuracy regarding geographical coordinatel for exemple for calnic instead of 45° 53′ 13″ N, 23° 39′ 32″ E should be 45.888940, 23.660730 do you have any ideea how can i correct this?~~

NRHP 0

What does this diff on Kellymiller.jpg indicate? The bot did this twice to the same listing in 9 months. Could the bot be modified to put in the summary what article triggers an addition? --Closeapple (talk) 21:45, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, missed the comment. This is most probably caused by en:List of African American historic places in West Virginia. I'm not happy at all about this list, because this will cause wrong information to enter the database. Multichill (talk) 08:57, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Now tracked at bugzilla:40728. Multichill (talk) 20:36, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

GPS EXIF

Euh, kan je aub stoppen met coördinaten toe te voegen wanneer er een {{GPS EXIF}} sjabloon op de bestandspagina staat ! De coördinaten van de bot bot zijn dan immers vaak onnauwkeurig = foutief tov. die EXIF-informatie.

B.v. de bot voegt identieke coördinaten toe aan File:Sint-Kornelis-Horebeke - Haaghoek 1.jpg en File:Zegelsem - Haaghoek 2.jpg, 2 foto's van dezelfde beschermde kasseiweg.

Tussen de 2 punten zit echter een afstand van 1 km !! Dus dezelfde coördinaten = sowieso fout, en komt ook niet overeen met de plaats van de foto.

Beide foto's hebben GPS-positie in hun EXIF-data. Daarom staat dat sjabloon {{GPS EXIF}} er op. Een correcte en precies location-sjabloon met de werkelijke coördinaten zal dan binnenkort wel door User:DschwenBot worden toegevoegd; dus in dat geval moet je geen onnauwkeurige coords "gissen", gebaseerd op die erfgoedlijsten ;-) --LimoWreck (talk) 23:13, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

PS: als er geen GPS-data in het bestand zit, is een externe lijst natuurlijk wel zinvol ;-) --LimoWreck (talk) 23:40, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

PS2: aha, ik had er over gekeken dat je bot blijkbaar {{Object location}} gebruikt, niet {{Location}}. Dat maakt wel al een verschil - en dan ben ik meteen een stuk meer "gerustgesteld" ;-) Al weet ik niet hoe verwarrend of duidelijk dat voor de gebruiker/lezer is; en de nauwkeurigheid van de object location is ook vaak heel wat minder dan de location (zeker in een vb. als hierboven). Dus als de location aanwezig is, is die object location waarschijnlijk minder zinvol ;-) --LimoWreck (talk) 23:42, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

IDs of Czech monuments

Hi. IDs used in {{Cultural Heritage Czech Republic}} are mostly compound from two parts divided with the slash (/). The first part is ID of the national numbering, the second part is an alternative (old) ID from the corresponding old regional numbering with a forward number of the region (with that together, it is also countrywide unique). Monuments which became to be protected ca in the last 10 years have only the first (new) number. Either of the two numbers is a specific ID of the monument and can be used also separately, although the register (as well as Wikipedia lists of Czech monuments) use both of them together, divided with a slash. Even the MonumNet used this number sometimes with spaces (34204 / 7-8061), sometimes without spaces (34204/7-8061) and understand both forms when searched. Unfortunately, your bot is not able to understand the form with space(s) if in the template in the Wikipedia lists are the numbers without spaces. Can you erase the redundant spaces from the file pages before comparison the numbers? In addition, would you able to make the bot understanding when is used only one of the two alternative IDs? --ŠJů (talk) 23:16, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Are you sure this is a big problem? The bot was able to empty out Category:Cultural monuments in the Czech Republic. Multichill (talk) 20:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Because tens of problematic pages were fixed or manually categorized yesterday. --ŠJů (talk) 02:57, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Nice bot! Great job! Codrin.B (talk) 13:30, 4 October 2012 (UTC)