User talk:EnglandMeadows

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, EnglandMeadows!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your overwritings[edit]

Please do not overwrite files with upscale and\or "colourizations" made by bot under already existing files, but instead upload under a new filename and state the fact that your colourizations or upscaling using bots\apps\programs and that they instead of your previous erronueos descriptions of "Original Colors restored" or "Most Natural Version". Cheers. Tm (talk) 16:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Underlining this, regarding File:TonyHatch2013.jpg, where you've upscaled an old smartphone photo to give Tony Hatch 1/4 of a moustache. Please upload under a new filename and say what you're doing. --Lord Belbury (talk) 17:27, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Alberto Herrera Franchi.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Alberto Herrera Franchi.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Manuel Urrutia Lleó 1959.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Manuel Urrutia Lleó 1959.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop overwriting historical photos with upscaled images[edit]

Your triple-sized software upscaling of File:Subhi barkat.jpg changed his pencil moustache into a full, white moustache with a thick black stripe up the middle, which I doubt is how he wore it.

If you want to create a software upscaled version of a historical photograph, you must follow COM:OVERWRITE and upload it as a separate image, rather than replacing the original. You should also add a {{Retouched picture}} template to make it clear to people that it has been digitally manipulated, or at the very least mention this fact in the file description. --Lord Belbury (talk) 20:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#EnglandMeadows digitally upscaling historical images. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Lord Belbury (talk) 15:30, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Blocked Indefinitely
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

azərbaycanca  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  kurdî  la .lojban.  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Uploading AI-upscaled images is highly discouraged; as several users have already informed you, it is wholly inappropriate to overwrite existing images with upscaled versions. I have blocked you from uploading files until you are willing to communicate that you understand this. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand and will refrain from overwriting images. EnglandMeadows (talk) 17:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way that you could block me from overwriting images only but still have the facility to upload? EnglandMeadows (talk) 17:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I apologize for being unresponsive to my talk page messages. I understand what you and the other users have been telling me about overwriting images and I will allow an overwriting block to continue. I will only upload images from now on, and will use little to no software for uploading. I will also check my talk page each time I am on wikimedia, and the only way there will be no response is when I am not on the website. EnglandMeadows (talk) 17:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)"[reply]
Decline reason: "This block relates to an open discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems; as it is only a file space block, you are not prevented from participating there. After making this request (17:26, 28 July 2022), for example, you were asked additional questions (20:15, 28 July 2022) to assess the unblock request. You've not responded, which is problematic on its own and in fact appears to be a continuation of behaviour that contributed to the block. Please address the outstanding questions there. Эlcobbola talk 15:46, 3 August 2022 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

@Pi.1415926535: do you agree to unblock? Taivo (talk) 13:23, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]