User talk:Elisardojm/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ramón María Aller Ulloa.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 09:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Benvida

Galego: Benvido/a a Commons, Elisardojm!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
Titorial Primeiros pasos

No titorial primeiros pasos e nas preguntas frecuentes pode atopar moita información de axuda logo de rexistrase. Explícase como configurar a interface (por exemplo, elixir a lingua), como cargar ficheiros e os puntos básicos da política de licenzas. Non necesita coñecementos técnicos para contribuír aquí. Anímese a contribuír aquí e presupoña boa fe con respecto ás intencións dos outros colaboradores. Isto é un wiki - é realmente fácil contribuír.

Onde atopar axuda

Hai máis información dispoñible no Portal da comunidade. Pode pórse en contacto co resto dos usuarios galegofalantes na Taberna ou cos usuarios internacionais no canal de IRC #wikimedia-commons. Tamén pode contactar cos administradores na súa páxina de discusión. Se ten algunha pregunta específica sobre o copyright, formúlea en Commons talk:Licensing.

Recomendacións
  • Poña as caixas Babel na súa páxina de usuario para que outros coñezan que linguas fala
  • Todos os ficheiros que vostede cargue poden consultarse na Galería persoal
  • Por favor engada a súa sinatura nas páxinas de discusión escribindo ~~~~
  • Use a ferramenta CommonSense para atopar as categorías correctas para os seus ficheiros (así tamén outras persoas poderan dar con eles!)
  • Para enlazar cara unha páxina de imaxe, escriba isto: [[:Image:Foo.svg]]; o resultado é este: Image:Foo.svg
  • Se vostede está publicando imaxes procedentes doutro proxecto, asegúrese de utilizar CommonsHelper
Cometeu un erro?
  • Quere renomear ou mover un ficheiro? Só ten que carregar o ficheiro outra vez e o antigo marcalo con isto: {{bad name|Nome correcto}}
  • Para ampliar información lea directrices de borrado (en inglés)
(P.S. Por favor pode responder a esta mensaxe no espazo común para que saibamos que ten a información que precisa?)

--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 17:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Re:Boas, pregunta

Ola de novo. En Commons:Licenzas indícase (está inda sen traducir ese anaco) que non están permitidos en Commons os símbolos e os logos con copyright, e non se poden empregar nin en gl.wp (Wikipedia galega) nin en es.wp, por mor da lexislación vixente. Agora ben, se reparas nas imaxes presentes nas subcategorías de Category:Vehicles by brand, podes facerte unha idea da fronteira entre o que é esa prohibición e o que é a liberdade de panorama, observa por exemplo Image:Opel Zafira 08-7-2005 silver vl.jpg, o logotipo está presente, pero non é o centro de atención, é dicir, a finalidade da imaxe non é o logotipo. Se precisas máis datos podería intentar informarme. Aproveito para darche as grazas pola túa inestimable colaboración. Un cordial saúdo--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 11:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Elisardojm!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:56, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Poster_Wikipedia10_Culleredo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 00:02, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Cool! *g* Elya made this design for me as I left Cologne to Berlin in fall 2009. The Design because of Wikipedia (ofcourse) an an ancient greek cup, because I'm writing about such themes. It's interesting to see, that the design lived on ;). Marcus Cyron (talk) 06:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ramón María Aller Ulloa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Xabier Cid (talk) 14:15, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Lista de categorías en galego, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

FASTILY (TALK) 01:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Categorías raíz de Commons en galego, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

FASTILY (TALK) 01:30, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Re:Derechos de autor de facsímiles

Hola Elisardojm, creía que había dejado un mensaje sobre el asunto este, pero por lo visto no terminé de guardar los cambios. Como es un tema complejo y no tengo formación en Derecho tampoco sé decirte algo más concreto a lo que ya sabes sobre la postura de la Fundación. Creo entonces que sería mejor que preguntaras a algún abogado ¿quizás Marctaltor sepa del tema? Un saludo. Lobo (howl?) 04:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Más de eso apenas puedo concretarte que la postura de la Fundación viene sustentada si no recuerdo mal por el caso Corel de la legislación estadounidense y que, hasta donde yo sé siendo lego en la materia, no conozco jurisprudencia al respecto en España.Lobo (howl?) 04:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC) PD:Aquí se menciona justo el asunto, que en España las fotografías de reproducción fiel están sujetas a la protección local del copyright:

In some jurisdictions, notably that of England and Wales, Spain and the Nordic countries, arguments have been presented that faithful reproduction photographs are entitled to local copyright protection, either because local law considers them 'original' or because it allows a special type of "simple photograph" copyright.

Y te amplío más información sobre un caso similar en Reino Unido, de la National Portrait Gallery contra Wikimedia: User:Dcoetzee/NPG_legal_threat User:Dcoetzee/NPG_legal_threat/Coverage. Por esto mismo creo que si quieres asegurarte no hay más remedio que consultar algún experto en Derecho de España... Por cierto ¿Wikimedia España no tiene ningún tipo de asistencia jurídica por parte de la Fundación o alguna vía similar? Lobo (howl?) 05:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Please let me know when you finished your work with the file.   ■ MMXX  talk  11:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Ola Elisardojm. Sei facer o que dis ou iso creo, pero a imaxe non é miña, subina eu desde Flickr: Se reparas no autor, este é Ramon Piñeiro.

Fixen algo semellante cos cables desta imaxe, quedou así, pero cando o fondo é o ceo resulta fácil.

Os programas ideais son Adobe Photoshop e Gimp (este último gratuíto). Son programas moi complexos. Algo tamén se pode facer con Adobe lightroom, pero malamente. Se tes algún deses programas, pódoche dar unhas curtas indicacións para lograr eliminar un pequeno obxecto da imaxe. Consiste en copiar pequenos anacos próximos encima ata facelo desaparecer. Pode levar tempo ter un bo resultado. A ferramenta a usar débese chamar algo así como clonar; con todo, hai outros sistemas que, para min, resultan máis complexos.

Saúdos--Miguel Bugallo 20:33, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Non sei como non entendín á primeira. A verdade é que non lembraba que lle quitei a marca de auga a moitas fotos.
Estaba pensando en facer e enviarche un PDF coa explicación, menos mal que encontrei unha páxina que explica cómo se fai.
Quizais che chegue só con isto:
  1. Carga a imaxe
  2. Activa o botón "clonar", o cal ten un carimbo ("cuño") como imaxe (isto non se di na explicación). Se te pos sobre os botóns, aparece un texto aclaratorio do uso dos botóns.
  3. Para marcar o cacho de foto que queres copiar noutro sitio, fai click sobre a imaxe mantendo premida a tecla control (eu uso Mac, se non funcionase con control, proba con alt).
  4. Inmediatamente calca no sitio da imaxe que queres que desapareza e arrastra mantendo premido o botón esquerdo se desexas estender a clonación.
Con todo recoméndoche que lle botes unha ollada á ligazón anterior pois explica moitos detalles e posibles variacións da ferramenta, ademais de dar algún consello.
Se non te aclaras, faimo saber. Apertas--Miguel Bugallo 10:46, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Por certo, o marco retireino case sempre recortando a imaxe. Para o mesmo, co primeiro botón, o de seleccionar (un rectángulo) seleccionas a parte da imaxe que queres salvar. Despois vas a Menú "imagen" e seleccionas "recortar a la selección".--Miguel Bugallo 11:13, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Mondoñedo

Consulta--. HombreDHojalata.talk 20:03, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Percorrido_Cidade_da_Cultura.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

. HombreDHojalata.talk 19:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Elisardo, as cartografías de Google, Tele Atlas, etc, está protexida por copyright.
Non te extrañaba que non se empregen masivamente nos milleiros de artigos referentes a xeografía (países, concellos, lugares, parroquias...) das wikipedias?
Unha aperta e a seguir--. HombreDHojalata.talk 10:52, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Anúncio

Messagem enviada em 09:27, 27 September 2011 (UTC) usando Lucia Bot, se tem alguma dúvida por favor contacte um dos organizadores.

Translating templates for thank you and survey of WLM 2011

Hello Elisardojm, Please see http://etherpad.wikimedia.org/WLM-thankyou-survey From this page on we started to translate every template and survey. Greetings - Romaine (talk) 23:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

See: User_talk:Romaine#Translation_of_thanks_message - Romaine (talk) 23:52, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Elisardojm,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:17, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Lingua/nacionalidade

Elisardo, penso eu que non hai que mudar Category:Galician poets por Category:Poets from Galicia (Spain). Poden ser complementarias. Ou non. A primeira fai referencia a lingua e a segunda ó lugar. Pode haber poetas que escriban en galego que non sexan galegos, igual que hai poetas galegos que escriben so en castelán, ou en inglés ... non?

Olla Category:Poets by language.

Do mesmo xeito hai, por exemplo, Category:Writers by country‎ e Category:Writers by language etc.

Unha aperta. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 21:50, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

OK --. HombreDHojalata.talk 11:19, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Re:Uso externo dunha imaxe túa

Gracias. Es un caso estraño. La página parece del escultor. Es increíble que ni los escultores respeten los derechos de autoría. Le he dejado una nota, pero... hay tantas fotos mías en Internet que no respetan la licencia que tendría que crear una empresa para seguirlas y denunciarlas. Gracias de todos modos--Miguel Bugallo 18:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Xesús/Roger/Kirita

Tal como declarou na Galipedia, Xesús Constela, Roger222 e gl:Usuario:Kirita22 son a mesma persoa. Se ve que a ese administrador de Commons lle resultaron sospeitosas e non se cree a autoría propia, tendo en conta que subiu unhas portadas de libros, e iso na maioría dos casos das publicacións modernas non se pode facer...

Digo eu que sería por iso.

De todas maneiras, a solución é que Xesús/Roger/Kirita mande unha autorización a Commons:OTRS. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 17:32, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Marquei File:Entrega Garcia barros 2008.jpg como copyvio. Se o usuario subira a imaxe orixinal constarían os dados EXIF. Parece claro que o que fixo foi collela da páxina do xornal [1]. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 11:24, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Se comprobas o historial de File:As humanas Proporcións - Xesús Constela Doce.JPG verás que eu xa fixera antes o mesmo ca ti (a imaxe foi sacada de aquí).
Se ve que outros usuarios consideran que o deseñador da portada non engadiu elementos orixinais dabondo para engadirlle dereitos propios de obra derivada, so algún pequeno elemento (o texto do título e o logo de Galaxia nunha resolución moi baixa, que podería considerarse de minimis). E pensándoo, creo que teñen razón. Por min debe quedar.--. HombreDHojalata.talk 01:03, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Firma/sinatura de Lois

E logo? Firma e sinatura son dúas palabras galegas sinónimas. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 21:52, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

SIGPAC

Ola Elisardo.

Sorprendeume que subiras esta imaxe!

Penso que é unha violación de copyright.

En que te baseas para poñer que es o autor e que a licenzas con CC-BY-SA?--. HombreDHojalata.talk 21:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Pois atopei que se deu permiso a través de OTRS. Olla este ficheiro: File:VistaAereaCozuelosDeFuenduenia.png
Iso abre un universo de posibilidades!
E o máis sorprendente é que en Commons so atopo unhas 40 imaxes procedentes do SIGPAC. Creei unha categoría nova para ilas metendo: Category:SIGPAC.
Saudiños. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 21:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Sen dúbida. Hai que divulgar o tema. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 12:10, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Na Galipedia dicimos que é un musico galego. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 20:19, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! P1120438 Cerceda mural homenaxe mineiría detalle.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments smme blown areas, but nice --Carschten 19:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Liberdade de panorama?

Ola Elisardo.

A lo menos hai 13 fotos en Category:Ramón Conde, que cargaches ti, que penso que habería que borrar. A obra orixinal ten copyright, o autor non morreu fai máis de 80 anos, a obra non está permanentemente expostas na vía pública...

E mellor que marques ti mesmo para borrado, non si? --. HombreDHojalata.talk 21:01, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Xa sabes que non hai problema. De todas, deixoche a referencia que penso que é a principal neste caso. Estívena revpasando de novo e metendo nun cadriño para tela a man na miña páxina de usuario:


Ley 5/1998, de 6 de marzo, de incorporación al Derecho español de la Directiva 96/9/CE, del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 11 de marzo de 1996, sobre la protección jurídica de las bases de datos.:


Artículo 35. Utilización de las obras con ocasión de informaciones de actualidad y de las situadas en vías públicas.
...
2. Las obras situadas permanentemente en parques, calles, plazas u otras vías públicas pueden ser reproducidas, distribuidas y comunicadas libremente por medio de pinturas, dibujos, fotografías y procedimientos audiovisuales.
...

--. HombreDHojalata.talk 08:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Xa tes as da emigración en Category:Ramón Conde, son todas as que comezan por File:Ramón Conde 2010...
Como vai o das feitas en interiores???--. HombreDHojalata.talk 13:33, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
En que quedou isto? As marcamos para borrado, ou?--. HombreDHojalata.talk 09:24, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Bo traballo. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 11:55, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Technique

Outra cousa.

Na mensaxe seguinte a túa na míña páxina de conversa, verás que User:Zolo encargoume o modelo que traduce as técnicas. Metínme a facer o {{Technique/gl}}, pero faiseme grande. Podes meterlle man cando teñas tempo? --. HombreDHojalata.talk 22:36, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:56, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Contribucións de Ostiudo

As contribucións de Ostiudo son un pouco "desastrosas". Carga varias versións dos svg con nomes diferentes. E ultimamente volve cargar, tamén, versións en png das fotografías que xa subira en jpg. Tentei falar con el e non hai maneira. Douno por imposible. En calquera caso, non te preocupes, só marca para borrar imaxes repetidas. Os administradores tampouco as borrarían se non fora así. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 09:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:37, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Corredores de maratón?!

Foi un erro tremendo. A que lle quería engadir era a category:Praza Pública que creei. Non sei como puido suceder. Grazas por dáreste conta! --. HombreDHojalata.talk 11:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ramón Piñeiro Siro López.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ramón Piñeiro Siro López.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:43, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ramón Piñeiro Siro López.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Benoit Rochon (talk) 19:50, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! P1130832 Pol Mosteiro praza Galicia placa altimétrica concello.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 07:17, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
To me too if the slight tilt is corrected Poco a poco 07:20, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Feito mover ficheiros

Feito.

Sería moi bo para a comunidade que ti, Elisardo, tiveras dereitos de movedor en Wikimedia Commons. Podes solicitalo en Commons:Requests_for_rights#Filemover (exemplo: Commons:Requests_for_rights/Approved/Filemover/2011#HombreDHojalata). Antes familiarízate co contido de Commons:File renaming.

Eu, por traballo, estarei lonxe de Galicia, e dos proxectos, durante meses. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 15:56, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi Elisardojm, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

INeverCry 23:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Pisa o freo

Perfect!! e que quería metelo eu pero non estaba seguro como facelo...Perdóa, pero e que estou a igualar categorías de todolos monumentos de Galicia (Por agora da Provincia de Pontevedra...)

1º Category:Sculptures in the province of Pontevedra (que xa estaba escomenzado)

2º Creando novas Categorías das esculturas en cada concello (que unhas tiñan e outras non...e pretendo que haxan en todas. Segun voy revisando fotos, vou categorizando)

3º Estou a engadir [escultores galegos] as fotos de monumentos, que quizais por descoñecemento, a xente non sabe de que son... sobre todo se son galegos...

La fabrica de nubes (talk) 10:27, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Témome que non, para que sirve? (ou pásame un link onde atopala, descargala...)La fabrica de nubes (talk) 10:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Ok, probarei... graciasLa fabrica de nubes (talk) 10:50, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Moito maís rapido, onde vai parar... La fabrica de nubes (talk) 10:57, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
¿Por que esta imagen tiene ese mensaje? "Hace falta corroborar las categorías de esta imagen". Yo le cambié la categoría (estaba mal)de Esculturas de Pontevedra (City) por Esculturas de O Grove... La fabrica de nubes (talk) 11:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Ok

Categoría César Lombera

¿Qué acontece coa Categoría Cesara Lombera? ¿Por que aparece esa mensaxe de que as fotos non son de Dominio Publico se todas teñen as súas licencias? Andiven a pasar fotos a esa Categoría, pero que eu lembre, ó principio non estaba a mensaxe... pero tampouco vin cal foi a imaxe que fixo saltar a mensaxe... La fabrica de nubes (talk) 15:51, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Ok. E que ademais todas as fotos están sacadas na rúa... non o entendo. La fabrica de nubes (talk) 10:25, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Imaxes de concellos

Tes razón trabuqueime, e que o lugar é San Roque de Crespos, pero sí, a igrexa debería levar o nome da parroquia... Pois que sexa Igrexa de San Xoán de Crespos.JPG entón. ¿Como se fai ou que permisos hai que ter para cambiar os nomes das fotos?

Saquei, saquei, trouxen tres igrexas e tres centros de saúde... O teño en conta pero o outro día estaba medio nubrado e fíxoseme de noite antes... (e iso que era bo día xa que era domingo, había fútbol e non había ninguén pola rúa) Por certo, ¿hai algún problema con que saia xente o matrículas de coches?

Gracias. La fabrica de nubes (talk) 09:07, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Renoméao ti xa,antes de que se nos esqueza... Eu son un humilde Usuario Autoconfirmado e non tenho competencias...
Pódense pixelar ou por borrosas as caras das persoas? Eu utilizaría o Photoshop, ¿pode ser con este programa? La fabrica de nubes (talk) 10:42, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Ok. La fabrica de nubes (talk) 11:27, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Pontedeva

No artígo de Pontedeva non hai escudo, pero atopei este File:Escudo Pontedeva.jpg no Commons, pero hai unha mensaxe de que non está vectorizada...¿o poño de todos xeitos? La fabrica de nubes (talk) 10:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Feito. La fabrica de nubes (talk) 11:27, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Imágenes de Praza Pública

Hola Elisardo, muy buenas las imágenes que subes de Praza Pública. Sólo te pido que incluyas la plantilla {{LicenseReview}} para que un administrador verifique la licencia es correcta (de hecho podías pedir permisos de revisor y atestiguar tú mismo la revisión :-)) Un saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 14:24, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Hola, Elisardo, no veo ningún problema en revisar lo que uno mismo ha subido. No encuentro ninguna contraindicación y, en todo caso, el método se basa en la confianza. Esto es, pensamos que un revisor no lo es para evadir al sistema. Ten en cuenta que no se trata de imágenes tuyas, sino de imágenes con licencias asignadas por otros. En tu petición, sin embargo, yo trataría de argumentar por qué serías un buen revisor, aludiendo a tu experiencia, tanto aquí como en la gestión de imágenes en galipedia, así como en la frecuencia con la que subes material de medios ajenos (como Praza Pública, por poner un ejemplo). Creo que es eso lo que puede justificar que se te conceda el flag. Un cordial saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 16:04, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Respecto a Praza Pública yo creo que es una fuente problemática. Mira lo que ha pasado con la imagen de Vanesa Veiga. Es que, aunque no creo que la imagen sea de foroatletismo, en foroatletismo aparece con una (c). Ten cuidado con ello (te recomiendo el Search by Image de Google y que te instales un EXIF Viewer en tu navegador, para verificar que las imágenes no tienen información EXIF indicando su origen real). Un saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 16:11, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Tienes razón. Es una mejora muy moderna de la que no era consciente. Por cierto, he nominado para borrado esto. La image de Juana de Ibarbourou fue borrada y, según eso, habría que borrar también el collage. Supongo que con sustituir su imagen sería suficiente, pero no sé quién podría ser lo suficientemente representativo. Un saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 09:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Renomear Ficheiro

¿Poderíasme cambialo nome deste ficheiro, polo de Centro de Saúde de San Xoán de Río.JPG?. Gracias. La fabrica de nubes (talk) 16:59, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

OK. Gracias. La fabrica de nubes (talk) 20:36, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:4fb3e0f2d870f-20061112231142-prestige7 Praza Pública.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 12:46, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

File:507c435f25d02-collageprestige Praza Pública.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 12:58, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

De nada

Encantado de seguir colaborando con la galipedia. A tu disposición --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 21:22, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Vanessa-veiga-maratc3b3n-castellc3b3n-praza-publica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Morning (talk) 15:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mariló Candedo-Praza Pública-2012.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mariló Candedo-Praza Pública-2012.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mariló Candedo-Praza Pública-2012.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 21:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Reviewer

If you use the helper-the scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-

Hi Elisardojm, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{User reviewer}} or {{User trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons!--Morning (talk) 09:54, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Outra imaxe de Ortigueira

Boas Elisardo, estiven lendo sobre como cargar unha imaxe de flickr e fixen unha proba con este ficheiro que achego. Penso que fixen todo ben, bótalle unha ollada (amais penso que podes facer tamén o flickreview). As coordenadas metinas a man, como se introducen a partir de flickr? Saúdos, --Xosé Antonio (talk) 22:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:57, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:50a5157d2ce48-Fernando Cortizo-Praza Pública.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:50a5157d2ce48-Fernando Cortizo-Praza Pública.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:50a5157d2ce48-Fernando Cortizo-Praza Pública.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ralgistalk 17:16, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Hola, Elisardojm: Lamento que no hayas podido encontrar la fuente de esta fotografía. Sin embargo, gracias por tus otras contribuciones. Si alguna vez necesitas ayuda, no dudes en pedírmela. --Ralgistalk 15:22, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Poto copyviada

Boas, Elisardo. Acabo de ver que algúen en Commons pensa que unha foto que eu subín é copyvio. Podes averiguarme algo sobre o tema? eu non controlo moi ben o que pasa por Commons, sobre todo despois que de borren a foto. Se sabes algo dimo na miña páxina da Galipedia. Gracias. Xoacas (talk) 22:24, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! P1160048 paisaxe, Trabada.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilt should be corrected - A.Savin 23:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done --Elisardojm 20:30, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 Support - A.Savin 21:28, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

AELG upload done

I've finished the upload. Duplicates weren't uploaded. See Commons:Batch uploading/AELG for source. Cheers.Smallman12q (talk) 21:24, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

I've added the author link. See User_talk:Smallman12q#AELG_photo.27s_upload.Smallman12q (talk) 03:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:Demesa-Praza Publica-Prestige.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 11:31, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: Foto borrada de Praza Pública

Hola Elisardo, la verdad es que se me había pasado tu mensaje... Perdona. Creo que, lamentablemente, está bien borrado. Verás, coincidirás conmigo en que la imagen de la televisión está protegida por el copyright. Desde ese punto de vista, para ver si se considera obra derivada, lo que hay que considerar es Commons:De minimis. Ahí exponen criterios para el análisis. En este caso aplica claramente Copyrighted work X is the central part of the subject (eg it is the reason for taking the photo). Removing it would make the derivative work useless. Por lo tanto, claramente es una obra derivada e infringía los derechos de autor del propietario de los derechos (porque una cosa es que pongan la tele fuera para que los periodistas puedan verlo y otra es que cedan los derechos de dicha emisión, algo que debe hacerse de forma explícita). Un saludo y perdona por la tardanza --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 08:59, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Nada, dame la tabarra todo lo que necesites. Yo creo que lo importante es que le eches un vistazo a Commons:De minimis. Es muy clarificador. --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 11:42, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Barreiro

Lo estándar es pedir que se autorice. He "plantilleado" la imagen. Un saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 20:18, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

A mandar

Pues eso :-P --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 10:42, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Re: preguntillas

He pedido fuentes para todas las imágenes. Cuando tengamos veremos qué hacer. Un abrazo y gracias --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 23:39, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Limpiado :-)

Hola Elisardo, he borrado algunas y para otras he abierto una consulta de borrado: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nemigo y Commons:Deletion requests/File:Distribuidor Hempel Culleredo 34naiazwGL.jpg. Un saludo y a tu disposición --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 22:04, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Roberto Vidal Bolaño

Tomo nota, aunque sabe un poco mal hacerlo si ya hay alguien que hizo un retrato. ¿Sabes si se pueden encontrar registros en vídeo del autor? Eso va muy bien a los ilustradores para no captar sólo de fotos. E igual estaría bien hacer un conjunto de "escritores/as gallegos" para dar coherencia al encargo. Solemos hacer un pack de 7 de los que elijen 5. Y claro, que no sean autores vivos ni haya posibilidad de conseguir fotos libres de forma clara y a medio término. --Dvdgmz (talk) 12:22, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Sí, me parece bien.
Ahora estaba viendo y el retrato que hay enlaza a un Flickr que ahora es privado. Un poco raro. --Dvdgmz (talk) 12:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC)