User talk:El Grafo/Archive 5

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

16:12, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

15:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kückelheim (Schmallenberg).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Qgis and FEVE maps

I completed drawing the whole FEVE narrow gauge network. (see My KML website) In the meantime my laptop crashed and had to be replaced. I am now ready the load the software again. I noted down the installation but I get stuck with choices I dont understand:

From https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/download.html I downloaded:

Downloads for windows -> For new users -> QGis standalone version 2.8 (64 bit) Downloaded: QGIS-OSGeo4W-2.8.2-1-Setup-x86_64.exe

I started the installation:

Qgis Wien (2.8.2) installation After the license questions: Chose the parts you want to install: North Carolina data set, South dakota (Spearfish), Alaska data set

What the hell are these datasets and do they have any connection with projections of the North of Spain? This is not very user friendly for new users. I wont go beyond this point until I understand what I am doing.Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:19, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Could you convert the KML files to a SVG map? I suppose an conical East - West projection is best for this long distance (438 km). From there I could try to add details (stations, tunnels, etc) with Inkscape (I have to learn to use this tool also). PS: I started a discussion in the village Pump (Mapmaking of the FEVE metergauge network).Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:19, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Smiley.toerist, I recently had the same problem of qgis not being installed correctly. As far as I remember, choosing a different download source fixed that (I may have used this one, don't remember). Those datasets you mentiopn are part of GRASS, you don't need them. If the alternative download doesn't work for you, I can try converting them to SVG, but that may take a while since I'll be traveling for at least a week. --El Grafo (talk) 11:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palm Springs International Airport, final approach on runway 13R.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

19:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

15:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

15:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Naturalis - persistent link to come

Dear El Grafo,

Thanks for your interest in this problem of two links switching in time! You suggested me to drop a line here as you had an idea tackling it (perhaps with #time and #ifeq?). Vielen Dank, Hansmuller (talk) 08:08, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Hansmuller, thanks for reminding me. From you example I gather that the ID used for the single images (here: RMNH.ART.5) will stay the same, right? Then we could create a template which takes this ID as a parameter and automatically builds the source link(s) from that. There are several examples for templates like that, {{NARA-image}} being one of them (though that one uses a sub-template for generating the link). The easiest way would be to switch the url structure in the template by hand once the new structure is used on their website … --El Grafo (talk) 09:45, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Mmh, I've just noticed {{Naturalis donation}}. Maybe split that into two for source and permission? --El Grafo (talk) 09:58, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay. Splitting {{Naturalis donation}} could be an option. Thanks to your hint of {{NARA-image}} I copied the underlying sub-template in {{Naturalis-link}}. You had something more elegant in mind? Please edit. Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 11:03, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pipistrel Virus, landing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

15:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Liriodendron chinense (Chinese tulip tree), leaf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acantholimon acerosum, habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Samsung NX1, chassis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Central bus station of Bayreuth.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cologne Cathedral, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

15:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi!

Hello there! could you review those scans made for an user uploaded? i don't know if he has any permission of upload it here:

Waiting for your answers. My regards.--VictorPines (talk) 01:41, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

@VictorPines: Thanks for noticing. We would need permissions from the different authors, so I've created Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ilczech. Regards, --El Grafo (talk) 08:03, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi again...

Also this photo has been uploaded:

My regards.--VictorPines (talk) 21:10, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

15:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

03:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Director's viewfinders.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

15:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

14:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

16:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

13:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Ambushed train graves

Hi El Grafo,

Thank you for your suggestions at Commons:Valued image candidates/ChurchillCapture Graves.JPG. I have now changed the scope as suggested by you (as well as adding an Afrikaans text to the new category).

Martinvl (talk) 16:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gillette Mach3 cartridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cute Monkey cropped.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cute Monkey.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

21:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Gallery

Hi, I note, like you, that the gallery does not interest many people. They give a lot of work. But in the future they could be useful to avoid waterlogging category. The scope points to one or the other is not, in my view, a fontamental element. Regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:55, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:High-Pressure-Cleaning-with-Personal-Protective-Equipment-01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:High-Pressure-Cleaning-with-Personal-Protective-Equipment-01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Incomplete Graffito.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Incomplete Graffito.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:11, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

17:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

VI resubmission

Hi El Grafo

I have resubmitted Commons:Valued image candidates/Eastern clapper lark (Mirafra fasciolata) clapping.jpg on behalf of the original submitter. You requested that I notify you when I resubmit. Martinvl (talk) 21:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rohloff Speedhub 500/14, cutaway.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Fish-eye Cat

I was reconsidering this. I will put Cat for Samyang 7.5 mm. --Mile (talk) 12:37, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Danke

Hallo, ich danke Dir für das Voting meines Bildes Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hof, Zierbrunnen im Botanischen Garten.jpg --Dh1970 (talk) 12:50, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Da nich' für ;-) Ist irgendwie blöd wenn tagelang keiner einen Kommentar abgibt und man so in der Luft hängt. Manchmal muss halt einfach mal einer einen Anfang machen … Viel Erfog noch! --El Grafo (talk) 13:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerotowing, towing positions.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

16:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

MVR's

Hey El Grafo, da sich immer mehr MVR's ansammeln und so langsam der Überblick was schwer wird, wollte ich dich fragen, ob du nach fast gut zwei Wochen laufender Abstimmung (da du die Abstimmung "gestartet hast") mal über die Kandidaten drüberschauen könntest um ggf. schon eindeutige Abstimmung zu schließen und so dort etwas aufzuräumen :). Beste Grüße --Dr. Chriss (talk) 15:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

@Dr. Chriss: Danke für's erinnern. Beim Strand habe ich lange überlegt aber dann doch erst noch meine eigene Stimme abgegeben, bleibt also noch ein paar Tage offen. Das Hotel habe ich erledigt. --El Grafo (talk) 16:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
@El Grafo: Klar kein Problem :). Beim Strand bin ich immer noch unsicher und bei der Burg denke ich ist es auch eine Geschmackssache.... aber kaum einer schaut sich auch die MVR's an, sondern nur die normalen Nominierungen.... Beste Grüße --Dr. Chriss (talk) 16:34, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

18:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)