User talk:EVula/Archive-2010

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[en] As a dedicated Wikimedian, I don't limit myself to just one project or just one language.


Re: Fixing broken redirects isn't difficult

Thanks for letting me know, I wasn't thinking of that at the moment. I will in the future. Techman224Talk 00:09, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

No worries. :) EVula // talk // // 06:29, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear EVula/Archive-2010. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you – Kwj2772 (msg) 02:46, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Responded. I'll zip around and make the subsequent admin actions in a bit. EVula // talk // // 05:22, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

We need your help at the Wikiproject medicine

Hello, Sorry for spaming your talk page, but this is very important. On the behalf of the Wikiproject medicine at the en.wikipedia, I am inviting you to be a part of the discussion going on the project's talk page about Patient images, The discussion started after I obtained a permission to more than 23000 dermatology related images, and about 1500 radiology images. As some editors of the Wikiproject medicine have some concerns regarding the policy of using patient images on wikipedia, and regarding patient consents. Also they believe that common's policy is not so clear regarding the issue. And since you are the experts please join us at this very important discussion -- MaenK.A.Talk 14:21, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

File:WTN_EVula_206.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:09, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Seems like a valid deletion request. EVula // talk // // 07:14, 19 September 2010 (UTC)