User talk:Dr. Karl-Heinz Hochhaus/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Abb6 Schiffbauausbildung.jpg was uncategorized on 21 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Bauakademie2.JPG was uncategorized on 21 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Abb1Taufe 3.jpg was uncategorized on 22 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Schiffbauausbildung3.png was uncategorized on 22 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Schiffbauausbildung.jpg was uncategorized on 22 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kühlschifffahrt Bild3.jpg was uncategorized on 25 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kühlschifffahrt Bild6 HQL.JPG was uncategorized on 25 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kühlschifffahrt DCP 1633.JPG was uncategorized on 25 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kühlschifffahrt BanCont1.JPG was uncategorized on 25 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kühlschifffahrt Bild3 Kühlkapazität.png was uncategorized on 26 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:CA-Mermaid.jpg was uncategorized on 26 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kühlschifffahrt PalettSwinger.jpg was uncategorized on 26 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kühlschifffahrt Fruchtzentrum2.jpg was uncategorized on 26 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kühlschifffahrt Bananen Exporte 2007.png was uncategorized on 26 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kühlschifffahrt MonteRosa2.jpg was uncategorized on 26 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:CapSanNicolas.jpg was uncategorized on 13 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:1997 10 00 Autotransporter HHK.jpg was uncategorized on 23 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Image:2011 06 04 Harburg Taucherhelme DSCI5241.JPG was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:29, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:2011 10 14 NDL DSCI1299 k.JPG was uncategorized on 16 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Image:2011 10 14 Rickmers LLoyd DSCI6118.JPG was uncategorized on 16 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Please give images good descriptions
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!
High Contrast (talk) 17:15, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:1914_MAN_6_12000PS.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1914_MAN_6_12000PS.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 17:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Krupp_2000PS_Einzylinderversuchsmotor.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Krupp_2000PS_Einzylinderversuchsmotor.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 17:19, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Kategorien
Hallo Herr Doktor, ich freue mich über Deine Bilder, sehe aber, dass Du noch gravierende Probleme mit deren Kategorisierung hast. Bevor Du noch mehr Bilder hochlädst und falsch kategorisierst, lese Dir doch bitte erst einmal Commons:Categories (oder hier die deutsche Kurzfassung) durch! Beachte bitte, dass wegen des internationalen Publikums nur englische Kategorienamen zulässig sind. Beispielsweise beim Bild File:NotdieselSanClem1.jpg siehst Du ja schon am roten Link, dass Category:Schifffahrt, Hilfsdiesel nicht funktionieren. Brauchst du Hilfe? -- Ies (talk) 16:42, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Nochmal Kategorien
Hallo, ich hatte Dich doch schon deutlich darauf hingewiesen, dass deutschsprachige Kategorien hier nicht zulässig sind. Warum also wählst Du jetzt in File:1996 08 00 V2 Steuerruderk.jpg schon wieder eine deutschsprachige Kategorie? Die ist hier nicht zulässig! Nehme bitte nur englische Kategorienamen! -- Ies (talk) 10:55, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Da ich bisher keine für mich verständliche Übersicht gefunden habe, habe ich sie bisher auf Deutsch hochgeladen. Andererseits finde ich nicht nur meine Bilder auch unter deutsche kategorien. Wenn Du mir helfen willst, gebe mir die Adresse, den Hinweis, wo ich z. B. eine systematische Übersicht der Kategorien in der Technik finden kann. Primär interessiert mich die Schifffahrt.
Gruß Dr.K.-H. Hochhaus --Dr. Karl-Heinz Hochhaus (talk) 11:10, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Hallo,
das mit den Kategorien ist etwas nervig, weil die Kategorien sich aufgrund der Materialfülle stetig weiterverzweigen und zudem auf Englisch sind. Du könntest Dich zunächst mal ein wenig mit der Kategorie http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Ships vertraut machen, andere Wege sind die Suche nach einer Datei zum gleichen Thema in der Hoffnung, dass diese treffend kategorisiert ist, oder die Suche nach dem englischen Begriff. Hilfreich kann da das Online-Wörterbuch http://dict.leo.org/ sein. Das mit den Kategorien erschließt sich erst mit der Zeit, aber ohne treffende Kategorien wäre es schade um Deine schönen Bilder, denn die findet dann kaum jemand. Im NOtfall hilft auch das Forum http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum für Fragen.
mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:16, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Eine systematische Übersicht der Kategorien oder gar ein fixes System der Kategorien gibt es nicht. Grund hierfür ist, dass die Kategorien sich je nach Anforderung entwickeln. Große Kategorien werden geteilt, sich nicht als sinnvoll erweisende Kategorien werden gelöscht bzw. in Elternkategorien übernommen usw. Das ganze Kategoriesystem ähnelt weit eher den sich ständig ändernden Nervenverbindungen in einem Gehirn als einer fixen Verdrahtung. Leo, wie schon oben empfohlen, nutze ich auch häufiger, um passende englische Begriffe zu finden. Häufig hilft auch schon in Blick in einen entsprechenden deutschen und parallelen englischen Artikel. Wenn es in die Tiefen der Technik geht, kann es durchaus sein, dass eine passende Kategorie noch gar nicht existiert und neu angelegt werden muss. Wenn Du Dir unsicher über den neuen Kategorienamen oder den Inhalt der geplanten Kategorie bist, "spreche" mit anderen Benutzern darüber. Du bist hier nicht allein. -- Ies (talk) 15:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Bauarbeiten_1973.jpeg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Bauarbeiten_1973.jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bauarbeiten_1973.jpeg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
D.W. (talk) 19:06, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:2010_02_19_Schiffsbetrienstechnik_Flensburg.JPG
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:2010_02_19_Schiffsbetrienstechnik_Flensburg.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2010_02_19_Schiffsbetrienstechnik_Flensburg.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
D.W. (talk) 19:08, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Antrieb.JPG
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Antrieb.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Antrieb.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
D.W. (talk) 19:10, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.
Thank you.This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:55, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Arbeiter_an_der_R_27_1939.jpeg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Arbeiter_an_der_R_27_1939.jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Arbeiter_an_der_R_27_1939.jpeg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
D.W. (talk) 17:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:39, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Hallo Dr. Karl-Heinz Hochhaus,
wer hat das Gemälde in File:2005 02 22 Tecklenborg 1907.JPG denn gemalt? Du hast dich zwar als Autor eingetragen, meintest damit aber wohl nur die Reproduktion des Originals. Außerdem müssen wir wissen, wann der Maler gestorben ist. --Túrelio (talk) 21:20, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Túrelio, erstmal Dank für die Unterstützung bei den Bildern (Fairplay).
Der Punkt File:2005 02 22 Tecklenborg 1907.JPG steht bei mir auf der Liste und wird voraussichtlich bei meinem nächsten Besuch in Bremerhaven erledigt. Ich habe das Bild natürlich nicht gemalt, sondern fotografiert, die Daten des Malers werden nachgetragen. --Dr. Karl-Heinz Hochhaus (talk) 14:28, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Dr. Karl-Heinz Hochhaus,
Kategorien werden nicht so gebaut wie du es hier gemacht hast. Das ist eine Mischung von Wikipedia-Artikel und Gallerie. Eine Kategorie soll nur ein paar Worte über den Inhalt enthalten, falls nicht selbsterklärend, dann aber auch zumindest auch auf englisch. Gallerie-Konstruktionen gehören aber nicht in Kategorien. --Túrelio (talk) 13:58, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Danke für den Hinweis, ich übe noch. Werde versuchen, es besser hinzubekommen.--Dr. Karl-Heinz Hochhaus (talk) 14:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ich habe die Kat. inzwischen weitgehend korrigiert, d.h. Commons-konform gemacht. Schau bitte auch mal meine ältere Frage im Abschnitt hier nächsthöheren Abschnitt an. --Túrelio (talk) 14:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
File:Schiffsing-Journal.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
— Huntster (t @ c) 03:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- Just a note regarding this deletion request: modern publications are automatically copyrighted, and photographs of such a publication is derivative, and thus cannot be released under a free license. Also, images of modern models created by someone else, such as File:2011 02 19 TMB Katapultschiff Ostmark k DSCI4612.JPG, will also be copyrighted, so you may want to review your contributions to make sure you haven't uploaded any similar images. Thanks! — Huntster (t @ c) 03:50, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
File:2011_02_19_TMB_Katapultschiff_Ostmark_k_DSCI4612.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Huntster (t @ c) 03:48, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Hallo! Du hast als Urheber STG angegeben, was ich als Laie nicht deuten kann. Ohne die Einverständniserklärung/Freigabe durch den Rechteinhaber können wir das Bild so nicht behalten. Wenn Du jedoch mehr Angaben machst, können wir vielleicht rausfinden, ob das Bild tatsächlich gemeinfrei ist. --Schwäbin (talk) 21:00, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo, STG bedeutet Schiffbautechnische Gesellschaft, eine Gesellschaft, in der ich aktiv bin und bis Anfang 2011 den Fachausschuß (FA) Geschichte im Schiffbau geleitet habe. Dieser FA ist neben der Geschichte im Schiffbau auch zuständig für die eigene Geschichte und ihrer Mitglieder. Alfred Dietrich war Schiffbauingenieur und ein bemerkenswertes Mitglied unserer Gesellschaft und ist 1898 verstorben. Das Foto wurde 1898 höchstwahrscheinlich von seiner Familie der STG zur Veröffentlichung übergeben worden und zu diesem Zweck im öffentlichen Jahrbuch der STG abgedruckt worden.--Dr. Karl-Heinz Hochhaus (talk) 21:22, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Danke für die Info. Ich hatte gestern nacht (vor Deiner Antwort hier) eine Nachricht an die STG geschickt mit der Bitte um Angabe des Fotografen, damit wir rausfinden können, ob das Bild wirklich gemeinfrei ist. Dass die Familie es zur für eine spezielle Veröffentlichung zur Verfügung stellte, hilft uns hier auf Commons noch nicht wirklich weiter. Wir müssen versuchen rauszufinden, ob der Fotograf (nicht der Eigentümer) schon mehr als 70 Jahre verstorben ist. Versteh mich bitte auch richtig: Mein Interesse ist es, das Bild behalten zu können - aber korrekt lizensiert. Vielleicht kannst Du ja meine Anfrage über das Kontaktformular noch unterstützen, hast ja sicherlich gute Kontakte :-) --Schwäbin (talk) 09:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC)==
Overcategorising
At this moment you are overcategorising at least the ship categories. Rudders ar e.g. ship parts and this category is already in category:Rudders. Please read the instructions before categorising and be so kind to revert these actions yourself. --Stunteltje (talk) 14:22, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Seefahrtschule
Hallo, ich habe gerade Deinen Upload des Bildes File:Seefahrtschule - Bremen - 1859.jpg auf die ursprüngliche schwarz/weiße Datei zurückgesetzt. Die einfarbig kolorierte Version stellt m.E. keine Verbesserung der Grafik dar – sie reduziert den Kontrast des Bildes und ist ästhetisch weniger ansprechend. Wenn Du die farbige Variante nutzen willst, lade sie bitte als eigene Datei hoch (z. B. mit dem Namenszusatz colorized). Unter dem Punkt „other versions“ in der Bildbeschreibung könnte man dann wechselseitig auf die zwei unterschiedlichen Versionen des Bildes verweisen. Gruß --Gepardenforellenfischer (talk) 09:36, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Ich glaube, daß File:2011 08 20 Hafenarbeit Nutzung der Griepen DSCI0037.JPG kann nicht "selbst fotografiert" in 2010 sein. Es sieht aus wie ein altes Foto, nicht wahr? Ich glaube nicht, daß Hafenarbeiter Kleid auf diese Weise heute. Oder, vielleicht irre ich mich? - Jmabel ! talk 06:14, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Kategorien
Hallo Herr Doktor, gebe Deinen Bildern doch bitte sinnvolle, funktionierende Kategorien. Beispiele:
- File:2012 08 26 Polizisten in deutscher Uniform auf Samoa DSCI0590.JPG: Category:Datei:Frei ist komplett sinnlos.
- File:2012 08 18 Marine Technik Schule Parow Vereidigung DSCI7467.JPG: Category:Vereidigung ist unzulässig, Category:Swearing-in gibt es nicht, wie schon der rote Link zeigt.
- File:2012 08 18 Marine Technik Schule Parow Abgasturbolader k DSCI7475.JPG: nicht kategorisiert
- File:2012 08 18 Marine Technik Schule Parow Raketen k DSCI7424.JPG: Category:Rockets by type ist hier sinnlos.
- File:2012 08 18 Marine Technik Schule Parow Sea Sparrow k DSCI7421.JPG: Category:Sea Sparrow gibt es nicht, wie schon der rote Link zeigt.
- File:2012 08 18 Parow Opa DSCI7349.JPG: Category:Dieselmotor ist unzulässig, Category:Four-stroke diesel engines und Category:4-stroke diesel engines gibt es nicht, wie schon der rote Link zeigt.
- usw. usw. usw.
Was bist Du eigentlich für ein komischer Doktor, dass Du immer noch so große Probleme mit dem Kategorisieren hast? -- Ies (talk) 18:16, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Ies,
ich habe nach wie vor Probleme mit der Kategorisierung, da es dafür bei Wikipedia und Commons keine brauchbaren Vorgaben
gibt. Meine Hilfen hatte ich leider zu Haus, als ich die von Dir "gerüffelten" Bilder in Berlin hochgeladen habe. Aber wenn Du so schlau bist, dann helfe mir doch bei der Kategorisierung von:
- File:2012 08 18 Marine Technik Schule Parow Raketen k DSCI7424.JPG: Category:Rockets by type ist hier sinnlos.
- File:2012 08 18 Marine Technik Schule Parow Sea Sparrow k DSCI7421.JPG
viele Grüße von --Dr. Karl-Heinz Hochhaus (talk) 13:53, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
File:2011 08 20 Hafenarbeit Nutzung der Griepen DSCI0037.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jmabel ! talk 15:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Trinkwassersystem Fährschiff.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Trinkwassersystem Fährschiff.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 22:50, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Diese Grafik wurde von mir selbst erstellt, daher bin ich der Meinung, dass meine Angaben nicht widersprüchlich, sondern korrekt sind.
--Dr. Karl-Heinz Hochhaus (talk) 17:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:2014 01 03 Dole Colombia IMG 0043 S KK.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:2014 01 03 Dole Colombia IMG 0043 S KK.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Dieses Foto habe ich von einem Bildschirm im Kieler Stadtmuseum abfotografiert, das darauf abgebildete Schiff wurde bei der Werft HDW in Kiel gebaut und die Vorlage wurde von der Werft zur Verfügung gestellt. Was habe ich falsch gemacht bzw. welche Lizenz hätte ich wählen müssen?--Dr. Karl-Heinz Hochhaus (talk) 18:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
File:2014 01 03 Dole Colombia IMG 0043 S KK.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eingangskontrolle (talk) 13:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:2013 10 01 Parsons Schiffsturbine 1896 IMG 0835 k P.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:2013 10 01 Parsons Schiffsturbine 1896 IMG 0835 k P.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
axel (talk) 12:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:2013 09 18 mühlendammschleusenplan 1894 IMG 9193 S P k2.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:2013 09 18 mühlendammschleusenplan 1894 IMG 9193 S P k2.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
axel (talk) 12:11, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:2013 09 18 mühlendammschleuse um 1880 3 IMG 9196 b g.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:2013 09 18 mühlendammschleuse um 1880 3 IMG 9196 b g.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
axel (talk) 12:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:2013 09 14 Kavitationstank um 1920 HSVA IMG 9063.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:2013 09 14 Kavitationstank um 1920 HSVA IMG 9063.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
axel (talk) 12:18, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:2010 03 15 Primus DSCI0237 k.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:2010 03 15 Primus DSCI0237 k.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
axel (talk) 12:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
File:2010 03 15 Primus DSCI0237 k.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 11:23, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
File:2013 09 14 Kavitationstank um 1920 HSVA IMG 9063.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 11:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
File:2013 09 18 mühlendammschleuse um 1880 3 IMG 9196 b g.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 11:28, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
File:2013 09 18 mühlendammschleusenplan 1894 IMG 9193 S P k2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 11:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
File:2013 07 19 Berlin Plan Mühlendammschleuse IMG 7378.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 11:31, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
File:2013 10 01 Parsons Schiffsturbine 1896 IMG 0835 k P.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 11:32, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:2016 05 24 Dresden Kurbr Freg Friedr Wilh zu Pferd IMG 8123.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:2016 05 24 Dresden Kurbr Freg Friedr Wilh zu Pferd IMG 8123.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
File:2016 07 15 AFC.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 15:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:2016 08 06 Zehdenick Schleuse Einfahrt 1 IMG 8909.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:2016 08 06 Zehdenick Schleuse Einfahrt 1 IMG 8909.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:13, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- erledigt, danke für den Hinweis --Dr. Karl-Heinz Hochhaus (talk) 07:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
File:2016 09 17 Husumer Schiffswerft um 1956 IMG 1369.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vanellus (talk) 04:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
File:2016 09 28 Windmes Aeolus 6 IMG 1651 Paint.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fegsel (talk) 20:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
File:2016 08 07 Carola Ziegelverladung IMG 9232.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
axel (talk) 11:42, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
File:2016 08 07 Carola alte Klappbrücke IMG 9322.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
axel (talk) 11:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:1994 10 15 Sol do Brasil Laderaumtks IMG 2660.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:1994 10 15 Sol do Brasil Laderaumtks IMG 2660.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:1994 10 15 Sol do Brasil LKA Kwp Saugbr IMG 2636.JPG
- File:1994 10 15 Sol do Brasil LKA Soleraum IMG 2637.JPG
- File:1994 10 15 Sol do Brasil LKA Kälteverdichter IMG 2641.JPG
- File:1994 10 15 Sol do Brasil 1 Brennstoffsepart 2 IMG 2616.JPG
- File:1994 10 15 Sol do Brasil 1 HH IMG 2675.JPG
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:1994 10 15 Sol do Brasil Freifall Rettboot IMG 2652.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:1994 10 15 Sol do Brasil Freifall Rettboot IMG 2652.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
File:2016 05 01 Projekt America Jan 2004 IMG 7156.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ariadacapo (talk) 10:35, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
File:2010 04 10 Prinz Tab1 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 16:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
File:2010 04 10 Prinz Tab2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 16:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
File:2010 04 10 Prinzenklasse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 16:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Image without license
File:2013 03 08 Deckshaus für Aeolus k DSCI1773.JPG
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:03, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:2018 08 15 Padburg Berufe in Baracke H15 IMG 8563.JPG
Copyright status: File:2018 08 15 Padburg Berufe in Baracke H15 IMG 8563.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:2018 08 15 Padburg Berufe in Baracke H15 IMG 8563.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:31, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Wurde ergänzt
--Dr. Karl-Heinz Hochhaus (talk) 15:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
File:2018 07 30 Fürstenberg KZ-Ravensbrück final.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Anselm Rapp (talk) 10:56, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Image without license
File:2018 09 21 Bild 2 Kupfermühle Wasserrad IMG 9723.JPG
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 18:46, 23 September 2018 (UTC)