User talk:Didia

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Didia!

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Didia!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:42, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Menkheperraseneb

[edit]

Hello. I've found this picture uploaded by you and I find it very interesting. The name of Taiunet is recognizable (but, sadly, not the one of Menkheperraseneb), but the claim that it belongs to TT86 is not in accordance with a study in my possession [Peter Dorman, 1994: Two Tombs and One Owner, in Thebanische Beamtennekropolen. Studien zur Archäologie und Geschichte Altägyptens 12], under which it seems more likely that the relief came from TT112 instead (for long time Menkheperraseneb was considered the owner of both TT86 and TT112):

  • "The scenes in the transverse hall (of TT112) depict Menkheperraseneb [...] in the company of this family at the funeral banquet and in a pose of adoration before Osiris."
  • "In TT112, the tomb owner (Menkheperraseneb) is named repeatedly as the son of Taiunet and is frequently portrayed with her: the emphasis on this relationship is as striking as the woman's total absence in TT86."

Recently I was trying to understand more about these characters, but I'm still pretty confused. Thus, I will be grateful if you could check for me again the original caption of this plate. Regards, Khruner (talk) 13:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Didia,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Alice-bob-eve.jpg

[edit]

Die Grafik ist der Hammer. Ich habe eine englischsprachige Bildbeschreibung ergänzt.--Nameless23 (talk) 19:24, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Danke ;-) --Didia (talk) 07:55, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Alice-bob-eve.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alice-bob-eve.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Alice-bob-eve.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Didym (talk) 13:51, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe mal die alte Version wiederhergestellt. Deine politisch (un)korrekte kannst du ja - wenn die Urheberrechtsfrage geklärt ist - als neue Datei hochladen. Wobei ich sehe grad: Auch die Ausgangsdatei ist ja "derived work" - du müsstest also als Mindestes angeben, aus welchen Dateien du das zusammengebastelt hast und - soweit es Material ist, das unter einer CC-Lizenz steht - die Urheber nennen. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 15:02, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Die Grafik besteht aus drei Bildern, die auf Wikimedia Commons gefunden werden können, siehe dazu die Diskussion zur entsprechenden Grafik. --Didia (talk) 15:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alice-bob-eve.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lord Belbury (talk) 15:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]