User talk:Davey2010/Archive 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Happy Christmas Davey![edit]


Thanks for your greetings, Davey. I wish you — and all of us — the new year to be better than the old one and soon to be Corona-free. --Túrelio (talk) 22:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!. –Davey2010Talk 21:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ItsPugle (talk) 06:05, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder[edit]

Hi Davey2010. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a file by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion, otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 08:19, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeff G., Ah damn sorry about that - I don't wait for the page to load I DR them and sometimes wait for the page refresh bit and other times I'll exit the page whilst it's loading - I assumed all would work without me having to wait but apparently not. I'll go ahead and check other nominations just in case those haven't worked either, Thank you for fixing that and thank you for bringing this to my attention, Many thanks, Warm regards, –Davey2010Talk 12:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thankfully it only seems to be that one page, Lesson learned!, Mustn't be lazy in future! :), Thanks again, Happy editing. –Davey2010Talk 12:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome, apology accepted.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence[edit]

Hello Davey2010 I hope you're doing well. May I ask you what evidence do I need to provide which convey I have sufficient knowledge related to YouTube uploads. Could you please clarify? Thanks, --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 01:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Apologies for being so blunt but no as you should be able to work this out yourself. If you're going to go to LR you need a bit more than just "Hello everyone, I would like to help out with backlog. I intend to focus on YouTube snaps, along with Bollywood Hungama files review. You can ask me questions, Thank you for your consideration". That's all I'm saying. Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 12:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know[edit]

Just to let you know this discussion may concern you. Ottawahitech (talk) 22:38, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Am_I_in_danger_of_being_blocked_here?. Sorry to leave this message here but they just make some allegations which I am uncomfortable with. I will appreciate if you can clarify I am not involved in your message to them in their talkpages as well as the ANU thread. Thanks so much.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:31, 18 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

COM:AN/U[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Retaliatory deletions by A.Savin. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.


Sorry to drag you into this. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eurostar speed record plaque, 27 October 2014 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 10:36, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eurostar speed record plaque, 27 October 2014 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 10:36, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aberdeen bus station deletions[edit]

Hi, I noticed that a load of files were deleted after I tried to reupload one from Flickr. This is the deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aberdeen bus station 13 May 2013 DSCF0356 (9058722989).jpg. The image in question is of low resolution but otherwise is identifiable as the interior of Aberdeen bus station. I don't think we have any images on the bus station now so am confused why this was deleted? Isn't a low resolution image better than none at all? The "Transport in Aberdeen" page is lacking an image of the bus station. Thanks NemesisAT (talk) 12:40, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I should clarify, it was this image I was looking to upload. NemesisAT (talk) 12:48, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi NemesisAT, Unfortunately the majority of those images were all of poor quality however I wouldn't object to maybe 1-3 images being undeleted as other than demolition files you're right we don't have any images of this bus station,
This file and this this file look to be the best out of them all (unless you've seen better), Anyway you're more than welcome to ask th deleting admin to undelete a few but I don't agree with them all being undeleted. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for my late response, I forgot to follow this page! Thanks for this, if I do request undeletion I will just ask for those two. However, on second thought, I can take better pictures myself so I'll probably leave it and take a trip to the bus station to get some photos. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 10:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi NemesisAT, No worries, You're still more than welcome to request undeletion as the more photos the better, If you want I can request these instead if it makes it easier :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:20, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If there is room for compromise, then adding what outcomes you would wish to see would be appreciated. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:35, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi billinghurst, If they state they'll do x, y and z in future I'll be happy with that and would be happy with them keeping their filemover rights. It should be fairly obvious to them what response I'm looking for. Even one "x" would be enough, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 12:01, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request assistance[edit]

Greetings: It would be great if you could examine and comment on this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:%C3%93scar_Gerardo_Montes_Barz%C3%B3n,_Gobernador_de_Tarija_2021-2026.jpg nomination. It seems routine to me, but another user is taking exception to the nomination. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:37, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ellin Beltz, Thanks for popping by - nice to see a friendly face :),
I've commented on it but in short unless I've missed something glaringly obviously I don't see anything that suggests this is a copyright violation - to my knowledge you don't have to be an official person to upload a picture of someone who's well official and the photo doesn't look professionally took either,
The exif data is poor on all of their images which could be a sign of them removing or adding exif data who knows but as I said I'm not seeing any copyvios here sorry :(,
Take care and stay stay safe, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 11:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hiya Davey! Good to know I'm not entirely losing my touch with the mop & bucket!  :) HUGS!! Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hiya Ellin Beltz, Haha, Sorry I hadn't realise the copyvios sooner but I guess spotting it late was better than not at all :), Haha big hugs!!, Take care and stay safe Ellin, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 11:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uuuhmmm[edit]

Did you just use revert privileges to undo an edit you personally dislike at https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Help_desk&diff=569646103&oldid=569639951 ? That really is not a kosher way to use that fyi... --Taktaal (talk) 19:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Taktaal, I have no idea how I came to undo your edit so apologies for that, I'm sure there was a reason at that time but have no idea what that reason was but either way I' not seeing a valid reason for its removal so will reinstate it later or you can, apologies again for that, thanks –Davey2010Talk 07:03, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok no problem then we're cool --Taktaal (talk) 08:14, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Taktaal I've reinstated your comment - FYI I was reverting another editor and somehow you were accidentally reverted too which explains why you were reverted, Apologies again Thank you for making me aware of this, Take care and stay safe, Warm Regards –Davey2010Talk 11:03, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing FIles which has not been from a long time[edit]

@Davey2010: Request to please review these files as they have not from quite a long time. I would be very grateful to you if you do that.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Crow_on_a_rock_in_a_forest.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fresh_Sweet_Corn.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_mock-up_Picture_frame.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cambodian_custard.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_cell_phone.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_dragon_fruit.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fresh_Carrots.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Modern_Skyscrapers_(or_Buildings)made_with_glass.jpg

Thanks, Contributers2020 (talk) 09:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Contributers2020, Plot twist: the communities decided (twice) that I shouldn't be one either ..... Go figure. Unfortunately you'll need to ask someone who's a licence reviewer or failing that wait, Sorry I couldn't be of help, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:00, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Its completely okay. I would surely find another one. Thanks, Contributers2020 (talk) 11:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Contributers2020, Not saying they will but the reviewer may refuse to do them as I don't know how they go about reviewing them (don't know if it's starting from page 1 or just randomly) so be prepared for a no lol, Should get reviewed tho can't see why not, Anyway take care and stay safe C, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--–Davey2010Talk 10:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why?[edit]

PDF files, that I requested to move, have been uploaded for Bengali Wikisource. So, shouldn't the names of the files be in Bengali according to the name of the book? But why did you undo my edits without responding to my request? MS Sakib (talk) 07:33, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - I had my reasons for declining however I failed to check your userpage which states your Bangladeshi so I wish I checked your page first. I've gone ahead and renamed them. –Davey2010Talk 10:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong move[edit]

Hi, Davey2010. Can you explain this move?. Are you aware filenames should not be neccesarily written in English? Cheers. Strakhov (talk) 12:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Strakhov, My sincere apologies this should've been declined so I don't know how or why it wasn't, Not that it's an excuse but I had sifted through over 200 files waiting to be renamed (as no one else bothered) so I guess it's easy to make mistakes when you're going through such a large amount but still no excuse for something that easy.
Anyway I've moved it back and have speedied the redirect, Thank you for bringing this to my attention and again apologies for this mistake, Many thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010Talk 13:20, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Don't worry. We all make mistakes sometimes. Thank you. Strakhov (talk) 12:39, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Davey2010. Now I have a question, why you declined this one? Only "Zoetermeer station" is way too common. Maybe the requester (is from my country) should have used crit. 3 and not 2, but for me that's no reason to decline files. I see you decline a lot of files, maybe too much? :-) But in this case I did move it afterwards, so I just let you know. The warning is back now, 'be prudent' (or something). Greetings and regards, - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:45, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Richardkiwi, Because I see nothing wrong with the current name and unless I'm missing something it does not disambiguate itself from say Zoetermeer Oost train station, You should have consulted me before moving it but either way I've moved the filename back and unless the user can provide a solid based reason as to why it should be moved it can continue staying where it's at.
I judge renames on a case by case basis and the vast majority of file names I do are all accepted/renamed, there's a few that get declined for 1 reason or another. Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 22:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I always rename his files, we know each other, not personally. I don't agree that you decline so many files. Don't revert me again. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:58, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Not my concern, I'm the dealing renamer and I declined their reasoning for a valid reason. Good keep disagreeing. If you opened your eyes you will see I decline for various valid reasons but don't let facts get in the way!. Then don't rename it again. –Davey2010Talk 23:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First time nominating for a speedy deletion[edit]

Davey2010Hello Davey Sir,

Today I just nominated a file for speedy deletion first time and I am not sure if I have done correct. Please confirm if I have done correct or wrong.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:18th-century_French_line_engraving_of_Qin_Shi_Huang.jpg

The sources given by the author didn't explain the licensing CC 3.0 Unported. Thanks in advance for confirming.

Warm Regards, Contributers2020 (talk) 03:43, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Contributers2020, Apologies for the delay,
The Granger site states and I quote:
"Our website may have some collections that include images that are in the public domain, not protected by copyright or where the copyright ownership is unknown. Content can enter the public domain when copyright has expired, has been forfeited or is not applicable. For these images we don’t claim any copyright or other intellectual property rights and neither do our contributors, we just provide you with access to a high resolution copy to use in line with the terms of the license you buy. Other copies or versions of these images might be available elsewhere."
Smithsonianmag states "© 2021 Smithsonian Magazine although they do have an education website that allows CC Zero however those 2 websites would appear to be 2 separate enterprises
Pinterest isn't a CC licenced site
Alchetron.com states "Qin Er Shi Wikipedia (Text) CC BY-SA" and makes no mention of images
So you were correct to speedy this :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:45, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your assistance Davey sir.
Warm Regards,
Contributers2020 (talk) 04:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome Contributers2020 :), Take care and stay safe, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 10:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance[edit]

Hi Davey2010, I trust this message greets you well. I have been looking up websites such as Pexels, Unsplash and Pixabay to upload, but there is some strange rule stating some changes in regards with some files. The files in question is File:A woman riding a skateboard bikini and denim shorts (Pixabay).jpg, however the author has released it on a free compatible licence, but the upload in question was after the due date. I believe I may have made a mistake, but I do just want to verify whether it can still be used provided the author has released it fully. I do not want to get in trouble for violating copyright --Nim Bhharathhan (talk) 07:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nim Bhharathhan, I hope you and yours are safe and well, I don't know about Pexels or Unsplash but with Pixabay images uploaded to Pixabay on or after 9 January 2019 cannot be accepted as that's when they changed licences unfortunately, I'm not sure if you've seen it but inregards to Pixabay it does state it all in the licence (File:A_woman_riding_a_skateboard_bikini_and_denim_shorts_(Pixabay).jpg#Licensing),
I can speedy it if you want as it wont be accepted unfortunately, Meh you won't get in trouble as it's an easy mistake to make :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think let's get an admin to deal with it. This is not the only issue that we are facing. A lot of the images that are not reviewed have been uploaded on that date. The only reason why I am uploading them is to do a massive overhaul on articles heavily neglected with images. I think Commons needs to get their act together and make other compatible exceptions. Well, back to the drawing board I guess. You or I could raise the issue to COM:AN and get them to investigate this, I reckon to keep it as is, but if an admin says to delete, they can do it, but this is not the only one. Cheers --Nim Bhharathhan (talk) 11:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, Unfortunately there's backlogs everywhere - there would be backlogs on En too no doubt,
It's not Commons' fault - Pixabay went from a Creative Common licence to one which isn't compatible with Commons or anywhere else for that matter. If you understood Creative Commons you'd understand why they cannot be accepted here.
There's nothing to investigate - Everything you need to know is in the licensing part so there's no point complaining to AN.
Yeah I've not seen the backlog not something I'm overly bothered with tbh. Not a licence reviewer so I'd have no need to go licence reviewing backlog hunting. Cheers. –Davey2010Talk 11:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Place relevant deletion requests to files as discussed. Might consider doing licence reviewer, despite my poor block log in the earlier years, it has been four years since I have been blocked and i think if I can eye deletion requests, then I could potentially do that role. --Nim Bhharathhan (talk) 12:14, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately you wouldn't be successful with that as you'd need to do a lot more than just sort through Pixabay images - Probably best to stick with DRing them, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 12:24, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah well, it would be a time-consuming task anyway. I am doing a heavy load next semester so I will be very busy and not very active after July 19th – but I am glad we are on the same page. I will still come on and do some cleanups, such as fixing typos, overhauling articles, nominating copyright-suspect images for deletion, but otherwise its just me at the books. Hmm considering driving Uber while studying at uni, but I'd probably be crapping myself as I do need to rent a car, might go luxury to give a good feel for my passengers, but i'd have to milk out my parents account to do that, and i'd be grounded/kicked out if I do that, so that will not be an option. What is rideshare like in the UK as in Australia, you'd find a lot of uni students are hooked on the app for nighttime, but I prefer to use it in the morning, to avoid the surge and considering the credit card is shared between me and my sister, we cannot spend a lot. Cheers --Nim Bhharathhan (talk) 02:50, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EggPudding77777[edit]

Hi. I noticed you've tagged some of this user's images as copyvios. Could you state the original sources to give evidence that they are copyvios? I'm an editor on wikipedia in which some of this users images are used. Specifically at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritage_unit please reply ASAP thanks. Slenderman7676 (talk) 22:21, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Slenderman7676, Unfortunately the image is here, EP may be William or on the other hand it could be a copyvio, Given all of their uploads are copyvios I'm inclined to believe this image is a copyvio too , Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:13, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You could try asking EP if that is the case. Slenderman7676 (talk) 23:20, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said I highly doubt they're the same person - If I believed otherwise (like I have done with people in the past) then I would've left a note instead of tagging, Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 00:03, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Query regarding Flickr file[edit]

Hello Davey, I got permission from this user to use his photo on Wikimedia Commons. Considering that the image itself is copyrighted, I am not sure whether we can upload it. The comment read "You have my permission for this singular usage" which I have attached it to the article and I would like to do so. May you please help me understand whether I can still upload. I know some users like User:Cement4802 uploaded a Tangara train image from a copyrighted author but he asked for permission to upload. Would that be ok to do that? --Nim Bhharathhan (talk) 06:48, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nim Bhharathhan, Uh I have no idea how you could go about that - Your best bet would be going to COM:OTRS or COM:Copyright,
I've tried backing up that page at http://web.archive.org/web/20210707101727/https://www.flickr.com/photos/lteagarden/3950877373/ however the comments aren't showing and https://archive.is/ is refusing to archive it up, Problem is he can easily delete that comment hence why the archives,
Technically speaking the other person has done it wrong as anyone can say "direct permission", without proof it's meaningless - Atleast by going to OTRS other (and maybe the uploader himself) can confirm all of this),
Sorry I couldn't be of any more help, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 10:27, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Always click the main link. What computer are you using to do something like that? This is the first time in a while i've heard of this happening --Nim Bhharathhan (talk) 10:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have - What I'm saying is that the comments work on https://www.flickr.com/photos/lteagarden/3950877373/ but they don't at http://web.archive.org/web/20210707101727/https://www.flickr.com/photos/lteagarden/3950877373/ which is an archived version. Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 11:07, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A series of biggy backlog[edit]

Davey2010Good Morning Davey Sir, There is a series, called The Illustrated poultry record, has 200's of file with disputed copyright or the Wrong License template. In order to reduce backlogs of our fellow reviewers, I started to research on it. This file, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Illustrated_poultry_record_(IA_CAT31037114020).pdf has a very very confusing license I have never saw before. Request to please spread light on this topic.

Warm Regards, Contributers2020 (talk) 07:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning Contributers2020, Agreed there's nothing that says this file is Gov-related (if there is I've completely missed it!), Fae may have proof etc as they obviously uploaded this file and they tend to upload old documents/images etc, Thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010Talk 08:48, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So will it be correct to mark it No Permissions and let him confirm the copyright information. And also, you're correct that there is no information saying this is Gov related neither it looks like it is.
Warm Regards, Contributers2020 (talk) 11:07, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Contributers2020, I don't want to say Yes and be wrong. If I came across the file then admittedly I would believe what's in front of me and leave it there, I don't have a great understanding when it comes to Gov related stuff so I stay well from it so as I said I don't want to give you the wrong information.
You can mark it as no perm, send it to DR or ask Fae first (and if that doesn't get anywhere then DR or no perm) but again entirely up to you what you do.
Sorry I couldn't be of any more help, Many thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010Talk 13:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your advice Davey Sir. I would prefer to ask Fae first and take any action after that.
Warm Regards,
Contributers2020 (talk) 15:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You're very welcome kind sir, Take care and stay safe, Warmest Regards. –Davey2010Talk 18:44, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BSicon file moves[edit]

Closing as per this edit summary. Sorry if this seems rude certainly not my intention but yeah my talkpage isn't ANI and I don't particulary want to see the notification message everyday just to see it's from either of you arguing over something that doesn't really concern me as such. Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 10:46, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please do not perform any more page moves requested by Cmuelle8 (contribs) or his logged-out IPs 91.55.163.63, 84.135.*.* and 93.201.*.*; he seems to have his own interpretation of the BSicon naming scheme and category taxonomy. Thank you. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 11:54, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AlgaeGraphix Why the passive-aggression ?, Am I supposed to be a mind reader or something?. Take your anger on the moron who requested the file renames, not the messenger. –Davey2010Talk 12:10, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Davey2010: I don't understand where you get this "passive-aggressive … anger" from? I don't expect you to be an expert on BSicons and be able to tell if a renaming is good or bad; this was just a simple request for future actions. Tuvalkin has asked Cmuelle8 to discuss his changes, but – fractured English aside – C8 seems to be pushing forward along his own path regardless. I hope this clarifies the situation. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 12:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi AlgaeGraphix, Please do not perform any more page moves comes off in a passive-aggressive way whereas you could've said "Hi Dave, I noticed you moved file.jpg, in future could you not move these files from User:X because x, y and z" - See the difference ?,
Anyway for whatever reason my laptop gives up trying to move these so I wasn't going to move these anyway but thanks for the heads up,
Many thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010Talk
I've also had some difficulty processing his requests (both performing and denying) – I think it's because of his propensity for adding reams of justification into the move request template – so I've resorted to removing the template manually in those cases. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 12:45, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah maybe I never thought of that, Well I see a few files are at the file renaming queue so I'll decline those now before someone makes the same mistake I did :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 12:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

comment moved to Talk:BSicon/Renaming#File moves


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

What is your deal?[edit]

I provided proof that it's copyrighted now can you stop reverting it Lilzlulz (talk) 22:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You provided proof that you gave the image to a news corporation which is what you did. –Davey2010Talk 23:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yea they own it not me I cannot legally put it here Lilzlulz (talk) 23:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If the image is not you then why are you so eager to get it deleted ? ... Most people here either upload their own images or upload copyvios ... so why would you upload a "copyvio" and then try and have it deleted ? –Davey2010Talk 23:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am the person in the image, I was posting articles and doing news stuff but I've decided to distance myself from this. I don't want to be known as that diaper guy. Also I did sign the rights away. Can't you just stop Lilzlulz (talk) 23:51, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Right, So the image is of you, The image was taken by you ... so therefore it's not a copyright violation. Unfortunately my friend we don't ever delete images here I'm afraid (unless they're of poor quality etc which this isn't). To be blunt my friend you're screwed. CC licences are irrevocable and no matter how hard you try I'm afraid the image probably wont be deleted. –Davey2010Talk 00:01, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's like your not listening I don't own the rights to this image. Before I submitted it here I signed them away to the news company I posted earlier. I don't have the right to put it here so no, you don't have the cc license Lilzlulz (talk) 00:09, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies I missed the last part. Well from my understanding that means nothing - At the time of uploading the file it was yours .... It would be no different to me uploading a CC image on Flickr and then changing the licence to "All rights reserved" - I released it under a CC licence first so that would waiver anything thereafter if that makes sense, –Davey2010Talk 00:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great example of the Streisand effect. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 04:18, 23 July 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

Hi AlgaeGraphix, Couldn't agree more!, Over at the DR he even linked to an article on him!!, It all seems a bit weird and without spilling beans I genuinely don't know if the file is of the uploader or whether it was an attempt to shame that person and the uploader now feels guilty .... who knows lol, –Davey2010Talk 10:51, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I literally sent you an image with my face and username written down. I don't understand what more you would need. I think you have an unhealthy obsession with this. Try to think rationally. Even if it was me what's the point of keeping it here after so many people voted delete and the original uploader said they didn't want it here. On the other page you lied and said people only voted delete under false a pretense and that's a lie even before king. A few had voted delete regardless of the date the article I posted was published.
The way you have been acting makes this site seam more like encyclopediadramatica or kiwi farms then Wikipedia.
I'm sure you acting like this really does make the commons proud!. Lilzlulz (talk) 16:56, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lilzlulz I changed my !vote to delete explaining my reasoning why .... So what's your problem now?.... –Davey2010Talk 17:27, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry Lilzlulz (talk) 17:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 17:32, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion request[edit]

Davey2010 Good morning Davey sir,

I wanted to ask that there is a [file], which, to me, was looking a obvious Delete picture, because in the license template they say that "Do not use this template if the date of death is available". The death date, with day, month and year written clearly on the source, but the author of the File, [[1]] say that I am wrong and humiliated me. I still thought this is wrong and a complete vio, so nominated for deletion. Can you please confirm if my step was correct or not.

Warm Regards,

Contributers2020 (talk) 03:46, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Contributers2020, Indeed the licence does state " the country of origin copyright lasts 70 years after the death of the author, and the date of the author's death is unknown. However, the date of creation of the work was over 120 years ago," so whilst it's saying after 120 years it's fine to have the file here it's sort of not fine as we know when the authors death date was so I would indeed say the licence is wrong - I don't work with old images so have no idea what it should be replaced with (assuming {{PD-old}} but that's a wild guess), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 10:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the information. Warm Regards, Contributers2020 (talk) 14:44, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome Contributers2020, Take care mate, –Davey2010Talk 20:46, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have quoted your comment on this topic in the DR request. Is it right?? I don't want to again rolled up in WikiPedia policies so asking you. Warm regards, Contributers2020 (talk) 02:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Contributers2020, My apologies the author and the subject would be 2 different people so I'm wrong with the above comment. FYI I was in a rush to leave the house yesterday so didn't pay close attention as I normally would. As I said I don't do old images so you'll need to ask someone more knowledge than me, Probably should've said that yesterday but hindsight's a lovely thing :), –Davey2010Talk 10:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Davey2010 Ok, I will take that delete nomination away. By the way, I asked in Help Desk as well but I also wanna ask you, can I change my username color to Contributers2020Talk to me here (inspired by you) instead of Contributers2020? I thought your username looked cool so asked.
Hi User:Contributers2020, You're more than welcome to keep the DRs open and that way either someone else can confirm or a closing admin can, Yeah sure you're more than welcome to copy anyones signature although it's generally preferred not to pick the exact same colours (which you haven't done here) :), Adds a bit of colour to the project lol, Take care and stay safe C2020, –Davey2010Talk 15:37, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But how will I do it permanently. For example, I live in India, and tracking UTC is tough for me (maybe??)so I wanted to do it like permanently so if I do four tides, I get the same colours in my username as orange and red. I just wanted to know if it is possible. I completely understand as well if you don't want to respond further (maybe I'm just disturbing you). Stay safe and healthy --Contributers2020 (talk) 17:50, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Go to Special:Preferences, Scroll down to signiture and paste in [[User:Contributers2020|<span style="color:orange;">'''Contributers'''</span><span style="color:red;">'''2020'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Contributers2020|<span style="color:navy;">'''Talk to me here'''</span>]]</sup> make sure the box underneath it is ticked. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 17:58, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the information; I am super grateful of you. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 02:47, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You're very welcome C, Take care and Happy editing, Kind Regards, –Davey2010Talk 10:57, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

drs[edit]

File:2 Weeks In Italy - A Cinematic Travel Film.webm

Help desk note (via edit) incase flickr route doesn't work

User removing templates[edit]

@Davey2010: Hello Davey sir,

I am so so sorry for messaging you again and again but there is no other good sysop who is more prompt than you. I highly appreciate that. My concern is that there is a user called Universitätsarchiv Zürich who is deleting subst:npd template. Isn't there any limitations on him. I mean, he can do like this again and again indefinitely. Is there a solution for this. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 14:07, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Contributers2020, Unfortunately I'm not an admin - just a normal editor like yourself :), The editor had been removing the template and adding the source to each file which is the correct thing to do - If you disagree with the source etc you can DR the file, Thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010Talk 15:15, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I am so sad hearing it. Believe me- you'll be a great Sysop. Coming to the point, he didn't change anything, just removed the template. Changed neither the source, nor date nor license as you'll see on his talk page. Even I do DR, I am sure he will close it by enter delh. Is there any permanent solution. Like for ex. Blocking him for 2-3 weeks. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 17:09, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you that's very kind of you :), He did he moved the source down as can be seen here - The source was already in the description but not in the "source" section so he moved it to there instead, As I said as far as I can see he's doing everything correctly so blocking is certainly not needed here, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 17:22, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I thought he didn't because he didn't write that it in the edit summary. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 03:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 10:15, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsing my vote[edit]

@Davey2010: Hello Davey sir,

Do you think I am wrong huh. Do you like opposing me every time huh? Don't believe me- written in Wikipedia only. Are we not judged by the language we use? Suppose a new editor( who is young because the Commons maybe teen based, but children are completely allowed) did some wrong upload and then the LR told (**** ***). Do you think it will be good for Wikimedia Commons. I request to please take back the collapsing template immediately . My voting also consisted of DR related stuff- why is that collapsed? --Contributers2020Talk to me here 12:55, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No sorry. Kindly don't participate at LR which includes nominating yourself and !voting. Have a good day. –Davey2010Talk 14:41, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment at COM:BN[edit]

Hi Davey2010, I just noticed this comment by you and found this part quite offensive: “weeding out useless admins such as yourself”. We do not “weed out” anyone here – this language is not appropriate for other fellows around here. There is not need to raise further tensions when someone is disappointed on losing their admin bit. You were eager to point them to COM:CIVIL and COM:MELLOW. See, sometimes it is best to weigh carefully what we add ourselves to a debate. You should have fixed your comment as well. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 18:14, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AFBorchert, We'll agree to disagree on that comment as I'd rather not get in to another arguement over it. I sort of explained my main problems on Rubins talkpage, Take care and stay safe, –Davey2010Talk 18:35, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


COM:AN/U[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Davey2010. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

--Contributers2020Talk to me here 03:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please, please, please, stay civil. You may be disappointed or frustrated but you are an experienced editor and you should show others how to behave in difficult situations. I have reverted your edit. rubin16 (talk) 05:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rubin16, Thank you for your message and thank you for not blocking me as I know in all honestly it was a block-worthy comment, Ironically only last week or so I was telling someone else to be civil and mellow ..... and then I do the same silly thing yesterday, Wished I hadn't become so angered like I was but to come home to see what I did yeah I unfortunately flipped and let things get the better of me so I apologise for that,
Anyway thanks again for your message, Take care and stay safe, –Davey2010Talk 10:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Per your request I've speedily deleted the following files:

Yours sincerely, AFBorchert (talk) 09:46, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you AFBorchert I greatly appreciate that, Take care and stay safe, –Davey2010Talk 10:46, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks AFBorchert for collapsing that - Although not mentioned I too will head the advice you gave to that user and wont comment further unless I know it's going to be of any help as that's twice you've had to collapse discussions which have included my replies,
I guess sometimes saying nothing is the best answer one can give,
I apologise for my part in continuing this however I'm only trying to resolve it but yeah silence can be the best reply,
Anyway I wont reply unless asked (or unless I know I've not said it before and that it will help in any way), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:18, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Davey2010, this is indeed correct. We have seen this many times that two or more are inclined to answer to the statement just posted before. This is a natural reaction, in particular if some aspect does not appear to be justified or fair. But in the end, we will get an endless back-and-forth which will not help. We should have here at Commons a happy time with contributing and helping each other with the mission to build an amazing media archive. This is more important than extending something unfortunate which is upsetting us. I hope you will find again the fun to contribute here. Best, AFBorchert (talk) 15:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi AFBorchert, I absolutely agree with you - We're only on this planet once and we should make the most of it and we should strive to enjoy what we do and be happy with what we do. Absolutely agree with your sentiments I really do - I want to enjoy editing here and believe it or not I want to make it an enjoyable place for others too.
Anyway thank you for replying, I hope you enjoy the rest of your day/evening, Take care AFB and stay safe, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 15:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Fiat Ducato[edit]

LOL, it IS a facelift with significant changes, introducing all-new interior style with brand new steering wheel, dashboard and infotainment system, new range of engines and construction updates together with introduced EV version. Despite minor changes outside, anyway still easily noticeable, this is still a facelift. Seems like you haven't read enough about 2022 Ducato before writing this message to me, have you? Michge (talk) 21:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LOL no it isn't. Unless the exterior is visibly different then it will be treated as the 2014 model - that's how it's always been. Now get the fuck off my talkpage and take your condescending tone with you. –Davey2010Talk 00:17, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh[edit]

Best of luck with whatever is next. You have done a heap of great work, and your contributions will be missed. Always welcome at enWS if you are looking for something different.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:54, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi billinghurst, Many thanks for your kind comments I appreciate them a lot, Thank you for the fantastic work you do here too,
Unfortunately I'm still around and have no plans to retire just yet lol :), I'd forgot about the templates so will remove them, Thanks though for your very kind comments, Take care, –Davey2010Talk 11:50, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm okay with that. Still welcome at enWS.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you![edit]

Thank you for your help with the Infoshop pictures :D Jamzze (talk) 08:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC) No worries Jamzze, Happy editing, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brand! Oh no...[edit]

Anyway, you invited me Commons (I am already here), but I realized you are using Nikon... As a amateur Canon user, I can not accept this situation :) Regards! :) Vincent Vega (talk) 20:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vincent Vega, Nice to see you, Haha unfortunately money wasn't (and still isn't) on my side and the Nikon camera was my very first camera so I didnt really know what to expect and I didn't know what brands were great and what weren't,
I wanted something that was mildly expensive, did the job but and also something I could drop or bash around and knew it wouldn't break :P (and so far 7 years on it's still working like brand-new :)), –Davey2010Talk 20:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you will get this camera that you want soon :) See you! Vincent Vega (talk) 20:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I can suggest Canon EOS 4000D. I think it is not so expensive in UK. Vincent Vega (talk) 20:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me![edit]

Hello Davey2010,

Please, I request can we stop being angry to each other and can you please help me. Can you please make me a Category:PDFs uploaded by Contributers2020 as I am having troubles doing the thing. I would be so grateful to you for this. And if possible, can you simplify the instructions on how to make a category, please. Contributers2020Talk to me here 15:04, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. Now get the hell off my talkpage. –Davey2010Talk 23:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your comment on COM:ANU said I stalked you(even tho I didn't) and now you were the only one who instantly opposed my unblock request. Any explanations?--Contributers2020Talk to me here 11:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I simply opposed your unblock request ... that's hardly stalking you. –Davey2010Talk 13:30, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So also....I simply nominated your files for deletion last time.....that's hardly stalking you Contributers2020Talk to me here 16:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You went through my contributions and nominated all of my images - That's stalking.
I commented on your unblock request because your talkpage is still on my watchlist - That's not stalking.
Please don't try to act smart with me - You'll only further embarrass yourself...., Have a wonderful day C2020. –Davey2010Talk 17:15, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit summary directed to Ytoyoda: it really should have been directed to the user who added an upskirt category in the first place, @Alice2Alice. Brianjd (talk) 14:55, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, but still YT should've had the common sense to remove it when they came across it. –Davey2010Talk 15:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Fiat Ducato[edit]

Seriously? Here it is, first source [2] around about Fiat Ducato 2021, this year's model after second facelift. Here is another one, straight from Fiat, jesus [3]. If previous facelift from 2014 received a separate category, what are the obstacles against literally the same move for the next facelift? As I said, learning about existence of this facelifting demands a few seconds of research, Google Fiat Ducato 2021 and you got plenty of results, pictures and data about this year's second facelift. But you took it as a "condescending" tone instead, using outrageous, vulgar language [4] without any feedback to my arguments. F-word, really, are we on a Wiki site or 9gag? What's wrong with you to escalate a pointless conflict on such a innocent subject? Is it really easier to remove an edit instead of check on Google what am I talking about? More good will, less conflict-approach, dude. Bring that category back, please. Michge (talk) 16:24, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did my research (again) before CSDing the category, I'll seek clarification as the new Fiat badge may be enough to put these in a new category. In the meantime stop recreating the category. Have a fucking wonderful day Michge. –Davey2010Talk 16:27, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is not only badge, but new interior, new engines, restyled bumpers, headlights and new EV variant. See, you are an vulgar and aggressive ignorant making a mess without any knowledge about subject, seems like you're just a troll which needs to be reported. What a guy, jesus christ. Michge (talk) 16:40, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes again I'm aware of all that but what I'm saying is there's nothing different exterior-wise to warrant putting these in a seperate category but again like I said I will seek clarification before either of us make a mess of things. You know where ANU is so go and knock yourself out. –Davey2010Talk 16:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • You have my condolences. Unwarranted accusations of adminship are truly disgusting, and I've spent my fair share of time curled into the fetal position, crying in the shower over that very thing. MjolnirPants (talk) 19:00, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hey MjolnirPants long time no see, How you're keeping well my friend, Thank you - I know right! I can take anything that comes my way but the adminship accusation is beyond the pale!, I'm still crying in bed cuddling a teddy bear as we speak mate - my feelings are deeply hurt.
Anyway nice to see a friendly face - Hope you're safe and well mate, –Davey2010Talk 19:52, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am, and I appreciate the sentiment. Hope you're doing just as well, yourself. Now excuse me while I fuck right off and find something productive do so ;) MjolnirPants (talk) 19:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good good and yeah all's good here, Lol okay mate take care and thanks for popping by, Take care, 21:09, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello Davey2010, you unfortunately declined my renaming request for the file above. Let me short explain: The original file may be in Deletion request. My aim is to save my cropped version, which is used in German-WP. Further I removed not EU-conform information, softened the number plate of this scooter, too. The signs of the number plate in the name of the file is the last obstacle. Hope, you can understand. Please tell me, if you see any other obstacle. Thank you in advance and a nice weekend. KR, --Wikisympathisant (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikisympathisant, At the time I didn't see much point in renaming a file that was going to be deleted however I see you've since cropped the image and uploaded as a new one which I'm fine with so I've renamed the new file for you, Thanks and you have a nice weekend too, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:49, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, very fine, thank you very much , best regards --Wikisympathisant (talk) 21:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You're very welcome :), Thanks, Regards, –Davey2010Talk 22:26, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a duration of one day[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of one day for the following reason: edit-warring and disruptive editing.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.


العربية  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  euskara  français  Gaeilge  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  română  sicilianu  Simple English  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  فارسی  +/−

Hi Davey2010, you continued edit-warring where you restored speedy deletion requests which have been declined. You have to refrain from that. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 23:22, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've also removed your comment with personal attacks that you added in this edit. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:27, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@AFBorchert I assume you missed the part where I RESTORED THE DR and added the template to all images (replacing all of the copyvios I placed). Your block solves and achieves absolutely nothing because as clearly evidenced I'd stopped edit warring like 10 minutes before this block. Congratulations you've blocked me, Have a cookie. –Davey2010Talk 23:28, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Never in my life here since 2008 have I seen such a pointless block. Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Rodhullandemu, This is about as punitive as a block can get,
I edit warred 3-4 times no denying that but credit where credit's due I stopped, restored the DR[5], helped the admin by replacing all of my copyvio notices with DRs[6][7], admittedly made an angry personal attackish comment and left ..... so why the need for this block bearing in mind I restored the DR 10 minutes prior to this block .... All seems punitive and nonsensical if you ask me.
Anyway hope you and yours are all safe and well my friend, –Davey2010Talk 00:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You've done another revert after that though. That reduces the gap between last revert and block to 5 minutes, which is not unreasonable IMO. The PA against AFB, not realizing that your speedy deletion tagging of TOO-related files was wrong, and your passive-aggressiveness don't help either. The block was correct and preventative.

Assuming your UK userbox in your enwiki userpage is correct, I suggest not doing mass tagging when you feel tired in the middle of the night. pandakekok9 15:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should reread the discussion before commenting on something you know nothing about. I stopped reverting at the DR a whole 10 minutes before the block was placed (and which was the sole reason for this block anyway). Imagine yourself asking for an admin to help and alls you get is "rvv" with said admin undoing everything you've just done .... would you be pleased with that ? ... No and as evidenced with my "passive-aggressiveness" as you put it I wasn't impressed either. I asked for help and alls I recieved was a block and dramah .... Hey ho the world moves on. –Davey2010Talk 15:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pings[edit]

Hi again. I wrote at Gameposo's RfA that I appreciate being pinged when mentioned (except on my user talk page, where that would be superfluous), but you nixed your reply, so I am replying here. By way of further explanation, I am not one of those excessively busy people that don't want pings or ask questions similar to "why did you ping me?"; rather, I give them frequently to those I mention as a matter of common courtesy, and I expect them in return (I also thank when strictly appropriate, and expect to receive thanks in return). Exactly one person has asked me not to ping them, and another has turned notification of pings of them off wiki-wide, so I try not to bother them. At the moment on Commons, I have given 4,002 thanks and received 1,526.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jeff G., Ah okay that's fair enough, Thanks for explaining your reasoning inregards to pings, Me personally I'm not fussed about pings or thanks - I used to care but not no more. Anyway take care and stay safe, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 22:51, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why...[edit]

... do you close discussions in a language you dont understand and who gives you the right forbid discussions? --Isderion (talk) 22:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just because I don't talk that language doesn't mean I can't still close discussions ?, Don is forum shopping and no amount of whinging and whining will help - He went to BN which IMHO is still wrong but either way there's no need for a second discussion on this at another venue.
Either discuss the aforementioned issues at the BN thread or don't discuss them at all. Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 23:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Don was socialized at de.wp, where his problem would have been handeled quite differently and was asking if that was normal behaviour. This is a perfectley legitimate point of discussion on a local language Village pump.
You still need to point me to the community consensus that gives you the right to stop discussions --Isderion (talk) 23:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see, Laptop translations aren't great and don't give the best results - If he wasn't whinging and whining then I apologise to you both, I've gone ahead and undone my closure as I certainly don't mean to cause more problems for him, Thank you for kindly explaining his reasoning, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.
Andy Dingley (talk) 23:59, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
When I told you to FO and do one I didn't mean go to ANU Andrew. Why help our viewers Mr Dingley when you can drag me to ANU over sweet nothings. Each to their own Mr Dingley each to their own. –Davey2010Talk 00:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]