User talk:DKrieger/Archiv 2012

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanteglos DSC 8617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deggenhausertal-1552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but you have to provide the Latin name of the species. --Jebulon 23:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC)  Done Latin name added, thanks for the info --DKrieger 05:37, 2 April 2012 (UTC)I have put it in italics, but it is good now, thanks.--Jebulon 09:39, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deggenhausertal-1554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 18:39, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligenberg-056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is wonderful. --Florstein 18:05, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grabfeld-099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok with me. --Iifar 17:19, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eriskircher Ried 037-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good light, composition and colors. DOF is a little shallow, but I think acceptable given the relative large depth of the flower. --Slaunger 19:55, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehenfeld-3063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's tilted Poco a poco 17:29, 30 July 2012 (UTC) Done I corrected the tilt a bit, but there is an angle between the upper an the lower part, and the shrine does not stand straight in the meadow --DKrieger 15:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC) Good for me. --Berthold Werner 17:20, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindau-4582.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 11:00, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jüdischer Friedhof Worms-4217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 11:25, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jüdischer Friedhof Worms-4202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really nice. - A.Savin 12:14, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jüdischer Friedhof Worms-4188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jüdischer Friedhof Worms-4227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:38, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirschau-DSC 1800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition --Haneburger 10:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehenfeld-3024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but I don't like the composition: It needs a crop. I would crop out the right zone, and perhaps the lower zone.--Lmbuga 02:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC) I reckon you are right, thank you --DKrieger 15:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC) Better, thanks--Lmbuga 17:46, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wülfershausen-3155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:50, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Partschins-Naturns-7425-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Öhningen-Wangen 188-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 16:31, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeppelin NT-4871-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shadow in foreground a bit disturbing, but main subject OK, so QI to me.--Jebulon 23:40, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wülfershausen-3161.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Your contributions are appreciated. INeverCry 20:39, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

• PS. I've also made you Autopatrolled. INeverCry 20:40, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank you very much!! --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 21:18, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birnau-Seefelden-4922.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 18:17, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meersburg-153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --Iifar 17:41, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birnau-Seefelden-4955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, very good composition IMO.--Jebulon 13:49, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frenkenbach und Hagnau 017-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:35, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baitenhausen-5094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immenstaad-5033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tilt or perspective distortion on the right side. --Iifar 18:24, 16 September 2012 (UTC) New version, would be grateful for comments. Thank you so far! --DKrieger 20:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC)  Support Fine with me now. --Iifar 14:23, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immenstaad-5085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think the house is a bit green, but ok. --Mattbuck 10:19, 22 September 2012 (UTC)  Done Now as you mention ist ... you were right, fixed it, thank you. --DKrieger 11:53, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

wer

File:Ingenheim-4080.jpg

Hi, Dietrich ! -- Just a few words about your file. In my opinion, the simplest scope is : "Symbols on Jewish gravestones ". As you say in the "reasons", it's the only picture with such a symbol on Wikipedia, so it's the only one in the category too. You don't have to bother with the exact place : it's in the file description. -- Another suggestion : edit your file and, instead of "Category:Symbols on Jewish gravestones" note : "Category:Symbols on Jewish gravestones|Symbols on Jewish gravestones", to prevent the word "Category" from appearing in the scope name. I hope I've been of some help (I've been helped in such a way this afternoon about a similar problem of scope). -- Sorry for my English. Best regards. JLPC (talk) 16:18, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Well,I wanted to help you but things are no so simple, especially with "Valued images" ! When I wrote the upper lines, I didn't notice that your file wasn't in the category "Symbols on Jewish gravestones"... so I added the category to your file. But while I was adding it and writing a few words of explanation, Pere prlpz wrote on the VI page. His remarks are not unnecessary but I think he considers that a VI is only the best in the scope. However, it can also be the only one... Anyway, I'm very sorry for all these discussions around a good picture and, after all, Pere's suggestion can be considered. So would you be so kind as to change (one more time !) the scope to :"Tables of the Law on Jewish gravestones". After this new change, everything will be all right, I suppose, and I hope I can promote your photo... at last - as I intended to do this afternoon ! -- Lots of apologizes and best regards. JLPC (talk) 17:37, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi JLPC, you don't have to apologize! I have noticed, that this stuff is rather complicated. Thank you again! --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 17:57, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. I agree that the VI stuff is complicated, and people with different opinions make it even more complicated. It makes it more interesting, too.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: St. Proculus church Naturns, Italy.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
St. Proculus church Naturns, Italy.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:30, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Jewish cemetery Heiliger Sand in Worms.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Jewish cemetery Heiliger Sand in Worms.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:31, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingenheim-4080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 09:34, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tables of the Law on Jewish gravestones.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I think the scope should be reworded. Now, it's more an image description than an scope. If you mean in this scope jewish gravestones with this particular symbol, anywhere in the world, then the place of the gravestone shouldn't be included in scope.--Pere prlpz (talk) 23:44, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

 Comment Thank you, I am very grateful for such comments. --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 09:58, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment In my opinion, "Symbols on Jewish gravestones" is a very broad scope, and it would be better represented by a set of images or a single image of a common symbol, not a rare one. Tables of the Law on Jewish gravestones seems a better scope for this tomb, although I'd like to read the opinion of somebody more experienced in valued image nominations about whether notability of an scope on a rare thing needs any kind of references of notability. Furthermore, I think the image file:Ingenheim-4081.jpg (closer approach to the same tomb) would be better for this scope.--Pere prlpz (talk) 16:53, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment Thank you Pere prlpz and JPLC for your advice. I changed the scope back to the first version (without the location), because I think there are too much different symbols to nominate a good set. On the other hand, all of these symbols have a certain meaning, so that one typical symbol would not be enough. IMO it would bee a good idea, to look for a VIC for the most important symbols. If I am wrong, please let me know --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 17:55, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Category:Symbols on Jewish gravestones Jewish gravestone (matzevah) with the rare symbol of the Tables of Law, jewish cemetery Ingenheim, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany to Tables of the Law on Jewish gravestones --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 17:55, 27 September 2012 (UTC) {{{3}}}

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

 Support : all criteria met, imo. --JLPC (talk) 18:50, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:08, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jüdischer Friedhof Worms-4270.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:04, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mennwangen 039-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 05:29, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quitten-5483-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition : QI. --JLPC 22:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenhausen-5514.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:17, 7 October 2012 (UTC)  Comment The tree and two of the tombstones (mazewa) are tilted by 1.5° cw; are you sure it is not the picture that is tilted? --Aisano 14:55, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenhausen-5545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 17:52, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenhausen-5578.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 10:22, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsingen-6353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --JLPC 22:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch, Du hast gewonnen!

Du bist Gewinner im Fotowettbewerb
Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Liebe_r DKrieger,

Herzlichen Glückwunsch! Dein Bild ist eines der besten hundert Fotos von Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 Deutschland!

Wir freuen uns Dir mitzuteilen, dass eines Deiner Bilder am 20. Oktober 2012 auf der WLM-Jury-Sitzung in Nürnberg als Preisträger ausgewählt wurde. Wir sind begeistert über die Qualität, die Vielfalt und die Schönheit der zahlreichen eingesendeten Fotos – vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag!

Anlässlich der Preisverleihung und der Abschlussveranstaltung des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs für Deutschland lädt Dich die WMDE herzlich zur Europäischen Denkmal-Messe am 22. November 2012 in Leipzig ein (Weitere Informationen findest Du hier). Wir würden uns freuen, Dich dort begrüßen zu können und Dir Deinen Preis persönlich zu überreichen. Für einen Reisekostenzuschuss und weitere Informationen kannst du dich (bitte möglichst bald) bei community@wikimedia.de melden.

Im Namen der WLM-Deutschland-Jury --Atamari (talk) 21:04, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear DKrieger, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 02:24, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebern-6068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grabfeld-045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I really like this shot, QI for me -- Achim Raschka 14:26, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsingen-6350-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me. Mattbuck 14:58, 26 October 2012 (UTC) Agree Poco a poco 16:46, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

NSU 251 OSL

Hallo DKrieger, ich habe den Hintergrund „meiner“ NSU 251 OSL ein bisschen begradigt. Schaust Du Dir das Bild bei den Commons-Kandidaten bitte noch einmal an? Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:27, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leiblach-8573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:49, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20110423-Wilhelmsdorf-DSC 5130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 11:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jüdischer Friedhof Worms-4277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, some small blown out parts but nothing disturbing. Basvb 23:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirschau-6930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirschau-7024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:35, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herdwangen-5394 pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK I guess. --Mattbuck 03:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirschau-6759.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:51, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blitzenreute-7232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:00, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for kind words! --Ivar (talk) 06:50, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blitzenreute-7222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very cute. --Florstein 21:07, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirschau-7039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Although this file would have deserved a better title, it is definately a QI. Nice image! --High Contrast 17:58, 12 November 2012 (UTC)  DoneThank you, I tried to translate the description --DKrieger 20:08, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gehrenberg 7258.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:45, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligenberg-0959.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Below minimum size requirement(2 mp) --Rjcastillo 20:50, 14 November 2012 (UTC) Oops, sorry, that was the version for my calendar, now it is the original image --DKrieger 20:59, 14 November 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --King of Hearts 22:26, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birnau-Seefelden-4918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition and good DoF. --NorbertNagel 19:30, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bildstock Nordheim-Heufurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support : very Good. --JLPC 18:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gehrenberg 7252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:12, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argental-7337-Bearbeitet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argental-7354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--JLPC 18:44, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Nikolauskapelle Untermooweiler-7430.jpg

I think you forgot to sign on the QI page, yesterday evening, under "File:Nikolauskapelle Untermooweiler-7430.jpg". -- Best regards. JLPC (talk) 14:46, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikolauskapelle Untermooweiler-7430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 19:16, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Achberg-Wangen-7417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 19:47, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frenkenbach-7567.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:05, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzweiher-7523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Ajepbah 21:10, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buttenhausen-5691.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:08, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstaufen-7933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Odd crop but good quality. --Selbymay 08:38, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstaufen-7940.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Moving (is "rührend" the right word ?) and QI for me. --JLPC 18:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argental-7365.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:12, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Konstanz 080.jpg

I was worried, yesterday evening, to open the QI page too late : Selbymay had already voted for your beautiful, and technically perfect, photo of the statue ! I didn't know who Imperia was : I've learnt a bit more on Wikipedia, despite my age ! ... And I've noticed one of my favourite writers, Honoré de Balzac, had written a short story about her : one more thing to learn ! -- But I just want to tell you your photo is really the best in the category "Imperia, Konstanz" : in my opinion it could be a Valued Image if you want to. -- Best regards from the rainy depths of the French countryside. JLPC (talk) 21:30, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your friendly comment! I really like that picture, I took it, passing by, as our ferry arrived in Konstanz. And a former girlfriend from France also liked H.d.B. very much, it seems to be for me the time to catch up .... VI: Thank you for the suggestion, I will have a try. Kind regards from Lake Constance --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 19:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gehrenberg-7617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and useful too.--Jebulon 10:53, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hofanlage Milz Retterschen 027.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:06, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstanz 080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good light and quality. --Selbymay 17:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Ittendorf-7760.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hofanlage Milz Retterschen 023.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI - good quality --Isiwal 21:25, 15 December 2012 (UTC)