User talk:Church of emacs

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

New message

Please sign your posts with --~~~~. Thanks!

deprecated function in your monobook.js[edit]

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 650709f119a10444442b01acb7776a4d[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Image:Free-Software-Song-Notes.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Free-Software-Song-Notes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

83.194.95.239 00:07, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Church of emacs!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:44, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File tagging File:DefectiveByDesign logo.png[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:DefectiveByDesign logo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:DefectiveByDesign logo.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stifle (talk) 10:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I emailed the DBD campaign team --Church of emacs (talk) 11:36, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding questions about File:Volcanic_ash_cloud_bergen_norway.jpg[edit]

I have answered your questions for my uploaded file on my talk page. --stiaand 19:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC +2)

File mover[edit]

The functionality of the template {{Rename}} has recently changed. You might need to clear your cache to see the changes. If successful you should then be able to use the new "Quick adding" link in the template to instruct CommonsDelinker to replace the old name with the new name in all wikis. Please use that every time you rename a file. If further questions arise, feel free to write on my talk page --DieBuche (talk) 10:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manifiestocoruña.jpg[edit]

Why was this file deleted? I took the photograph by myself and it was written in the permissions.--Dagane (talk) 22:39, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. See this page for a discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Manifiestocoruña.jpg. Basically, my point is that the text is copyrighted, and if you take a picture and upload it on Wikipedia, the original copyright of the text is still intact and has to be respected. See Commons:Copyright. You may want to contact User talk:Jameslwoodward. Regards, --Church of emacs (talk) 09:07, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agelou11.jpg[edit]

Unfortunately what you removed wasn't a "watermark", but a historically- and bibliographically-important series mark, which was on the postcard as originally printed. AnonMoos (talk) 15:58, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you are absolutely right. I don't know why I removed the mark back then. Thanks for letting me know and regards, --Church of emacs (talk) 21:38, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MediaWiki-Purging-URL.png[edit]

Hi Church of emacs. Ist dieses Deutsch-Englisch-Gemisch beabsichtigt? --Leyo 15:37, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ähm, ehrlich gesagt nicht. Keine Ahnung, was da passiert ist ;-) --Tobias (talk) 22:49, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Magst du eine rein englische Version drüberladen? --Leyo 23:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Tobias (talk) 14:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Danke! --Leyo 14:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-05-16 Kai Schmidt-Eisenlohr 8946.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perfect. Also I like your username ! --D4m1en 12:52, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-07-14 Bergrettung Bodenschneid 1054.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Considering the composition, the bag is disturbing, but nevertheless, I like your argument. There are some issues but taking into consideration how difficult this kind of dynamic pictures are to shot, I'll promote it. --Sputniktilt 13:55, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bausteine beim Festivalsommer[edit]

Hi, lässt Du bei Deinen Festivalbildern absichtlich die Bausteine Persönlichkeitsrechtsbaustein und OTRS-Ticket aus {{Festivalsommer 2013}} weg? Wenn ja, weswegen? Grüße, --Emha (talk) 07:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Emha! Ja, ich lasse beide Bausteine weg.
  1. Zum OTRS: Ich wüsste nicht, warum wir ein Ticket bräuchten. Es ist ja aus der Vorlage ersichtlich, dass es sich um ein Foto des Festivalsommer-Projektes handelt und somit aus dem Kontext ablesbar, dass eine Erlaubnis zum Fotografieren besteht. Ich habe außerdem immer gedacht, dass im gegenteiligen Fall ohnehin nur der Fotograf dran wäre (der als solcher die Festivalordnung gebrochen hat), nicht Commons. Bin aber kein Jurist und falls das nicht so ist, bitte ich um Aufklärung :)
    Darüber legt der OTRS-Baustein eher nahe, dass ein Externer die Rechte an dem Bilder hält, was ja nicht der Fall ist. Ich finde den Baustein daher eher unpassend.
  2. Zum Persönlichkeitsrechtsbaustein: Auf allen Festival-Bildern, die ich bislang hochgeladen habe (es kommen ja noch welche), waren Personen der Zeitgeschichte zu sehen, die willentlich (wenigstens konkludent) einer Abbildung zugestimmt haben. Mein Verständnis von dem Baustein ist, dass er bei Bildern einzusetzen ist, die keine Person der Zeitgeschichte sind oder bei denen die Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung fraglich ist. Also beispielsweise Festivalbesucher.
Im Sinne der Übersichtlichkeit habe ich die Bausteine bei den bisherigen Bildern daher weggelassen. Viele Grüße, --Tobias (talk) 16:34, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, zu 1) Nicht jede/r darf auf Festivals (vor allem nicht mit Kameras wie unseren) fotografieren, sondern nur nach Akkreditierung. Diese auch für Außenstehende auf Nachfragen hin zu dokumentieren, dient der OTRS-Baustein. In dem Ticket sind alle Zulassungen gesammelt und ich finde das schon sinnvoll.
Zu 2) Ich würde Dir zustimmen, aber hier habe ich mich nach dem Text auf der Doku des Bausteins gerichtet, der besagt "Per default wird der Baustein eingebunden, weil ja in aller Regel mehr oder weniger "öffentliche" Personen abgebildet sind." Wollen wir deswegen auf der Projektdiskussion nochmal nachfragen? Diskussion dazu gab es hier (2012) und dort (2013). Viele Grüße, --Emha (talk) 10:40, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Emha, ist das hier ggf. ein Kompromiss? File:2013-08-25 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Wayne Wonder 6036.JPG. Siehe den klein gedruckten Text unter dem Festivalsommer-Baustein. --Tobias (talk) 12:56, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, das ist ein Kompromiss. Die meisten Deiner Festivalbilder haben jedoch diese Kennzeichnung (noch) nicht, weil sie vorher hochgeladen wurden, gelle? Gratulation übrigens zu Deinen beiden QI-Auszeichnungen untendrunter. Ich hatte bisher weniger gnädige "Richter". Beste Grüße, --Emha (talk) 21:06, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Max Herre & Afrob 4613.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK given the circumstances. --Mattbuck 19:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-23 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - T.O.K. et al. 4054.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Appears to be on its side but ok. --Mattbuck 19:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Pentateuch 5438.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice picture. Pymouss 18:51, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-25 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Richie Spice 5629.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI - Very good. -- Spurzem 15:31, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-25 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Wayne Wonder 6041.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 15:31, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-25 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Protoje 6721.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 15:37, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Pentateuch 5423.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality given the circumstances. --Jastrow 11:21, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - I-Jahman Levi 6285-cropped.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality given the circumstances. --Jastrow 11:21, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dein Autorenhinweis[edit]

Deutsch: Die Autorennennung bitte wie folgt: "Wikipedia / Tobias Klenze" (Link auf Benutzerseite ist optional). Die Lizenz muss ebenfalls genannt und verlinkt werden. Falls dieses Bild zum Beispiel unter der Lizenz CC-BY-SA 3.0 steht, lautet der Hinweis: Bild: Wikipedia / Tobias Klenze / CC-BY-SA 3.0 - Das mit dem Verlinken geht bei Printnachnutzung schwierig :-), außerdem erlauben die CC-Lizenzen ausdrücklich die Angabe der URL der Lizenz in Textform oder aber die Beigabe der Lizenz ohne Link (die URL ist im Lizenztext erstaunlicher Weise nicht enthalten). Das solltest du mal anpassen. sугсго 10:46, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Beginner 5151.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:52, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

30C3[edit]

Congratulation for the portraits of the 30C3 speakers -- especially the much-needed one of Sarah Harrison! Keep up the good work and happy new year! Rama (talk) 11:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! It's good and motivating to get positive feedback :-). Happy new year, --Tobias (talk) 22:55, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-10-04 Lake Koman, Albania - Landing place at Koman 0933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-10-03 Fierza Hydroelectric Power Station, Albania 0632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --P e z i 18:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-10-03 SH5, Albania 0465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very difficult, the version is better but sharpness overall is just just ok --Poco a poco 19:15, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Church of emacs,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die schönen Bilder. Da ich zum ersten Mal Ende August 1982 ins Valbona-Tal kam und mit Det aus RRogami nach Theti gewandert bin, bilde ich mir ein, der erste Individualtourist dort gewesen zu sein. Später erst habe ich verstanden, warum ich praktisch von Hand zu Hand gereicht worden bin. Damit stand ich immer unter dem Schutz der Gastfreundschaft (siehe Canun i Leg Ducagjini). Das Touristenhotel war damals noch intakt, aber von Leuten bewohnt, die mich besser nicht sehen sollten. 1994 war ich noch zweimal dort und habe meinen Führer zu Hause besucht. Tschüss Dieter Schaefer

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-23 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Junior Kelly 3686.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Beginner 5133.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Ska-P 4903.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Hallo Tobias, das 400er ist schon recht nett...[edit]

ISO 5000
ISO 12800

was mir aufgefallen ist, dass auch bei ISO 1600 das Bildrauschen in Grenzen blieb. Hast du das mit einer Luminanzregelung reduziert? ich hab nämlich selbst eine 6D, ich trau mich fast nie, höher als 800 zu gehen. Eben weil das Rauschen so stark ansteigt. BTW: Hast du mit Raw oder Jpg fotografiert? Aber insgesamt: ein tolles Ergebnis! Muss auch mal damit auf den Fußballplatz gehen! Hast du auch was mit dem 2.0 Konverter gemacht oder hat dir 400mm gereicht?

Und letzte Frage: ab wann ist das Ding wieder in Wien oder brauchst du es noch für ein paar andere Sachen? Gruß aus Wien --Hubertl (talk) 12:25, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hubertl. Eine Luminanzregelung o.ä. hab ich nicht angefasst – ich habe einfach die Defaults der Kamera verwendet (normale Rauschunterdrückung). Damit bekommt man bis ISO 3200 kaum Rauschen, bis ISO 6400 ist es noch akzeptabel und über ISO 10.000 werden die Bilder selten brauchbar (außer auf kleinen Vorschaubildern). Generell finde ich bei der 6D phänomenal nicht nur wie wenig Rauschen es gibt, sondern auch wie gut die Farben erhalten bleiben, wenn man mit dem ISO nach oben geht. Bei meiner 550D wurden die Farben sehr flau bei höherer Sensorempfindlichkeit. Die Bilder oben sind übrigens mit der 6D, ohne Nachbearbeitung direkt als JPG aus der Kamera gekommen (z.T. leicht gecroppt).
Wenn über ISO 800 keine guten Bilder bekommst, dann ist irgendetwas falsch. Hast du eventuell die Rauschunterdrückung abgestellt?
Das Objektiv hat UPS vor 10 Sekunden abgeholt ;) --Tobias (talk) 14:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2013-11-23 WikiCon 2013 1369.JPG[edit]

File:2013-11-23 WikiCon 2013 1369.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

StagiaireMGIMO (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2013-11-23 WikiCon 2013 1371.JPG[edit]

File:2013-11-23 WikiCon 2013 1371.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

StagiaireMGIMO (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos für Jahreskalender 2015[edit]

Wir würden uns freuen, wenn du bis 15. November auf der Planungsseite geeignete von dir gemachte Fotos für den gedruckten Jahreskalender 2015 von Wikimedia Österreich vorschlägst. Liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 18:55, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hab ich gemacht! Grüße aus Kanada, --Tobias (talk) 23:31, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-05-30 Austria - Iceland football match, Viðar Kjartansson 0372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-07-29 Padjelantaleden, Sweden 5686.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-07-26 Padjelantaleden, Sweden 5163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. But you should check your file description. --XRay 12:26, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

400mm[edit]

lb. CoE, du hast ja im Sept/Oktober mal das 400er aus unserem Pool verwendet. In der Nachschau des Ergebnisses nicht nur von dir sondern auch der Ergebnisse anderer Leute, die dieses Objektiv verwendet haben (inkl. meiner eigenen Erfahrungen damit) stelle ich fest, dass man nicht ganz zufrieden sein kann. Die Bilder sind teilweise im Ergebnis wächsern, auf wirklich großen Entfernungen scheint sich der Stabilisator eher negativ auszuwirken, auch gibt es bei Crop-Kameras chromatische Abbereviationen (was aber auf dich nicht zutrifft - 6D). Diese Probleme scheinen durchgehend zu sein. Unabhängig von der doch vorhandenen guten Qualität. Ähnliche Probleme interessanterweise auch mit dem 70-200er aus unserer Geschäftstelle. Natürlich weiß ich um die unterschiedlichen Verwendungen, je nachdem welche Kamera auf die Linse draufgeschraubt war.

In deinem Fall sind die Ergebnisse der Sportaufnahmen durchaus akzeptabel (sorry, mir gehts jetzt hier um das Ausloten des Machbaren), insgesamt sind ja deine Bilder sehr gut geworden, wenn auch in einigen Situationen durchwachsen. Ich bewundere deinen Einsatz, die Linse wirklich überall raufgeschleppt zu haben...

Wir versuchen gerade, das Problem zu klären und hätten gerne eine wirklich sehr kritische Meinung zu den Ergebnissen von Dir. Ich möchte damit keineswegs jetzt deine Ergebnisse kritisieren, es geht mir darum, herauszufinden, welche Probleme es gibt, wie wir sie lösen können (speziell jetzt in so kritischen Einsätzen wie Sportfotografie). Das Ziel ist, dass wir eine Handlungsanweisung zustandebringen, welche wir denen zur Verfügung stellen wollen, welche sich das Equipment ausborgen. Es muss ja nicht jeder dieselbe Erfahrung machen, noch dazu da keiner der Fotografen etwas davon hat, wenn man diese Erfahrung nicht weitergibt.

Auch wollen wir Anfang nächsten Jahres einmal ein paar Tests unter ähnlichen, wenn nicht gleichen Bedingungen mit unterschiedlichem Gerät machen. Ich habe nämlich zumindest das 400er im Verdacht, dass es längst kalibriert werden sollte. Vielleicht bringt das dann eine Verbesserung.

Ich habe in letzter Zeit eine lange Reihe von Bildern analysiert und festgestellt, dass zB das 300er-Nikon-Objektiv von uns bessere Ergebnisse erzielt. Natürlich sind die Umstände nicht vergleichbar, umso wichtiger ist es, dass man diese - wie eben durch deine Kritik - aber vergleichbar und vermittelbar macht. --Hubertl (talk) 12:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hubertl. Ich habe andere Erfahrungen mit dem Objektiv gemacht, m.E. ist es das mit Abstand schärfste Objektiv dass ich bisher verwenden durfte... mit einer solchen Qualität, dass eher der 20-Megapixel-Sensor der 6D der begrenzende Faktor sein dürfte. Warum meine Sport-Bilder trotzdem nicht so dolle sind? Nunja, viele sind sehr, sehr stark gecroppt. Teilweise auf ein Zehntel der Bildfläche. Da macht sich dann schon das Rauschen bemerkbar (ISO 800) oder die nicht ganz exakte Fokussierung (was aber eher an der 6D und meinen Fähigkeiten liegen dürfte als am Objektiv).
Schau mal diese Bilder an, findest du die unscharf? Z.B. File:2014-06-06 Tierpark Hellabrunn 1446.jpg.
Zu chromatischen Aberration kann ich nichts sagen, die werden von meiner 6D automatisch korrigiert. LG aus Kanada, --Tobias (talk) 18:51, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Foto der Parabel in der TU München Garching[edit]

Hallo Church of emacs, Könnten Sie bitte das schöne Foto der Parabel in der TU München Garching exakt beschriften: Brunner / Ritz, Parabel oder so ähnlich wie hier: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunst_am_Bau#mediaviewer/File:050322-tumuenchen-parabeln.jpg

Danke für Mühe und Arbeit! Grüße! R.Ritz --46.244.128.125 20:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis. Ich nehme an, gemeint ist die Einbindung in den Wikipedia-Artikel "TU München"? Den habe ich geändert. --Tobias (talk) 00:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hans-Ulrich Rülke[edit]

  • Rülke/Haußmann
    Rülke/Haußmann
  • Rülke/Haußmann
    Rülke/Haußmann
  • Jochen Haußmann
    Jochen Haußmann

Hi Tobias! Ich glaube, das hier ist nicht Rülke. Ich weiß aber leider auch nicht, wer das sonst ist. :-( Grüße, ireas (talk) 21:52, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Über das Sitzungsprotokoll bin ich auf Jochen Haußmann gestoßen, der scheint zu passen. ireas (talk) 01:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für den Hinweis! Hab den Fehler korrigiert :) --Tobias (talk) 00:12, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


File:2010-04-13-hoecker-by-RalfR-01-cropped.jpg[edit]

File:2010-04-13-hoecker-by-RalfR-01-cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-- M\A 15:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015-06-10 Pronghorn in Yellowstone National Park, USA 7862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Ermell 20:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015-06-21 Bugaboos 8835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015-08-14 Tatshenshini-Alsek Park 1368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nutzungserlaubnis Foto[edit]

Hallo Tobias,

ich arbeite für das "Museum Mensch und Natur" in München und habe eine kurze Frage bezüglich eines deiner wikipedia-Bilder: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MI-Geb%C3%A4ude_der_TU_M%C3%BCnchen_Magistrale1.JPG

Das "Museum Mensch und Natur" ist Teil der Staatlichen Naturwissenschaftlichen Sammlungen Bayerns. Das Museum wird in den kommenden Jahren erweitert und wir arbeiten derzeit an einer Broschüre, die über den Umbau und das neue Konzept des Museums informieren soll. Die Broschüre wird nicht verkauft, sondern nur an mögliche Projektpartner und -unterstützer weitergegeben, sowie in PDF-Format auf der Website des Museums verfügbar sein.

Das oben erwähnte Bild wäre zur inhaltlichen Illustration des Projektes sehr gut geeignet und wir möchten hiermit gerne anfragen, ob wir das Bild in der Broschüre verwenden könnten? Natürlich würden wir das Foto mit einem entsprechendem Bildnachweis versehen.

Weitere Informationen zum Projekt gibt es unter www.namu-bayern.de. Ich würde mich freuen, dazu von dir zu hören! Meine Emailadresse ist: info@namu-bayern.de

Danke und viele Grüße, Verena Braun — Preceding unsigned comment added by Verena Braun (talk • contribs) 21:54, 03 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WLE Nepal 2016 Notice[edit]

Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Nepal Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Nepal


Hi Church of emacs, Thank you for participating to Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Nepal competition during 1 May to 15 June, 2016 and for sharing your great and valuable images with the whole world. We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. You are qualified to receive (a) postcard(s). please use this new survey to submit your mailing address. we will contact you for the further information. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 2,274 pictures of Natural heritage objects from Nepal.

Kind regards,
The Wiki Loves Earth Team

WLE Invitation[edit]

Wiki Loves Earth 2017 in Nepal Wiki Loves Earth 2017 in Nepal


Hi Church of emacs, We would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Loves Earth 2017 in Nepal competition during 1 May to 31 May, 2017 and share your great and valuable images with the whole world. We would like to ask a few minutes of your time before you start upload your valuable images from 1 May, 2017. Please use this new survey to submit your mailing address.

Kind regards,
The Wiki Loves Earth Team

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:21, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal — Invitation[edit]

Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal


Hi Church of emacs, We would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal competition during 1 May to 31 May, 2018 and share your great and valuable images with the whole world. We would like to ask a few minutes of your time before you start upload your valuable images from 1 May, 2018. Please use this new survey to submit your mailing address.

Kind regards,
The Wiki Loves Earth Team

Nachholtermin 17. Fotoworkshop[edit]

Im Gedenken an Gnu

Moin von der Küste,
es ist schon so viele Jahre her, dass wir uns in Nürnberg getroffen haben, wir (Ailura und ich) planten deshalb einen Fotoworkshop im Frühjahr 2019. Als wir erfuhren, dass Sebastian ebenfalls in Frühjahr ein BarCamp plant, entschlossen wir uns, zusammen zu arbeiten. Wir gliedern uns organisatorisch an diesem BarCamp an, sprich sind im gleichen Hotel, essen gemeinsam und nutzen ein Raum des Camps für unsere Fotovorträge, ähnlich wie auf der WikiCon 2011 in Nürnberg.
Wie Ihr vielleicht mitbekommen habt, ist Gnu zu seiner letzten Wanderung aufgebrochen, daher möchten auch wir seiner Gedenken.
Die weiteren Tage wollen wir gemeinsam ein Programm aus Fototouren und Vorträgen zusammenstellen, es ist noch viel Luft für Eure Ideen und Vorträge. Den geplanten ausführlichen LR Workshop wird zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt im Frühsommer ( WMDE gibt den Ort vor) stattfinden, da dieser sehr weit in die Tiefe gehen soll. Ich würde mich freuen, Euch in Nürnberg begrüßen zu können, wundere Dich nicht über meine Nachricht auch wenn Du lange nichts mehr editiert hast, ich habe Deinen Namen aus den letzten FWS kopiert. ;)

Tschüß
Euer
-- Ra Boe watt?? 12:39, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

विकी लभ्स अर्थ २०२० नेपाल खुल्ला छ![edit]

नमस्कार! हामी घोषणा गर्न पाउँदा खुसी छौं कि विकी लभ्स अर्थ २०२० नेपाल अहिलेसम्म पनि खुल्ला छ। तपाईंको सहभागिताले हामीलाई नेपालको प्रकृतिलाई अभिलेखिकरण गर्न र यसलाई विकिपिडिया तथा यसका अन्य परियोजनाहरू मार्फत विश्वलाई देखाउन मद्दत गर्दछ। नियमहरू पढ्नको लागि कृपया प्रतियोगिताको पृष्ठमा जानुहोस्: Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Nepal । त्यहाँ तपाइँले प्रतियोगितामा कसरी भाग लिने भनेर पनि थाहा पाउनु हुनेछ। यदि तपाईंसँग केहि प्रश्नहरू छन् भने कृपया हामीलाई सम्पर्क गर्नुहोस्: https://www.facebook.com/WLENepal

धन्यवाद,
विकी लभ्स अर्थ २०२० नेपाल आयोजक समिती 14:52, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

File:IPFire Logo.png[edit]

File:IPFire Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

181.203.37.151 00:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Political chart DE.svg[edit]

File:Political chart DE.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Alhadis (talk) 21:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Church_of_emacs&oldid=806386506"