User talk:Chu Tse-tien

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Chu Tse-tien!

Licensing[edit]

Hi, I noticed you have chosen cc-zero license for the file File:阮曉寰煽動顛覆國家政權案上海公安局楊浦分局滬公(楊)捕通字〔2021〕20210617號逮捕通知書.jpg, as the author of this document didn't publish it with this license, this may be a mistake.

For such documents of legislative, in UploadWizard, the step 2, you may choose "This file is not my own work", then choose "Another reason not mentioned above" and submit with {{PD-PRC-exempt}}, the correct licensing template. Thanks! Shinohara Chihiro (talk) 01:47, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thanks for telling me that. You’ve told me once about that, yet I still don’t know where to put it. I’m really a novice in dealing with these licensing things. Sorry about that ;) Chu Tse-tien (talk) 02:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which category to use?[edit]

You recently created Category:Court Adjudications of China, but there's already Category:Sentences (law) of China present. Which category do you consider better to represent them?

I don't think dividing your uploadings to 2 categories a good option. Shinohara Chihiro (talk) 01:36, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing this up, and sorry for the mess I (kind of) created. But I do reckon that the use of ‘adjudication’ is more proper than ‘sentence’. For that, ‘sentence’ in law (ref: Sentence (law)) exclusively denotes to the process of consideration of punishment for a convicted criminal. And yet ‘adjudication’ (ref: adjudication) means ‘reaching a judgement or decision’; it does not contain the implication that a ‘sentencing’ must be imposed. In fact, even in mainland China and even if we further narrow the range to political cases only, not all defendants received a sentence; some very lucky guys escaped from being sentenced but still received their judgements. Therefore, I would argue that ‘adjudication’ is a better choice. But not all legal documents fall under this type of category—I reckon that you do understand—documents like Indictments issued by the prosecution or Notices or Warrants issued by the investigation authority are not ‘adjudications’ of court and, therefore, shall have their own sub-categories under the upper category ‘legal documents of China’. In my opinion, ‘court adjudications’ can only contain judgements (判决书) or decisions (裁定书).
As always, I am profoundly grateful for your continued invaluable support and assistance. Thank you. Chu Tse-tien (talk) 02:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And… As for the two-category uploading (I have just realised what you mean), I was reckoning that creating one sub-category for the very case to be used as the commonscat in the header of the wikisource page, meanwhile keeping the files under the upper category for the convenience of browsing. But if this is not how things are done conventionally, then I’ll keep it in mind and not add two categories to the same file in the future. Thanks for telling me this. Chu Tse-tien (talk) 02:39, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not subcategories thing. I mean, for the convenience of readers, all your judgment documents should be under the same category, but some of them are in Sentences and some are in Adjudications. In the future, it is best to modify the category of each document and let them be grouped together. Shinohara Chihiro (talk) 04:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, that thing. But I have never put any file under the category of ‘Sentences (law) of China’; I was reckoning that it was you who kindly added these files to that category. In fact, before this time, I did not even know how to create a category; therefore, I had left all my past uploadings with no categories filled. Chu Tse-tien (talk) 04:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Larryasou (talk) 15:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]