User talk:Centenier/Archive 1

Replacements

Hi, You should upload over the old files. It would save a lot of work for admins. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:15, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Centenier (talk) 10:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2 Rgt. de chasseurs à cheval.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2 Rgt. de chasseurs à cheval.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

OK -- Centenier (talk) 13:44, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Centenier (talk) 10:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

File:KorporalStahlgrün.PNG

Have you seen [1]? Malarz pl (talk) 12:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

The name “Stahlgrün” is simply wrong! -- Centenier (talk) 12:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Centenier (talk) 10:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Your renaming requests

Hello Centenier, I really have no problem to work at your renaming requests, but in my opinion you are so active here, that you can get the filemover-rights here. You can try it, if you want to. Kind regards, --Brackenheim (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Centenier (talk) 10:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi Centenier, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Steinsplitter (talk) 13:29, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Centenier (talk) 10:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Deine Archivierung

Hallo Centenier, ich habe mir erlaubt, Dein Archivierungsziel zu ändern. Du möchstest mit dem Archiv doch sicherlich bei 1 anfangen und nicht mittendrin bei 7 ... Grüße --Brackenheim (talk) 12:49, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

jou, Mann latürnich, hicks.......Centenier (talk) 14:30, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Centenier (talk) 07:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

File:TrpÜbPlKdtr Elsenborn.jpg

Ich würde gerne die quelle einsehen, da ich die richtigkeit strak anzweifele. Besonders die verbindung mit der bundeswehr ;-). Ein derartiges verbandsabzeichen der bw gab/gibt es nicht. Allendhalben der VIII. preußischen armee.--217.255.132.239 13:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

hmmmm, also brustanhänger waren vor 1975 m.W. nicht offiziell??? Und ein ärmelabzeichen (Verbandabzeichen) derart gab es nicht???--217.255.132.239 17:36, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Brustanhänger waren “immer” nur geduldet - und nein, eine derartiges Ärmelabzeichen gab es mit Sicherheit nicht -- Centenier (talk) 08:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

m.W. wurden irgendwann in den 80zigern die brustabzeichen (interne verband(bataillon)sabzeichen) sowas wie offiziell. Jedenfalls hatte unser bataillon auch so eine "tafel" am stabsgebäude stehen......--217.255.137.196 09:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

um das truschbaummuseum in elsenborn ist es ziemlich ruhig geworden. (ging einher mit einem neuen lagerkommandanten). Ich werd da mal im sommer mit meinem choppern hinfahren und mir mal die vergangenheit "antun". Vielleicht kann ich auch ein paar bilder machen......--217.255.137.196 09:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

ich hab jetzt aus berufenem mund die lösung: Es ist das derzeit verwendete, aktuelle belgische abzeichen der belgischen truppenlagerkommandator elsenborn! Ich hab ein bild des brustanhängers soeben von einem ehemal. belg. soldaten bekommen und nun auf meinem PC. Der belg. berufssoldat zählt zu den letzten, die auf vogelsang langjährig gedient und 2005 dort auch "abgeschlossen" hatten. Name, Adresse liegt mir vor. Siehe auch auf dieser webseite http://www.mil.be/nl/eenheden/kamp-elsenborn oben,ganz rechts! --217.255.137.196 12:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Centenier (talk) 12:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Dienstgrade der Feuerwehr in Hessen

Hallo,

machst du noch den "Gehobener feuerwehrtechnischer Dienst", da du schon die Sterne in Vorbereitung hast??--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Centenier (talk) 12:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Image uhlan polonais

Merci beaucoup pour ton efficacité. Au plaisir, --Kozam (talk) 22:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Centenier (talk) 15:39, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

File:WSS OF5 Staf-Oberf-Infantry.jpg

Why you will delete the redirect? - It's in use [2] --2003:4D:2C59:1D77:7DDA:BA69:5592:ECDC 17:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Because the term OF 5 is simply wrong and never has been used in the German Army until 1945. Was a private adventure by user HHubi to outfit all Ranks back to the Romans with the NATO code! -- Centenier (talk) 12:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Centenier (talk) 15:39, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2e bataillon du 45e rég inf 1793.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2e bataillon du 45e rég inf 1793.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:31, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Centenier (talk) 15:39, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

File renamed: File:TMW - Gebirgshaubitze.jpg → File:TMW - 10 cm Panzerhaubitze M 99.jpg

This renaming is a nonsense, (Panzerhaubitze=Self-propelled howizer) please se museum caption in image and revert. Thanks --Demostene119 (talk) 08:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

The Name ist certainly not nonsense, because it's correct as the Austria-Hungarian Army called this gun, mounted in the cupolas of the Border Fortresses as «10 cm Panzerhaubitze M99» - but for to avoid mistakes I wil change it again -- Centenier (talk) 10:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Can you provide a reference for your claims? The caption of the museum states Gebirgshaubitze, where did you read otherwise? --Demostene119 (talk) 10:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

• certainly = “k.u.k. Befestigungsanlagen in Tirol und Kärnten” (E.A.Grestenberger) Vienna 2000 ISBN 3-7046-1558-7 Pages 161 & 162

10 cm Panzerhaubitze M99 F

10 cm Panzerhaubitze M99 B

10 cm Panzerhaubitze M5

10 cm Panzerhaubitze M6 F

--Centenier (talk) 10:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

As I can guess, your book talk about the fortress gun, (or is there a picture of the same gun portrayed?) there isn't any evidence that the gun portrayed is a fortress gun and not a mountain field gun. Moreover on the barrel you can see the mounting of the iron sight that is not present in the fortress mountings (as you can see here.--Demostene119 (talk) 11:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

For sure is not the fortress version, look at the trunnion, they are half size of the fortress version.--Demostene119 (talk) 12:46, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Okay - you have right so far, but it's named “10cm Feldhaubitze M99”, not mountain howitzer for evidence: --Centenier (talk) 13:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Centenier (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Question

Feldkirch - Brothers in arms

Hi. Why did you remove the word "Türkische" from the File:Batterie in Feuerstellung bei Kocina. (BildID 15539474).jpg? Was the original source wrong? --E4024 (talk) 08:41, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Indeed, are no Turks but Austria-Hungarians -- Centenier (talk) 08:43, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Yep. We know that Turks fought together with Austrians in "Galizien"; are there pictures of this here in Commons? --E4024 (talk) 08:53, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes - take a look onto Category:Kriegspressequartier Alben 1914-1918 (Türkische Truppen) (categorizing is still in progress) -- Centenier (talk) 08:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Centenier (talk) 09:14, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Wiedererichtet Brücke über den Tagliamento in Ariis 2.11.17. (BildID 15610554).jpg

I noticed some difficulties in renaming this file. Correct spelling would be File:Wiedererrichtete Brücke über den Tagliamento in Ariis 2.11.17. (BildID 15610554).jpg. That would work but it would't match fully. Wiedererrichtet = built up again. However, the image shows a bridge that looks like a temporary makeshift construction, so Behelfsbrücke (without Wiedererrichtet) would fit better in my opinion. Best, --Achim (talk) 19:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

d'accord, mon cher -- Centenier (talk) 06:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Centenier (talk) 09:15, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:Commanding Officers of the Austria-Hungarian Army

Category:Commanding Officers of the Austria-Hungarian Army is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD G8 (page dependent on deleted or non-existent content) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

R'n'B (talk) 13:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Centenier (talk) 07:30, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:FschJgBtl 262 (B).png

Copyright status: File:FschJgBtl 262 (B).png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:FschJgBtl 262 (B).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:33, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Centenier (talk) 07:50, 17 October 2019 (UTC)