User talk:Centenier

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days.

Image without license[edit]

File:Croix de guerre 5 p + 1.png[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dateien auf Wikipedia[edit]

Guten Tag Centenier, ich hätte ein kleines Anliegen bezüglich der Dateien von Benutzer:Meent, sind diese noch von Nutzen? Diese sollen nämlich (auf DeWP) gelöscht werden, da keine Quelle und kein Author angegeben. Da du dich wohl hier mehr als gut auszukennen scheinst wollte ich dir die Entscheidung, ob diese nach Commons können, überlassen. MfG -- User: Perhelion 18:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

von mir aus - sind alle in bessere Qualität hier: Category:Badges of the German Armed Forces (Bundeswehr) vorhanden! -- Centenier (talk) 08:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh* ich habe gesucht und meist nichts gefunden. Also 8 Dateien werden noch genutzt im Artikel w:de:Panzergrenadierbrigade 31 Ich habe schon die Hälfte der Dateien abgearbeitet, dies ist der Rest (11). Vlt. kannst du mir behilflich sein (entweder hierher verschieben oder die redundante Datei in DeWP angeben). MfG -- User: Perhelion 09:54, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
erledigt, ersetzt -- Centenier (talk) 15:31, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Danke sehr! 👍 (auch wenn ich persönlich die Zeichnungen nicht schlechter gefunden habe, die Löschung liegt an... ) Einen schönen Sonntag -- User: Perhelion 21:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:4e cav 4e esc 1794 revers.png[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 07:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


File:4e cav 4 esc 1794 avers.png[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 07:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


File:4e cav 3 esc 1794 revers.png[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 07:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion[edit]

Hi, if you request deletion of your own uploads and the file was uploaded more than 7 days ago, please always use a regular DR. Jcb (talk) 16:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wish[edit]

Hello. Add info more for [1]. Thanks you. 125.214.48.90 08:28, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Who is that? --Centenier (talk) 08:30, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Maureen Wroblewitz.125.214.48.90 08:31, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have nothing to do with -- Centenier (talk) 08:32, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You can add categories.125.214.48.90 08:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Because I don't know who that is in reality, I dont know nothing about a category that is needed -- Centenier (talk) 08:37, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Centenier. Nach dieser Diskussion soll der Inhalt aus Category:Badges of the German Armed Forces (Bundeswehr) in die verschiedenen Kategorien für Category:Coats of arms of the Bundeswehr verschoben werden. Ich habe da schon einiges erledigt, aber Hilfe ist immer willkommen. Hättest du Zeit und Interesse, mitzuhelfen? Die meisten Dateien sind sowieso schon in einer "Coats of arms ..." Kategorie einsortiert und müssen nur aus den Badges entfernt werden. De728631 (talk) 20:19, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Badges und Coats of arms ist nicht dasselbe! -- Centenier (talk) 08:31, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Die Badges zeigen immerhin das Wappen der jeweiligen Einheit, und der Konsens war nun mal, dass eine Extrakategorie für die Brustabzeichen nicht gewünscht ist. De728631 (talk) 20:36, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Trotzdem vielen Dank für deine Mithilfe. Das Umsortieren ist jetzt erledigt. De728631 (talk) 21:58, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Frage an dich als Kenner[edit]

Kannst du dir erklären, warum der Mann im Hintergrund seine Epauletten so seltsam trägt? --Prüm (talk) 12:03, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

sicherlich ein Spaß - nach dem was da auf dem Tisch steht sind die Herren «bei Laune» - um es mal so auszudrücken --Centenier (talk) 12:07, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, très bien! --Prüm (talk) 12:12, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:FeSpKp 100 (B).png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 16:26, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Genehmigung ist
Public domain
This file depicts the coat of arms of a German Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts (corporation governed by public law). According to § 5 Abs. 1 of the German Copyright law, official works like coats of arms are in the public domain. Note: The usage of coats of arms is governed by legal restrictions, independent of the copyright status of the depiction shown here.
Wappen Deutschlands
Wappen Deutschlands

und

Public domain I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide.
In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so:
I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

-- Centenier (talk) 06:40, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Werk Verle[edit]

Hallo Centenier, auf der Seite "Werk Verle" befindet sich eine Zeichnung, die die italienischen Forts Monte Verena bzw. Campolongo aus der Sicht des Werkes darstellt. Leider sind die Bezeichnungen der beiden Täler dort vertauscht. Das Val d'Astico befindet sich in Blickrichtumg rechts, das Val d'Assa links. Weiterhin gibt die Zeichnung die tatsächlichen Verhältnisse nur ziemlich schematisch wieder. Monte Verena liegt ca 300m höher als Campolongo. Ich habe ein Foto, das ich letzte Woche vom Gipfel der Cima Vezzena aufgenommen habe, das die Situation besser darstellt. Dieses könnte ich gern zur Verfügung stellen.--Physiker52 (talk) 22:58, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hab die Zeichnung überarbeitet -- Centenier (talk) 10:12, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:BerFmFhr 324 (B).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

85.140.6.215 13:24, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Drapeaux régiments français[edit]

Bonjour Centenier. Bravo pour vos créations. Je vous informe toutefois qu'il y a une erreur, qui semble récurrente sur les drapeaux modèle 1880 (revers) ou il est écrit HONEUR au lieu de HONNEUR comme par exemple

mais surement d'autre je suppose Cordialement--William Jexpire (talk) 07:40, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rég des Gardes Lorraine 1737-1744..png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

H87ui8ee (talk) 16:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]