User talk:Cdang

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thank you for providing images to the commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another wikipedia user link his local user page.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a Copyright tag - images without a appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate Categories, so it can be found by others.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki.


It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more Information, have a look at Commons:Licensing, Commons:criteria for inclusion and the Community Portal. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you. -- Joolz 23:03, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading images from other wikipedias[edit]

Hi !
If you upload images from other wikipedias pleas eupload the full size image and not only a small version/thumbnail of it ! Please copy source/creator info and use a correct license tag, then place the {{NowCommons}} template to the original image. --Denniss 13:29, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Loi de bragg.png[edit]

Hello, Cdang! I just wanted to point out that in this image the angle of incidence is not equal to the angle of reflection. :) Could you please correct it?.. -- Koveras 09:41, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Schwarze auge 1 logo.svg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Schwarze auge 1 logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.
Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

ElRaki 01:16, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 11:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SVGs[edit]

Hi Cdang, are you sure you want the die faces to be transparent (not white), as well as the backgrounds?? --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 11:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Refraction[edit]

Hello Cdang, thank you for your nice picture "Refraction metaphore sport1.png" with the swimmer at the beach. For an international use I deleted the French words and painted a blue background for the sea. If you don't like it, just revert the image. Greetings from Germany! --Kdkeller 01:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:LaTeX_vademecum.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

-Nard 16:13, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fixation plaque isostatique.svg[edit]

Bonjour,

Attention avec Image:Fixation plaque isostatique.svg !

S'il s'agit de vis à face d'appui plane, elles constituent une liaison par adhérence et pas par obstacle, de sorte que la plaque n'est pas positionnée, on ne peut donc pas parler d'isostatisme.

S'il s'agit de vis à tête fraisée, alors il y a un degré de liaison de trop et la liaison composée est hyperstatique.

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN 10:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Reaction support avec et sans frottement.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 15:49, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 07:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 026bb11ac996f3eb2bf42080ff45c0a5[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Are you planning to add files to this gallery? If not it would seem to be out of scope and probably better suited at a wikipedia project than here at Commons. Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 11:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Cdang!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:44, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Loi de Bragg[edit]

File:Loi de bragg.png - Tu es sûr concernant l'angle? Le loi de Bragg (n*lambda=...) déclare, quand l'interférence constructive est possiblé. Pour l'intereférence destructive, il faut prend 'n + 0,5' au lieu de 'n'. Encore l'angle est definé comme dans ce image: File:Bragg diffraction.png. Dans toi image, l'angle 2 sigma a droite est plus grande que l'angle definé. (Maybe you should answer in English, I'm just exercising my French. Could be possible that I dont understand you :) Cordialement, Amtiss (talk) 15:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

tête revolver[edit]

Salut, y'avait longtemps !

Attention, cannelure s'écrit avec 2 "n" mais les « canelés » bordelais (pâtisseries fort appréciées dans la région) n'en prennent qu'un !

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 23:39, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hyperstatique ![edit]

Attention : pivot glissant + appui plan, ça fait 7 degrés de liaison et un degré de mobilité, donc hyperstaticité d'ordre 2 ! Avec la clavette ... c'est beaucoup plus compliqué encore.

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 00:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Cinema_pellicule_35mm_son_optique.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Дмитрий Сутягин (talk) 12:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cdang!

Thanks for translating the description into French. Good job! Thank you! --High Contrast (talk) 10:25, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Intersection sphère-cône[edit]

Salut,

Il y a toujours un problème sur l'intersection !

Pour être clair, je suppose qu'il y a une vue de face, une vue de gauche et une vue de dessus. La vue de face n'est pas bonne ! Il faut considérer le niveau de plan auxiliaire horizontal qui correspond aux points où l'intersection traverse le contour apparent de la sphère. Au-dessus de ce plan, on voit apparaître en trait plein le dit contour apparent, et l'intersection est logiquement représentée en trait interrompu puisqu'elle est cachée par la sphère. En revanche, en-dessous, le contour apparent de la sphère disparaît, tandis que l'intersection que tu as représentée en trait interrompu devient visible, donc trait plein !

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 09:12, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:18, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, I've fixed the bug! :-) Sorry for the waste of time! --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 10:12, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strukturbericht[edit]

Salut,

je viens de mettre deux nouvelles images, "SrCu2(BO3)2 room temperature phase.png" et "SrCu2(BO3)2 high temperature phase.png". Je ne les ai pas mises dans la catégorie crystal structures qui est un peu trop vague à mon goût... mais je ne connais pas la classification Strukturbericht. Comme tu avais déjà classifié l'image spinelle que j'avais ajoutée il y a quatre ans, est-ce que tu pourrais y jeter un coup d'œil?

Merci! Perditax (talk) 20:51, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, merci. D'après ce que j'ai vu sur le lien que tu m'as envoyé, il n'est pas possible d'y classer les composés contenant quatres éléments. Mais il faudra que j'approfondisse ça un jour. Perditax (talk) 16:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion notification Category:Strukturbericht has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−

--Aushulz (talk) 22:02, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Monde palladium.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Kungfuman (talk) 17:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And other map. --Kungfuman (talk) 17:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Cdang

Je voudrais utiliser ce diagramme en classe (chimie CH101) mais je ne le comprends pas exactement. Au gauche extreme il dit 0.01 GPA, ce serait 100Atm a peu pres, mais sous de tels conditions la glace ne fond pas a +10oC, non? Est-ce ce que l'echelle est en erreur? Jcwf (talk) 15:58, 11 November 2010 (UTC) nl:wikt:Gebruiker:Jcwf[reply]

File:Diag_phase_fer_carbone.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wizard191 (talk) 17:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please provide your ref for this image, because my Degarmo 2003 text has some small discrepancies. Specifically 1154 deg C vs. 1153 deg C and 4.28% vs. 4.25%. Thanks! Wizard191 (talk) 02:55, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Prehenseur adaptateur culasse piston cotes.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Fred the Oyster (talk) 14:53, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:39, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:20, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Cdang, wenn du möchtest, lade den Audiopart der Datei im Originalformat einfach temporär bei einem Filehoster hoch (z.B. http://www.file-upload.net/). Dann konvertieren wir das und fügen den Ton deinem Video hinzu. Gruß aus Marburg, --Pristurus (talk) 08:17, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cdang, do you have the expressed permission of the parents of this poor child to upload/publish this video? --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of the chemical structure File:Autoprotolyse eau simplifiee.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Autoprotolyse eau simplifiee.svg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Files in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 15:24, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


I really don't think that having the land area be transparent adds anything to this graphic. Are you attached to this rendering for some reason? -- AnonMoos (talk) 12:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks... AnonMoos (talk) 17:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Always Coming Home[edit]

Didn't see anything very problematic. I slightly adjusted the image parameters for clarity... AnonMoos (talk) 04:14, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Multiverse (science fiction) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:20, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talking to myself[edit]

todo when I'm back:

User talk:Fastily

Sorry,

I wrote you november the 6th, but didn't check your own talk page. So you answered “sure”, does it mean you restored the file for a while? If so, I'm afraid I missed it.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Miroir parabolique avec et sans contre miroir.svg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Miroir parabolique avec et sans contre miroir.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leyo 23:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shearing force and bending moment[edit]

Bonjour Cdang! (That is about the limit of my French.)

I send you my compliments for the excellent diagram you created and inserted in the Wikipedia article on bending moment - File:Poutre flexion trois points diagrammes.svg (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bending_moment)

I have one comment. The diagram shows the bending moment having a positive slope until it reaches its maximum value, and then a negative slope. That is correct and it is the usual way of depicting bending moment. One important relationship between shearing force T and bending moment M is that T is equal to the derivative of M. However, the diagram shows the shearing force having negative sign until the center of the beam, and then positive. This is opposite to the slope of M. The way shearing force is depicted does not conform to the usual convention on positive and negative shearing forces.

I request that you refine the diagram a little by changing the sign of T so it is positive from the origin to the center, and then negative from the center to the end of the beam.

Thank you for any assistance. I can be contacted on Wikipedia (English) at User talk:Dolphin51

Au revoir! Dolphin51 (talk) 05:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Types de phenomenes de roulement.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:58, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plans d existence ADD PH 1978[edit]

Hello, I think there is a problem in the description of the File:Plans d existence ADD PH 1978.svg: the number 9 is described as "Septième ciel/Seven Heavens" and the names of the Outer Planes are numbered upt to 24. I think the number 9 is the Astral Plane (I dont' known the french name :D) and the Seven Heavens is in reality the number 10 (and the other name shifted one place down).--Moroboshi (talk) 19:52, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Moroboshi: you're probably right. I'll check this tonight (French local time) if possible. Thanks for pointing this out.
Regards
Cdang (talk) 09:31, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that the image should be deleted, please do not re-propose speedy deletion. Instead, just nominate it for deletion if you want. --George Ho (talk) 12:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@George Ho: Noticed. I just wonder why the talk page was deleted, it is IMHO important to keep track of the discussion to avoid repeating errors (if there is any). Regards.
Cdang (talk) 08:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strukturbericht @ afwiki[edit]

Bonjour Cdang,

J'ai commencé à ajouter des catégories selon la classification de Strukturbericht au wiki Afrikaans en pensant qu'il y en aurait déjà autrepart, mais il semble que commons est le seul qui en a. Je voudrais maintenant ajouter des liens wikidata, mais je ne sais pas exactement comment le faire. Est-ce tu pourrais m'aider avec ça?

Cordialement Jcwf (talk) 04:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcwf:
Goedendag
(
We can go on in English if you prefere
)
Il y a plusieurs pages Strukturebericht sur Wikipédia :
mais je pense que ce qui t'intéresse, c'est quelque chose comme category:Strukturbericht D51 c'est ça ?
Je n'ai pas vraiment bien compris comment fonctionne Wikidata, mais je pense que si tu crées la catégorie sur af:, tu as en bas de la colonne de gauche une zone « Dans d’autres langues » (
Ander tale
)
. Si tu cliques sur «  Modifier les liens » (
Wysig skakels
)
, cela t'amène à la page Wikidata.
J'espère que cela répond à ta demande.
Salutations
Cdang (talk) 07:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
J'ai créé Category:Strukturbericht D1₃. (D'accord?) J'ai aussi créé un lien wikidata pour B2, mais ça se voit seulement ici, pas au wiki Afrikaans. Je ne sais pas pourquoi :-( Jcwf (talk) 23:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcwf: Sur le principe de la création de la catégorie : OK. Mediawiki redirige automatiquement « Category:Strukturbericht D13 » vers Category:Strukturbericht D1₃ donc le caractère « ₃ » ne pose a priori pas de problème.
En ce qui concerne le lien wikidata B2, je en vois pas où il apparaît. Je ne le vois pas sur https://af.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategorie:B2-strukture .
Cdang (talk) 12:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, ma faute: c'est Category:Strukturbericht B1 que j'avais fait, pas B2. Si Mediawiki ne fait pas la distinction entre D13 et D1₃, il y a un problème, car ce n'est pas forcement la même structure...
@Jcwf: Donc on parle de : https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q29386778 . Effectivement, je ne vois pas apparaître les inter-wiki sur https://af.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategorie:B1-strukture . Je te conseille d'attendre un peu (peut-être un problème de synchronisation), et sinon de poser la question à un administrateur.
Cdang (talk) 13:22, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Cdang: Il semble que les liens vers commons n'apparaissent jamais. Il y a un lien "Wikidata-item" qui a été ajouté par contre. Jcwf (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcwf: Merci pour cette information, je ne le savais pas. Le problème peut donc être considéré comme soldé ?
Cdang (talk) 16:04, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, j'ai vu que tu as créé cette catégorie. Bon début. ;) Et bon courage si c'est le début d'une série de catégorisations. Marc Mongenet (talk) 09:29, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Marc Mongenet: Merci. Mais tu sais, je travaille par opportunité, je n'ai pas entrepris un travail de classification systématique :-D
Cdang (talk) 10:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Development has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 13:16, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Pour un magnifique album de matériel illustratif dans le domaine de la science des matériaux et de la thermodynamique Vac 23:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello Cdang, the file name and German description of the picture are not understandable. Please put it right. Thanks and best regards --Hydro (talk) 10:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hydro: ich denke ich kann nicht besser machen. Mit DeepL habe ich:
Struktur des gehobenen medizinischen Dienstes (aber ich denke medizinische Vorpost ist korrekt)
Organisation eines vorgeschobenen Sanitätspostens im Falle eines Orsec-Novi-Plans (zahlreiche Opfer, ehemaliger Roter Plan).
  • Abholung Noria;
  • Eingang;
  • Eingangssekretariat;
  • Sortierbereich;
  • Leichenschauhaus;
  • CUMP, medizinisch-psychologische Notfallzelle;
  • RU, relative Notfälle;
  • AU, absolute Notfälle;
  • Evakuierungszone;
  • Sekretariat verlassen;
  • Ausgang ;
  • Evakuierung Noria.
Grüsse
Cdang (talk) 21:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Fond torispherique.svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fond torispherique.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diagramme_Euler_types_de_triangles.svg[edit]

Bonjour,

dans le fichier Diagramme_Euler_types_de_triangles.svg https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle#/media/Fichier:Diagramme_Euler_types_de_triangles.svg

pourriez vous corriger isoscèle en isocèle, merci !--Robert FERREOL (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert FERREOL: Merci de m'avoir prévenu. C'est corrigé.
Cdang (talk) 20:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated template[edit]

Hello Cdang, thank you for uploading fine SVG images.

You are tagging them with {{Inkscape}}, ignoring that it signals bad usage with a red color.

When you continue with that habit, you are leaving it to others to correct the wrong usage of a template deprecated since many years. I corrected your last uploads. I am using a script which does a lot, including all the cleaning up (remove of {{Inkscape}} and {{Cdang}} whose functions are integrated in the correct template). When you will use also the script, your files would be tagged in a correct way. When you will not use it, please at least obstain from using the deprecated {{Inkscape}} template! Stay well, -- sarang사랑 16:37, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sarang@ sorry for the disturbance. Please tell me where I can find the help page showing the adequate templates. But please do not remove the template:cdang as it helps me finding my media.
Regards
Cdang (talk) 17:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Above I gave you the link Template:Image generation#Script_support how to install the script (use the script of Sarang, not of Perhelion!); when it is active you will see in the "Dimension" cell of the upload history the link →SVG Igen, when you click it the script works - editing the file description. When you need further support, just ask me.
Your Template:{{Cdang}} will be included, you need not to write it explicitely to catagegorize; see your last File:Semaines ISO de l'année 2021.svg, the categorization occurs because of the parameter |u=cdang in the template. -- sarang사랑 05:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You may create a User:Cdang/commons.js and copy the content of User:RicHard-59/commons.js just as-it-is. -- sarang사랑 05:52, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Because the {{Cdang}} replacement is only done by the script for SVG files, you need your template for your other files; therefore it will remain. It will not do any harm if the categorization occurs doublewise, by the script and in addition unnecessarily by the template. -- sarang사랑 07:01, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This may be a little late, but... / C’est peut-être un peu tard, mais...[edit]

English: I wanted to say thank you for your 2013 correction of the template {{One California area code}} to correct the French translation. Since I am only a native writer of English, I have to use automated translation from Google or Bing. Sometimes it's good, sometimes it's subpar, but hey, it's free and at least I made the effort to at least try to accomodate nonnative speakers of Emglish. So, anyway, thanks for your help.
Français : Je voulais vous remercier pour votre correction de 2013 du modèle {{One California area code}} pour corriger la traduction Français. Comme je ne suis qu’un écrivain natif de l’anglais, je dois utiliser la traduction automatique de Google ou Bing. Parfois c’est bon, parfois c’est médiocre, mais bon, c’est gratuit et au moins j’ai fait l’effort d’au moins essayer d’accommoder les locuteurs non hostiles de l’emglish. Donc, de toute façon, merci pour votre aide.

Rfc1394 (talk) 14:58, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rfc1394: Don't mention it. I'm happy if it helped.
Regards. Cdang (talk) 18:42, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rfc1394: for the translation, you migth as well try DeepL : https://www.deepl.com/ I'm quite happy with it (although it has less languages than Ggl Translate).
Cdang (talk) 13:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Frescobaldi exemple hauteur notes jaidubontabac macOSX.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 08:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Very high-quality work! EllieBellie25 (talk) 20:26, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh…, Well, thanx a lot EllieBellie25. I'm a bit surprised because I usually don't try to make "beautiful" pictures, just useful and readable pictures. Is there a specific picture you appreciate?
Cdang (talk) 07:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You did a very good job and can be proud of your hard work. To me they are very clear and explain the theory perfectly, while also being aesthetic. The "materials science-ones" are very useful for Wikipedia, because the quality of those pictures really stand out in that topic. EllieBellie25 (talk) 21:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Those ones are quite easy: regular shapes, flat colours or a bit of shading. I try to make the pictures I would like to have when I was a student ^_^ So I'm happy you appreciate and that it is useful to someone. Kind regards.
Cdang (talk) 07:23, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Template:= has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:36, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mauvaise année[edit]

Bonjour. Il semble que tu ais confondu deux fichiers sur Calendrier 2020 semaines ISO fr.svg, c’est l’année 2021 ! L’as-tu encore ? 37.170.126.112 10:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC).[reply]

@37.170.126.112: Merci d'avoir signalé l'erreur. L'ancien fichier se trouve en bas de la page, à a rubrique Historique du fichier. Je corrige.
Cdang (talk) 12:37, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ʽːCategory:Strukturberichtʼ[edit]

Bonjour Cdang. Merci pour tes contributions sur ce page. J'essaie d'ajouter des liens vers les catégories correspondantes au wiki Afrikaans. Mais il y a un problème quand les symboles de Strukturbericht contiennent un subscript comme H11 etc. Ce n'est pas accepté dans les titre des pages ou des catégories. Au af.wiki j'ai utilisé les caractères U ̟2081 ff comme ₀₁₂₃₄₅₆₇₈₉ mais ce n'est pas idéal non plus. Est-ce que tu pourrais m'aider en trouver une solution? Jcwf (talk) 02:48, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jcwf
Bonjour @Jcwf: je ne suis pas sûr d'avoir bien compris le problème, mais : Pour H11, j'ai simplement omis la notation en inférieur, puisqu'il n'y a à ma connaissance pas d'ambigüité (pas de H onze). Et sur le Wikipédia francophone, on utilise w:fr:Titre mis en forme pour mettre des indices dans les titres.
Cdang (talk) 10:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merci, Cdang. Tu as raison que H11 n' existe pas, mais est-ce vrai pour tous les codes? Le lien vers fr.wiki est vide. Est-ce que tu veux dire la fonction DISPLAYTITLE?
̴̴ Jcwf (talk) 10:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcwf: J'avais oublié le mot « modèle: » dans le lien, c'est w:fr:modèle:Titre mis en forme.
Sinon, d'après w:fr:Strukturbericht#Liste_des_structures, les structures dont les références dépassent 9 sont A14, A17 et C19 et il n'y a pas de risque d'ambigüité ; mais la liste est complète (donc à vérifier)
Cdang (talk) 16:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]