User talk:Basotxerri/Archive 11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 5 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Zubizuri 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Euskotren Ciudad Jardín 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Euskotren Ciudad Jardín 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Nobody at the platform. ;-) --XRay 18:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Euskotren Ciudad Jardín 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Plaza del Gas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Plaza del Gas 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMHO, by cropping the sky a bit, you would get a better composition. --C messier 17:35, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done You're right, there was a lot of sky. Please check now. --Basotxerri 19:59, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 Comment I would crop more, but OK  Support. --C messier 17:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Plaza del Gas 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 20:39, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Acceso estación Uribarri 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:53, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Puente La Salve - Detalle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 19:49, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Palacio Europa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 11:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bilbao Airport terminal gates in Loiu, Basque Country, Spain, view direction NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Zubiarte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments In first instance it looks deformed, but it's not: well done --Michielverbeek 18:35, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Parque Doña Casilda - Farola 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support--Jebulon 18:53, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Acceso estación Uribarri 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality.--Capricorn4049 17:57, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Puente La Salve, Guggenheim, Torre Iberdrola 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Edificio Bami - ETB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--ArildV 20:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Review request

Hi Baso. I hope you are well. I took this photo with a new lens. If you don't mind and have time, could you tell me if you think either is FPC worthy? One is a crop of the other. Danke sehr.

Hi PumpkinSky, I'm sorry but I'm not at home for the next days and I've got only a mobile and slow internet connection here? Could you wait two weeks, would that be OK? --Basotxerri (talk) 06:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Sure. PumpkinSky talk 09:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi PumpkinSky, I've got a faster Internet connection right now and I've just had a look to your images. Although I'm with a small netbook screen right now, I've noticed that your new lens has a good sharpness. Technically you've got a very good shot. If I had to chose between the original and the crop, I would take the crop. The unsharp rock in front of the uncropped image seems too disturbing to me. Is it FPC-worthy? That's a difficult question. I think that I wouldn't vote for it because it's a very static art object and for me personally there is missing some wow. However, maybe others might be pleased by it, it has a certain harmony and it's technically good. I think if you try it at FPC, at least you wouldn't have to feel ashamed about it. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much for looking at it. I highly value your thoughts. I just minutes ago withdrew two FPC candidates because they were basically technically good but no wow and I said said something about it on both withdrawals. You can check my contributions if you want. So I'm not sure what I'll do. You seem to be saying this bell photo is similar to my FP of the Japanese cistern that is just a few meters away. Thank you again for looking at it. PumpkinSky talk 16:02, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
You're welcome! May I ask you if you find something special about these images? These could be my next tries at FPC.

Maybe the only good enough is the anchor chain, I'm not sure. Best regards, --Basotxerri (talk) 16:41, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

The ship anchor is definitely the best one, both technically "wow-wise". For sure put that at FPC. I would not oppose any of them, though I might not vote on a few of them. I might vote for all of them. I've put numbers to rank them per my humble opinion, but as we've discussed, no telling what the picky people at FPC will say until you nominate them. PumpkinSky talk 18:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Museo Marítimo - Grúa Carola 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Museo Marítimo - Contenedores 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Museo Marítimo - Contenedores 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Museo Marítimo - Grúa Carola 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Museo Marítimo - Cadena 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting and good quality -- Spurzem 19:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bilbao - Acceso estación Uribarri 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bilbao - Acceso estación Uribarri 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Zubiarte 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bami Building, headquarters of the Basque television ETB, in Bilbao, Biscay, Spain, view direction W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zubizuri Bridge, in Bilbao, Biscay, Basque Country, Spain, view direction W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naval 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 21:15, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estada 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Capricorn4049 20:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estada 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Capricorn4049 20:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estadilla 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Capricorn4049 20:49, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Armentia - Casa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Armentia - Crucero 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 01:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrizala - Sorgiñetxe 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 16:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tella - Dolmen de Tella 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tella - Dolmen de Tella 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 23:32, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Armentia - Casa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:01, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olvena 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:53, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graus - Río Ésera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:01, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graus - Ayuntamiento 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:55, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graus - Ayuntamiento 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:01, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graus - Plaza de Coreche 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estada 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Campo de los Palacios - Fuente 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality! I don't know the aperture but it looks like a bokeh effect -- Sixflashphoto 12:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
@Sixflashphoto: I think this was shot at f/2.8, using a awfully cheap Tokina RMC 28 mm of the 1980s. --Basotxerri 12:50, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huertas de Olarizu 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Campo de los Palacios - Fuente 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Campo de los Palacios - Fuente 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Adurza - Colegio de San Ignacio 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huertas de Olarizu 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sahún - Lavadero 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sahún - Jardín de la quesería 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sahún - Portal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 08:47, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sahún - Llamador 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 08:47, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Graus, in Huesca, Aragon, Spain.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ischgl - Walk of Lyrics - Message in a Bottle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ischgl - Walk of Lyrics - Message in a Bottle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ischgl - Walk of Lyrics - Message in a Bottle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 19:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kopsstausee - Staumauer 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition for me.--Famberhorst 06:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galtür - Gemeindehaus - Treppe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:04, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eriste - Ventana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sahún - Escuela de hostelería de Guayente 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sahún - Santuario de Guayente 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp photo, good composition, straight verticals, a Q1 --Michielverbeek 17:20, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ochsental - Ill und Piz Buin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice.--Famberhorst 15:52, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Concrete dam of the Kops Reservoir, in Vorarlberg, Austria, view direction SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bilbao - Museo Marítimo - Cadena 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bilbao - Museo Marítimo - Cadena 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montes de Vitoria - Pieza de Vitoria 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:22, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Zabalgana - Mariturri - Armentum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality and it's in the right category but I bet this could be found from more then one category -- Sixflashphoto 23:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Zabalgana - Mariturri - Armentum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality but more then one cat would be nice -- Sixflashphoto 23:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Zabalgana - Mariturri - Armentum 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:20, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - CC Hegoalde 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe some cut on the right. But also good quality.--Famberhorst 16:11, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Zabalgana - Mariturri - Armentum 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice urban views. --Moahim 14:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Zabalgana - Mariturri - Armentum 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moahim 14:55, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Zabalgana - Mariturri - Armentum 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moahim 14:56, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Parque de Zabalgana - Mirador 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Stones on the star are a bit bright but Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 15:07, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montes de Vitoria - Pieza de Vitoria 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Cosy! - although it's out of focus: could you please correct the strong CA under the roof and eliminate the dustspot (see annot.)? --PtrQs 00:36, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Sorry, you're right. Please check now. --Basotxerri 15:44, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Everything fine now! --PtrQs 23:42, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Torre Iberdrola 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:10, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Museo Guggenheim 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:10, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Torre Iberdrola 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Looks good but there's a white spot in the cloud on the right side of the tower - dead pixel?--Peulle 15:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Spot removed. --Basotxerri 15:13, 6 October 2017 (UTC) OK--Peulle 22:05, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Puente de Deusto 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice shot. More sharp in full view and the sky works with the composition -- Sixflashphoto 16:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Muelle de Evaristo Churruca 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments But soft but the framing and composition are great. More then 1 category would be nice but still Good Quality -- ~~~~
@Sixflashphoto: I've added Promenades in Spain, if you were thinking of something else, please let me know. --Basotxerri 16:43, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sahún 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Baños de Benasque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 08:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Plan de Turpí - Ésera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Buildings don't look straight to me, so you probably need to do some kind of perspective correction for them. Otherwise good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:07, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Thanks for the review! --Basotxerri 08:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 Support - You're welcome. The photo seems acceptable overall now, including the buildings. -- Ikan Kekek 00:12, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villanova - Argolla 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Subject sharp; Good Quality Sixflashphoto 08:27, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villanova - Iglesia de Santa María 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 06:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villanova - Iglesia de Sant Pere 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful object.--Famberhorst 05:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villanova - Iglesia de Sant Pere 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitoria - Parlamento Vasco 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montes de Vitoria - Hayedo y ruedas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice scene but a bit dark. Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tella - Dolmen de Tella 06.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tella - Dolmen de Tella 06.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohes Rad - Radschulter 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohes Rad - Gipfelkreuz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Did you write your name in the book?--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Sometimes I do but in this case I didn't... --Basotxerri 17:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ochsental - Piz Buin - Gletscher 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Great view. More annotations could be added fore more information. --Milseburg 19:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesbadener Hütte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 19:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesbadener Hütte 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Baños de Benasque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 22:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alpine hut Wiesbadener Hütte, in Vorarlberg, Austria, view direction S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Upper Ochsental valley, Ochsental Glacier and origin of Ill river, in Vorarlberg, Austria, view direction S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Manual saturation

So, what I would suggest, when not all picture should be saturated, first try +Vibranbce, otherwise saturate manually: in PS you go to Sponge tool (Icons on left side), above you choose to Saturate or Desaturate, put some smaller Flaw (20 %) and use Soft round (not Hard round), and then go over with round where you want to saturate more. --Mile (talk) 08:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi Mile, as you might imagine I tried to get the rainbow as colourful as possible. Anyway, I'll try to get that better. As I don't use Photoshop, I have no sponge tool but in Lightroom I'll try to use radial or gradual filter, that should do it, too. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the vibrance hint! --Basotxerri (talk) 06:42, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Actually, there is a sort of sponge tool on LR. It is that long thing that looks like a 'match stick' just to the right of the radial filters. You select it and set it to 'saturation' and then you can use it the same ways as a sponge + many, many more applications. --cart-Talk 18:09, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Lately, I'm so fixed on gradual and radial filters that I always for get the adjustment brush. I've got to get deeper in Lightroom... Thank you! --Basotxerri (talk) 18:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Now, this is what I really came here for. Thanks so much for your tips on appertures for our small cameras/sensors (btw, your's is way bigger than mine ). That was a sort of face-palm moment for me and I will certainly test it. Much appreciated! cart-Talk 18:13, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi cart, I'll go for some cookies for all that cups of tea... Anyway, what I said, should be tested, I could be wrong but normally you get the best sharpness at about f/4 - f/5.6 (check the corners, too!). However, some of the "bigger sensor guys" might say that the aperture is far too wide but that's it: we've got more depth of field and can do this! Have a nice evening! --Basotxerri (talk) 18:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ischgl - Walk of Lyrics - Message in a Bottle 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ischgl - Walk of Lyrics - Message in a Bottle 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Benasque - Llanos del Hospital 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Benasque - Llanos del Hospital 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Llanos del Hospital 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Llanos del Hospital 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valle de Pineta - Fondo del valle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Árbol muerto 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Árbol muerto 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - Hospital de Basurto 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Maman

I thank you for Mamam . it touches me all the more because I know you know the subject well. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Avec plaisir mon ami. That's it, I found the image looking about Guggenheim stuff and I was really surprised that it hasn't been presented at FPC, it's worth it! --Basotxerri (talk) 11:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Benasque - Aigualluts - Árbol muerto 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Benasque - Aigualluts - Árbol muerto 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Pico de la Mina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielerkopf - Schafe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 12:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bielerkopf 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galtür - Jamtal 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice shot! Perfect lighting and shadow recovery --Granada 11:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galtür - Jamtal 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for improving the background of my photo. I could not get it myself. Thank you again for your helpfulness!
Greetings from Dominicus Bergsma.--Famberhorst (talk) 13:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Cascada 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:12, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Cascada 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Cascada 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Aigualluts - Llano 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Forau de Aigualluts 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Forau de Aigualluts 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality, Great composition -- Sixflashphoto 15:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Llanos del Hospital 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benasque - Anciles - Labrador Retriever.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak front, Right front leg some blurred.--Famberhorst 18:22, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)