User talk:BartekChom

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, BartekChom!

The Evil IP address (talk) 20:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Przenoszenie grafik[edit]

[1] - zwracaj uwage, by zachowac poprawna licencje. Masur (talk) 08:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conj/pl/i[edit]

Szablon template:Conj/pl/i nie będzie użyteczny. template:Conj pomaga w tłumaczeniu okreslen na różne języki, a template:Conj/pl/i nie jest w sieci szablonów. Czy sa przypadki kiedy potrzebujesz "A i B" a nie "A oraz B"? Odpisz tutaj. --Jarekt (talk) 03:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"i" chyba bardziej pasuje w File:The Lady with an Ermine.jpg i ogólnie dla {{Technique}}. W każdym razie miałem poprawić do postaci z "i". Ogólnie zrobiłem osobny szablon, bo nie miałem siły na grzebanie w {{Conj}}. Właściwie może najlepszym wyjściem byłaby zmiana polskiej {{Int:and}} na "i". Opis File:Jacques-Louis David 006.jpg wyglądałby dużo gorzej, ale gdyby poprawić {{Creator}} tak, żeby mieściło się w jednej linii, może "i" lepiej by pasowało.
Jacques-Louis David  (1748–1825)  wikidata:Q83155 q:it:Jacques-Louis David
 
Jacques-Louis David
Description French painter, politician and architectural draftsperson
Date of birth/death 30 August 1748 Edit this at Wikidata 29 December 1825 Edit this at Wikidata
Location of birth/death Paris City of Brussels
Work period neoclassicism
era QS:P2348,Q14378
Work location
Authority file
creator QS:P170,Q83155
i
Georges Rouget  (1783–1869)  wikidata:Q2164632
 
Georges Rouget
Alternative names
Marie-Georges-Louis Rouget; Rouget
Description French painter and etcher
Date of birth/death 26 August 1783 Edit this at Wikidata 9 April 1869 Edit this at Wikidata
Location of birth/death Paris Paris
Work location
France (1797-1869)
Authority file
creator QS:P170,Q2164632

(i zwinąć) Można też dodać do szablonu {{And}} (użyć go w {{Conj}}) parametr short, dla polskiego i ewentualnie innych języków, które mają dwie możliwości (mam nadzieje, że kryteria użycia będą zgodne). BartekChom (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aha. Trzeba by też dopracować {{Subcat}} i podobne. Tam też przyda się "i", ale razem z dorabianiem łącz. Jeśli wszędzie można usunąć przecinek przed spójnikiem, to dobrze, a jeśli nie, trzeba będzie myśleć. BartekChom (talk) 18:25, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pozdrowienia --Jarekt (talk) 06:04, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Aha. Jeśli uważasz, że "oraz" nie będzie potrzebne, wystarczy tylko poprawić na translatewiki.net (Możesz to zrobić? Ja nie mam pojęcia, jak.) i będzie można usunąć {{Conj/pl/i}}. A {{Subcat}} to osobny problem. Pozdrawiam, BartekChom (talk) 18:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki:AjaxQuickDelete.js/pl[edit]

Bartek, ja zakładam twoją dobrą wolę - weź mi po prostu napisz co zmienić na co. Konkretnie :) Nie każ mi myśleć, ani decydować :) Masur (talk) 18:12, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, BartekChom!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:01, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Szablony[edit]

Wbij na plwiki i popytaj Sapera, Malarza pl czy innych "technicznych", bo ja w tym zbyt rzutki nie jestem. O, albo Oddera, on też na Commons bywa. Masur (talk) 20:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hej!
Przepraszam za tak późną odpowiedź, ale miałem lekkie urwanie głowy w związku z protestem w sprawie SOPA i kampanią 1% OPP Stowarzyszenia Wikimedia Polska i zapomniałem o Twoim pytaniu :-)) Oczywiście mógłbym przenieść Twój kod w proponowane miejsce, ale miałbym prośbę, abyś przygotował odpowiedni kod (dla szablonów -en i -de), a ja wtedy po prostu kliknę w przycisk „Przenieś” i po kłopocie :-))

Jeśli zaś chodzi o szablon {{Self}}, to czy mógłbyś nieco szerzej opisać swój pomysł? Podejrzewam, że i tak mimo wszystko musiałbyś rozpocząć dyskusję na ten temat na stronie dyskusji szablonu albo w anglojęzycznej kawiarence, bowiem do wprowadzenia jakichkolwiek zmian w tym szablonie niezbędny byłby szerszy konsensus społeczności. Pozdrowienia, odder (talk) 18:14, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jak pewnie widziałeś, przeniosłem wczoraj po północy wskazane przez Ciebie szablony w odpowiednie miejsca. Jeśli chodzi o szablon {{Self}}, to jest on na tyle ważny dla działania Wikimedia Commons, że nie chciałbym (i nie mogę) podejmować decyzji w jego sprawie samodzielnie — zwróć się proszę z tym pytaniem do szerszego grona w polskojęzycznej kawiarence albo w anglojęzycznym Village Pump. Jeśli chodzi zaś o szablon {{GFDL-self-en}}, to obawiam się, że nie jestem aktualnie w stanie go poprawić: próbowałem wczoraj, ale coś nie wyszło :-( Pozdrawiam, odder (talk) 14:24, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Triangulo 1,6 2,7 3,14 + cikloj.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

McZusatz (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Triangulo 1,6 2,7 3,14.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

McZusatz (talk) 16:03, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you--Trixt (talk) 13:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Smoking bans.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 20:03, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Firma de Rafael Corres.svg[edit]

I've talked to Jimmy Wales, and he told me this: << With only a few rare exceptions we should not publish people's signatures.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 10:31, 15 July 2011 (UTC)>> you can see it on Jimbo's Talk page [2] --Dabit100 (talk) 05:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I saw that you are the author of the Polish version of the Template:Rijksmonument. Since I am engaged in the South Tyrolean monuments project, I wanted to kindly ask you, if you could provide a translation for our Template:Denkmalgeschütztes Objekt Südtirol, as well. The Google Translator brought me to something like Plik ten/ta kategoria pokazuje pomnik numerem ... w Południowym Tyrolu, but I'd really like to have a native speaker to revise that version ^^. Cheers, --Mai-Sachme (talk) 16:04, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! --Mai-Sachme (talk) 20:21, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Polish for Template:Closed captions[edit]

Thank you for adding the Polish for Template:Closed captions WhisperToMe (talk) 20:24, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question[edit]

How do you say "Dmitry Medvedev speech on the 2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash" in Polish? I just created a commons category for all of the videos of the speech Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 20:32, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For File:Dmitry Medvedev 2 - 2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash.ogv how do you say "Dmitry Medvedev visiting the Polish Embassy in Moscow" in Polish? Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 01:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! WhisperToMe (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Dmitry Medvedev and Vladimir Putin - 2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash.ogv needs a Polish description. I think it's the last video related to the Smolensk crash, but I'll have to keep looking for them WhisperToMe (talk) 17:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Internationalisation[edit]

Hi I am German native speaker interested in Art and made some comments on User talk:Vincent Steenberg#Internationalisation Regards––Oursana (talk) 07:36, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Polish version for new Template:Closed captions[edit]

Are you interested in adding a new Polish translation for Template:Closed captions? There is a new version of the template available

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 13:28, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied here.--Praveen:talk 15:39, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pies has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 15:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Education_for_Fukushima_nuclear_disaster_in_Taiwan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Alan Liefting (talk) 05:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Unidentified_electronics has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Remember-How (talk) 06:53, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Unidentified_electronics has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Remember-How (talk) 06:59, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Categories in location by location has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


DenghiùComm (talk) 00:23, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Maps_of_the_Kingdom_of_Serbia_(XIII_th-century) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Zoupan (talk) 21:09, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Categories by "special criteria"[edit]

Before adding to this category, would you please check first to verify that there are no other categories using the criterion? In case you don't know how to do that, here's how I do it:

  • Go to Special:Search.
  • In the text box at the top, enter this (using ideology as an example): intitle:"by ideology"
  • Under "Search in namespace", check "Category" and uncheck everything else.
  • Click the "Search" button to the right of the text box at the top.

Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:24, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. BartekChom (talk) 21:47, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. Be aware that this method will find redirected categories, which you probably don't want to count.
If you have any reply, you can reply here so that the conversation is all in one place. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:13, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Przepraszam, mówię tylko trochę po polsku. Ich sehe, dass du besser Deutsch sprichst als Tschechisch, daher schreibe ich deutsch. (Das ist auch einfacher für mich.)

Du hast zum Bild Máte to v kapse.jpeg den Verweis www.itesco.cz/cs/qr hinzugefügt. Er funktioniert aber nicht, er geht einfach auf www.itesco.cz.

Pozdrowienia -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 20:25, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my distraction indeed. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 08:16, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

4 cats[edit]

I must apologize as I reverted your category addition in the Category:Four Cats . I must have been a bit absent as I just thought you mistakenly added the category in its own category (it is probably not even possible). As I thought it was just a mistake you might have not even noticed, I did not leave any comments. So I am sorry. --Estormiz (talk) 17:36, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Category discussion warning

Category:Federated_States_of_Antarctica has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 14:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Diagrams by subject has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 14:11, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Exponentiation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Jochen Burghardt (talk) 19:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Macierz - 2020.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Enyavar (talk) 09:03, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Theoretical economics has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JopkeB (talk) 08:20, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


ZandDev (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]