User talk:Balou46

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Balou46!

Danke[edit]

Danke

für deine Bilder aus Hardheim!

Freundliche Grüße

Graf Foto (talk) 11:57, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a Original upload log[edit]

Hi! When you copy files to Commons like File:Granada Alhambra Löwenhof verkl.jpg you should add a original upload log. Like on File:Oslo_Holmenkollen_2.jpg#Original upload log for example. Without a link back to the original location and information about upload date etc. it is very hard to verify that the information is correct. --MGA73 (talk) 11:31, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -- Balou46 (talk) 11:36, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Balou46,

erstmal danke für die vielen Bilder von dir, die via Wikivoyage jetzt auch hier gelandet sind. Bei manchen sehe ich allerdings Probleme mit dem Urheberrecht, die werden auf Dauer nicht auf Commons zu halten zu sein. Das im Betreff genannte Bild einer Salzskulptur ist ein Beispiel: Skulptur heißt Kunst, also prinzipiell urheberrechtlich geschützt. Die Skulptur ist zudem m. W. noch nicht so alt, ihr Urheber also noch keine 70 Jahre tot, also ist sie nicht gemeinfrei. Sie ist zudem auch nicht dauerhaft draußen an einem öffentlichen Platz angebracht, sondern unter Tage, also greift auch die deutsche Panoramafreiheit nicht (die zudem neuerdings übers US-Copyright hier ausgehebelt werden kann, siehe Commons:Village pump#DMCA Take-Down).

Irgendwann wird das Bild wie so manche andere auch also Commons verlassen müssen. Ich habe gelesen, dass die Wikivoyage-Projekte an einer offiziellen Ausnahmeregelung für geschützte Inhalte basteln und dann solche Bilder vermutlich irgendwo "lokal" speichern können. Das warten wir mal ab und sehen dann weiter. Viele Grüße --Rosenzweig τ 11:48, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BW-weinsberg-lvwo-fässer.jpg ist noch so ein Fall. --Rosenzweig τ 12:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für Deinen Hinweis. Die Bilder waren ursprünglich auch für einen Reiseführer bestimmt und nichtfür eine Enzyklopädie. Allerdings ist auch innerhalb der Commons die Regelung nicht eindeutig, einerseits werden Bilder von mir abgelehnt, so z.B. Bilder der Rio-Andirrio-Brücke, jedoch mit dem gleichen Motiv (siehe :File:Rio_bridge_-_wave_1.jpg) werden Bilder als qualitativ hochwertig ausgezeichnet. Also warte ich mal ab. Notfalls habe ich ja noch die Originale. -- Balou46 (talk) 08:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Über den Status der griechischen Panoramafreiheit wurde kürzlich diskutiert, s. Commons talk:Freedom of panorama#FOP Greece. Ich habe unter Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Greek bridge mal nachgehakt. Ich befürchte, es wird darauf hinauslaufen, dass die meisten Bilder der Brücke von Commons verschwinden, solche Aktionen gab es mit Bauwerksbildern aus Frankreich, Island, sonstwo schon mehrfach :-( --Rosenzweig τ 05:56, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Mit Reiseführer oder Enzyklopädie hat das recht wenig zu tun, Commons ist keineswegs nur der Dateienspeicher von Wikipedia, sondern auch der anderen Projekte wie Wikisource, Wikibooks, Wikiversity und jetzt eben Wikivoyage und außerdem auch eine Mediensammlung per se. Es liegt an der Grundsatzentscheidung, hier nur wirklich freie Dateien (im urheberrechtlichen Sinn) zuzulassen. Manche der Projekte haben deswegen zusätzlich noch Ausnahmeregeln, um auch andere Dateien aufnehmen zu können, und daran scheint Wikivoyage wie gesagt ja auch zu arbeiten. --Rosenzweig τ 06:02, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Deine Einwürfe in Ehren, und ich würde dir auch gerne glauben, wenn es auf den Commons nicht sehr unterschiedlich gehandhabt würde. Nehmen wir mal als Beispiel 1 die von Dir erwähnte Brücke. Ein Blick auf Category:Rio-Antirio_Bridge zeigt, wie genau das genommen wird. Beispiel 2 ist das Category:Besucherbergwerk_Kochendorf, wo ich nicht der einzige bin, der das Kunstwerk abgelichtet hat. Also, wenn es ernst wird, dann löschen wir eben die Bilder. Ärger will ich deshalb nicht, und die Commons sollen wegen mir auch keinen Ärger haben. Nur verwundert mich immer wieder die deutsche Gründlichkeit. Falls es zur Löschung kommt, würde ich gerne informiert, damit ich die fehlerhaften Links bei WV rechtzeitig stopfen kann. Gruß -- Balou46 (talk) 09:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Commons hat mittlerweile über 15 Millionen Dateien, jede Stunde kommen Hunderte dazu (Special:NewFiles verschafft dir einen Eindruck). Die Eingangskontrolle ist nicht systematisch organisiert, sondern wird von Freiwilligen gemacht, die es meistens schaffen, die offensichtlichsten Urheberrechtsverletzungen zu löschen bzw. zu melden, aber es sind einfach zu wenige Leute. Das ist ein zähes Geschäft, ich mache es gelegentlich auch, halte aber meistens nicht lange durch. Auf diese Weise rutschen immer wieder Dateien durch, die eigentlich nicht auf Commons sein dürfen, die werden dann oft erst Tage, Wochen, Monate, Jahre später oder auch gar nicht entdeckt. Die von dir genannten BFH-Bilder hatte ich bislang auch nicht gesehen, ich habe zwar mitbekommen, dass da mal ein Schwung Bilder hochgeladen wurde, hatte aber nicht die Zeit und Muse, alle anzusehen. So läuft es eben hier. --Rosenzweig τ 00:24, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. File was nominated for deletion. Please check and comment :-) --MGA73 (talk) 18:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. That file was a lot of work, but because it is outdated and shows now several wrong connections, it seems better to delete it. -- Balou46 (talk) 17:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Balou,
hab grad deine Hofburg-Skizze bewundert. Nicht ganz verständlich war für mich nur die Wahl der eingezeichneten alleinstehenden Denkmäler... Sind das das Kaiser Franz II-Denkmal auf Platz A (In der Burg), sowie die Statuen von Kaiser Franz I und die Kaiser Franz Joseph im Burggarten extra nicht dabei?
Liebe Grüße, Anna reg (talk) 10:03, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Das hat einen einfachen Grund: von den eingezeichneten Denkmälern hatte ich Bilder, von den anderen nicht. Ich sehe mir es mal gelegentlich an und versuche sie zu ergänzen. Viele Grüße -- Balou46 (talk) 11:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok... und ich hatte mir schon allerlei rätselhafte Auswahlverfahren ausgemalt... ;-> Anna reg (talk) 14:36, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:LK-dambulla-stupa.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:LK-dambulla-stupa.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Steinsplitter (talk) 17:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis. Warum die Lizenz vergessen wurde, weiß der Geier. Habe es jetzt nachgeholt. -- Balou46 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Registan samarkand steve evans 10 2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 15:33, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


San Antonio[edit]

Hallo Balou46, nehme doch bitte Category:San Antonio (Volcano) für Bilder des Vulkans San Antonio in Fuencaliente. Grüße, -- Ies (talk) 10:23, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

O.K., ändere ich gleich. -- Balou46 (talk) 10:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Für das Bild der St.-Bartholomäus-Kathedrale in Pilsen! Aarp65 (talk) 11:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


File:NO-tromsoe-amundsen-domkirke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Deadstar (msg) 13:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified ships in the Gatun-Locks[edit]


Hallo Balou46, könnten Sie mal bitte schreiben, wie die Schiffe auf den von Ihnen in der Gatun-Schleuse aufgenommenen Bildern heißen, vielen Dank, einige Namen sind zu sehen:

  • Hyundai Glory
  • MSC El...


--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 00:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Das zweite ist die MSC Eugenia. Wie das weiße Schiff heißt, habe ich vergessen. Es war ein amerikanischer Auto-Transporter. -- Balou46 (talk) 07:14, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A-Wien-Karlskirche-Chorraum[edit]

Dear Balou46, I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A-Wien-Karlskirche-Chorraum.JPG. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Do you prefer us to use your nick name in Wikipedia or we can note your proper name if you prefer. Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com hippofish 11:53, 18 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 11:53, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad you would like to use one of my pictures. You can use my nickname, but in principle, it's quite indifferent to me. Thanks, Balou46 (talk) 18:22, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:IMGP5998-1.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 17:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:HR-dubrownik-werbung-filme.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:HR-dubrownik-werbung-filme.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yann (talk) 16:49, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Das Bild ist ein Foto einer Werbung. Ich weiß beim besten Willen nicht, wen ich da um Erlaubns fragen könnte. Dann meinetwegen löschen, ich werde mich nicht weiter darum kümmern. Viele Grüße mit Autotranslate -- Balou46 (talk) 20:20, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:VAE-louvre-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:VAE-louvre-03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:VAE-louvre-04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:VAE-louvre-05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:VAE-louvre-07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:DE-BR-bikiniART-03.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:DE-BR-bikiniART-03.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:05, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 07:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Regions Norway.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Worldlydev (talk) 16:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 14:10, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:LK-aluthgama-kande-vihara-rep.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:29, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:38, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:WV-DE-NW-karte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A00:20:100B:CAAA:5862:83BC:812D:79D3 03:51, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burj khalifa nyc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 11:21, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:05, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 10:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:IMGP6647-BAUZEICHNUNG.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:IMGP6647-BAUZEICHNUNG.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:FR-honfl-muscheln.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 10:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WS-apia-regierg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WS-Apia-Immac-concept.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]