User talk:BSRF

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, BSRF!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:57, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Turkish women

Sütlaç in İstanbul

Selamlar. This cat has to be filled. We have lots of material. (Aralarında İzmirli olanlar da var... :) Thx. --E4024 (talk) 14:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Good, thanks. Bir de şurada olduğu gibi kategorilerin üzerlerine diğer sene, dekat, cinsiyet vb ve diğer ülkeler endeksi eklemek gerekiyor. Pek tanınmadıklarından kadınlarımıza öncelik veriyorum ama daha sonra aynı şeyleri erkekler için de yapmak gerekecek. It's a tedious work... --E4024 (talk) 17:46, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Hep İzmir olmasa. Bakın son birkaç katkım hep İstanbul resimleri ve onlar da "sene" ulamları istiyor. Van, Samsun, Kayseri gibi... Teşekkürler. --E4024 (talk) 19:20, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Böylesini de ilk defa duyuyorum :) İlgili olduğum alanlarda katkı vermeyi tercih ediyorum. Zamanım olursa diğer şehirlere de bakabilirim. Sütlaç için de teşekkürler :) İyi akşamlar.--BSRF (talk) 19:26, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Rica

Merhaba, son eklediğim fotoğraflar için vakit ayırabilirseniz uygun kategoriler açabilir misiniz?--Kingbjelica (talk) 17:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Merhaba Kingbjelica. Tabii ilgileniyorum şimdi.--BSRF (talk) 18:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Teşekkür ederim, birkaç tane daha yükledim, tarayıcı ve nette sorun yaşadığımdan çoklu eklemelerde kategoriler zorluyor, çok sağ olun.--Kingbjelica (talk) 20:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Tekrar merhaba, Category:Teknofest 2019 fotoğrafları için de kategori geliştirmeleri yapabilir misiniz müsait olduğunuzda?

File:Halkapınar Train Station.jpg

---

Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Halkapınar Train Station.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:45, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Autopatrolled rights given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. - FitIndia ^{Talk Mail} 19:04, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Coronavirus Türkiye haritası

İller açıklandığına Covid-19 turkiye haritasını duzenlemisin Eray08yigit (talk) 18:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

@Eray08yigit: yeni bir harita oluşturup ilgili maddelere ekledim.--BSRF (talk) 19:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Kategorilendirme

Sayın @BSRF: , son yüklediğin stadyum görseli için kategorilerde değişiklik yapmışsınız. Anladığım kadarıyla Vikipedi'de uyguladığımız daralan kategoriler prensibine göre bir düzenleme. Ben şu ana kadar Commons'u sadece Vikipedi'ye görsel sağlama amaçlı, yükleme ya da dosya çekerek kullandım. Siz gördüğüm kadarıyla Commons'ta düzenleme işlemleriyle de ilgileniyorsunuz. Yüklediğim diğer dosyalara da bakabilirseniz sevinirim zira ben sadece dosyaya insanların ulaşabilmesi için alakalı gördüğüm kategorileri ekliyorum. Saygılar. İyi çalışmalar.-- Estin  ^{Giç Giç?} 20:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Merhaba @Estin Giç Giç: . Category:Gürsel Aksel Stadium kategorisinin en altında dahil olduğu kategorileri incelerseniz yüklediğiniz dosyaları ayrıca Göztepe, stadyumlar, Türkiye'deki stadyumlar, futbol stadyumları, Konak kategorilerine eklemenizin gerekli olmadığını görebilirsiniz. Çünkü o kategoriler zaten ana kategoride mevcut. Yüklediğiniz diğer dosyalara da genel olarak bakmıştım, eksik olduğunu düşündüğüm kategorileri eklemiştim. İyi günler dilerim.--BSRF (talk) 06:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Tamamdır, sağol. Açıkçası Gürsel Aksel Stadium kategorisi olduğunu fark etmedim, aynen Vikipedi'deki mantıkla yapmışsınız anladım. İzmir'deki Otomobiller de commons'a ait bir bakış açısı olsa gerek. Görselde ne varsa kategoriyede onu yanstıyorsun. Biz bu taraftan ansiklopedi gözlüğüyle baktığımız için, bundan sonra bende ona göre değerlendiririm görselleri. Bizden birilerinin burda düzene dair çalışma yapması güzel. Kategoriler hep İngilizce olduğu için bizde yoksa zaten olmuyor varsa da hususi araştırman gerekiyor, ben dosyayı yüklerken alakalı gördüklerimi ekliyorum. İyi günler. İyi vikiler.-- Estin  ^{Giç Giç?} 14:06, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Deletion

Hello!

If you use {{SD|C3}} instead of {{Speedydelete|C3}} the entire criterion is spelled out. See Special:Diff/409542229.Jonteemil (talk) 18:03, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

File:İzmirim Kart front.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:İzmirim Kart front.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Radar

Hi, I was surprised that a picture (Karataş 6672.jpg) I published very recently has already been put in a category. I have a question concerning thisː I have seen many radars, but this one looked so awkward. No moving parts, no wire mesh or parabolics. Is it a special type, maybe particular for Turkey? I'd love to know a bit more about this curious machine. And as I'm putting thousands of pictures of Turkey on the Commons, and you write about it (and are a cat lover also) I'd be happy if occasionally me steer me to some article or destination (when I can travel again).Dosseman (talk) 12:19, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Dosseman: . First of all, I really admire your work. Thank you for your efforts. I took a photo of a tower which looks very similar to yours. The one I've photographed is a marine traffic monitoring tower. I assume that yours has the same purpose. If you disagree, you can remove that category. I'd be happy to give you some advice on your next destination in Turkey. Which cities have you visited in Turkey so far?--BSRF (talk) 12:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi @BSRF: . Thank you for the compliment. As for agreeing or disagreeing, I do not know enough, so let's just keep it this way. As for where I've been, it's almost a case of where I haven't been. That is, I'm a city dweller rather in general, though I'll travel into the country for excavations or very special sights. You can find a list of where I've been on a personal site I have at https://pbase.com/dosseman , part of those pictures I'm copying now to Commons, leaving out people, shops as well as nature shots and other non-encyclopaedic pictures. I have been on my way to Şırnak and Hakkâri once, but there was fighting in Hakkâri streets then, so I went elsewhere. I love Istanbul, Edirne, Bursa, Cappadocia and often went to Inebolu. When travel is possible I'll probably go and see what the Karadeniz is like now, mainly the eastern parts. I cannot drive a car, so I'm bound to public transport. Dosseman (talk) 13:08, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

@Dosseman: The list of places you've visited is impressing! :) Eastern part of the Black Sea Region is definitely worth visiting. I hope this pandemic ends soon so you can go wherever you want. Take care!--BSRF (talk) 13:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Claims?

What claims? That categories for former countries are useful? If we believed that, then we would have no categories for the Roman Empire, which would be a tragedy. Please maintain NPOV. Stop being disruptive. Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

@Laurel Lodged: You claim that historical facts should be represented in the categories. Do we have a category named Category:Cities in the Soviet Union? The answer is no. But you keep adding such meaningless categories to the Azerbaijan-related categories. Please refrain from doing so.--BSRF (talk) 14:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

I made no such claim ("You claim that historical facts should be represented in the categories. D"). But if I did make such a claim it would be correct. Please read what the purpose of categories is. Hint: it's not about pushing nationalistic agendas of any side. I am neither Azeri not Armenian. Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

@Laurel Lodged: "Historical context is always useful in category navigation." This is what you've said. Commons:Categories does not support your claims. I ask you think again and restore my edits.--BSRF (talk) 14:39, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

How then do you explain Category:Colosseum ? It's parent is Category:Ancient Roman theatres in Rome. But Ancient Rome is a former state? Has the Colosseum been incorrectly classified? Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:51, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

@Laurel Lodged: That category is about architectural style, architectural period, etc. Your example is irrelevant. Dadivank was not built by the Republic of Artsakh. Dadivank is not located in the Republic of Artsakh. Dadivank is not owned by the Republic of Artsakh. Adding such category to Dadivank is not compatible with Commons guidelines. It is like adding Category:Buildings in the Soviet Union or Category:Buildings in the Ottoman Empire, since the building was part of those countries in the past. You are in violation of our guidelines.--BSRF (talk) 15:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

The analogy is relevant. And frankly if you wanted to it as a child of Category:Buildings in the Soviet Union or Category:Buildings in the Ottoman Empire, that would be fine too. Because the Soviet Union no longer exists, do the buildings no longer exist? No. They were validly part of the Soviet Union at the time. Ditto for Ottoman period. Categories are not always about current realities. Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Nagorno-Karaback

You have make large additions to this category out of process while a discussion is on-going. I remind you of the warning on the category page: "Please do not make major changes to this category, nor categories and pages related to this discussion, or remove this notice until the discussion has been closed.". Please stop this activity immediately. Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:28, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) It is not "Karaback" and everything is in order. The community cannot wait for you to understand that there is no mistake nor POV there. --E4024 (talk) 14:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
• @Laurel Lodged: First of all, you are the one who removed every subcategory from Category:Nagorno-Karabakh in October 2020 without a consensus. (Here is an example) Then you started a category discussion and said that category should be deleted. en:Nagorno-Karabakh (NK) and en:Republic of Artsakh (RoA) are different topics. NK is a geographical and historical region. On the other hand, RoA is a de facto country. NK is larger than the RoA, since the latter lost a great amount of its territory in 2020. They are not identical. Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (NKAO) was an administrative unit of the USSR. Category:NKAO cannot be a subcategory of Category:RoA. The parent category should be Category:NK. Your edits are biased and disruptive. I have no choice but to report you.--BSRF (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
• @E4024: , @BSRF: The discussion is still open. No movements should take place while it is open. Simple. Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:53, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Categories does not support your claims.

Which one exactly? There are so many. Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Please read that official policy thoroughly. If you can find even a single sentence which supports your claim, please do tell me.--BSRF (talk) 15:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

But I have made no claims. On the contrary, it is you who have made rather large claims. The onus therefore lies with you to specify the exact policy violations of which you accuse me. Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Are you kidding me? Your claim is "categories are not always about current political realities."--BSRF (talk) 06:56, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

We have indeed talked about it. I'm still waiting for you to produce the Commons policy that says that categories may not be linked to categories about former political entities. Until you produce such a document, I will continue to assume that Artsakh is a valid category to use. Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:36, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Categories reflect current realities. When you add Category:Mountains of Artsakh, it implies that it is a mountain in Artsakh. But it isn't now. It was before. You could add Category:Former mountains of Artsakh, but such a category does not exist.--BSRF (talk) 15:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Your personal theories do not interest me. Produce the Commons document that supports your theories and you will have my attention. Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Like it or not but it is a fact. When I hear "personal theory", it reminds me of "categories cater for former political realities as well as current political realities."--BSRF (talk) 15:54, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

It is a fact that it is your personal theory. It remains to be proven if your theories are supported by the only facts that matter in this discussion: Commons policy documents. I await production of same. Since it is increasingly unlikely that you will be able to produce such documents, i will meanwhile continue to ignore your personal theories and get on with sensible categorisations. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:10, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Before making such demands, you should support your claims with a policy/guideline. Otherwise your edits will be reverted.--BSRF (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

I make no claims. It is you who is advancing personal theories. The onus therefore lies with you to back up your theories. If such policy documents existed, I think that you would have produced them by now in support of your theories. Since you have not done so, it is reasonable to suppose that no such documents exist. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:18, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

You are repeating yourself. Please read the first four messages in this section. You can find my answer there.--BSRF (talk) 16:31, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

It would appear that you wish to continue to evade your responsibilities. Since you are unable to furnish any Commons policy documents in support of your personal theories, I will continue to apply categorisation norms. I must formally warn you now, that any disruptive reversions of my edits in furtherance of normal categorisation work will result in you being reported to the Administrators for disruptive behaviour. You are probably aware that other Turkish / Azeri / politically motivated editors have reported me making similar claims: none has been upheld. What does that tell you? Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:58, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Yanlış kategorilendirme

Merhaba BSRF. Yüklediğim fotoğrafların büyük bir çoğunluğuna "Taken with Huawei P20" kategorisini eklediğinizi fark ettim. Sanırım başta yanlış başlayınca devamı da öyle gitti. Fakat bunların "Taken with Huawei P20 Pro" olarak düzeltilmesi gerekiyor. Ben cat-a-lot kullanmayı bilmiyorum. Müsait olduğunuzda ilgili düzeltmeyi yapabilirseniz sevinirim. Kolay gelsin. --Gargarapalvin (talk) 10:01, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Merhaba @Gargarapalvin: Fotoğrafların altında "camera model" olarak en:CLT-L29 yazıyordu. Ona tıklayınca da P20 maddesine gidiyordu. O nedenle o şekilde ekleme yapmıştım. Ama siz pro kullandım diyorsanız o şekilde değiştiririm. İyi günler.--BSRF (talk) 10:06, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Neden bu modeli P20 sayfasına yönlendirmişler bilmiyorum. Gerçi "Huawei P20 & P20 Pro" olarak birleştirilmiş sanırım ama CLT-L29 ve CLT-L09 serileri P20 Pro modellerine ait. Teşekkür ederim ilginiz için. --Gargarapalvin (talk) 10:16, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

And you do not believe, it would be a good idea to talk to each other?

It's a common project! Tozina (talk) 11:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello to you, too @Tozina: . I left a note here for you to read and you've received a notification for that. But you didn't care. Please read Commons:Categories to better understand category hierarchy.--BSRF (talk) 12:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) It looks like I am not the only user who has difficulty in communicating with you. I really do not like to visit this place but Commons is more important than my personal preferences: Please do not add files and cats from Trabzon to Category:Ortahisar, as this cat is about the more famous place in Cappadocia. Make a new cat like Category:Ortahisar, Trabzon if you wish. I am not going to revert your wrong edits, because I am bored and tired of people taking corrections as personal issues... --E4024 (talk) 03:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:Ortahisar

Ortahisar has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 15:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

File:İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi.png

File:İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Glorious 93 (talk) 09:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

File:İzmir Tınaztepe Üniversitesi logo.png

File:İzmir Tınaztepe Üniversitesi logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Glorious 93 (talk) 09:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Kategorilendirme

Selamlar. Burada seni aktif gördüm :) Istanbul kategorisinde 6 bin küsur görsel birikmişti. Birkaç haftadır uğraşıyorum, anca 5 binlere indirebildim. Ara sıra bakarsın belki :) Ben kabaca en alt kategorilere atıyorum ama ilçelere atsan bile yeterli şu an (yahut cami gibi kolay yapılar varsa ona uygun kategorilere vs). İstersen tabi. Kolay gelsin :)--Nanahuatl (talk) 08:54, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Selam @Nanahuatl: . İstanbul'u çok iyi bilmiyorum ama fırsat bulursam tanıdığım binaları/yerleri alt kategorilere eklemeye çalışırım. İyi günler.--BSRF (talk) 17:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Koordinatlar oluyor bir kısmında, onlar yardımcı oluyor bayağı. Teşekkürler, iyi çalışmalar.--Nanahuatl (talk) 18:44, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

RfC

Hi. Can you just explain why it's not correct to the user who keeps doing this? Thanks in advance :)--Nanahuatl (talk) 18:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Karsiyaka Old.jpg

File:Karsiyaka Old.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:24, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Necati Cumalı

Merhaba BSRF, umarım iyisinizdir. Kategori eklemeleriniz için çok teşekkür ederim! Yüklediklerimi Türkçe Vikipedi'ye de ekleyebilirseniz mutlu olurum :) Saygılarımla,--Kadı Message 18:02, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Merhaba Kadı. Rica ederim. Uygun maddelere denk gelirsem eklerim elbette. İyi günler dilerim.--BSRF (talk) 18:04, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Tamamdır çok teşekkür ederim tekrardan. İyi vikiler! Kadı Message 18:05, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Viki Yeryüzünü Seviyor 2022 Türkiye'de başladı!

Merhaba! Viki Yeryüzünü Seviyor 2022 Türkiye'nin başladığını duyurmaktan mutluluk duyuyoruz. Bu yarışmaya katılmak, Türkiye'nin doğasını fotoğraflamaya; ve bunu Vikipedi ve kardeş projeleri aracılığıyla dünyaya sunmaya yardımcı olacaktır. Lütfen kuralları okumak için yarışma sayfasına gidin: Commons:Wiki_Loves_Earth_2022_in_Turkey. Yarışma sayfasında yarışmaya nasıl katılabileceğiniz açıklanmaktadır. Sorunuz varsa, lütfen bizimle e-posta yoluyla iletişime geçmekten çekinmeyin: wmtr@wikimedia.org.tr Teşekkürler,
Viki Yeryüzünü Seviyor 2022 Türkiye Organizasyon Komitesi 03:07, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Bu mesajı daha önce yarışmaya katıldığınız için alıyorsunuz.

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thanks for adding new categories to my uploads! Kadı Message 19:46, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

30 ağustos

30 ağustosla ilgili görsellerime kategorilendirme yaptığınız için teşekkürler. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ ^TALK 11:45, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Removal of content from Republic of Artsakh to Azerbaijan

Why are you moving content from Republic of Artsakh to Azerbaijan categories and the requesting deletion for the emptied category? There are multiple reasons against this. The first reason is that the areas still exists as a geographical area and as a state or district of Azerbaijan. The other reason is that at the time the photo was taken the Republic of Artsakh existed. GPSLeo (talk) 17:54, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi GPSLeo. As you know, Republic of Artsakh is an unrecognized breakaway state which is about to dissolve. Only images related to the republic should remain in the Category:Republic of Artsakh. Category:Soviet Union and Category:Yugoslavia are examples of this. If there are any contributions you disagree with, feel free to revert them. Best regards.--BSRF (talk) 06:24, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

As I wrote independently to the legal status this is still a geographical area. When moving files to the Azerbaijan category the information that something is located in this area gets lost. I do not know if "Artsakh region" would be a accurate name, but such kind of category should definitely be used instead of moving to the country category. GPSLeo (talk) 05:36, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

The republic is a political entity. When it comes to geography, Category:Karabakh or Category:Nagorno-Karabakh (which are subcategories of Azerbaijan) can be used.--BSRF (talk) 16:10, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Nagorno-Karabakh / Artsakh

Hi, These categories were already deleted a few days back. You must stop revert back and forth. Yann (talk) 09:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)