User talk:B1mbo/2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Insignia de la I. Municipalidad de Calama[edit]

La Insignia de la I. Municipalidad de Calama tiene la llama de color Café, siendo que la original la tiene de color blanco grisaseo. Como Ud. es el creador de la imágen, solicito que cambie el color. 190.161.54.199 21:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Using one of your images[edit]

Hi. I was hoping that I might be able to use the image of the Chilean Coat of Arms that you have uploaded in a book that I'm publishing (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coat_of_arms_of_Chile.svg). Could you possibly tell me where the image comes from? I can best be reached at thom.van.dooren (at) gmail.com. Thanks for your help.


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Escenario cierre Teletón 2006.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Stifle (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Voluntarios de la Teletón 2006.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Voluntarios de la Teletón 2006.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stifle (talk) 12:53, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You've marked both image as sources... I uploaded those images based on the permissions given by the authors in Flickr (using FlickrMail). I've sent a copy of the mails (the same that has been in their respective talk pages) sent by the authors to OTRS but I haven't received their response. I was hoping if you could remove the template, at least until I get the answer from OTRS. --B1mbo (talk) 12:35, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The way this works is that the template stays until the OTRS permission is verified. Otherwise people might just forget about the image entirely.
Please note flickr mails are not generally accepted as permission because it's impossible to verify that the message is genuine. Instead, the user should change the license on flickr to Creative Commons Attribution or ShareAlike.
You can add {{OTRS pending}} to the images to state that you've submitted permission to OTRS, which may influence administrators not to delete the image in the meantime. Stifle (talk) 12:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Escudo Universidad de Concepción[edit]

Estimado, el escudo que usted a creado para la universidad de concepcion no se corresponde con los colores que aparecen en la pagina oficial [1]

Por otra parte, el diseño de las ramas de laurel no coincide con el oficial. Para enmendar estos errores rogaria utilizar esta grilla, para la confeccion del escudo [2], y guiarce por los colores de esta imagen [3].

Un Saludo.

--Jp Neira (talk) 06:01, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Escudo de Vallenar[edit]

Hola: No quiero ser pesado con usted, pero me parece que el dibujo del escudo de la ciudad de Vallenar que ud. hizo (File:Escudo_de_Vallenar.svg) no es muy exacto del modelo de escudo que conozco, y del cual hice un archivo hace un tiempo (File:Escudo Vallenar.png). Para ello me baso en lo siguiente

  • El escudo de Vallenar, hasta donde yo sé, no lleva corona mural en su parte superior. Delo que aparece en la página web de la municipalidad local y de otros sitios (ej: miciudadvallenar.blogspot.com), se ve que en su lugar aparece un sol y una estatua blanca. En esos me inspiré para hacer el dibujo.

Ahora bien, aparece que ud. se inspiró en lo aparecido en http://www.chilecollector.com/archwebfila03/archwebstamp1300/stampset1335_38.html para hacer este archivo, pero no sé cuál es el status oficial (al menos la Municipalidad es un ente oficial).

  • Faltan las guirnaldas verdes y las cintas blancas, y el borde del escusón es una franja verde.

Espero no haber sido muy duro con usted, y la verdad es que fuera de esto, me gusta mucho su aporte acá en Wikimedia, sobre todo en el tema de los escudos de Chile.

Sin otro particular saluda atte.

Sergio Arenas B. - Xarucoponce (talk) 03:07, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of Arms[edit]

But that's my point. The fact that SVG and computers and 3-D didn't even exist when the Arms were created and adopted is exactly what makes your version inaccurate. It should depicts the Arms as intended, not as modern technology can interpret. Fry1989 (talk) 01:20, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the original intent of the Arms was an emblem of State, for use on documents, legislation, treaties, so yes, it would have been intented to have been drawn. And those 3-D draws are meerly mod-edits by people with a perk for 3-D, they're not official or anything like that, and sit aside the official 2-d versions here on the Commons. Fry1989 (talk) 01:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes they do, I have noticed that on their official website, but A: only in modern times, and B: these reliefs still do not replace the official version as adopted to represent the Nation alongside it's Flag as an official symbol. Fry1989 (talk) 02:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to propose if I may, a comprimise on the issue. Would you be willing to revert back to the non-3-D, and upload the 3-D version seperately, with "3-D" in the name, so that people have an option of both? This has been done for a few other countries with 3-D and non 3-D versions available. Fry1989 (talk) 00:36, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Because some people, not just myself, may have a preference for the other version, without 3-D. It's not an unreasonable request really. Fry1989 (talk) 01:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Because I view the non-3D version as superior, and despite your arguments, believe that it is more official. However I'm trying to make a comprimise because I see no need for further bickering. Fry1989 (talk) 02:02, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't a Crusade! I'm giving people the choice! I have uploaded my NON-3D version as it's own. If this really was a crusade against you I would have uploaded it over your version, but I haven't. Stop taking things so personally. Fry1989 (talk) 00:10, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'd also like to point out that unlike you, alteast I was willing to comprimise, asking you to upload a second version, so we could have one 3D and one not. If anybody is being inflexible, it's you. Fry1989 (talk) 00:31, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Countries in the FIFA World Cup 2010[edit]

The map you made of the countries that take part of the World Cup 2010 has a mistake. Brunei is a non-participing country. SkySilver (talk) 18:11, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know what issue you and Fry have with the arms, but it needs to cease immediately. I also uploaded a version of the arms, based on government images I have found. You two should find a version that is acceptable and should do so based on images created by the Chilean Government. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:17, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ecuador[edit]

I received official documents from the Ecuador government in the past week. The ratio, since at least the 1980's, is 2x3 for all flags (civil and state) and the 1x2 ratio was never established in law. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 18:00, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Malawian lion[edit]

Thanks for fixing the File:Flag of the President of Malawi.svg. Greenshed (talk) 16:59, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:41, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:MSJ.es.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Diego Grez return fire 17:49, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amada44  talk to me 16:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alex_Vega_after_being_rescued.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-Aude (talk | contribs) 20:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mario_Gomez_being_rescued_from_the_San_José_mine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-Aude (talk | contribs) 20:30, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 665a63a989e0a86163ddc3c93f314b1a[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Request for coat of arms of Chilean municipalities[edit]

Dear B1mbo,

I have a request for you. Could you upload the coat of arms of es:Porvenir to Commons in the next few days. Yours sincerely, --Michael Metzger (talk) 16:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, B1mbo. The reason for my request was, that I'm writing articles about Chilean administrative divisions for the German Wikipedia, currently about those in the Magallanes Region. And because you are Chilean, I have some questions for you. Is a pueblo an small town or is it an village? Are the comunas the lowest level of administration and should I merge the comuna and the included ciudad/Pueblo/aldea in one article ore should I make separate articles, one for the comuna and the others for the settlements, for example is it better to put all about Natales comuna, Puerto Natales, Puerto Eden etc. in one article or to split it into several articles. --Michael Metzger (talk) 14:35, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sobre comentarios al actualizar imagenes[edit]

he tratado de hacerlo, pero no se donde se coloca esa informacion para que aparezca en el historial de cambios madek (talk) 02:18, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Italy_1934_World_Cup.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 01:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo_de_Alto_Hospicio.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

201.223.128.239 20:25, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion notification Category:Cecilia_Morel has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−

193.153.183.152 00:32, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:World_homosexuality_laws.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Damiens.rf 15:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Juntos Podemos logo.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

ecelan (talk) 08:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

La pregunta es si es:Tomás Hirsch tiene los derechos de copyright sobre el diseño para entregarlo a la Wikipedia. --ecelan (talk) 08:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Si me dices que el tal Tomás Hirsch es quien tiene los derechos, voy a revertir el cambio. Un saludo, --ecelan (talk) 19:25, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Campaña Iguales Chile 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Elya (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Campaña Iguales Chile 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Elya (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Escudo de Linares[edit]

Buenas noches: Le escribo porque he visto que ud. diseñó una versión en SVG del Escudo de Linares. Yo hace tiempo hice una versión previa en PNG del escudo, y viendo ambas versiones quisiera hacer precisiones para que ud. las considere: - El escudo no es de estilo ibérico (forma redonda hacia abajo), sino afrancesado (con una punta aguda). - Las orlas deben estar separadas del escudo, rodeándolo, no cubriendo sus orillas. Además, faltan las orlas de color azul o celeste. - El tamaño de la corona es muy pequeño para el escudo, en el diseño original el ancho de ella es algo como 3/4 del ancho del escudo. Además, falta el adorno que va entre el escudo y la corona, que es como una orla dorada.

Como fuente de mis argumentos, y para que vea que estoy en lo cierto, le dejo algunos links:

Saludos de un linarense. --Xarucoponce (talk) 05:16, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PD: Intenté hacer una versión corregida del emblema, pero como soy inexperto en uso de SVG me quedó con errores. ¿Podría ud. verlo?

Acuso recibo de su mensaje, vi sus modificaciones en el escudo y están bien. Xarucoponce (talk) 18:00, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Escudo de la Región del Maule[edit]

En esta imagen.

Hola, quería preguntarle por qué revirtió mis cambios en la imagen del escudo del Maule, leí la descripción pero sinceramente no entiendo a qué se refiere con "WP Heráldica". El problema es que en la región ultimamente se ha estado utilizando su trabajo, pero éste --si no es por menospreciarlo ya que tiene los colores y forma correctos, así como el diseño general; no muestra el ruil que se aprecia en el escudo original, sino otro tipo de árbol, además de un problema en la parte inferior ya que las barras blancas no están alineadas con las lineas del mismo color en la parte derecha, así como es preferible que la pluma sobresalga de la zona amarilla. Si no es mucha molestia, le pido por favor que me explique las razones del cambio, ya que varias personas han utilizado su trabajo en informes, etc. y no ha sido completamente aceptado en ciertas situaciones.
Aquí le dejo algunos enlaces por si quiere comprobarlo:
En un enlace a la página oficial
En esta página se utiliza de forma común
Gracias de antemano por su comprensión, Gabo M.C. 200 (Discusión) 03:34, 28 de julio de 2011 (UTC)

File:Italy_1934_World_Cup.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 10:50, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flag of San Marino.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Lokal_Profil 15:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Un gatito...[edit]

por subir la imagen y quitar la marca de agua =)

Superzerocool (talk) 12:30, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hamburguesssa[edit]

Que nos recuerda que tenemos que hacer dieta =( Aleposta (talk) 18:08, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear B1mbo,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:29, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:PASO_emblem.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andrwsc (talk) 18:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag_of_PASO.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andrwsc (talk) 18:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ODEPA_flag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andrwsc (talk) 18:12, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, B1mbo. You have new messages at Template talk:CC-Historia Política BCN.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:03, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Libya Flag[edit]

Hi, I saw that you drew a construction sheet for the Libyan flag File:Flag of Libya (construction).svg, and I was glad to see that it was the same as the one that I drew: File:Libya Flag Constitutional Construction.svg.

That's great, it made be more confident with my drawing.

I'm still doubtful however; are you sure I/we have followed the construction according to the constitution correctly? Jaw101ie (talk) 18:17, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Germany (1946-1949).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Rodejong (talk) 10:48, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bandera comunal de La Pintana.[edit]

Hola. Le escribo porque el archivo File:Bandera de La Pintana.svg tiene que ser cambiado. Resulta que visité el sitio web de la municipalidad respectiva y encontré que en realidad la franja superior no es azul, sino verde. Ejemplos:

Incluso hay un decreto que establece que los colores de la bandera pintanina son verde, blanco y amarillo:

CREA EMBLEMAS HERALDICOS DE LA COMUNA. No. 120.- La Pintana, Febrero de 1985.-(...)

Decreto:(...)
2°.- La Bandera Comunal estará formada por tres fajas, la Superior Verde, la Central Blanca y la de abajo Amarilla.(...)
Anótese, comuníquese, publíquese y archívese.- Sergio Torres Gundian, Alcalde.- Rodrigo Celis Cornejo, Secretario Municipal.

Fuente: http://www.leychile.cl/Navegar?idNorma=162702

Sin otro particular saluda atte, Xarucoponce (talk) 23:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Escudo municipalidad de Lampa[edit]

Hola el escudo que tienes de lampa esta mal, si quieres te puedo mandar los archivo de las imagenes oficiales del municipio para que soluciones eso, por todo lo demas muy bien =)

Saludos.

PD: te paso mi mail: sol.vanosten@gmail.com

Camiseta alternativa de la "U"[edit]

Hola B1mbo. Me parecieron acertadas las modificaciones a las camisetas de Universidad de Chile, pero en el caso de la alternativa hay unos alcances: las tres lineas de los hombros no terminan con detalles en los brazos (como en la camiseta titular, cuyos detalles o rayitas son blancas), ni tampoco las mangas terminan con un borde azul. En esta página se puede apreciar con mayor detalle: http://todosobrecamisetas.blogspot.com/2012/01/presentacion-oficial-de-las-camisetas.html

Te agradecería la correción de la camiseta, para una mejor precisión. Saludos. --TegazUl (talk) 21:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Presentación de cartas credenciales de Miguel Serrano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ferbr1 (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ciudad de Maldonado no es lo mismo que Departamento de Maldonado[edit]

cito lo que publique en el archivo de la bandera de la ciudad de maldonado: "esta bandera NO es del departamento de maldonado, es de la CIUDAD de maldonado, NO ES LO MISMO!!!!! ya cambie los artículos Departamento de Maldonado y Maldonado, borrando la bandera de uno, y agregándola al otro, respectivamente. por favor, habría que cambiarle el nombre al archivo, o volver a subirla con un nuevo nombre. no se puede volver a cometer este error, por favor!!!!! gracias, --Sebast732 (talk) 19:09, 9 April 2012 (UTC)" --Sebast732 (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Estimado B1mbo: la bandera sí es del Departamento, se ubica en la ciudad de Maldonado porque justamente es la capital del Departamento homónimo. Además, dicha bandera la utiliza el Departamento de Maldonado como símbolo en el Congreso de Intendentes, que reúne a los intendentes de los 19 Departamentos de Uruguay.
Saludos! MauriManya (talk) 21:50, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Escudo Universidad de Chile[edit]

Hola B1mbo. Mi nombre es Juan Marcelo Contreras, Diseñador de la Universidad de Chile. Soy quien ha tenido la tarea de rediseñar el escudo de nuestra Universidad. Trabajo que ha requerido mucha dedicación en el estudio de los componentes del emblema (sus subemblemas) y en el cuidado del trazo, delicado, que cuide la forma del escudo y sus usos en color, out line, a gran o en pequeño formato. Así como la fragmentación de la Universidad en términos de imagen (revisa estas diapos http://www.afaelec.cl/DesordenUniversidaddeChile.pptx) da cuenta de un sinnúmero de símbolos que la identifican, el objetivo es lograr que la institución en su conjunto respete su principal emblema y lo use adecuadamente siguiendo las normas expresadas en un manual corporativo que está en desarrollo. Sería un importante aporte si puedes, a partir de esta imagen http://afaelec.cl/UniversidaddeChile.png comenzar a incorporar el emblema. Como he notado tu preocupación, te envío imagen donde podrás ver cómo se compondrá el isologotipo acompañado de sus subemisores (en este caso la Universidad y la Facultad de Derecho) http://www.afaelec.cl/UniversidaddeChile-Derecho.png . Luego te daré noticias del manual corporativo para que puedas tener antes que cualquiera las reglas de uso y su infinidad de aplicaciones.

Un abrazo

File:El Peligro Rojo.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:07, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rapa Nui - Pasado, presente, futuro.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:21, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Desarrollo e Implementación de la Gestión del Conocimiento en el Parlamento de Finlandia.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Equipamiento de fútbol[edit]

Hola B1mbo. La camiseta de fútbol de mi club está editada con su colores correspondientes, pero al ver la camiseta de la Universidad de Chile con su insignia, me dieron ganas de ponerle el escudo que lleva. He buscado y re buscado la manera pero no doy con ello. Al ver que la camiseta de la Universidad de Chile fue creada por tí, me atreví a pedirte una mano, a que me expliques como lo haces, siempre y cuando sea posible, claro está. Bueno, un abrazo. --Fernandocamba3 (talk) 10:34, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Italian football team 1934.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Graf Foto (talk) 07:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WLM: Alerzales[edit]

Hola. Cambié las coordenadas de los alerzales del "Potrero Anay" (SN de la región de Los Lagos) porque las que habían marcaban la entrada al Parque por Anay, en la desembocadura del río, a 7 horas de camino desde Cucao y todavía a 3 o 4 días de distancia de los alerzales, con machete y siendo el maestro de Rambo. Las coordenadas que puse están dentro del cuadrado demarcado en el decreto y corresponden a un punto cercano a la otra entrada del Parque Nacional Chiloé, en el camino a Abtao, cerca (unas dos horas de caminata) de donde se tomó la foto que tenemos y a unas 5 horas de camino del último lugar donde puede llegar un vehículo todoterreno. Saludos. Lin linao ¿dime? 20:27, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. Las coordenadas que repusiste no corresponden al Parque Nacional ni tienen alerces. La franja costera entre el río Anay y el río Colecole fue entregada a la gente de Huentemó y Colecole hace más de 10 años (habían hecho el parque con ellos adentro) y el lugar señalizado no corresponde a un sitio donde pueda haber alerces. Como te decía antes, puse coordenadas que se ajustan a lo señalado en el decreto y en un sitio donde sí existen alerzales. ¿Me explicas tus motivos? Saludos. --Lin linao ¿dime? 22:23, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Instituto Nacional en toma.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

in sourcepage will be read © 2002-2012 Fotolog, Inc. Fotolog ® et Flodo™ are registered trademarks of Fotolog, Inc. All rights reserved. --Motopark (talk) 14:23, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MontajeStgo-4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 16:40, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcha de escolares en Santiago.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 17:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Border[edit]

Doesn't look very good at Template:Upload campaign header Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 August. Why did you add it? Multichill (talk) 19:20, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I added the border because of the flags with large white (as the Chilean one in Template:Upload campaign header wlm-cl), but I didn't notice it was used also in the Template:Upload campaign header Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 August and Template:Upload campaign header Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 finished. I changed the parameters so if you use |flag = will appear with a border, but not if you use |image = . Thanks for the warning! --B1mbo (talk) 19:35, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, looks good! Multichill (talk) 21:18, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Una de la BCN y otra de WLM[edit]

Hola. Este afiche fue tomado de un sitio de la BCN con licencia libre, ¿pero tenían ellos derecho a subirlo a su sitio? Es posible que hayan recibido autorización del autor o que solamente se inspirara en algún tipo de fair use o... varias otras posibilidades. ¿Tienes línea directa con la BCN que permita aclararlo? En cuanto a WLM, un amigo que es fotógrafo aficionado (autor de esta foto) me pregunta si hay premios en el concurso y en qué consisten y no supe qué responderle ni encontré información en ningún lugar. Saludos. --Lin linao ¿dime? 23:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mapa Aysén[edit]

Estimado!

Le dejé un mensaje acá.

Saludos!

Rakela (talk) 14:20, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Imágenes de Wiki Loves Monuments[edit]

Hola B1mbo, qué pena, no había visto eso entre las bases. No hay problema, lo importante es ayudar. Salutes! ;-)

Uniforme Chile[edit]

Hola B1mbo. Quiero hacerte una consulta respecto al uniforme de Chile y su uso; lo que me sucede es que el archivo , que es tuyo, no aparece bien en uno de mis artículos en Wikipedia (este) y creo que es debido a que es tipo svg, a lo que voy es a ¿Cómo puedo hacer para usar el uniforme de Chile sin que se dañe a la hora de visualizarlo.? --Darwinjvega (talk) 03:18, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

¡Excelente! Muchas gracias, B1mbo. Veo que haces un gran trabajo en los proyectos de Wikimedia. Saludos Darwinjvega (talk) 03:55, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WLM Chile[edit]

Hay algunos usuarios que han subido fotos de monumentos nacionales de Chile, pero no han agregado la plantilla WLM. ¿Cómo se debe proceder en estos casos? Jespinos (talk) 00:28, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FAIL[edit]

No sabe subir fotos, no sabe subir fotos. Besis. Galio (talk) 03:15, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No te preocupes, el año que viene vamos a poner un tutorial con video. --Galio (talk) 03:20, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Kosovo-Dardania flag proposal.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AceDouble (talk) 13:56, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Osmar,
I was wondering if you could help me with categorising this picture of a Chilean building which – at least according to the uploader – is not a monument. Apparently, what we see on the picture is the consistorial building of the Valparaiso`s Municipalidad, but I have no idea how to categorise it properly (except for Category:Valparaíso Region). Your help would be greatly appreciated here (you can see ticket:2012100410001084 for more information). Thanks in advance, odder (talk) 05:10, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Austria-Hungary-flag-1869-1914-naval-1786-1869-merchant.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ÄDA - DÄP (talk) 14:45, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear B1mbo,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 21:03, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

UN Resolution of Palestine as Observer State.svg[edit]

Hello,

Can you please check what I've made wrong editing the file's dscription.

Regards, -- Igorp_lj (talk) 22:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Tu opinión[edit]

Hola B1mbo, estoy segura de que conoces mejor que yo la legislación chilena sobre propiedad intelectual, por lo que te pediría que, si tienes ganas y posibilidades, pusieras una opinión aquí. No estoy ni remotamente interesada en salvar esas imágenes a toda costa. Me importa mucho más definir si lo que he aportado es adecuado o no. Permíteme aprovecharme de la ocasión para dejar un saludo, que ya se acerca la Navidad: traigo este mibiarbolito multisistema, con velas a la antigua y conexión USB :) Abrazo Mar del Sur (talk) 23:28, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Exactamente. Hay que despejar la duda, porque si no lo hacemos, resulta que casi todo lo que está aquí no se podría publicar hasta muchas décadas más. En algunos casos (desaparecidos) ni siquiera se podría conocer una fecha de fallecimiento. Yo creo que el meollo del asunto está en lo que esa ley chilena define como sujeto del derecho, en combinación con el reconocimiento del patrimonio cultural común y su equivalencia con lo que aquí llamamos public domain. Lo he tratado de explicar en esa discu, pero yo no soy jurista. Genial si un abogado amigo te pude dar una opinión. Mil gracias por tu respuesta y nuevamente, que tengas felices fiestas! Mar del Sur (talk) 13:56, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Wikipedia en el aula.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Agent001 (talk) 00:08, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Flag of the Christian Democrat Party of Chile.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

RJFF (talk) 01:04, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Emblem of the Socialist Party of Chile.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

RJFF (talk) 01:04, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello B1mbo,

I have proposed this file for deletion. I think that the claim that it is ineligible for copyright and therefore under free license, is unjustified. You might want to participate in the deletion discussion here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emblema Pri Centro.png. Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 23:05, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Logo NS.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Brimz (talk) 10:28, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bandera y Escudo del departamento de Colonia[edit]

Estimado: En estos dos archivos que creaste File:Bandera del Departamento de Colonia.svg File:Escudo del Departamento de Colonia.svg hay un error. El escudo del departamento de Colonia, que figura también en la bandera, tiene 4 espigas no 3 como figura en las imágenes. Espero puedas modificarlo. Te dejo esta imagen PNG por cualquier consulta File:Colonia Department Coa.png.

Un cordial saludo. MauriManya (talk) 22:51, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Campaña Piñera 1era vuelta 2010.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Stefan4 (talk) 14:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Campaña Piñera 2da vuelta.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Stefan4 (talk) 14:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, quería realizar algunos alcances al escudo de la comuna de Juan Fernández, ya que las fechas presentadas en él son incorrectas. En la fecha de la izquierda aparece "22-XI-1974" (22 de noviembre de 1974), siendo que la fecha correcta es "22-XI-1574" (fecha del descubrimiento del archipiélago). La fecha de la derecha dice "5-V-1980", siendo que la fecha correcta debiese ser "5-VI-1980" (fecha de fundación de la comuna). Como referencia están los siguientes enlaces [4] y [5]. Espero se puedan corregir dichos errores en el escudo. Saludos. --Sfs90 (talk) 20:45, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fotografía oficial del Presidente Sebastián Piñera - 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hiperfelix (talk) 16:51, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Andrés Allamand.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ecce Ralgis (háblame) 17:13, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

De igual manera he solicitado el borrado de {{Cc-Gobierno de Chile}}. Lamentablemente, en ningún momento ha sido compatible, y parece que el Gobierno de Chile nunca ha publicado el contenido de su cibersitio bajo una licencia Creative Commons compatible. --Ecce Ralgis (háblame) 17:55, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Republika Srpska coat large.png seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: This file is tagged as PD as per Serbian Copyright Law (PD-SerbiaGov), but this is coat of arms of w:Republika Srpska (part of Bosnia and Herzegovina), not of Serbia. So, Serbian Copyright Law has nothing to do with this file.

Vanjagenije (talk) 20:03, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Comuna de Melipilla.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 17:12, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Comuna de Alto Biobío.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 17:13, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Poster de Wiki Loves Monuments Chile 2012[edit]

Hi, B1mbo, I see that you uploaded this nice poster. May I translate it and use for WLM in Armenia? If yes, can you provide a svg version of the file? --vacio 15:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are quite a couple of these continental maps. Could you create a new version with the Arctic included? It might be an idea to give a different color to Greenland and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago to realize that... Ischa1 (talk) 20:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Galeria de fotos Minrel[edit]

Estimado B1mbo:

Se pueden utilizar la Galería Fotográfica del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores (http://163.247.50.16/webrree.nsf/frmIndiceGaleria?OpenForm) ?

Saludos! --Rec79 (talk) 12:39, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Gracias por la aclaración. Saludos

--Rec79 (talk) 20:46, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola[edit]

Hola Osmar, primero que nada te felicito por las tomas que has incorporado al patrimonio de la humanidad con motivo del Wiki Loves Monuments. Está demostrado que el zafari fotográfico es una gran idea. Solamente pasaba a indicarte que encontré una serie de errores repetitivos en las cargas que has hecho, observa en detalle estos cambios que hice. La mayoría son errores menores, pero le has errado al número de monumento histórico. Sobre lo de borrar la hora de la toma es solo para que la plantilla traduzca la fecha al idioma de quien la lea, pero puedes reincorporarla si lo deseas. Y lo de la corrección a la exposición, ¡hasta que lo aclaré no tenía forma de distinguir el material del que está hecha la obra! Nuevamente reitero que es solo una cuestión de gustos :). Sería agradable que revises si le has atribuido el ID correcto a cada foto, presiento que debe haber más erratas. Saludos, --Metrónomo (talk) 03:14, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Saludos otra vez. Ahora veo que la fecha se muestra correctamente igual, aunque hayas puesto la hora. De seguro ya usan Lua. Así que el borrarla es algo totalmente innecesario, salvo por el que pequeño detalle de que en ningún sitio pone que es UTC -3, lo que la vuelve ambigua. Pero nada, me disculpo por eso. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 04:19, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, voy a averiguar en la facultad con los calígrafos si se puede (fácilmente, obvio) superponer las dos imágenes de las estatuas que sobreexpuse, para que salga el cielo de una con la escultura de la otra. Sería una obra derivada, pero quedaría genial. ¿O no? --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 04:23, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Evelyn Matthei foto campaña.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marcus Cyron (talk) 11:25, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Campaña Evelyn Matthei Presidenciales 2013 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marcus Cyron (talk) 11:25, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Campaña Evelyn Matthei Presidenciales 2013 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marcus Cyron (talk) 11:26, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear B1mbo,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear B1mbo,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo


File:Passarella levanta la Copa Mundial.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fma12 (talk) 02:53, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


File:Maradona y la copa 1979 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fma12 (talk) 01:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]