User talk:ArildV/Archive 2014

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamngatan January 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Storsjö kyrka December 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice atmosphere and good composition. With acceptable noise under those light conditions. --Cayambe 09:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungsgatan January 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good quality. (pls. remove dust spot) --P e z i 23:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SAS Boeing 737-683 December 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 22:56, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nya Carnegiebryggeriet January 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 10:22, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

QIC

Hi ArildV, I wonder if you read my last comment on this QIC nomination where I suggest to correct the exposition, since the right spectrum of the histogram is void. That means to me that the photo is technically underexposed and I don't think it is so dark at 13:38. Am I wrong? Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for reminding me. I uploaded a new version (+ 0,5 EV). Do you think it's enough? Best regards --ArildV (talk) 13:08, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten December 2013 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 14:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungsgatan January 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent --The Photographer 18:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten December 2013 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--ArildV 18:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC) Comment Imo it's underexposed (easy to fix). Why did you convert it to b/w? It's obviously your right to do it but I am curious --Moroder 21:55, 30 December 2013 (UTC)  Done I had uploaded some similar pictures in color, but I thought black and white was adequate for the landscape (which had few colors already) and draws attention to the trees and lines in the landscape. I have some interest in black-and-white photograph, although I mainly use my analog camera for that. I'm not very good or experienced when it comes to black and white, but sometimes it is interesting to look for new challenges. --ArildV 20:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC) Comment I'm not familiar with northern light but on the histogram the image is still underexposed --Moroder 19:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC)  Done--ArildV 13:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC)} OK --Moroder 04:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kungsgatan January 2014 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kungsgatan January 2014 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

File:Portal Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque.jpg

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Portal Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Portal Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Suggestion in Commons: Featured picture candidates.

Your suggestions for images you could nominate. ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 18:45, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

• File:Klara kyrka february 2013 01.jpg

• File:Chroicocephalus ridibundus 2012a.jpg

• File:Breite Straße Potsdam November 2013.jpg

• File:Alte_Rathaus_Potsdam_November_2013_01.jpg

• File:Adolf Fredriks kyrka december 2012.jpg

Hey,

Thanks for the suggestions. Klara kyrka just became FP at enwiki (mainly due to high EV as far as I understand it, and EV is more important there). I'm not really convinced by the other images, the image of the town hall has not really great colors and interior picture from the church is taken with the camera placed on the floor (I had no tripod). Breite Straße and the bird is fine, but I doubt whether they have enough wow for FP.--ArildV (talk) 06:12, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello. In my opinion, I think the picture of the bird has a "wow" effect, because to take a picture that way is quite difficult. Cheers! :) ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 18:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sofia kyrka January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skurusundet February 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 23:38, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skurusundet February 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 21:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blasieholmen February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:53, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sofia kyrka September 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 00:31, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Für das tolle Fernsehturm-Foto! Aarp65 (talk) 03:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Vielen Dank!--ArildV (talk) 13:22, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Blasieholmen February 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blasieholmen February 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reindeer in Ljungdalen 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 02:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholm City Hall February 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 03:08, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 01:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Landsort February 2014 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 01:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality with bright colors. --Kulmalukko 19:57, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support : nice imo --JLPC 18:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine now --DXR 11:05, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:19, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokskär February 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DXR 10:35, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Landsort February 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Landsort February 2014 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --Nino Verde 12:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:52, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Plan du jardin et chateau de la Reine.png, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plan du jardin et chateau de la Reine.png has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality shot. --Tuxyso 10:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 10:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Landsort February 2014 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice collors and very sharp, very good--Lmbuga 09:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:14, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:24, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 12:47, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 17:39, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Filnamn

Hej Arild! Det är inte så att File:Hamngatan January 2014.jpg har fått ett lite förvirrande filnamn? Borde det inte vara 2014? /Julle (talk) 16:16, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Hej,

Jag måste January 2014.jpg&action=submit erkänna att du har en klar poäng där. Tack!--ArildV (talk) 16:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DXR 15:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --P e z i 15:45, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stockholm City Hall February 2014 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stockholm City Hall February 2014 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality image. --DAJF 15:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort February 2014 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality image. --DAJF 15:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberbaumbrücke November 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower Bridge Mars 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 23:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower bridge Mars 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:43, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Big Ben Mars 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:35, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shell Mex House Mars 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Billingsgate Market Mars 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:28, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whitehall Court Mars 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:28, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Naval College Mars 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but the left is leaning out a little bit (and also the buildings in background) --Christian Ferrer 09:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--ArildV 10:35, 5 March 2014 (UTC) Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greenwich foot tunnel Mars 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:28, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South Bank Mars 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left is leaning out --Christian Ferrer 18:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC) Done--ArildV 19:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC) Sorry but there is no difference in my eyes, I nevertheless succeeded to open the latest version --Christian Ferrer 21:18, 5 March 2014 (UTC) Ok, new version. --ArildV 21:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC) Support Now it's the right however it's better and acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 22:08, 5 March 2014 (UTC) It is impossible to say, it's an old building on the right which is built on (I guess) pillars on a river bank. For this kind of images (street photo rather than architecture photo) is a possible minimal tilt that is only possible to detect if one very carefully looking for it in full resolution irrelevant. Anyway, thanks for your careful review and promotion. Regards --ArildV 22:26, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fashion Street February 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:30, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charing Cross railway station Mars 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality. --Cayambe 16:33, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Art Deco Mars 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:08, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unilever House Mars 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:35, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greenwich foot tunnel Mars 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:19, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festival Pier Mars 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Thanks for note. --ArildV 21:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:50, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Whitehall Court (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:05, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:58, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stockholm City Hall at night, SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. (I've slightly modified the scope according to the geocoding.I hope I'm not wrong.) --JLPC (talk) 17:08, 5 March 2014 (UTC)--JLPC (talk) 17:08, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Its correct. Thank you for review!--ArildV (talk) 17:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:58, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Billingsgate Market Mars 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unilever House Mars 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:16, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whitehall Court Mars 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good. --A.Savin 10:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greenwich market Mars 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:40, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Billingsgate Market Mars 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 11:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower Bridge Mars 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:48, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20 Fenchurch Street Mars 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a bit perspective I think --A.Savin 10:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC) Thank you. New version uploaded. --ArildV 16:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC) OK --A.Savin 13:58, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Whitehall Court Mars 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Whitehall Court Mars 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shell Mex House (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Unilever House (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 09:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Selfridges Oxford Street store Mars 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Cool, however it would be better without the cropped people at right --Christian Ferrer 08:38, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ministry of Defence Main Building Mars 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 09:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South Bank Mars 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Geocoding would be nice) --P e z i 00:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC) Thank you.  Done I added geocode to all my London images.--ArildV 08:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southwark Bridge Mars 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Goog quality --Halavar 16:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skurusund Februry 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:49, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokskär February 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:49, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Greenwich foot tunnel ; entrances.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. (I modified the scope : it seems now more precise imo. Feel free to reverse.) --JLPC (talk) 17:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nationalmuseum Mars 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:19, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnboda Mars 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like your photos, because they are easy to review :) QI for me. --Tuxyso 18:05, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnboda Mars 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 18:05, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnboda Mars 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 18:05, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Helags Mars 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Helags Mars 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nationalmuseum Mars 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:46, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholms stadshus Mars 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 12:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsborg Mars 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction on the right is not perfect. Take another look on the verticals. --Tuxyso 10:36, 16 March 2014 (UTC) Thanks,  Done --ArildV 12:43, 16 March 2014 (UTC) OK now. --Tuxyso 21:51, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsborg Mars 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 10:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danvikens begravningsplats Mars 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:03, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnboda Mars 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Halavar 13:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hebbeska huset Mars 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:14, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cannon Street station Mars 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Beautiful colours and composition. --Arctic Kangaroo 07:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Moros FP

I hope you aren't offended. You should now me by now: I speak plainly. And I'm not afraid to oppose when others support. Which is why I'm puzzled you dropped your oppose. I'm sure Poco is confident enough at his FP trophy chest to handle the odd oppose vote! If there's something FP suffers from just now is not enough people opposing for wow, composition, lighting, and other artistic reasons and too many opposing over easy-to-spot technical concerns. And far far too many people supporting images that are nice and where the camera did its job. So if you think this is QI but not FP then oppose! We need more bold reviewers. -- Colin (talk) 19:49, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Hey,

I'm absolutely not offended and I also very sure Diego is confident enough to handle my oppose vote. But my oppose vote was based on technical objections (not lack of wow), when I gave the image a second look I reconsidered my view about the technical issue (partly at least). If it had not been for the technical issue I would probably have abstained from voting (because I was not and is not sufficiently convinced of the lack of wow). So for me it was both from a moral and logical point of view correct to drop my oppose vote.

Regards --ArildV (talk) 20:06, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Ok. I thought "Composition and lighting is good, but not outstanding (nothing that sets it apart from a good QI). No wow either" was a fairly solid oppose. -- Colin (talk) 20:28, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Råsunda February 2013 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Råsunda February 2013 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi ArildV, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lumabryggan February 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umeå Universitet February 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 12:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umeå Universitet February 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 12:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Förmiddagsklänning, drottning Victoria - Livrustkammaren - 15799 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Förmiddagsklänning, drottning Victoria - Livrustkammaren - 15799.tif has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sjöstadskapellet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 07:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parasol oder Riesenschirmpilz, Macrolepiota procera 3.JPG

Hello! Which photo is better in Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parasol oder Riesenschirmpilz, Macrolepiota procera 3.JPG? ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 16:21, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Hey,

The first is certainly better imo (higher EV). I see no point in cropping the mushroom (the background is not distracting). Regards--ArildV (talk) 16:31, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perito Moreno Glacier January 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perito Moreno Glacier January 2008 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sky needs denoising; for now it looks pixelated. --Cccefalon 07:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review. Unfortunately, I had no better camera back then.--ArildV 09:30, 8 April 2014 (UTC) Much better now. Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:33, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Landsort February 2014 33.jpg

Hello Arild, I was looking at some of your images when I saw this one, there is at least 6 dustspots, I have added notes. --Christian Ferrer 04:50, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello Christian,

Thanks for the notes. I found another 16 dust spotes! All removed now I hope.--ArildV (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

It seems OK, see you soon, good day. --Christian Ferrer 06:38 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stortjärnen October 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:18, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kastellet April 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:04, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Båtmanskasernen April 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:07, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Båtmanskasernen April 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 13:38, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen February 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Älvkarleby June 2013 (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Älvkarleby June 2013 (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Jee 07:07, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Främlingsvägen April 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments On the way to perfectionism: Could you consider to enhance this very good photo by cloning out the branch at the upper right border? --Cccefalon 09:34, 17 April 2014 (UTC) Done Thank you.--ArildV 18:08, 17 April 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:12, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vaxholms kastell November 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vaxholms kastell November 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten April 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:20, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lugnets skola April 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Öjön April 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 14:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:52, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten April 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:35, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:35, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Öjön April 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:07, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Härjångsfjället April 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten April 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelsrasta April 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Somewhat yellowish snow, WB off maybe? --A.Savin 09:26, 22 April 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks, you are right. I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 10:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC)  Support OK. Better -A.Savin 21:14, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Öjön April 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality image promotion process

Hello Arild. I have uploaded a few images as IQ candidates just to see what the QI standards are (I need to get better!) and have noticed that a number of Commoners are uploading dozens of images and promoting each other's images. The quality of some images promoted is poor. Your image Brunna gruvor 2012b.jpg, for instance,must be a joke. How is this acceptable within Commons QI guidelines? Is this one of Commons 'most valuable images'? I don't think so. You have some super QI promotions, but also quite a number that I cannot understand why they have been promoted. I also have noticed that you promote many of MattBuck's quite ordinary images. I have just looked at his most recent QI candidates and Declined most of them. Some of the Commoners promoting eachother's pictures are Commons Administrators, but I wonder if there is any monitoring of the promotion process? I have posted a similar request on Poco a Poco's and Pleclown's pages --Charles (talk) 09:44, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

I would suggest that you use Commons_talk:Quality_images (rather than individual user discussions) for a general discussion of the quality and criteria for QI. But before you do, please read Commons:Quality_images_guidelines and try to understand the difference between QI and FP/VI (QI is not about the single most valuable image or best image, its about basic technical quality). Your message is on the borderline of being insinuating and rude, yes Commons is made up of volunteers who upload pictures and together helping with projects such as QI, VI and FP (and its a strength not a weakness!). Although it seems as if you lack both the experience and the knowledge of QI, you dont hesitate to insinuate some sort of cronyism and you do so at my user talk (meaning that the criticism and accusations even directed at me). I have nothing to be ashamed of, neither my over 1200 QI or the thousands of reviews I've done.--ArildV (talk) 10:42, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

The discussion continues here User_talk:Pleclown#Quality_images.3F. Please answer there

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten April 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice image- --Cayambe 18:33, 20 April 2014 (UTC) Yes, but isn't it underexposed ? I find the snow very very grey.--Jebulon 22:00, 22 April 2014 (UTC) Thank you for your comment. I added more exposure.--ArildV 10:20, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelsrasta April 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:07, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality., QI for me --J. Lunau 09:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 09:06, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Himmelsrasta April 2014 03.jpg

Hi Arild, I uploaded a version of this file with of what I think a more correct WB, revert if you don't like, good day Christian Ferrer 17:28, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Christian!--ArildV (talk) 13:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

• It is with pleasure, I did the same with File:Ljungdalen April 2014 02.jpg, same sentence : revert if you don't like, good day Christian Ferrer 05:38, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Påskrännet 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 16:11, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Påskrännet 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:23, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Påskrännet 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:08, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent --Moroder 20:25, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lugnets skola April 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Too much red. Please reduce this colour. --Halavar 18:44, 17 April 2014 (UTC) Done Thank you.--ArildV 12:49, 21 April 2014 (UTC) Dust spot needs removing, and I think a bit sharper would be good. Mattbuck 22:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC) Done --ArildV 14:52, 25 April 2014 (UTC) The low levels are a bit bright for my taste, but ok. Mattbuck 10:04, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some cyan remnants of automated CA removal in the trees (see annotation). I also think, that the snow could be a little bit brighter (raising the whites). --Cccefalon 09:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC) Thank you for your review. I agree regarding the snow and i uploaded a new version (enough or should I do more?). I'm not sure when it comes to traces of CA. I used a 30 + years old 50mm F/1.8 AI lenses, I never apply any automatic CA removal when I use the lens because the lens never seems to produce any visible CA (and raw format, so no in-camera removal). Whatever it is you see, I have no idea on how to fix it.--ArildV 10:30, 30 April 2014 (UTC) Let me check tonight at my calibrated monitor back home. If it is just a problem of the monitor in my office, it won't be your bad. --Cccefalon 10:59, 30 April 2014 (UTC) I suspect the cyan/yellow colours in the trees is colour moire due to the Bayer filter. Lightroom's moire brush should remove it. -- Colin 20:24, 30 April 2014 (UTC) Thank you both, I saw it now and removed it (thanks!) with the moire brush. I also made the snow a little bit brighter. --ArildV 21:09, 30 April 2014 (UTC) It's perfect now and the snow looks very natural. Very good! --Cccefalon 05:45, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flatruet June 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:31, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelsrasta April 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Info new version uploaded --ArildV 10:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC) Like your other image in CR, white is not enough white --Christian Ferrer 17:10, 28 April 2014 (UTC)  Done new version by me --Christian Ferrer 17:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC) Thank you, the new version is fine imo. --ArildV 20:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC) over opinion please? --Christian Ferrer 08:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC) * Support I can't judge the light, but photographer likes the new WB and in general the photo meet QI for me, so I support --J. Lunau 12:56, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Brevik February 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brevik February 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Sedov

You are right that I can't determine what went on in the mind of each of the individual voters on that nomination. And I fully expect everyone who chooses to comment now to do so defensively as you have done. If you ever read the book "Mistakes Were Made (but Not by Me)" you see why none of us are capable of reasonable self-examination, especially when put under the spotlight. One cannot even reliably go back in time in one's mind to figure out why one made a decision, because the mind needs to rationalise it and interpret in the light of one's own self-belief. There's really no use asking people "why did you support?", particularly when the response may reflect negatively on one's abilities. All of us make mistakes with our voting and can at times be over-enthusiastic or over-negative. All of us vary in the weight we give to the pros and cons of an image. Some individual voters may well have studied the image carefully, examined the other images in the category and of the same ship, and those in our FP collection, considered the lighting and colour rendering and composition, and yet still decided on balance to support. Just as you ask me to consider that not everyone reviewed as poorly as I imagined, you should also consider that not everyone reviewed as carefully as you think you did, yourself included :-)

I look at the pictures in your collection of FPs and I feel more than "like": I am "amazed" and go "wow". They really are among the finest here. But recently, they are being joined with images that are orders of magnitude lesser in terms of technical quality, composition, lighting... -- Colin (talk) 09:19, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

I dont understand why you move the discussion to my talk page. I encourage everyone to read my original post and continuing (if necessary) there. I would kindly ask you to read the post again before you continue to discuss (of course your choice). Regards--ArildV (talk) 10:33, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

I moved it here because of your comment in small letters made me think you were interested in the psychology of misunderstandings and dispute, which is off-topic. And also in response to your comment about "negative assumptions about .. the rest of us". I don't see any merit in discussing that further on what is supposed to be a FP candidate page. You wrote "Very few people outside the conflict share the assumptions." Well I don't really know what "assumptions" you mean here, or how you know for sure what other people think. But I can quite understand if you don't wish to discuss this further. -- Colin (talk) 12:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Again, I think you should read read my original post more carefully. Every word was related to the discussion, and the ongoing conflict around Christian's nomination. If you wish to comment, discuss or ask anything regarding my post please use the nomination page.--ArildV (talk) 08:17, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

I have read your post multiple times. Clearly there's a failure of communication going on here. What went wrong with that nomination was when it started going off-topic. Jee's comments were made in good faith but ultimately led the discussion onto the meta issue of nominators and reviewers rather than the image itself. And I added to the problem by commenting that I wasn't too happy that my text was edited/reformatted as a result of someone accusing me of sabotage. Then Christian's sarcastic comments continued the escalation. If none of that off-topic stuff had occurred we'd simply have seen an "interesting" set of votes on a nomination and left it at that. I'm sorry but I think your post there was simply prolonging the misery by continuing to make personal comments on a page that is supposed to be about the image. That's why I do not wish to discuss those comments further on that page. Does that seem reasonable? If you have some personal advice for me, you are most welcome to use my talk page and I'll try my best to understand. -- Colin (talk) 09:25, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

I believe that I have been both patient, polite and consistent here. Every word in my only post was related to the discussion, and the ongoing conflict around Christian's nominations. I have also clearly indicated that I have no interest in discussing the nomination here, and I have logically also abstained from comment on your opinions.

My only post was peaceful and diplomatic. It contained four short paragraphs: 1) was about that I understand both sides; 2) was about a concrete tips to avoid further escalation; 3) was about how the conflict was escalating and how innocent user who had voted in the nomination was being drawn into the conflict and assessed according to the conflict logic and beliefs; 4) was about a friendly request to be more careful.

Of course, I recognize your right to disagree and also to ask me for clarification (on the nomination page, or ask here). But that was not what happened here. Instead, you wrote a long post on my talk page about why it is a waste of time to defend a vote. A topic I have not touched. Further more, you also invited users to read the post.

So next time you need a clarification, please just ask a simple question and I will be happy to answer. I think you've got an very fair answer now without any negative comments on you so please consider not to continue the discussion. --ArildV (talk) 15:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

All these posts -- yours, mine, Christian's, and others -- represent a failure to communicate: a belief that one has been "clear" and assumption that the confused/angry response by the other person is entirely their fault. I do wish we could all just go for a beer together. Well thanks for trying to help. See you around. -- Colin (talk) 18:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vreten May 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:22, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vreten May 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You got inspired! :) --Poco a poco 19:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Poussan, Hérault 02.jpg

Thanks for your review, like with recipes I make some experiences during the editing process. Here it's a very, very processed image (here certainly too much or in a wrong way):

• In first there is an exportation in TIFF of 2 different versions of the same image (expo, highlights, shadows)
• I made an upsampling of this 2 files (50%) with a dedicated software
• I made a pseudo HDR fusion with the 2 big TIFF files
• I downsampled the result to the orgininal size.

Like I said it's like an experience and sometimes I have some good surprises with the results. I had withdraw it and I will start again the edition and will renominate it again. I have just read your discussion with Colin. Numerous time, you attended on the FPC page of severals fight between Colin and me, now it's finished, if you're interested you can read this and if not have a nice day and see you later in one of our carefull review --Christian Ferrer 06:35, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

I have read the discussion on his talk page before.

Personally, I use LR enfuse for exposure fusion. A very easy to use plugin to Lightroom (no need to export the files, just create a virtual copy in LR). I have used it for example here and here. One exposure is often sufficient thanks to the wonderful dynamic range of the D600, but LR enfuse also works fine with multiple exposures here.

Regards, --ArildV (talk) 09:16, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

• Interesting, thanks for these informations, here is a better exemple of my technique, also maybe a little bit too much sharpening... --Christian Ferrer 10:18, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungsträdgården Metro station May 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:30, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sundbyberg centrum May 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:14, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huvudsta May 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:22, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vreten May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 13:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huvudsta May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 13:27, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungsträdgården Metro station May 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:32, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungsträdgården Metro station May 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 14:00, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vreten Metro station (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Örebro slott May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good however you should remove the two birds (disturbing IMO) or at least the blurred one --Christian Ferrer 15:31, 25 May 2014 (UTC) Thank you.I removed the disturbing bird from the sky.--ArildV 15:54, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungsträdgården Metro station May 2014 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I would consider cropping the left element --DXR 18:30, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sundbyberg centrum May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:07, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungsträdgården Metro station May 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgarhuset May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 11:22, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungsstugan May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:03, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Örebro tingsrätt May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 08:39, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanslibron May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:15, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Våghustorget May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:15, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krämaren May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 10:32, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adolf Kjellströms villa May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 11:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adolf Kjellströms villa May 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgarhuset May 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frimurarlogen Örebro May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --A.Savin 11:14, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungsträdgården Metro station May 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 22:20, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Choisie May 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:12, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nämndhuset May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:59, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karolinska läroverket May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -good quality --Isiwal 12:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nämndhuset May 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very nice --A.Savin 11:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vasabron May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frimurarlogen Örebro May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 05:32, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T Centralen May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Örebro slott May 2014 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Örebro slott May 2014 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Örebro slott May 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 02:19, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allehandaborgen May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:51, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Choisie May 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:25, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungsträdgården Metro station May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:06, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungsträdgården Metro station May 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very eye-catching. I'm wondering if it is FPC material? --Slaunger 17:17, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vreten May 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:10, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Choisie May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok to me now. --Cayambe 05:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allehandaborgen May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:07, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Husaren May 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:49, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Nicolai kyrka May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:07, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Nicolai kyrka May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:49, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Choisie May 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svartån May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spots; marked --A.Savin 12:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC) Done, thanks for notes.--ArildV 16:06, 30 May 2014 (UTC)  Support --A.Savin 10:36, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wadköping May 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:21, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Örebro teater may 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but needs sky cleaning: several dust and a bird spot --A.Savin 13:40, 29 May 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--ArildV 19:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC) Seems OK, but still there is prominent dustspot just above the rain gutter. Please remove, and I'll promote then. --A.Savin 12:07, 30 May 2014 (UTC)  Done thanks.--ArildV 15:17, 30 May 2014 (UTC)  Support Yes. --A.Savin 10:33, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Örebro konserthus May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thanks, new version uploaded (also with different crop).--ArildV 10:26, 29 May 2014 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 20:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svenska Högarna June 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svenska Högarna June 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 17:08, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landshövdingestallet May 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Husaren May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:35, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svenska Högarna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 17:12, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svenska Högarna June 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landshövdingestallet May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:15, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Örebro stadsbibliotek May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kungsträdgården Metro station May 2014 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Kungsträdgården Metro station has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandhamn June 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svenska Högarna June 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Perhaps a little bit too much NR, but OK for QI to me --A.Savin 10:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandhamn June 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Choisie May 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prickgrundet June 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus and lighting. Rule of thirds seems OK.--Peulle 11:45, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svenska Högarna June 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, carefully composed. --Tuxyso 11:03, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svenska Högarna June 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centralpalatset May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Storgatan May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:05, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Örebro teatar May 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good light and focus.--Peulle 13:32, 5 June 2014 (UTC) Done New version with small tilt correction.--ArildV 19:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 03:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wadköping May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--ArildV 19:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC) Seems ok  Support --Christian Ferrer 03:46, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svenska Högarna June 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little bit bright, but still QI for me. (Please add the geolocation.) --XRay 10:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)  DoneX2--ArildV 09:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svenska Högarna June 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top left very blurry, perhaps wind blur? I'm not sure, but reducing the blurred area by another crop might help. --Cccefalon 09:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC) DOF are very limited here (taken with a 70-200mm lens), the trees are most likely just out of focus. Imo its not a problem, but I can try a new crop tonight.--ArildV 09:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC) Thank you, I am aware of the limitations of that lense. Before uploading the new crop, let me know, if it an impovement or not. I trust your judgement and I don't want to force a version, that is worse. --Cccefalon 09:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC) Thanks, I uploaded a new version with a small left crop. I think a bigger crop affects the composition too much. --ArildV 09:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Yeah, less dominant now. I think, it is a good compromise. --Cccefalon 09:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalkskär June 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lumafabriken June 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Cccefalon 05:06, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Södra Hammarbyhamnen June 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:28, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kajen 4 June 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shape of Kajen 4 cheated you: You made non-verticals rectangular and in consequence the old-styled house at the right side is leaning inwards. --Cccefalon 15:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)  Done My mistake, you are right! --ArildV 18:26, 13 June 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:41, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allébron June 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But what about lens information in EXIF? It shows "0.0 mm f/0.0". --Joydeep 14:18, 15 June 2014 (UTC) Its a old 1982 non-CPU lens (Nikkor 50mm F/1.8 AI). More information here about using non-CPU lenses. Unlike Canon (and most companies), Nikon never change their lens mount.--ArildV 14:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halichoerus grypus June 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halichoerus grypus June 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hackescher Markt November 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hackescher Markt November 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rådhuset June 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rådhuset June 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 11:05, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rådhuset metro station June 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 13:28, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rådhuset metro station June 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:07, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rådhuset metro station June 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:50, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rådhuset June 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen June 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 14:58, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen June 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen June 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, however yet tilted cw. --Cccefalon 10:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks. I also found and removed some moiré from white house, right facade.--ArildV 10:57, 20 June 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:21, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantmätartjärnen June 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen June 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:54, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flatruetvägen June 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thank you! New version uploaded with tilt correction.--ArildV 22:36, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Södermalm June 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Blue Elf 14:55, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantmätartjärnen June 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (only a slight problem, easy to fix : see note, please). --JLPC 15:11, 23 June 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you. --ArildV 20:47, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klövsjö June 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left side of the photo is leaning inwards, pse see the fence and the wooden door. --Cccefalon 12:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC)  Done --ArildV 13:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:44, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klövsjö June 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderful image (beside the dust spot of course) --Cccefalon 12:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)  Done thanks for note!--ArildV 13:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:44, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klövsjö June 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:07, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klövsjö June 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:07, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klövsjö June 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen June 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice. --Myrabella 20:45, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klövsjö June 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice mood, good quality. --Tsui 12:39, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantmätartjärnen June 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:53, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klövsjö June 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What happened to the building? It is skewed to the left. --Cccefalon 10:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC) I do understand the question, it was a small tilt (now corrected) but that does not explain everything. No perspective correction has been made, and I dont understand how the lens would have been able to created such a perspective distortion in the center of the image. I guess (in lack of a better explanation) that the building is not straight, but somewhat strange since the house seems well-maintained.--ArildV 11:48, 26 June 2014 (UTC) yes, it's weird, because the background houses are rectilinear. It is of course not your fault, that either foreground or background houses are skewed. The photo is doubtless of good quality. --Cccefalon 05:35, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen June 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:06, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen June 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 13:53, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pristina February 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:55, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pristina February 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 11:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten June 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:50, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nämndhuset May 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:30, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten June 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:20, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten June 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:58, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arbetshuset May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:26, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medborgarhuset May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Pudelek 12:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lugnets skola June 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 11:09, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen June 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:59, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Post och telegrafhuset May 2014.jpg

Good morning; I don't know, if perhaps something weird occured, but for me, the new upload looks the same than before. I mean, the church tower is still present. Even the thumbnails look same. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:34, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Good morning,

I see the new version, even the thumbnail. But I've had the same problem before, sometimes it works to open the page in another browser (or just wait).--ArildV (talk) 07:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the hint! I was just confused, because 400px less should be even appear in a thumnail. I will stay tuned! --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:45, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Örebro rådhus May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hungerford bridge April 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but shadows too much dark IMO --Christian Ferrer 04:42, 10 July 2014 (UTC) I like the dark shadows here for aesthetic reasons. Maybe not QI, but I don't want to change this image. --ArildV 17:23, 13 July 2014 (UTC)  Neutral Agreed, very nice. --Christian Ferrer 05:26, 14 July 2014 (UTC) Any chance of sharpening? Mattbuck 21:22, 15 July 2014 (UTC)  Support I don't think the having detail in the shadows will improve anything, probably it will destroy the beautiful winter mood. --Stegop 04:38, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estación Barón January 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 13:36, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Post och telegrafhuset May 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left side of the photo could be improved by a different crop. Please overthink my proposal in the annotation --Cccefalon 12:21, 16 July 2014 (UTC) Done Thank you for review and proposal. The new version is also slightly darker.--ArildV 07:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC) Good improvement! --Cccefalon 07:47, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Worth a new try for the Bay of Kotor?

Hello Arild, in this recent FPC (that almost became FP) you opposed. I am thinking about nominating this shot that I took the same day believing that it may have more acceptance (the spot is considerably smaller, the perspective of the church is better and most of the old town is visible). The weather is as bad as in the first picture, but still I wanted to know what do you think. CU, Poco² 19:41, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello Diego,

I think the second shot is better (even the composition and view of the church are better) but I have some problem with the weather (but not enough to oppose here). I'm not saying that all FP must have sun and blue sky (I love this shot and I think you should nominate this shot), but I expect that every photographer who nominating pictures for FP (unlike QI) carefully choose to take the image under appropriate weather conditions. When I vote, I assume that the photographer have carefully and deliberately chosen to take the image under those conditions and I ask myself if it is a good or bad choice.

Regards, --ArildV (talk) 20:41, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Well, that is possible if you spend some days at one place. When I travel with my camera I cannot afford that, I travel mostly everyday and just hope that the weather will be good. The trip in the Balcans was terrible from the weather point of view, although I escaped from the century floods there that came 3 weeks later. Thanks for reminder on the Linderhof palace, when I saw your review I already put it as FPC in my user page. Take care and, in fact, CU soon Poco² 20:47, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

I do really understand that, but I dont think its relevant when we talking FP. Take care and CU in London!--ArildV (talk) 20:58, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hudiksvall July 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 18:49, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Please, remove the 2 dust spots on the left Poco a poco 18:50, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Done Thank you. --ArildV 19:13, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuggörarna July 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:04, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuggörarna July 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Small overexposed parts. I left notes. Otherwise QI. --Halavar 12:01, 29 July 2014 (UTC)  Support Some small parts at the building are clipping, but not disturbing as there is no false colours for that reason. --Smial 12:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuggörarna July 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good photograph. --Bob Collowân 10:56, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuggörarna July 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:13, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hudiksvall July 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 09:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo July 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stegop 23:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuggörarna July 2014 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 22:38, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chevrolet Camaro Hudiksvall 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuggörarna July 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:55, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hudiksvall July 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments right side leaning out. Also, the crop left side could be improved my cutting some pixels. --Cccefalon 08:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC) Done + some improvements.--ArildV 10:58, 30 July 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:12, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuggörarna July 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please remove the strange blurry spot (see my annotation) --Cccefalon 08:02, 30 July 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you--ArildV 11:06, 30 July 2014 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuggörarna July 2014 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Famberhorst 17:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hudiksvall July 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Perhaps the window frames are a bit overexposed, but good IMO--Lmbuga 17:16, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuggörarna July 2014 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:54, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hudiksvall July 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tilted to the right. --Halavar 09:52, 31 July 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you. --ArildV 15:34, 31 July 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 17:13, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuggörarna July 2014 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Stegop 04:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rogsta kyrka July 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Högs kyrka July 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:43, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rogsta kyrka July 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but please remove the blurry bird. I also left a proposal; just an idea. --Cccefalon 07:51, 1 August 2014 (UTC)  Donex2 Thank you. I chose 4X5-crop to keep more of the foreground.--ArildV 09:27, 1 August 2014 (UTC)  Comment A good choice - even more impressive now. --Cccefalon 10:52, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Högs kyrka July 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:04, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hudiksvall July 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but please fix the dust spot (see note) --Poco a poco 19:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you. --ArildV 09:32, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rogsta kyrka July 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 13:19, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ol-Ers July 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:12, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Högs kyrka July 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please remove dust spots (see notice). --P e z i 18:42, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo station July 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:48, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo station July 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:29, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo forngård July 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:40, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo station July 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:58, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rogsta kyrka July 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rogsta kyrka July 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Thank you--ArildV 21:52, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 14:55, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuggörarna July 2014 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:05, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo forngård July 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Famberhorst 15:17, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo forngård July 2014 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 12:35, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo forngård July 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi to me. --Villy Fink Isaksen 13:08, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo forngård July 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:09, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo forngård July 2014 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:06, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo station July 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:55, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hudiksvall July 2014 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:37, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hudiksvall July 2014 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:28, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo forngård July 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, however, the right side is leaning in yet. --Cccefalon 07:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC) Done Thank you. --ArildV 07:58, 8 August 2014 (UTC)  Comment Great! You also managed to keep the disturbing floodlight out of the image! --Cccefalon 08:31, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuggörarna July 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please remove the dust spot. --Cccefalon 15:17, 6 August 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--ArildV 07:37, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo forngård July 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuggörarna July 2014 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:20, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo station July 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:53, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hälsingstuna kyrka July 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:15, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo July 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:07, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ol-Ers July 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Signalfabriken May 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 22:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Signalfabriken May 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 22:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo July 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hudiksvall July 2014 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo July 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:10, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delsbo July 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO it's good, but tilted CW.--XRay 12:22, 10 August 2014 (UTC) Done Thank you.--ArildV 15:47, 11 August 2014 (UTC)  Support OK now.--XRay 15:46, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Signalfabriken May 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but right side is leaning in visibly. --Cccefalon 09:31, 12 August 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--ArildV 16:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ol-Ers July 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please have a look to the image and the unsharp bird.--XRay 08:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you, i forgot to remove the bird.--ArildV 10:17, 18 August 2014 (UTC)  Comment OK now. Thank you.--XRay 15:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Signalfabriken May 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail all around --Daniel Case 04:32, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akalla metro station August 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Can you try to reduce the reddish fringe at the neon lights? --Cccefalon 18:47, 22 August 2014 (UTC) --Cccefalon 18:47, 22 August 2014 (UTC) Done thank you.--ArildV 19:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akalla metro station August 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:35, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isafjord 1 August 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Oh, I miss that employer...:( QI --Poco a poco 19:04, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isafjord 1 August 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sundbyberg centrum May 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:44, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Huvudsta May 2014 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Huvudsta May 2014 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoria tower August 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:22, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kista August 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kista August 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 09:31, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kista August 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The cropped car at the front is not optimal, but overall QI imho. --Tuxyso 09:24, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kista August 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But why have you choosen a slightly decentered shooting position? --Tuxyso 07:39, 24 August 2014 (UTC) Good question, no good reason.--ArildV 08:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akalla metro station August 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:21, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments är på gång igen!

This is an invitation to participate in the Swedish part of the Wiki Loves Monuments competition. You are getting it since you participated in 2013. The message below is in Swedish, should this be an issue you can get more information in English here or drop a message on my talk page.

Hej ArildV,
I september genomför vi fototävlingen Wiki Loves Monuments igen.

I år har vi till den svenska deltävlingen lagt till ytterligare en kategori med objekt du kan fotografera, nämligen arbetslivsmuseum. Vi har även passat på att förtydliga instruktionerna för hur man deltar. För mer information se tävlingens hemsida.

Det finns gott om fina priser och tio av bilderna går vidare till den internationella finalen. Så varför inte delta i år igen!

Vänliga hälsningar,
Arrangörerna av Wiki Loves Monuments i Sverige

Message delivered by L PBot (talk) 14:47, 27 August 2014 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lumafabriken August 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:23, 25 August 2014 (UTC) Yes, it is good quality. But please remove the dust spot (see note) --Cccefalon 09:41, 25 August 2014 (UTC Done Thank you both.--ArildV 13:00, 25 August 2014 (UTC))

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Götgatan August 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:44, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kista August 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Do we really need the yellow eye catcher? But anyhow, its of good quality and QI. --Cccefalon 15:33, 24 August 2014 (UTC) No we dont, but I dont know here. I like the cloud behind the building. I think I will upload your suggestion as a alternative version. Thank your for your review. --ArildV 13:38, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Skärholmen August 2014 11.jpg

File:Skärholmen August 2014 11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hangsna (talk) 10:38, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skärholmen August 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right side is leaning out. --Cccefalon 18:42, 26 August 2014 (UTC) Done thank you. --ArildV 19:23, 26 August 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:45, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skärholmens centrum August 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skärholmens gymnasium August 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skärholmen August 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 10:23, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skärholmen August 2014 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:41, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Rådhuset metro station May 2014.jpg

Hi ArildV. I saw your photo File:Rådhuset metro station May 2014.jpg, and I thought it was really amazing and could easily be an FP. But I also saw that it is too small, although very close to 2 MPX. Maybe you have a bigger version of the file, that can be nominated to FP? Tomer T (talk) 17:08, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Tomer,

Thank you very much. It is one of my own favorite pictures. Unfortunately, the image is not sharp at full resolution. I was trying a monopod, and it was not working. Normally I can go back and try again, but it does not feel right here (i saw the man and took the picture). I can upload a full resolution version (5885x3311) but I'm not sure that it helps.--ArildV (talk) 17:31, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skärholmen August 2014 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right side leaning in considerably. --Cccefalon 07:14, 28 August 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--ArildV 08:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skärholmens gymnasium August 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:29, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skärholmen August 2014 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colour. However, the buildings are leaning yet out considerably. Will be QI after correction. --Cccefalon 20:29, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Done Thank you.--ArildV 07:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skärholmen August 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Livioandronico2013 19:41, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

New Upload. By Ivan2010

Hi ArildV, I have corrected the image: File:Sunset in swimming pool.jpg in candidates of QI, but I cannot place it on the template, I Upload new version, the noise of color was reduced. excuse me. --Ivan2010 01:44, 8 septiembre 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosenbad August 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norrström August 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheraton Stockholm August 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 20:20, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet September 2014 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image --DKrieger 20:17, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image --DKrieger 20:23, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet September 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:18, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schumachers bageri September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 19:36, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tele2 Arena September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:44, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schumachers bageri September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:08, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet September 2014 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet September 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:02, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skärholmen August 2014 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Thank you, I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 09:48, 3 September 2014 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 08:44, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tele2 Arena September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schumachers bageri September 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Diana Ringo 10:10, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frukthallen 3 September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vattenfalls huvudkontor September 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I had reduced the luminance of the warning vests a little bit. --Cccefalon 18:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vattenfalls huvudkontor September 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:40, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet September 2014 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:34, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duvbo Metro station September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:35, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duvbo Metro station September 2014 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:35, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Particentralen 6 September 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:57, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tele2 Arena September 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:35, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arenastaden September 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:01, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duvbo Metro station September 2014 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly tilted ccw --Uoaei1 06:36, 10 September 2014 (UTC) Done Thank you.--ArildV 08:13, 10 September 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Uoaei1 08:54, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apotekets huvudkontor September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:49, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skärholmen August 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unfortunately not. Perhaps should I do the opposite, removing some of background to make it less disturbing? --ArildV 09:52, 3 September 2014 (UTC) weak Support --Livioandronico2013 12:36, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rissne Metro station Septamber 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duvbo Metro station September 2014 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:40, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tele2 Arena September 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:40, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tele2 Arena September 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:25, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silverpilen September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silverpilen September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantmännen siloanläggning September 2014 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 07:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantmännen siloanläggning September 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 07:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantmännen siloanläggning September 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Årstaberg September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 05:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arenastaden September 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but please, remove the 2 dust spots (see notes) --Poco a poco 18:39, 11 September 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--ArildV 08:13, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tele2 Arena September 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:09, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantmännen siloanläggning September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:25, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solna station September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:42, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turbinhuset September 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:15, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turbinhuset September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:32, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västerås stadshus September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:41, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantmännen siloanläggning September 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:48, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solna station September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:10, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apotekets huvudkontor September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:48, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silverpilen September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:12, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Grain elevator

Good morning, Arild. I don't want to burst the limited space on QIC and I answer here. The definition in en-wiki says: " grain elevator is a tower containing a bucket elevator or a pneumatic conveyor", that means, the term only refers to the tower part of a storage plant. However, this part is not visible on your photo. Doing explosion hazard expertises on silo storages in a former part of my bussines life, I know exactly the layout and the structure of such a storage and mill plant. However, the mistakable description won't be a reason to decline that photo. Removing the rainbow moiré and the left side incline will be good enough for promotion. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:53, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Good morning Uwe,

Ok I understand and and trust your expertise. in the pursuit of perfectionism, which description would you suggest? Regards--ArildV (talk) 10:08, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Just use grain silo storage or grain silo storage plant cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:16, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Allébron September 2014.jpg

Hi ArildV,

I just noticed your picture over at the featured picture candidates. Have you thought about entering it at the current Light on the move theme of our monthly Photo challenge? Looks like it might fit in there very well … --El Grafo (talk) 19:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi El Grafo,

Thank you for the suggestion. Some users have previously expressed concern about nominating images to FP and the Photo challenge simultaneously. I have already uploaded a another image to the Light on the move theme. Regards --ArildV (talk) 20:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Now that you say it I remember – don't really see the problem though. Well, you could still add it to the challenge once the FPC review is done after the 26th. Might make me consider actually voting for the first time ;-) --El Grafo (talk) 08:58, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västerås slott September 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 13:27, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västerås slott September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duvbo Metro station September 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turbinhuset September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västerås domkyrka September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, even a FPC I think --Taxiarchos228 07:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västerås stadsbibliotek September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Because I wanted to show the whole glass ceiling. I have different images with the floor. For example file:Västerås stadsbibliotek September 2014 05.jpg. In other words, I dont think the crop is weird.--ArildV 14:19, 14 September 2014 (UTC) That is a reasonable explanation, although I would have considered myself to crop it just at the base of the painting in the back, as the half-cut through shelves gives a not so good crop IMO. But that is more an FPC argument. -- Slaunger 14:40, 14 September 2014 (UTC) I uploaded a different crop also as a alternative. I understand your view, but I can also see the point in keeping some of the context. Thank your for a careful review.--ArildV 15:28, 14 September 2014 (UTC) ArildV: Thanks for the additional cropped version. I agree: No harm in having several different crops available. --Slaunger 05:11, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rissne Metro station September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Livioandronico2013 13:44, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duvbo Metro station September 2014 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantmännens siloanläggning Västerås September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mall Of Scandinavia September 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arenastaden September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 11:25, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duvbo Metro station September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turbinhuset September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 08:32, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västerås slott September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:46, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantmännen siloanläggning September 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality; please remove dust spot. --P e z i 21:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC) Done Thank you.--ArildV 08:12, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allébron September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice surprise photo. Good! --Cccefalon 19:03, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantmännens siloanläggning Västerås September 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a rainbow moiré (see note) in full resolution. Left side is slightly leaning in. And, excuse me, the title of the image is wrong: there are no elevators visible, they are all inside the silo building. --Cccefalon 07:26, 17 September 2014 (UTC) Sorry, I'm not a native English speaker but according to English Wikipedia the term "grain elevator" also covers the entire elevator complex.....--~~~~ I will answer on your talk page --Cccefalon 09:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC) Done and I will update the description.--ArildV 10:10, 17 September 2014 (UTC) Well done and good quality --Cccefalon 11:23, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mall of Scandinavia September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quality Hotel Friends September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet September 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but the door on the left needs to be tweaked (see note) --Cccefalon 07:52, 17 September 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you. I think it was a small tilt.--ArildV 09:49, 17 September 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:49, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arenastaden September 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:52, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quality Hotel Friends September 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:52, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vattenfalls huvudkontor September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:52, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Årsta partihallar September 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The shadow is disturbing. May be another crop would be better.--XRay 07:48, 14 September 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you. I agree.--ArildV 08:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC)) Good quality. --XRay 16:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Duvbo Metro station September 2014 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Duvbo Metro station September 2014 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

This nomination page puzzled me and the bot for two days. :) Jee 14:51, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. Something must have happened when I created the nomination page. Regards--ArildV (talk) 18:21, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tele2 Arena September 2014 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:02, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tele2 Arena September 2014 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:02, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tele2 Arena September 2014 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.Can be a FP --Livioandronico2013 21:41, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svenska Metallverken September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 11:48, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västerås slott September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kopparlunden September 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kopparlunden September 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kopparlunden September 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kopparlunden September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svenska Metallverken September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cirkusängen 6 May 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 12:16, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svenska Metallverken September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Poco a poco 16:44, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arvidverkstaden September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:05, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västerås domkyrka September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kopparlunden September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:40, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kopparlunden September 2014 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:57, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cirkusängen 6 September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (A little bit noisy, but IMO OK.) --XRay 17:05, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell 206B Jet Ranger III September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Årsta partihallar September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell 206B Jet Ranger III September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Livioandronico2013 16:14, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kopparlunden September 2014 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:56, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cirkusängen 6 September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:46, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falkenbergska kvarnen September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:17, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falkenbergska kvarnen September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:07, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malmö redd September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:54, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Östra kyrkogården Västerås September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Östra kyrkogården Västerås September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:30, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torggatan September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:27, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sundiska huset September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:27, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biskopsgården September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klipper hotell September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 17:53, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sundiska huset September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 18:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FB September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:19, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Particentralen 6 September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:08, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västerås habour September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:08, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capital hotel September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:42, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Televerkets hus September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:58, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Particentralen 1 September 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:46, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

I Have moved this away from my diskussion: --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:09, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Mange tak!--ArildV (talk) 07:16, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Allébron September 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Allébron September 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kopparlunden September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bottom is a bit blurry, but ok. --Mattbuck 15:08, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tele2 Arena September 2014 09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tele2 Arena September 2014 09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:16, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skanskaskrapan September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Televerkets hus September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Dust spot (please see notice); tiny perspective correction needed. --P e z i 20:06, 24 September 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for note. I removed the dust spot and did a very small tilt correction.--ArildV 19:34, 28 September 2014 (UTC) Support OK now. --P e z i 21:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Masthuggskyrkan September 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Cccefalon 22:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amerikaskjulet September 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Cccefalon 22:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksborg September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Cccefalon 22:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sjömanskyrkan September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Cccefalon 22:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amerikahuset September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Cccefalon 22:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skanskaskrapan September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skanskaskrapan September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilt/perspective correction  Done. Thanks for comments.--ArildV 20:57, 29 September 2014 (UTC) Good quality. QI for me. --Cccefalon 22:29, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Årsta partihallar September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 18:22, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Älv-snabben 4 September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skärhamn September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:43, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Storgatan 22 September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:39, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rivö September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:39, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Göteborgs baptistförsamling September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:39, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell 206B Jet Ranger III September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Färentuna kyrka September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Livioandronico2013 08:56, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantmännen siloanläggning September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The crop (or centering) is a bit too much arbitrary for my taste --Christian Ferrer 06:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC) There is a high structure, with limited space around. The picture shows the building's lower part. I admit, not the year's funniest QI. But I think the image is useful, see also other photos in the category.--ArildV 12:09, 22 September 2014 (UTC) I rather agree with Christian. I think it might be better to go with a tighter crop on the left, to get rid of all the sky. Also, is that a mark in the concrete or a dust spot 2/3 of the way up the left tower? Mattbuck 14:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC) Done Dust spot removed (thank you). I can agree from a photographic POV, but not from educational POV. The sky makes the image easier to understand, and the building easier to read. --ArildV 05:42, 30 September 2014 (UTC) Ok --Livioandronico2013 16:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skärhamn September 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality but still tilted ccw. --Cccefalon 06:42, 1 October 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--ArildV 20:59, 2 October 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:17, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skärhamn September 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please remove the two big dust/rain spots (see note) --Cccefalon 06:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)  Done thank you --ArildV 20:59, 2 October 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:17, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ekeröleden September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finska ambassaden September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:53, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Södersjukhuset September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 11:35, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roundabout September 2014 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:57, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilla Essingen September 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cilla Börjlind Göteborg Book Fair 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Pleclown 16:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Färjestaden September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 16:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Färentuna kyrka September 2014 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Färentuna kyrka September 2014 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garnisonen September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Solbacken September 2014 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:33, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Färingsö September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riksdagen September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 07:57, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Färentuna kyrka September 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sjöhistoriska September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 07:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Globen September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:19, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slottet September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gullmarsplan September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:43, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Essinge kyrka September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted cw --Cccefalon 08:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 8 October 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you, tilt corrected. --ArildV 07:18, 9 October 2014 (UTC) Sorry, I didn't see your comment, Uwe Poco a poco 20:06, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Erskine September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Goød quality--Lmbuga 16:25, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinesiska ambassaden September 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice and good--Lmbuga 16:23, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Friis September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Johanning 11:00, 11 October 2014 (UTC) ArildV can you see note? Thanks --Livioandronico2013 10:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you both, new version uploaded. --ArildV 14:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now --Livioandronico2013 18:39, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salems kyrka September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:20, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Essingen September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:26, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Globen September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:23, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alby metro station September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alby metro station September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:39, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilla Essingen September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 08:14, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Djurgårdsbrunnsbron September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:41, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Essingen September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The air in Sweden is much less foggy than at my home location --Tuxyso 08:16, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vintertullen September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:36, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallunda September 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit of noise, but ok --Poco a poco 20:07, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salems kyrka September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:17, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tjörnbro Park September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:22, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarteret Plankan September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 09:10, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bagarmossen Metro station October 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:44, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skarpnäck Metro station October 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:14, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Botkyrka kyrka September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 07:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garnisonen September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanslihuset September 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 10:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Template:QICpromoted/layout Template:QICpromoted/layout Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Excuse me

Hallo ArildV, please excuse my mistake of this morning. I don't know how it could happen. Kindest regards -- Lothar Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:31, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Hey Lothar Spurzem,

No problem. I understood it was a mistake/technical problem. Best regards--ArildV ([[User talk:ArildV#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:04, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:01, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

File:Reindeer Ljungris October 2014 01.jpg

Hi Arild, nice image. If you nominate it at FPC, I will bring my support. Nice day. ) -- Christian Ferrer ^{Talk / Images} 10:24, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Christian. I had a very nice weekend in the mountains.--ArildV ([[User talk:ArildV#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:12, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

I had already noticed, there are very nice images and I like very much this place. -- Christian Ferrer ^{Talk / Images} 19:17, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Dust spots

One more dustspot removal in the location of the note and its ready. --C messier ([[User talk:C messier|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:41, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Sorry C messier but I have stared at the images for five minutes, and manipulated the curves with LR to see all the dust spots, and I see absolutely nothing.--ArildV ([[User talk:ArildV#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Could you add a more precise note?--ArildV ([[User talk:ArildV#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:56, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Template:Done --C messier ([[User talk:C messier|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:11, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Photo Challenge Bronze

Template:Photo Challenge Bronze

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:09, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:16, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Happy holidays! 2015!

		* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

We did the same

at almost the same time with Estormiz´ file. I did a little more than just removing the CA. Shall I put it back to your version? --Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:31, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

I think your version is fine and now I can review the images again!--ArildV ([[User talk:ArildV#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Happy new year!

Hi ArildV, I present to you my best wishes :) -- ChristianFerrer 18:55, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

You´ve got mail

--Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted