User talk:Archaeodontosaurus/Quatrième trimestre 2012

Exterior

I know it would be useful because it would ease gathering support. Anyway, I still think a valued image is useful because it describes well the subject, including its main features, and many buildings have their main features outside. Then, a single main scope can describe the main features of the building as a whole.

For example, this is what we do with birds. Birds have a lot of interesting features inside, and any species have interesting anatomical distinctive characteristics in its internal organs that could be interesting scopes. Although, we don't label "exterior" the scope the external aspect of the bird.--Pere prlpz (talk) 07:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Well observed. But the birds we scope "egg" for butterflies "mounted specimen" etc ... If we are lucky enough to have one day a view of the interior of these buildings we can promote it, too. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:13, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Une question de typographie

Coucou Didier, j'ai vu que tu as retiré les parenthèses entourant l'autorité du modèle {{Specimen}}. J'aurais pensé justement que c'était utile ^_^, après je me trompe peut-être. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:38, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Hier j'étais en train de te faire un mot pour les retirer et je me suis dis que je pouvais essayé de comprendre et j'y suis arrivé assez facilement, j'en suis tout aussi fier qu'étonné. Non les parenthèses sont d'une gestion compliqué. Entre la zoologie qui en fait un grand usage et la botanique où le fait de les mettre ou pas a une signification. Ex Cryptomeria japonica MHNT.BOT2004.0.64.jpg ici le premier à décrire l'espèce est Linné (fils) mais Don l'a reclassée; le nom ainsi libellé est correct, mais si tu l'entoure de parenthèse tu vas signifier qu'il s'agit d'un synonyme... Donc comme tu l'as compris ce n'est pas automatique. Je suis a ta disposition pour une séance de graine... :)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

ps: je t'ai fais suivre un Email pour une sortie de préhistoire dans le Quercy Dimanche.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siproeta stelenes meridionalis, mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria met. Totodu74 (talk) 08:36, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Richeria grandis, bark.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 10:02, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment According to several Wikipedias, this bark is expected to be found in four states: in the trunk of the tree, after recollection (as in image), being stepped in rum and ready for consumption. I wonder if any precision in scope is needed.--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:00, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
• Fragments of bark, in the collection of systematic botany. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:18, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calidris ferruginea (Curlew Sandpiper) egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 11:51, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acer pseudoplatanus (sycamore maple), samaras.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 11:54, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opsiphanes cassiae MHNT ventre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 16:17, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opsiphanes cassiae MHNT dos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 16:17, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Afzelia africana MHNT.BOT.2004.0.227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI Poco a poco 17:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

FP nomination

Bonjour,

Je ne suis pas sûr que tu aies vu ça...

--Jebulon (talk) 15:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

...Du coup, je viens d'en profiter pour ranger un peu ton petit bazar, c'était la saison...--Jebulon (talk) 15:13, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Je te dois un double remerciement. En effet je n'étais pas aller en FP d'un moment. C'est toujours bien agréable. Demain je vais débuter le versement d'une petite série de coquillage, que nous avons reçu en don, au muséum, il y a quelque temps. Le nom du donateu,r qui sera inclus dans la légende, ne t'est pas inconnu... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:28, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Musée national de Préhistoire (Les Eyzies-de-Tayac-Sireuil) Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I'm not sure about if a better image can be conceived, but at the moment this is the best in scope, because other images show smaller parts of the museum.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:17, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:09, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Convolvulus arvensis (Field Bindweed), capsules and seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met. Totodu74 (talk) 09:37, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Wulfenite

Do you noticed how I arranged items in Wulfenite? I do similar changes at Papilio demoleus too. Categories are very crowded and low and high quality images are mingled together so it is very difficult to find a good image from them. So I think it is good to highlight the promoted files (FPs, QIs and VIs) at the top of the gallery. Is it good? Your opinion is highly appreciated. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 17:28, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

I agree with your idea. Our friend user:Jebulon, had also proposed. It may not be necessary to make a special gallery but place the image promoted head of the Gallery where she is. for example like this: Siproeta stelenes. It is especially useful to rank the images in a Gallery, and put only good. Do not hesitate to remove the bad images that make the difficult choice. You will always find me with you for this valuable work. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes; but sometimes people dump all the low quality works on the top of the gallery forcing the promoted ones down or be mingled with others. It is very difficult to delete them periodically. That is why I wish to create a sub-section "Promoted files" on top. No need of it if the gallery is small. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 05:51, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

I had not thought of, but the idea is attractive because it would avoid conflicts. I think we can try in Gallery overstaffed. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diactor bilineatus, mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 13:19, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:57, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar Periwinkle), fruit and seeds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 08:06, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:37, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charadrius dubius (Little Ringed Plover), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. (One day, Archaeodontosaurus' eggs will be as famous as Chritopher Columbus' one !) --JLPC (talk) 08:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

+1 :) -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 08:35, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:38, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rapana venosa MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JDP90 08:51, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Cerastoderma glaucum

Dear Didier, I want to point your attention to the paper: "Brock, V., 1987. Genetic relations between the bivalves Cardium (Cerastoderma) edule, Cardium lamarcki and Cardium glaucum, studied by means of crossed immunoelectrophoresis. Marine Biology, 93: 493-498.". In this paper it is shown that Cerastoderma of the eastern Mediterranean (and the Black Sea) and of the Western Mediterranean belong to different species. This means that one of both is not Cerastoderma glaucum. Because the type location of C. glaucum is in the Western Mediterranean, the species in the east is another species. Regrettably there has not yet selected a proper name for this eastern Cerastoderma. For the time being the name of the eastern species could be: Cerastoderma glaucum non Poiret, 1789. The specimen that you figured as Cerastoderma glaucum is therefore not this species. Subsequently the figure can not be used for proper Cerastoderma glaucum (as done in the Dutch Wikipedia). Best wishes, --Tom Meijer (talk) 10:44, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for this note. It is obvious that this species will deserve a new description, if only for the name of the author. We do not know who, Bruguière or Poiret has really described in 1789. For the moment it is classified in CG. It is even possible, if Bruiguiere who described, what is the reference species, as it traveled in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Black Sea. I'm looking for the original publication. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:41, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

In mine opinion this is a simple case of priority. However, both authors published in the same year, so one should look at the exact date, if this is still possible. If this is not possible than one of both names (and authors) should be preserved as the valid name. This is something a specialist should do. Taxonomic online databases are not conclusive, moreover they differ in opinion. I found in the literature that the type locality is in the Western basin, however it is not clear to me if this is the case for both authors. Only a search in the original publications of both authors can shed light in this matter. I don't have the time for such an investigation.--Tom Meijer (talk) 18:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

FP

Franchement, pardon d'insister, mais tu devrais aller jeter un coup d'œil de temps en temps...

C'est un déchaînement d'admirateurs !

Du jamais vu ! Le culte de la personnalité !--Jebulon (talk) 20:06, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Arrrrh ! J'y vais je vois les deux premières qui se suivent; j'en profite pour faire quelques modifications, et je me dis : tout de même il y vont fort. Et j'en découvre deux autres plus bas... Situation inédite car déontologiquement un auteur ne peut présenter que 2 images à la fois. C'est un peu gênant, mais pas déplaisant. Merci pour ta vigilance. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

C'est la Corée du Nord, te dis-je ! Tu es le Grand Insecteur, le Minéraliste de la Pensée, mais qu'est-ce que tu leur a fait ?! --Jebulon (talk) 09:44, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Remarque, pour Staline çà c'est bien passé jusqu'à sa mort... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:54, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

your photo

Hi dear Archaeodontosaurus! thanks for your all nice pictures. Alborzagros (talk) 07:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

You reverse the roles. It's me who should thank you for your attention to my work. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

VI: caption of the image?

Bonjour,

Pourrais-tu m'expliquer ce que tu veux dire par "caption of the image" ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 06:07, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

• La légende de la photo : On ne sait pas qui sont ses personnages. Une ou deux lignes devraient amplement suffire pour dire qui ils sont. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
• Ah OK. J'ai ajouté cette info dans la catégorie. Yann (talk) 07:37, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Sépulture de Teviec Global.jpg

What a great gift to my eyes!!! -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 05:29, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

This object is one of the most interesting we have to deToulouse Museum. I saw it when I was 6 years old, and it has always fascinated me. It has benefited from a full restoration in 2011. This is the very first image restoration. I was meeting starts at install lights before 3 flint, as seen before, have been replaced. I quickly appreçu I did not have enough light. so I'm more images by moving the lamps. It is not highly recommended. But I wanted to, absolutely, do this first image. Nearly 50 years after I still have the same emotion. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Je suis très heureuse de l'avoir vue "pour de vrai" à Paris, après l'avoir découverte quelques mois auparavant grâce à tes images. Amitiés --Myrabella (talk) 14:47, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Ces Dames ont passé l'été au Muséum National de la Préhistoire aux Eyzy et voguent aujourd'hui vers l'Afrique du Sud... bonne Soirée --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:40, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Tomb of Téviec

Picture of the Day and well deserved. Superb photo! Notafly (talk) 20:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your encouragement. Thank you also corrections that you bear my captions from time to time ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:26, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Qu'est-ce que je disais ! C'est pas Staline, c'est Kim Il Sung !--Jebulon (talk) 19:12, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wulfenite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Agree with the reasons. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:21, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

• The category seems too crowed; so I created a gallery to highlight important ones. Could you check it and make any corrections? -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:51, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:54, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ruta graveolens (Common Rue), capsules and seeds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:53, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:55, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heliconius antiochus (Antiochus Longwing), mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : meets all criteria. --JLPC (talk) 18:10, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:59, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aconitum lycoctonum (wolf's bane), follicles and seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : meets all criteria. --JLPC (talk) 18:10, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:23, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charadrius hiaticula ( Common Ringed Plover), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 14:17, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:28, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lilium pyrenaicum (Pyrenean Lily), capsules and seeds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:33, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heliconius demeter bouqueti (Demeter Longwing), mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 17:04, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:14, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vicia cracca (Tufted vetch), legumes and seeds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 17:05, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:14, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caligo idomeneus idomeneus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very goood --Llez 10:17, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus polyphyllus MHNT.BOT.2004.0.463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI and useful. --JLPC 09:01, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilium pyrenaicum MHNT.BOT.2004.0.786.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--JLPC 08:20, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aconitum lycoctonum subsp. vulparia MHNT.BOT.2004.0.787.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 07:35, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

FYI Grave of Téviec

Some information required at Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Grave_of_T%C3%A9viec -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 04:58, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, I made a response. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Actitis hypoleucos (Common Sandpiper), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 07:20, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:54, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lupinus polyphyllus (Large-leaved Lupine), Legumes and seeds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 11:11, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asphodelus albus (White asphodel), capsules and seeds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 21:01, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:38, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

A cheval sur les principes

Salut mon ami,

Tes désirs sont des ordres, j'ai même créé une galerie rien que pour te faire plaisir.

C'est vrai que ce cheval à la herse est spectaculaire.

Tes quadrupèdes toulousains rendent un bien meilleur hommage à ce sculpteur qui méritait de sortir de l'oubli, soit dit en passant. Participer à l'exaltation de la sculpture française du XIXème, ça nous fait un point commun avec une ancienne conservatrice du Musée d'Orsay de mitterrandienne mémoire...

Je ne proposerai toutefois pas la chose en FP, la netteté n'est pas excellente partout, il y a quelques aberrations chromatiques (correctibles, certes), et il faudrait que je reprenne la distorsion de lentille à peine visible sur le socle, mais que moi je vois et qui m'agace, mais j'ai un peu la flemme, et pas trop le temps...

Amitiés.--Jebulon (talk) 16:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antirrhea ornata, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and best in scope showing both sides. --JDP90 (talk) 07:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Numenius phaeopus (Whimbrel), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Obviously, criteria met, and high resolution picture. Texture can be felt by seeing it. Totodu74 (talk) 13:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:49, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alnus glutinosa (black alder), Fruits and seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support VI for me. Totodu74 (talk) 16:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:26, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morpho marcus Mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good work. --JLPC (talk) 08:28, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catoblepia xanthus mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:10, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:30, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phasianus versicolor (Green Pheasant), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. Criteria met -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:42, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:29, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dynastes hercules ecuatorianus MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dynastes hercules ecuatorianus MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Titanacris Albipes Vol.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Titanacris Albipes Vol.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Almandin.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Almandin.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Acrocinus longimanus MHNT femelle.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Acrocinus longimanus MHNT femelle.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dioptasetsumeb5.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dioptasetsumeb5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Porte musc Profil 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porte musc Profil 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:46, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Steneosaurus Holzmaden.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Steneosaurus Holzmaden.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:18, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rapana venosa MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rapana venosa MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bidens_tripartita (Three-lobe Beggarticks), Infrutescences and Achenes..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support In the examples of COM:VISC, the subscope is uncapitalized, but I support it either way. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heliconius burneyi catharinae Mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met imo. --JLPC (talk) 22:04, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paliurus spina-christi (Jerusalem Thorn) Fruits and seeds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 12:37, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:47, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Graellsia isabellae

Yes; both photos of live and collected specimens are interesting and informative. I like your works. I think you remember that I opposed some people's argument to avoid featuring dead specimens in English Wikipedia. My only doubt was about the arrangements of wings that look different from a natural dorsal view. Now I understand the reason from your reply (to show the hind-wings otherwise hidden in a normal view). I appreciate your willingness to answer any doubts/silly queries with a calm voice; not many people here have it. :) -- JKadavoor Jee 04:50, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agrius convolvuli MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Ximonic 15:42, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Help (Ça ne cadre pas ) !

Juste une question relative à ce qui n'est peut-être qu'un bug logiciel : vois-tu, sur la page VI, les quatre modifications que je viens d'y apporter ? Sur mon écran, ta question reste sans réponse et les trois cadres de Toto que je viens de supporter (!) restent résolument bleus -- alors, bien sûr, que tout me semble en ordre. Peux-tu, s'il te plaît, jeter un coup d'œil rapide sur la page, au moment où tu t'y rendras ? -- Merci d'avance. JLPC (talk) 22:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caligo idomeneus (Idomeneus Giant Owl) male, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:18, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Accipiter nisus (Eurasian Sparrowhawk) egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. Criteria met. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:36, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Acherontia atropos

Marvellous images.Warm regards Robert Notafly (talk) 09:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

• Hello Robert, Thank you. You are very forgiving, as for the image of the upper face I miss a photo in the stack and the wings are blurred. should redo everything. I renounce and then continues, there is so much to do. But our work here and advance it is a great pleasure. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:47, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Flickr - ggallice - Monkey treefrog (2).jpg

I think this is Phyllomedusa vaillantii as his other similar pictures; but the common name "Monkey tree frog" is a bit confusing. Google search shows another result Sharp nose monkey tree frog (Phyllomedusa vaillanti); but I don't think another binomial name exists with only one letter difference. What you think? JKadavoor Jee 18:27, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

• The name is Phyllomedusa vaillanti The species is dedicated to the French Zoologist Léon Vaillant. Double i is a mistake. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:41, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • So the mistake is in so many places including Category:Phyllomedusa vaillantii, species:Phyllomedusa vaillantii and w:Phyllomedusa vaillantii. Could you correct it? Or is it better to raise a discussion at w:Wikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles? -- JKadavoor Jee 05:40, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
    • I corrected a species of beetle that had the same problem. It is long and tedious. My time use will not like. But I think it should be done ... This frog will cost me a lot. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
      • Thanks. JKadavoor Jee 07:10, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
• Re: Hmmm; and I see a syn. Pithecopus vaillanti — Lutz, 1966 at species:Phyllomedusa vaillantii. JKadavoor Jee 08:12, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Lutz did not err in this nomenclature! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:17, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Graellsia isabellae MHNT male dos .jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Graellsia isabellae MHNT male dos .jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Soufresicile2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Soufresicile2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Advice

Archaeodontosaurus, I see you have prepared plenty of Valued and Featured images. I can hardly understand the exact meaning of Valued and Featured criteria, so I cannot see if some of my photos may be considered VI or FP. Maybe you could find a minute to explore my input and maybe tell me if something is worth to be a candidate? Thanks for you answer.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:13, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your message which honors me. There are two very different issues. For FP, I am pleased to see my friends put me pictures before. This is fortunate because I would not dare do it myself. I became very critical for my images, to the point that I no longer in QI, the images of which I am particularly telling.

For VI is very different. This is for me the most important label. This is the one that makes the most sense. It is also one that is not acuis permanently. A photograph is successful only if it serves the encyclopedia. That is why I am always in the label VI. The rules are not very easy but you will always be well received and we help each other so that works. It is very rare that there have conflicts VI.

I looked at your pictures, I see often move in QI. You have there a very important source of labels VI.

The monuments they must have an interest in the encyclopedia: Botik-arka-4355.jpg is entirely appropriate.

For churches is even easier knowing that you can cut the scope of "Outside" "Interior" "Belltower" ... You there your biggest deposit.

In "Memorial": B-memorial-4332-08.jpg, is a very good candidate.

The halves of the panoramas are also eligible.

For individuals must that you can prove that they have encyclopedic value. It is easier if they are, does at least one article on an encyclopedia.

The quality is not a major criterion is the relevance of the topic that is most important.

I hope you have been a little helpful. Go in VI! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, the logic of VI is clearer to me now.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 08:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adhemarius gagarini Mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:59, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:10, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Accipiter nisus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 11:30, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Limosa lapponica (Bar-tailed Godwit), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:14, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 20:18, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Parastagmatoptera serricornis, mounted specimen male.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Parastagmatoptera serricornis, mounted specimen male.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Bravo ! --Myrabella (talk) 23:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

• Bravo, surtout à toi qui veut bien épurer le stock des SETs --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neruda aoede aoede MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good--Holleday 16:25, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Heliconius sara sara MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Heliconius sara sara MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Image du jour

Salut!

Je suis sûr qu'en prenant les photos de l'andradite, tu n'as pas pensé au sens de la géométrie et à la dextérité qui avaient été nécessaires au sculpteur malien pour parvenir à une telle perfection !

Belle image en tous cas, que je suis heureux de revoir.

Félicitations !--Jebulon (talk) 21:28, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Merci, je ne m'étais pas aperçu quelle passait. C’est le paradoxe de notre travail. Cette image que j’ai faite pour illustrer l’article du même nom n’était pas initialement destinée à ce destin médiatique. Ce n’est pas une pièce exceptionnelle et j’en vois tout les défauts chaque fois que je la regarder. A l’inverse des images sur des sujet points qui m’ont coûtées beaucoup de temps de réalisation sont des flops. C’est un peu comme en cuisine plus s’est simple plus tu as de chance que ce soit bon… Bonne journée--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aptenodytes forsteri (Emperor Penguin) egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:32, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:26, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Erinnyis ello mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 09:33, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:26, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adhemarius ypsilon MHNT femelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and good EV --PierreSelim 07:38, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Demande de conseil

Bonsoir,

J'aimerais avoir ton sentiment et bénéficier de ton conseil à propos de cette photo d'une véritable merveille.

Dois-je couper les côtés, ce qui permettrait une meilleure symétrie (un carré parfait), rendrait moins visible le "tight crop" en haut et en bas (pas assez de recul, hélas), mais qui ferait perdre des informations ?

J'hésite d'autant plus que c'est un peu flou à gauche.

Qu'en penses-tu ?

Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 18:33, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Je te remercie de ton message. J’aurai fait 2 photos dès le début et tu les réunissais pour être tranquille, se qui recoud une bonne partie des problèmes lié au manque de recul. Maintenant je ne couperais rien à ton image car c’est un tout. Reste le flou gauche qui est à mes yeux le seul problème. Pour çà il te fut prendre la zone floue jusqu’à hauteur de la rambarde faire un calque et appliquer un filtre passe-haut que tu fusionneras finement. Sur Photoshop je peux te donner les paramétrages mais je ne connais pas ceux de ton logiciel. Tiens moi au courant...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

merci de ta réponse. Je ne sais pas coller des photos entre elles, je n'ai jamais essayé. De toutes façons, maintenant, je suis à 2000km... Je ne sais pas ce qu'est un filtre passe-haut, d'ailleurs je ne comprends pas le sens de l'expression, même si je l'ai déja lue, y compris en anglais. De manière générale, je pense que toute tentative de "sharpening", quelle que soit la méthode, se voit et est vouée à l'échec. Mais j'accepte volontiers d'essayer si tu m'en dis plus.--Jebulon (talk) 12:49, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Parfait, je te décrit cette affaire par Email, dés que possible...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:02, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Angostura bitters.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope and good quality picture. (Pour ma part, je m'en sers, à petites doses, pour "relever" le goût du punch des îles que je fabrique parfois en été !) --JLPC (talk) 08:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Grand consommateur de Fernet Branca, je ne connaissais pas cette intéressante liqueur avant de boire le verre de la photo. D’une façon générale je conseille d’ailleurs de faire la photo, avant, pour de nombreuses raisons...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:34, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:44, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adhemarius gannascus mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 06:54, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:55, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Consolida ajacis, Frutis and seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 06:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:54, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batus barbicornis MHNT femelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:18, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quercus ithaburensis ssp.macrolepis MHNT.BOT.2004.0.80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Gluck2.jpg

Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus. En répartissant les images de qualité en France me basant sur leur localisation, je n'ai pas trouvé l'endroit où tu as pris File:Gluck2.jpg. En cherchant sur Google, j'ai cru voir que ce buste était au musée de Cleveland, US. D'où mon "exportation". Désolé, mais où l'original de ce buste est-il exposé ? Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 06:29, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

• Je t'ai fais un Email. Bonne Journée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Merci pour ta réponse. Bonne journée, Jack ma (talk) 06:43, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Cave_Temple_3,_Badami.JPG

Thank you for the review of this VI. -- Dey.sandip (talk) 16:52, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Sainfieldite.jpg

Hi Archaeodontosaurus, wouldn't you prefer to move that picture to File:Picropharmacolite_and_Sainfieldite.jpg? It looks a little bit strange to see a File:Sainfieldite.jpg in the Category:Picropharmacolite ;-) greetings -- Ra'ike T C 10:47, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

That is very true, I renamed. I have a very good sample of talc ... but I do not remember where I stored. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:22, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello and thanks for the moving (I deleted the unused redirect now). For the talc, do you mean that discussion? If you mean a picture on your hard drive, I hope, you refind it soon greetings -- Ra'ike T C 12:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

No I have several samples with talc crystals of good quality, but they are not in the collection and it takes me to do research in my inventory. I should also make the photogrpahies of picropharmacolites. I have many samples. I even provided in the 1980 Rob Lavinsky the samples. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heliconius elevatus bari mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:44, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhinanthus minor (Yellow Rattle), Capsules and seeds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good composition, high quality, useful, and all criteria satisfied. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 15:48, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria Formosa (Venice) exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --Selbymay (talk) 18:49, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:10, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dioptase.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met imo. --JLPC (talk) 18:23, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:13, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caligo suzanna mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:25, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:14, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Talc.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:17, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saxifraga aizoides (Yellow Saxifrage), capsules and seeds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Meets all criteria. --JLPC (talk) 09:19, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:18, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meum athamanticum (Spignel), Fruits and seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. JKadavoor Jee 09:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heliconius ricini, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. JKadavoor Jee 09:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:20, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urania leilus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Selbymay 09:50, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agrius convolvuli (Convolvulus Hawk-moth), mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met and useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:01, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 16:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pinus coulteri (Coulter Pine), seed.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met and useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:02, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 16:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fernet Branca.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 08:57, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heliconius sara (Sara Longwing) Mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:59, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heliconius wallacei flavescens (Wallace's Longwing) Mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 21:03, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Elettaria cardamomum (Cardamom) Capsules and seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. I love this spice. ;o) Yann (talk) 09:25, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Milvus migrans (Black Kite) eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 21:16, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:26, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agrimonia eupatoria (Common agrimony), Achene..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 21:18, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:27, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

An important elephant

Bonjour Didier I see the holotype of this early elephant is in Musee Toulouse [1] Sadly there is no French text and no image of what is clearly an important fossil. I think I read that there is a reconstruction somewhere in France but I am not sure where.Best regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 20:43, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

It is here [2] (picture at the bottom of the page) "C'est trop cher" 20 OOO Euro and it is not Eritherium at all, but maybe it's very good. Deyrolles specimens often are.

Hello Robert,

You do not only interested butterflies. I know the discoverer of Eritherium azzouzorum and Phosphaterium esculieri, François Escullié. We are childhood friends. The holotype of Eritherium is not in Toulouse or Paris. François Esculliè donated to the Museum of Lyon. He has personally more complete fragments of Eritherium, I asked myself wearing one for a photograph, he must come to Toulouse in January. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:26, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calocedrus decurrens MHNT.BOT.2004.0.810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:47, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Simeone Piccolo (Venice).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice image overall --Dey.sandip 18:58, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deilephila elpenor MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. - A.Savin 10:25, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Images used

In page expanded page here [3].Stunning photos which this insect truly deserves.Best regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 21:48, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

I did not know the Lycee Fenelon Room of Biology. I love the atmosphere of the nineteenth century. I tried, in my office, reproduce the cabinets of naturalists of our elders. Thank you for this beautiful page Agrias. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

VI candidates/Palkhor-čhöde.jpg

Sorry and thank you for the notice and the correction!--Ondřej Žváček (talk) 10:44, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sterculia setigera MHNT.BOT.2004.0.226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:39, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Erreur !

Las de voir les images et les sets s'entasser, je viens de tenter de clore la procédure de promotion de ton set : San Martino (Venice) Exterior... et j'ai dû sauter une étape puisque tout ne se déroule pas comme prévu : le set a bien changé d'aspect mais pas de page, les liens qui apparaissent sous les images restent rouges. J'ai demandé du secours à Yann, que j'ai parfois croisé sur cette page. J'espère qu'il pourra m'aider. Quoi qu'il en soit, je tiens à m'excuser auprès de toi. Je sais que seuls ceux qui ne font rien ne font pas d'erreur, mais là, je me sens mal à l'aise. À suivre dans la soirée ou demain. -- Très cordialement, JLPC (talk) 17:53, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Je t'excuse d'autant qu'il y a quelques semaines j'ai moi-même essayé, pendant toute une mâtiné. Je n'y suis pas arrivé non plus! Au point que ce matin j'ai fait un petit mot au créateur de ce label pour lui dire que nous accepterions volontiers de perdre les SET mais que le label méritai qu'on le sauve. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:58, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Bonsoir les amis. J'ai suivi tout ça. J'aiderais volontiers, mais je 'y connais rien. Il faut d'autant plus sauver le label que, comme tu l'as dit à Slaunger, on a de nouveaux candidats... Pour le sets, ce serait dommage de s'en passer, c'est quand même toute une époque !--Jebulon (talk) 19:56, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

(Suite : perseverare) Hier soir en rentrant du théâtre et ce matin, j'ai tenté de rectifier mes erreurs... et les ai amplifiées. Le fond du problème : j'ai sauté l'étape qui consiste à ajouter ce que le pas-à-pas nomme des "catégories parentes". Je les ai ajoutées a postériori mais trop vite sans doute puisque leurs titres ne conviennent pas toujours. Certains liens sont devenus bleus, mais pas tous... Ma dernière tentative (et ce sera l'ultime) m'a conduit, en croyant demander la suppression d'une catégorie vide, à demander, en fait, la suppression du set sur la page de candidature. En désespoir de cause, j'ai voulu solliciter l'aide de Mr PanyGoff (lequel semblait maîtriser la procédure), mais il annonce sur sa page qu'il a cessé de contribuer à Commons ; je me suis donc adressé à George Chernilevsky. Voilà où j'en suis, avant de m'absenter pour l'après-midi. J'espère que quelqu'un pourra intervenir au plus vite. -- C'est la 4e fois en 4 semaines que j'ajoute aux problèmes en tentant de les résoudre : l'enfer est décidément pavé de bonnes intentions. Que cela ne m'empêche pas de te présenter de nouvelles excuses. -- Bien cordialement. JLPC (talk) 11:45, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

JLCP, is there anything I can do? Is it the closure of the set on the VIC page you are requesting help for? After all I invented this (possibly sick) system once. I have forgotten most of it, but I could try to assist. --Slaunger (talk) 11:54, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

I use more of your photos

Hi Didier!

Again, I use one of your photos in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia). In this time, a photo of Vespa crabro that you see in the link:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=34711

Have you consider send me some words or/and a photo for your "contributor profile":

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Didier%20Descouens

I want show to my students (and so everybody) that Animalandia is make for "real person", and I can tell them about "generosity", "share" and other similar words that they use very few...

Thank you! Fernando Lisón

--Fernando.lison (talk)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adhemarius palmeri mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met, Totodu74 (talk) 00:39, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:58, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Myrrhis odorata (Cicely), Seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 09:06, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:58, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nassarius reticulatus (Netted dog whelk), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Best in scope. But the best scope could be:
  

Nassarius reticulatus (Netted dog whelk), Shell

George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

 Done Oups! Thank George.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:23, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:36, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:20, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xylophanes tyndarus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 09:07, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heliconius xanthocles vala mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 10:12, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"La chienne" by Pierre Louis Rouillard, Toulouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:18, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parides sesostris mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:20, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adelpha viola pseudococala Mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 11:44, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mimosa pudica (Sensitive plant), fruits and seeds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 11:45, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"La louve" by Pierre Louis Rouillard, Toulouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 11:12, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acherontia atropos (Death's-head Hawk moth), mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 11:13, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thalictrum aquilegiifolium (French meadow-rue), fruits and seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acherontia atropos (Death's-head Hawk moth) – close up of “Death's-head”.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 19:01, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zanthoxylum piperitum (Sichuan pepper), fruits and leaves.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 19:03, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Erinnyis oenotrus mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good work, criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gyps rueppellii (Rueppell's Griffon) Skull.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. [Yesterday a Dearh's-head, today a (kind of)vulture skull... Brrrrr... What about tomorrow ?!] --JLPC (talk) 19:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Simeone Piccolo (Venice) exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 16:11, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laparus doris doris (Doris Longwing), mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 16:04, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Erinnyis obscura obscura, mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 09:33, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pinus coulteri (Coulter Pine), Cone.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 09:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Afzelia africana, fruit and seed..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 10:13, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neruda aoede aoede (Aoede Longwing), mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Do the males and females of this subspecies look different? Is this a male or a female? If both sexes are identical and this specimen's sex was specified in the description page, I will offer my support. -- Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 19:24, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
•  CommentUnlike other, sexel dimorphism in this tribu is not very marked. There are many, many subspecies in Heliconiini.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment Alright for the scope then. But I'll only offer my support when the specimen's sex is specified on the description page. -- Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 16:11, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Good shot. -- Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 20:22, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Liriodendron tulipifera (American tulip tree), fruit and seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 10:22, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morpho hecuba hecuba, male, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:30, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pouteria caimito, seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful too. --JLPC (talk) 19:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued image set promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: San Martino (Venice) Exterior.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
San Martino (Venice) Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--Slaunger (talk) 11:24, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

No blank after category:

Look at here] and here. There must be no blank after Category:. Be so kind to correct that again at File:Papilio hesperus hesperus MHNT.jpg and File:Papilio hesperus hesperus MHNT dos.jpg‎. --Havang(nl) (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Désolé. Mais je ne peux pas corriger 2604 légendes. J'ai bien lu vos recommandations. Je ne suis pas convaincu que cet espace change quoique ce soit, mais surtout Il me facilite mon travail. Merci. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Désolé. D'autres travaillent à corriger ce que tu laisses incorrigé. Au moins, facilite leur travail en n'introduisant plus des blancs dans vos éditions futures ni après Category: ni après Fichier:. Amicalement --Havang(nl) (talk) 16:33, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Bon, je te fais confiance. Je corrigerai au fur et à mesure de mes révisions. Je trouverai un autre moyen de classement. Bien amicalement --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Merci. --Havang(nl) (talk) 16:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Image in VIS not equivalent with VI

Hi Archaeodontosaurus,

I noticed you have done edits like this, replacing {{VIS}} with {{Assessments}} with a VI argument. I suggest you do not do that since an image being part of a valued image set is not the same as the image being a valued image. In the VIS template, there is a useful link to the VIS, the image is part of. You loose that information, when you integrate it into the Assessments template. The use of the Assessments template for tagging anything related to the valued image project is not something I will recommend. The VI logo and color theme is not properly integrated in Assessments, which IMO gives rise to confusion regarding project identity as it is being mixed with the colors and styles of QI and FP. I have very many times asked the creator of Assessmenst to not mix it with the VI project in any way, but with no succes, and we are now in a situation where people are confused as to what template to use (no wonder). I also think that it is a little incorrect to tag the images in the set with Category:Valued images of Venice and other Valued images...categories, as the individual images are not really VIs. Best wishes, --Slaunger (talk) 17:02, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Ok I understand. I chose this view because it was less ostentatious. I would correct at progressively. Thank you. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Great, thanks! --Slaunger (talk) 17:32, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Talpa europaea MHNT Tete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cool --Poco a poco 09:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prehistoric site of Fontalès, small harpoons..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 13:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Urania leilus, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good useful work. --JLPC (talk) 13:35, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:21, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Talpa europaea MHNT pate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Selbymay 07:58, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xanthocastnia evalthe, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : beautiful and useful. --JLPC (talk) 22:17, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:44, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The town hall of Mira (Italy) (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Selbymay (talk) 10:15, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

•  Oppose Lacks basic information about the building (architect if known, year of construction, etc.) which is necessary to establish it in the public domain -- even more important since Italy lacks Freedom of Panorama. cmadler (talk) 17:11, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Unknown architect. Construction completed in the first half of the nineteenth century. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for adding that to the file description. cmadler (talk) 17:42, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

"Exterior", or "facade" in scope, maybe ? --Jebulon (talk) 18:42, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Oups!--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:45, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Problème en VI

Oui nous avons un problème, je pense qu'il se résoudra comme les autres, le météore va se satelliser autour du label quelques temps, puis il poursuivra sa route ailleurs. Pour ce qui me concerne, je choisis la dérision. Et j'attends de pied ferme une participation de l'intégriste en question...--Jebulon (talk) 09:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

J'ai lu le message dans la journée et je suis passé ce soir en VI pour voir où en était ce nouvel adepte du mode verbeux. J'ai cru bon d'ajouter, très sobrement, un vote favorable dans le cadre jaune. Je pense aussi qu'il faudra inciter Velvet à ne pas laisser sa photo underground (excusez-moi !) et à la soumettre à nouveau. Quant aux remarques de Jebulon, elles feront bien rire ceux qui ont un peu d'humour mais je crains que l'humour ne soit aussi étranger à notre problème qu'un opticien l'est à une taupe. -- Bon week-end à tous les deux !

--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Talpa europaea, albino form..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:28, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:29, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adhemarius ypsilon, male, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:27, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:30, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morpho deidamia deidamia, Mounted specimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:08, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:50, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Talpa europaea (European Mole), portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 13:09, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Incomplete description, per cmadler: what is the name of the taxidermist ?--Jebulon (talk) 20:36, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Very good question. The series of images was performed on an animal caught in the night his death was only a few hours. It has not been naturalized thereafter.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:51, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morpho eugenia (Empress Eugénie Morpho), mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:05, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:55, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morpho eugenia (Empress Eugénie Morpho) Mounted specimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 19:06, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Porte musc global.jpg

Commons:Valued image candidates/Porte musc global.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

78.12.102.6 07:52, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Une rue qui ne manque pas de caractère(s)

Bien lu ta note. Je pensais qu'il suffisait que la photo soit, jusqu'à nouvel ordre, la meilleure du scope... et comme il y en a deux, dont une assez confuse avec légende erronée (le 43, rue L.B. y est confondu avec le 45), je croyais que tout était OK et que je pouvais même me dispenser du traditionnel "Best in scope imo" dans la case "reason". Or, il n'en est rien et je tombe de mon haut comme on disait jadis ! J'avais déjà cherché sur le web, en uploadant la photo, sans trouver trace de l'architecte ; peu importe : je ne me vois pas rajouter son nom, surtout après les péripéties de la semaine dernière ! En fait, il n'y a qu'une solution au problème : retirer ma candidature. Je viens de le faire. Pas grave : d'autres photos viendront. Et puis ce n'est tout de même pas la fin du monde ! -- Bien cordialement. JLPC (talk) 18:06, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Je viens de comprendre le titre de ce message ! --Jebulon (talk) 20:04, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

@ Archaeodontosaurus. Aucun problème. Ne sois pas désolé, je suis le seul responsable : je n'ai pas encore tout saisi pour ce qui concerne les scopes et je vais tenter de mieux formuler ceux que je choisis à l'avenir. -- Bien amicalement. JLPC (talk) 13:51, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

@ Jebulon. ... Soit 1 h 58 plus tard ! Bravo ! Une fois encore, je suis en avance sur mon époque ! -- Bien amicalement à toi aussi. JLPC (talk) 13:51, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Datura stramonium MHNT.BOT.2004.0.263a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High educational value, the quality is sufficient.--ArildV 19:00, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Talpa europaea MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Rjcastillo 15:16, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Joyeux Noël

Notafly (talk) 16:02, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

I wish you a happy new year. I do not know if God exists, but if this is the case, it's lucky we work to his glory. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Talpa europaea (European Mole) - Anterior leg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope and exemplary use of the DOF. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JLPC (talk • contribs) 14:28, 16 December 2012‎ (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:40, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Telchin licus (Banana Stem Borer), Mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:30, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:41, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles gallii (Bedstraw Hawk-Moth), mounted specimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:58, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:35, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Silene latifolia subsp. alba (White Campion), fruits and seeds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:59, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:36, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Deilephila porcellus (Small Elephant Hawk-moth), mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:36, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:56, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vanellus spinosus (Spur-winged Plover), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:37, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:57, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Wish you a Merry Christmas and a very very happy new year. -- Joydeep _Talk 18:00, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

2013!

		* * * 2013 !!! * * *
		Mon ami Didier ! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année ! Respectueusement, Georges -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:40, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Xylophanes guianensis MHNT.jpg

Commented here. Long story short: I think that, while this is the best in the scope "Xylophanes guianensis", I don't think "Xylophanes guianensis (mounted specimen)" is a valid scope. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:50, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

No. In entomology to describe a butterfly it must be mounted form. But this is not the physiological position of rest, found in nature. Especially the lower wings in this family are covered. There in place for two images. On the one hand the form mounted and the other an image in vivo that we have not yet but will happen. This is a debate that we had in VI. Again your actions are inappropriate and vexatious. Take the time to learn before. If you have a question, it is easy to ask and get an answer courteous.It is possible that you are not a gentleman. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:05, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes porcus continentalis, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope (would also be the best in scope without being a mounted specimen. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:51, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:42, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calocedrus decurrens (California incense cedar), cones and seeds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria satisfied. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:08, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:42, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year :-)! Best regards--H. Krisp (talk) 18:41, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

MrPanyGoff ?

Bonsoir mon ami.

Me promenant comme souvent au hasard de nos pages, je m'aperçois que notre Bulgare n'apparait plus guère.

Un coup d'œil sur sa page m'apprend qu'il a soudainement cessé de contribuer, visiblement très fâché.

C'est dommage, quoique parfois un peu rigide à mon goût, il avait été très dynamique en VI et avait maintenu à flot le label...

Il semble que j'ai manqué un psychodrame fin août. En sais-tu plus ?

bien à toi, --Jebulon (talk) 00:42, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Très bien observé. Il est vrai que de temps en temps je me disais « dommage que MrPanygoff ne soit pas là ce serait plus facile en VI ». Mais ma réflexion n’allait pas plus loin. Je n’ai pas gardé un souvenir de l’épisode d’août que tu mentionnes mais je crois que, là aussi, tu as raison. C’est le moment de lui faire un petit mot à l’occasion de cette fin d’année. Tu as des qualités de coeur naturelles que tu devrais travailler --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

 Done, dès avant que tu me le suggères.... J'ai maintenant à me préoccuper d'une agression caractérisée dont je suis victime en QI...:(.--Jebulon (talk) 09:59, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Duftite wulfenite.jpg

• Un jour, peut-être, tu me pardonneras...--Jebulon (talk) 15:40, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

J'ai répondu sur la page. J'ai 5 minutes les images passent sur ma machine... J'adore le challenges. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:07, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Deilephila elpenor (Elephant Hawk-moth ) mounted specimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 12:03, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes amadis, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 12:04, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entada phaseoloides MHNT graines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 09:57, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Re:Félicitation pour ta finale

Merci Didier (si je peut me permettre de te tutoyer) pour tes félicitations.

Mon gôut pour la géologie tarnaise est tout naturel :-). Mais sérieusement, je passe beaucoup de temps à revisiter les milliers des images dormantes dans nos départements français, et de les catégoriser pour que les trésors d'informations qu'elles cachent soit plus visibles dans notre Commons. Les images sont plus au moins réussites, dans tous les cas elles méritent d'y être présentes, mais il y a des jours où je tombe sur des vrais perles rares. Aujourd'hui, ce un des ces jours uniques et les perles étaient minérales et en plus déjà bien décrites, donc il ne me restait que de les admirer et d'ajouter la Geology of Tarn manquante :-)

P.S. Merci aussi pour la bonne note en VI de mon Château de Bois-Préau. Je l'ai nominée juste grâce à user:Jebulon qui me l'avait suggéré. --Moonik (talk) 13:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

P.S. 2 ...comme par hasard on est de la même année. Moi, je suis du mois de mai...--Moonik (talk) 13:05, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Donc tu me doit le respect... Hélas pour moi. Reviens souvent sur VI c'est un label qui a du sens... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:06, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

...alors avec tous mes respects! Je te souhaite des bonnes fêtes de fin d'année... et à bientôt sur les pages VI. --Moonik (talk) 15:18, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Oh, c'est là, ta ! Non, tus !

Bonjour Didier,
J'ai redirigé la Category:Smerinthus ocellata vers Category:Smerinthus ocellatus comme tu le souhaitais. La syntaxe d'une redirection de catégorie est assez simple : il suffit de remplacer tout le contenu de la page de la catégorie à rediriger par la ligne {{category redirect|nom-de-la-bonne-catégorie}}.
J'ai vu au passage qu'il y avait maintenant deux pages de galeries : Smerinthus ocellatus et Smerinthus ocellata ; j'ai attribué à cette dernière la bonne catégorie. J'ai vu également au tu avais été reverté sur cette page [4].
Quoi qu'il en soit, j'en profite pour te souhaiter d'excellentes fêtes de fin d'annnée. Que 2013 soit pour toi aussi douce et resplendissantes que les ailes d'une nuée de papillons rares ! Bien amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 11:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Je t'en remercie bien vivement. J'ai bien noté la syntaxe je m'y essaierai à l'occasion. Bonnes Fêtes --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:41, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes guianensis, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Weak oppose, but with a conditional Support: I think this is a fine example, but we do not seem to have anything but mounted specimens. As such, I think it would be better to promote this under the scope of Xylophanes guianensis. If nothing else, "Mounted specimen" is not actually a useful subcategory; as I don't imagine anyone would explicitly look for mounted as opposed to ones taken from life. And, while I might think that Commons:Valued_image_scope#Animals is a little over-restrictive, it still explicitly forbids this sort of subscope. If the scope is switched, please automatically change this to a support. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:48, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment No. In entomology to describe a butterfly it must be mounted form. But this is not the physiological position of rest, found in nature. Especially the lower wings in this family are covered. There in place for two images. On the one hand the form mounted and the other an image in vivo that we have not yet but will happen. This is a debate that we had in VI. Again your actions are inappropriate and vexatious. Take the time to learn before. If you have a question, it is easy to ask and get an answer courteous.It is possible that you are not a gentleman. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:06, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm sorry, but while I accept that this was likely discussed, the criteria weren't updated after this discussion. I honestly don't see how you can find stating an opinion in line with the criteria as written as being "inappropriate and vexatious". I was all set to change to support up to reading that point; as it stands, I'm just going to cross out my vote, and you can find someone else Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:38, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
    • I sincerely thank you. I also admit that my remarks were very lively. I will always be with you to defend the VI rules, if you please choose the path of dialogue beforehand. We have the same goal: to live this label.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:07, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
      • I kind of figured this was a reasonable place for discussion. I mean, it's not like it can be closed immediately. Anyway, as I said I was going to support, and only didn't because of annoyance, let's put this behind us, and I'll just  Support. Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:51, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
        • --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:06, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 10:21, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coelodonta antiquitatis skull.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 21:20, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 10:21, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Valued images/Recently promoted

Bonjour,

Plusieurs de tes images ont besoin d'une catégorie. Cordialement, et bonne année 2013 ! Yann (talk) 12:53, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Je parlais des catégories dans la page Commons:Valued images/Recently promoted à ajouter avec VI categorization tool. Désolé de n'avoir pas été plus clair. ;o) Yann (talk) 18:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

OK c'est fait! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Bonnes fêtes!

Merci Archaeodontosaurus! J'aime toujous tes photos sur Venise. Et je ne comprends pas pourquoi tu ne pas prends des photos sur Toulouse. C'est une tres belle ville aussi.

Bonne annee!--Paris 16 (talk) 07:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Non Toulouse n'est pas une très belle ville, c'est la plus belle ville du monde! Comme tout les poissons rouges il faut éviter de parler de son bocal. L'idée me vient souvent, mais jusqu'à maintenant j'y ai résisté... Bonne journée--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:26, 30 December 2012 (UTC).

VI Full Rainbow in november essex.jpg

Hello thankyou for your help and encouragment with this. I am still new and learning alot and I appreciate all your help you are giving me. Im not sure what geocoding is, would you mind helping me with this and explaining what I need to do, Many thanks once again. Happy new year to you, Best Regards --Danesman1 (talk) 20:45, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

COM:MOP

Je suis très étonné, mais ça a l'air d'avancer, "mon" petit projet.

Ça semble devoir s'appeler : "Meet our Creators", et ça fusionnerait les "Meet our Photographs-Illustrators-restorators" déjà existants

On commence déjà à y voir un peu plus clair, il se passe quelque chose, et les pyramides ne viennent pas en Scandinavie, finalement.

Je serais honoré et très intéressé par tes suggestions, et que tu nous évites des c...ries !

Merci de jeter un coup d'œil de temps en temps, si tu es intéressé.--Jebulon (talk) 23:08, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles livornica (Striped Hawk-moth) mounted specimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:31, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 05:54, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes anubus, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:33, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zanthoxylum piperitum (Sichuan pepper) Fruits and seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Studio photograph, so no geocode required. Used by six projects. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 15:48, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Église Saint-Martin d'Alpuech

Merci Archaeodontosaurus! je l'ai fait.--Paris 16 (talk) 15:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Bonne année

Didier,

Bonne et heureuse année 2013 à toi et à ta famille. Je te souhaite en outre de réaliser de nombreuses et jolies photographies de "bebettes" au cours des mois à venir.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 16:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Jenny & James

Je viens de terminer un roman (policier ?) de James Ellroy dont le protagoniste, pour ne pas dire le héros, découpe ses victimes en morceaux. Tu vois sans doute où je veux en venir... J'ai été rassuré quand j'ai lu que Jenny était née du cerveau d'un joyeux Dr Frankenstein de la taxidermie. -- Les sets sont mis en sommeil : espérons qu'ils reviendront bientôt, plus maniables dans leur stade ultime ! -- Tant que je suis sur cette page, et puisque l'année finit, un petit retour en arrière pour te remercier de ton accueil, de ton aide et de l'esprit que tu contribues à maintenir sur Commons. Dernier point de détail qui a son importance : je suis assez fier que tu aies utilisé le mot "gentlemen" pour nous désigner, toi et moi, lors d'un malentendu avec un tiers, malentendu dont j'étais le seul responsable (en juillet je crois). C'est un mot dont l'usage se perd et dont le sens se vide à toute vitesse par les temps qui courent. Alors, gentleman Archaeo, je t'adresse mes meilleurs vœux pour 2013. Tu voudras bien les partager avec tes proches. À l'an prochain sur ces pages. JLPC (talk) 17:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

2013

Oui ben gare ! Demain, j'archive !--Jebulon (talk) 17:34, 31 December 2012 (UTC)