User talk:An-d

File:Kapelle Althof 2.JPG

Hallo An-d, beim Kopieren von Kategorien ist Vorsicht geboten, so war zum Beispiel eine Userkategorie "Files by User:Schiwago" und eine Kategorie über gotische Giebel dabei :-). Da nun 4 Fotos vorhanden sind, habe ich mal eine separate Kat für die Kapelle angelegt. Viele Grüße -- Niteshift (talk) 12:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Niteshift, herzlichen Dank für die Korrektur und die neue Kategorie.An-d (talk) 15:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Gedenkstein A 20

Nur interessehalber: Wo steht der eigentlich genau? -- Niteshift (talk) 12:29, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Ich meine, der Stein liegt hier:

Object location	53° 51′ 11.95″ N, 11° 22′ 49.74″ E	View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMap

An diesem Parkplatz habe ich aber auch zum ersten mal gehalten :-) An-d (talk) 15:28, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, An-d!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Steenborg.jpg was uncategorized on 29 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutsche Schweden2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:01, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huckleberry Finn TT-Line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 13:28, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernmeldeturm Rostock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 13:55, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Bad Doberan Alexandrinenplatz 9 Baudenkmal 2011-08-31.jpg

Hallo An-d, die Perspektivkorrektur wirkt sehr unnatürlich, die Außenkanten scheinen nach außen geneigt. Ich weiß, dass hier oft solcherlei zu beobachten ist, es widerspricht aber meinen Sehgewohnheiten und wirkt unnatürlich. Sehe ich das falsch? Etwas anderes ist es, wenn nur eine Häuserfront/Giebelansicht entzerrt wird. Gruß. --Schiwago (talk) 22:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Schiwago, völlig ok, wenn du eher die alte Version bevorzugt. Diese stürzenden Linien enstehen eigentlich durch das kippen der Kamera - für deine Augen sollte das Haus schon gerade stehen. Gut möglich, dass ich es hier aber übertrieben habe. Soll ich deine Version wieder rüberkopieren, oder möchstest du? Ganz löschen geht glaube ich nicht. An einem Bild

Niteshifts Foto

von Niteshift war ich heute auch dran. Ihr kennt euch soweit ich weiß - sollte ich ihn fragen, ob er die alte Version dort auch besser findet? VG --An-d (talk) 22:24, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Ich habe jetzt einmal die hier rechts zu sehende Version erstellt,

Alternative zur ersten Bearbeitung

und mich dabei an dem Grundsatz "Bei Entzerrung eines Bildes sollte man aber behutsam vorgehen. Werden stürzende Linien zu Parallelen verzerrt, hat der Betrachter den Eindruck, diese Linien würden nach oben auseinanderlaufen." orientiert :-) schau mal, ob das für dich jetzt besser als dein Original ist. Falls nein, kann ich das jetzt problemlos löschen lassen. VG und ein schönes Wochenende --An-d (talk) 22:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Ich habe es bei meinem Bild zurückgesetzt, nehme dir deinen Versuch nicht übel, es muss auch die Version nicht gelöscht werden. Auch nach meinem Eindruck wirkt bei beiden Bildern v. a. die obere rechte Ecke wie zu weit nach außen gezogen. Ich möchte nicht sagen, dass das Original ideal ist, aber bei den geringen stürzenden Linien halte ich auch eine Korrektur nicht für unbedingt notwendig ;). Gruß -- Niteshift (talk) 23:08, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mähnenspringer Hagenbecks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks overexposed and a bit yellow IMO. --Vassil 01:12, 6 March 2012 (UTC), You are right, color is fixed now. Please review. thx --An-d 16:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC) Ok for me now. --Vassil 13:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Fleur_de_givre_L.jpg retouched

Thank you An-d for cropping this picture. It's really much better !--Cquoi 17:37, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Merci Cquoi, and congratulation for the "featured picture" of your original. best regards --An-d (talk) 17:59, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Papendorf4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 470 auf der Außenalster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gutshaus Rederank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness can be improved (easy to fix), but nice colors.QI. --JLPC 18:04, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Kambs (Vorbeck)

Nicht übel nehmen, ich habe den Inhalt der Kategorie mal in eine neu erstellte Gemeindekat eingeordnet und auf die o. g. Schnelllöschantrag gestellt. Auf dem Land reicht eine Denkmalkat auf Gemeindeebene aus. Beste Grüße -- Niteshift (talk) 22:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Niteshift, das ist völlig ok für mich - Danke dir!- VG --An-d (talk) 19:00, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Schwaan

Ich schon wieder ;). Wenn du in Schwaan warst, hast du zufällig auch den zu der Zeit aktuellen Stand der Dinge an der ehemaligen de:Hubbrücke Schwaan dokumentiert? Ich hatte im Zuge des Abrisses den Artikel 2009 geschrieben und bin da nicht auf dem Laufenden. Gruß -- Niteshift (talk) 06:23, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Niteshift, aktuelle Fotos habe ich nicht. Dort hat sich seit Jahren aber auch nichts getan. (Stand entspricht deinem Bild von 2009) Die Ersatzbrücke funktioniert und offenbar ist der Leidensdruck für weitere Aktivitäten nicht groß genug. In einem aufgegebenen Geschäft in der August-Bebel-Straße steht jetzt aber ein schönes Modell der alten Hubbrücke. (Gebaut von Einwohnern während einer ABM-Maßnahme.) Da ich keinen Polfilter besitze, habe ich das Fotografieren durch die Glasscheibe aber gar nicht erst versucht. VG --An-d (talk) 07:05, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear An-d, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 18:57, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Jakobi Hamburg Arp-Schnitger-Orgel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Selbymay 08:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Volumes of the 'The Dictionary of Art' shelved.JPG

To my eye your adjustment of this pic removes too much yellow. The lettering is bright gold. Now it looks almost silver to me. --Robert.Allen (talk) 00:16, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Robert, i try it again and i am not really happy. That are the right colors? Is a new pictuere possible? Best regards --An-d (talk) 19:29, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I think this third one is much closer to the mark, and the best of the three. --Robert.Allen (talk) 21:34, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! --An-d (talk) 22:15, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Höltigbaum Birke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:43, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berkenthin Kreuz Johann Buschin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:00, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kymco MXU 500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear An-d, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear An-d, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/An-d⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Backenzahn Bad Doberan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:13, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eingangsbauwerk der ehemaligen Margarinefabrik Voss, Hamburg-Barmbek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI now --Lewis Hulbert 17:59, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo An-d,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die Denkmaltopographie

Hallo An-d,

vor zehn Tagen endete der vierte Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit mehr als 35 Tausend Fotos hat Deutschland wie in den Vorjahren ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht und einen Anteil von 14 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 40 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 651 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Schon zum Abschluss des Wettbewerbs waren rund 6000 Fotos (=17 %) in Listen und Artikel eingebunden. Einen detaillierten Überblick zu den Fotos, den Bundesländern und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat nun die eingereichten Beiträge übernommen und ist gegenwärtig dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu den Kulturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am nächsten Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg. Du darfst gespannt sein und all Deine Freunde bitten, Dir die Daumen zu drücken.

Die preisgekrönten 100 Gewinner-Fotos werden in der Woche ab dem 20. Oktober veröffentlicht. Auf dieser Grundlage wird auch in diesem Jahr ein Kalender-Poster für 2015 gedruckt werden.

Auf zwei Möglichkeiten einer weiteren aktiven Mitwirkung an unserem Denkmal-Projekt möchten wir bei dieser Gelegenheit hinweisen bzw. Dich dazu einladen:

• Unsere Freunde in Österreich haben mit einem gerade gestarteten Denkmal-Cup das Editieren von Denkmallisten und Denkmalartikeln in den Focus gerückt. Bis Ende des Jahres kannst Du Punkte sammeln und Preise gewinnen. Dabei geht es mit diesem Wettbewerb nicht nur um Kulturdenkmale in AT oder D, sondern generell um Denkmale in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, als offen für alle Länder.

• Vom 6.-8. November findet erneut die Europäische Denkmalmesse in Leipzig statt. Mit Unterstützung von Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. werden wir zum zweiten Mal die Ergebnisse von Wiki Loves Monuments im Rahmen eines Standes sowie eines Workshops vorstellen.

WLM-Aktivisten sind herzlich eingeladen, bei der Betreuung des Messestandes sowie in den Gesprächen über Möglichkeiten einer partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit mit den Denkmalbehörden mitzuwirken. Die Reisekosten übernimmt für 8-10 registrierte Standbetreuer WMDE. Es muss nicht der gesamte Messezeitraum sein, auch eine Mitwirkung an 2 Tagen hilft uns, den Beitrag der Wikipedia für die Denkmaltopographie sichtbar zu machen.

Und schließlich gilt: Nach dem Wettbewerb ist vor dem Wettbewerb. Bereits jetzt kann jeder mit der Planung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 beginnen. Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross), 11.10.2014

Kalender-Poster für 2015 mit den Gewinner-Fotos von Wiki Loves Monuments 2014

Hallo An-d,

auch in diesem Jahr gibt es dank der Förderung durch WMDE einen WLM-Kalender im Format A1 mit den Gewinner-Fotos. Insgesamt sind es mit den Nachrücker-Fotos sogar 132 Bilder von Kulturdenkmalen in Deutschland, die durch 64 WLM-Teilnehmer hochgeladen wurden. Sicherlich wirst du darin schnell Dein(e) Foto(s) entdecken.

Mit der Vergabe der 100 Preise – es gibt in diesem Jahr max. 3 Preise pro Gewinner, woraus die Nachrücker resultieren – kann jeder Preisträger auch ein oder mehrere dieser gedruckten Poster bekommen. Es wäre schön, wenn du einige Poster auch an Wikipedianer Deiner Region oder Freunde verteilst und ihnen dabei auch den Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments erklärst, an dem auch sie 2015 teilnehmen können.

Dieses Poster wird sowohl auf der Leipziger Denkmalmesse (6.–8.11.) als auch auf der Mitgliederversammlung von WMDE am 29.11. in Berlin erhältlich sein.

Solltest du daran Interesse haben - und weder in Leipzig noch in Berlin die Gelegenheit zum Erwerb haben -, so sende bitte Deinen Wunsch mit Angabe des Real- und Benutzernamens, der Anschrift und der gewünschten Anzahl (1,3,5 .. oder gar 10) bis zum 14.11. mit dem Betreff "WLM-Poster" an das WMDE-Team Community mittels der Emailadresse: community@wikimedia.de.

Dies gilt: solange der Vorrat reicht, nach Maßgabe des geplanten Versandkosten-Budgets sowie nach der Reihenfolge der eingegangenen Bestellwünsche. Der Versand wird Ende November erfolgen.

Viel Freude – und auch Vorfreude auf WLM-2015 - mit diesem Poster

wünscht Dir die WLM-Orga.

( Bernd Gross), 01.11.2014

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zur erfolgreichen Teilnahme an WLM-2014

Hallo An-d,

auf der gerade zu Ende gegangenen Europäischen Denkmal-Messe in Leipzig konnten wir sehr erfolgreich die Ergebnisse unseres vierten Fotowettbewerbs „Wiki Loves Monuments“ einem breiten Publikum und der Fachwelt vorstellen. Impressionen findest du hier. Dazu gehörten auch die Gewinnerfotos für Deutschland. Zu dem darin eingeschlossenen Wettbewerbsbeitrag von Dir möchten wir Dich herzlich beglückwünschen.

Die Jury hat bekanntlich Ende Oktober die Preisträger auf der Grundlage eines Rating-Verfahrens ermittelt und ging in diesem Jahr davon aus, die Zahl der Preise auf 3 pro Teilnehmer zu begrenzen. Insgesamt wurden 100 Preise durch WMDE gestiftet. Durch das Nachrücken ergaben sich insgesamt 132 Bilder, die auch auf dem diesjährigen WLM-Kalender für 2015 dargestellt sind. Diese wurden durch 64 Preisträger eingebracht. Im Rahmen der Denkmalmesse konnten wir bereits die ersten 11 Bildpreise und 2 Fleißpreise an vier Projektteilnehmer überreichen.

Bis Ende November werden auch die Urkunden und Preise (Büchergutscheine) für die anderen Preisträger in der Geschäftsstelle von WMDE vorbereitet; ebenso der Versand der WLM-Posterkalender, sofern du Deine Wünsche per mail übermittelt hast. Anfang Dezember und damit rechtzeitig zum Weihnachtsfest wirst du also alles erhalten.

Es würde uns sehr freuen, wenn du auch im kommenden Jahr aktiv bei WLM wieder dabei bist.

Nochmals unseren Dank für Deinen Wettbewerbsbeitrag und Herzlichen Glückwunsch

übermittelt Dir die WLM-Orga.

( Bernd Gross), 11.11.2014

Dein WLM-2014-Preis zu Weihnachten

Hallo An-d,

der Fotowettbewerb "Wiki Loves Monuments 2014" liegt hinter uns und das Team Communitys von WMDE verschickt gegenwärtig an die Gewinner die Urkunden und Preise. Soweit ich weiß liegt Deine Anschrift noch nicht vor. Damit Dich aber dieser Preis rechtzeitig vor Weihnachten erreichen kann, sende doch bitte Deine Adresse mit Realnamen (und Benutzernamen zwecks Zuordnung) und Betreff "Mein WLM-Preis" so bald als möglich, spätestens bis zum Jahresende, per Email an mailto:community@wikimedia.de.

Gleichzeitig möchte ich Dich herzlich zu unserem nächsten Fotowettbewerb zum Themenbereich "Weinachtszeit, Winterzeit, Wendezeit 2014/2015" einladen. Wir haben diesen am Nikolaustag gestartet und er läuft bis zum 16. Januar 2015. Nähere Informationen findest du auf der Projektseite bei Wikipedia.

Ich wünsche Dir eine schöne Advents- und Weihnachtszeit und einen erfolgreichen Start ins neue Jahr 2015.

Herzliche Grüße

( Bernd Gross), 08.12.2014

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo An-d,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

File:Putbus Haus Markt 12 Fuerstenapotheke 02.JPG

Hallo An-d, Du hast bei obigem Bild einen „Farbstich“ korrigiert. Dafür zunächst grundsätzlich natürlich herzlichen Dank. Allerdings scheint mir das Bild nun erst recht einen Farbstich zu haben. Denn auf meinem Bildschirm leuchtet der Himmel jetzt in Milka-lila... So sah er über Rügen am Aufnahmetag aber nun wahrlich nicht aus! Es sollte schon ein tiefsattes Blau sein... Hast Du hier eventuell etwas zu viel des Guten getan, oder ist mein Bildschirm etwa ungenau eingestellt? Gruß --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 21:50, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Hallo J.-H. Janßen, zunächst danke für dein Foto. Ich hab da auch uberlegt,was ich mache. Das treffen der korrekten Farbtemperatur ist manchmal wirklich schwer. Am Ende bin ich davon ausgegangen, dass das Gebäude mit einem relativ reinen weiß angestrichen ist und habe auf dieser Basis das gesamte Bild angepasst. Ich kann deinen Einwand gut nachvollziehen und setze gern auf die Ursprungsversion zurück. Hab noch einen schönen Sonntag. --An-d (talk) 07:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Bitte beachten

Hallo An-d, bitte das Format der Beschreibung deiner letzten Uploads korrigieren, siehe z. B. File:Adorf St. Johannis Tauffünte.jpg. Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 16:58, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Arnd. danke für den Hinweis. Ich hatte recht viele Bilder per Commons hochgeladen und war während des reparierens des Blocks unterbrochen worden. Danke, dass du so nett warst und dich darum gekümmert hast. --An-d (talk) 18:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Kein Problem. --Arnd (talk) 05:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teterow St. Peter und Paul Orgel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear An-d,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo An-d!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

File:Bontkirchen Kapelle St. Maria Fenster.jpg

File:Bontkirchen Kapelle St. Maria Fenster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 16:26, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Fenster.jpg

File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Fenster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 06:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Unterkirche Fenster.jpg

File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Unterkirche Fenster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 06:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Unterkirche Fenster2.jpg

File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Unterkirche Fenster2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 06:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi An-d,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi An-d,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi An-d,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Osterkirche Bramfeld Relief.jpg

File:Osterkirche Bramfeld Relief.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 16:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Hamburg-Wandsbek Christuskirche Blick Richtung Altar2.jpg

File:Hamburg-Wandsbek Christuskirche Blick Richtung Altar2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Altar.jpg

And also:

• File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Altarbereich.jpg
• File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Kanzel.jpg
• File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Kruzifix.jpg
• File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Vorraum.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 17:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Auferstehungskirche Braak Eingangsbereich.jpg

And also:

• File:Auferstehungskirche Braak Fensterbild.jpg
• File:Auferstehungskirche Braak Innenraum.jpg
• File:Auferstehungskirche Braak Tauffünte Altartisch Relief.jpg
• File:Auferstehungskirche Braak Tauffünte.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:HH-Oldenfelde Bonhoeffer-Kirche Altar.jpg

And also:

• File:HH-Oldenfelde Bonhoeffer-Kirche Altarkreuz.jpg
• File:HH-Oldenfelde Bonhoeffer-Kirche Fenster.jpg
• File:HH-Oldenfelde Bonhoeffer-Kirche Innenansicht.jpg
• File:HH-Oldenfelde Bonhoeffer-Kirche Kanzel.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 22:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Mariä Himmelfahrt Rahlstedt Blick zum Altar2.jpg

And also:

• File:Mariä Himmelfahrt Rahlstedt Deckel der Tauffünte.jpg
• File:Mariä Himmelfahrt Rahlstedt Fenster1.jpg
• File:Mariä Himmelfahrt Rahlstedt Fenster2.jpg
• File:Mariä Himmelfahrt Rahlstedt Fenster3.jpg
• File:Mariä Himmelfahrt Wandtäfelung1.jpg
• File:Mariä Himmelfahrt Wandtäfelung2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 22:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kröpelin St. Josef Altar.jpg

And also:

• File:Kröpelin St. Josef Ambo.jpg
• File:Kröpelin St. Josef Eingangsbereich.jpg
• File:Kröpelin St. Josef Innenraum.jpg
• File:Kröpelin St. Josef Kruzifix.jpg
• File:Kröpelin St. Josef Tabernakel.jpg
• File:Kröpelin St. Josef Taufbecken2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 14:17, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Frohebotschaftskirche HH Dulsberg Altarbild Otto Flath.jpg

And also:

• File:Frohebotschaftskirche HH Dulsberg Altarbild Otto Flath1.jpg
• File:Frohebotschaftskirche HH Dulsberg Altarbild Otto Flath2.jpg
• File:Frohebotschaftskirche HH Dulsberg Pult.jpg
• File:Thomaskirche HH-Rahlstedt Christus und Thomas.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:St. Joseph Wandsbek Taufkapelle.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 06:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Neue flora 2010.jpg

File:Neue flora 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gnom (talk) 20:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments!

Thank you for uploading images for Wiki Loves Monuments!

However, we have noticed you have not enabled e-mail. To be eligible to win a prize the contest, you need to enable e-mail. This is what to do:

1. Check the top right of your screen, and log in if you have not done so already
2. Go to your preferences
3. Scroll down to Email Options
4. Enter your email address and click "Allow other users to email me"
5. Click Save
   

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Innenraum.jpg

And also:

• File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Unterkirche Altar.jpg
• File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Unterkirche Altarkreuz seitlich.jpg
• File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Unterkirche Altarkreuz.jpg
• File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Unterkirche Innenraum.jpg
• File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Unterkirche Innenraum2.jpg
• File:Rahlstedt St.Martin Unterkirche Wanddekoration.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Zetti Bambina.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zetti Bambina.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Zetti Bambina.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

And also:

• File:Zetti Knusperflocken weiss.jpg

Yours sincerely, Didym (talk) 14:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022

Hallo An-d,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger 2021 – Schloss Langenburg

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 06:08, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Djbobo.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kirche St.Stephan HH-Wandsbek Kreuz.jpg

And also:

• File:Kirche St.Stephan HH-Wandsbek Mosaik.jpg
• File:Kirche St.Stephan HH-Wandsbek Pult und Kanzel.jpg
• File:Kirche St.Stephan HH-Wandsbek Relief Taufkapelle.jpg
• File:Kirche St.Stephan HH-Wandsbek Rundfenster.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 10:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ddrschiffbau1971IwanFranko.jpg

And also:

• File:Ddrschiffbau1971typ17.jpg
• File:Ddrschiffbau1971typ451.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 13:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:St. Jakobi Hamburg Blick nach Osten.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 22:53, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:5 Mark DDR 1987 - Rotes Rathaus-vs.jpg

And also:

• File:5 Mark DDR 1990 - Zeughaus-vs.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 05:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Lufthansaddr15pf.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 13:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo An-d,

Sieger 2022 – Kloster Paulinzella

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2023 findet zum dreizehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Radomianin mit einer Gesamtansicht von Kloster Paulinzella gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Waltershausen in Thüringen oder in Fulda.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr „drei Sonderpreise für Bilder von Friedhöfen“ ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Friedhöfen, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map 

Upload your photos for the special price 

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:19, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Stpauli.jpg

Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 08:36, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hamburg Christuskirche Christusplastik.jpg

And also:

• File:Hamburg Christuskirche Kanzel.jpg
• File:Hamburg Christuskirche Tauffünte.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 10:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Thomaskirche HH-Rahlstedt Altar.jpg

And also:

• File:Thomaskirche HH-Rahlstedt Altar2.jpg
• File:Thomaskirche HH-Rahlstedt Fenster.jpg
• File:Thomaskirche HH-Rahlstedt Fenster2.jpg
• File:Thomaskirche HH-Rahlstedt Tauffünte.jpg
• File:Thomaskirche HH-Rahlstedt Tauffünte2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 11:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC)