User talk:Alvesgaspar/archive29

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elvas September 2013-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Dust spot (see note). In my opinion the vertical lines of the right side of the picture are tilted CCW--Lmbuga 00:48, 28 September 2013 (UTC) -- Thanks, dust spot removed and tilt minimized the best I could. -- Alvesgaspar 10:57, 1 October 2013 (UTC)  Support Good--Lmbuga 20:33, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vila Viçosa September 2013-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:55, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vila Viçosa September 2013-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:40, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vila Viçosa September 2013-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:33, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vila Viçosa September 2013-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:27, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Dust spots

Hi!

Olhe as notas (apuntamentos) da imagem File:Alcacer September 2013-3.jpg. Para mim é boa. Obrigado--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

• Obrigado Miguel, és um verdadeiro especialista a detectar manchas (you are a true expert in detecting the dust spots)! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcacer September 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vila Viçosa September 2013-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 15:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nazaré February 2013-12.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nazaré February 2013-12.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 06:18, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tampa Florida November 2013-2b.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tampa Florida November 2013-2b.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:05, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampa Florida November 2013-5a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:43, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Légende du fichier "Using sextant.gif"

Bonjour

J'utilise votre fichier Using_sextant.gif ou plus exactement Using sextant swing.gif sur la page de l'ancien observatoire de la Marine de Nantes

J'aurais voulu savoir s'il était disponible au format vectoriel .svg
Je voudrais en effet mettre la légende en français et avec le fichier au format .gif ce n'est pas assez "propre".

Merci d'avance

Eric Brosselin (talk) 14:47, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi,

I'm currently using your file Using sextant swing.gif on the following page ancien observatoire de la Marine de Nantes

I would like to know if you have the original file in SVG. I would like to put the captions in french. Editing the .gif file doesn't give good results !

Thanks a lot.

Eric Brosselin (talk) 00:15, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

• Hi Eric,

Je m'éxcuse de ne pas avoir répondre. Malheureusement je n'ai pas d'animation svg (ça existe?). Tout ce que j'ai sont les images individuelles CorelDraw. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:45, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:The_Photographer.jpg&oldid=109957381&diff=prev

Hi, Alvesgaspar, if you take a good look at the picture, you will see the man is walking away from the camera (look at his left foot, where you will see the heel), hence, in my opinion you should undo your revert. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 08:32, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

• I took this picture a long time ago and can't remember which the exact conditions were. Yes, it is likely that the man was walking away from me but that cannot be proven beyond any doubt from the image. Notice that some shadows and lines are just artifacts originated from the scaning process and the agressive light/contrast enhancements made to reveal hidden details. Please see the discussion page. best regards, Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:33, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your time Alvesgaspar. btw, I like the image very much. Lotje (talk) 13:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London November 2013-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London November 2013-3a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:25, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London November 2013-5a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M5A1 Stuart 1942-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:29, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London November 2013-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There is a little white halo (upper edges)--Lmbuga 19:41, 23 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment See notes. Perhaps it's not problem to be QI because it's a good picture--Lmbuga 19:43, 23 November 2013 (UTC) --  Done A new version uploaded. Not perfect but a little better -- Alvesgaspar 22:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)  Support Better. Good quality--Lmbuga 00:02, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London November 2013-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 19:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampa Florida November 2013-16a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I fear, you wont like my request, but what about cutting the branches on the left side? The photo would be even more perfect. --Cccefalon 12:26, 24 November 2013 (UTC) --  Done Y're right -- Alvesgaspar 13:43, 24 November 2013 (UTC)  Support Very good now! --Cccefalon 14:05, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London November 2013-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:34, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge

Hi. You may have seen that Colin has started a rather nice Photo challenge project at Commons:Photo challenge. Fancy getting involved in setting it up, or entering? --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

• Hi Michael! A nice intiative indeed! I'm rather busy right now but I will try to participate, one way or the other. Thanks for letting me know. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:15, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London November 2013-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty, but rather cyanotic and some overexposure. Can you reduce the blue a bit and make it a bit darker? Mattbuck 21:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC) --  Done Alvesgaspar 23:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 23:10, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
HMS Belfast, London.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment a small geocoding can be? :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:04, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

•  Done -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:47, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Good now, all criteria met. Halavar (talk) 20:19, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:12, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lisbon City Hall, facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment This is a Lisbona City Hall or Municipal Council of Lisbon because I see some difference in translation? Halavar (talk) 15:08, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

• I'm not sure I understand what you mean. "Câmara Municipal" translates, indeed, as "Municipal Council". But the term is also used with the meaning of City Hall, in Portuguese. To be absolutely accurate, the category should read "Edifício da Câmara Municipal de Lisboa" (Building of the Lisbon Municipal Council"). But that would be unnecessary in my opinion. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:23, 26 November 2013 (UTC)  Support Ok then:) All criteria met. I've added also "facade" to the scope. Halavar (talk) 15:57, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:13, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Chapel of Saint Anthony, São Martinho do Porto, Portugal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:18, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Monastery of Saint Augustin, Vila Viçosa, Portugal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 15:19, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:18, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Fort of Santa Luzia, Elvas, Portugal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampa Florida November 2013-3a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:10, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old Church of Our Lady of the Conception (portal), Lisbon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 12:21, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aqueduct of Amoreira, Elvas, Portugal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 18:04, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:06, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Nossa Senhora da Assunção, Elvas (exterior), Portugal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 12:23, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:06, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of São Domingos in Elvas, Portugal. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 16:25, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London November 2013-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Some highlights are a bit too bright IMO but I'm hard-pressed to find any actual 255 blow-out. --King of Hearts 18:04, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London November 2013-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 18:48, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Évoramonte September 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:38, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo December 2013-2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 21:21, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London November 2013-27b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:54, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo December 2013-3a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:24, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London November 2013-13a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The reflections on that golden parts are still somewhat too bright, but that should not be a reason to decline. Like it now. --Smial 17:02, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sky Tampa Florida November 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Rather green. Mattbuck 00:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC) --  Done -- You are right. Fixed. Alvesgaspar 11:17, 30 November 2013 (UTC) I have tried my own version. Mattbuck 20:38, 2 December 2013 (UTC) Could you crop out the cranes in the left bottom corner ? Pleclown 12:50, 4 December 2013 (UTC) --  Done Sure! -- Alvesgaspar 12:18, 5 December 2013 (UTC) QI --EpsilonEridani 22:17, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampa Florida November 2013-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good --Lmbuga 02:56, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampa Florida November 2013-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Florian Fuchs 18:33, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo Augustt 2013-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:27, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampa Florida November 2013-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The left side of the photo is tilted cw. --Cccefalon 20:02, 6 December 2013 (UTC) --  Done -- Corrected, thanks -- Alvesgaspar 15:11, 7 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:46, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Awesome images

	Inspiring photos into the human culture
	Your photos have inspired me. Thank you very much. The Photographer (talk) 18:39, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Esta é uma verdadeira vergonha. Você é um exemplo a seguir. Commons não é um lugar igual sem a sua presença. --The Photographer (talk) 12:03, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window Porto Covo July 2013-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --Ralf Roletschek 20:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

IP edit

It looks like you may have accidentally edited your talk while logged out, revealing your IP. I hid the IP with a revision deletion just in case. INeverCry 23:59, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

• Thank you for your care, INeverCry. I suspect this wasn't the first time! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:54, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spider November 2010-6a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. DerHexer 23:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo December 2013-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window Porto Covo July 2013-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 17:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampa Sun Trust November 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:13, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London November 2013-20b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:26, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window Porto Covo July 2013-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment As it might be to expect, easy geometric forms would undergo a finicky assessment of perspective ... QI after pc --Cccefalon 17:16, 12 December 2013 (UTC) --  Done -- Alvesgaspar 20:21, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 21:15, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo December 2013-6a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty. --Mattbuck 10:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crisopid July 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Imo wrong focus, some part of the background seems more sharp than the head --A.Savin 11:44, 8 December 2013 (UTC) I think it's OK. Mattbuck 10:23, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argiope July 2012-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good --Rjcastillo 15:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coimbra December 2011-28a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Clipping issue at the top. Mattbuck 11:11, 15 December 2013 (UTC) --  Done -- Thanks, fixed. Alvesgaspar 16:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 22:13, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London November 2013-23a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 01:36, 19 December 2013 (UTC) Support "Still there seems to be something wrong technically as if the unsharpness and lack of detail were the result of some wrong exposure solution or poor gear (very high ISO, extreme HDR, poor lens ?) or even a posteriori manipulation." These are your words and I see exactly these mentioned qualities here. But I like it. Why there is no information about the exposure in Metadata?--Urmas83 12:38, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

2014 !

	* * * 2014! * * *
	Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:27, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mantid August 2007-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 11:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acrididae grasshopper-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow! --NorbertNagel 12:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fly June 2013-6a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC) I disagree --~~~~ -- Please sign (and justify) your contribution -- Alvesgaspar 13:30, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Dear Alvesgaspar, I wish and you and your family a Merry Christmas and lots of health and, of course, nice pictures for the coming year! Your Poco² 14:02, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

File:SMP May 2008-9a.jpg

Your runners silhouette would be a great entry to the photo challenge imo. I know you have some entries already, but there is no restriction and this is quite different from the sunsets. Merry Christmas. -- Colin (talk) 18:45, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Argiope July 2012-3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Argiope July 2012-3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia in the European Parliament

Since 2009 Wikipedians are visiting German and Austrian State Parliaments to take pictures of their members. They have been made available under a free license on Wikimedia Commons. They can be used in Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects but also outside of Wikipedia - in compliance with the license conditions - for example by the Members of Parliament themselves. Besides the creation of free pictures of politicians, the project offers the deputies the opportunity to ask questions about Wikipedia and to discuss „their“ Wikipedia article (eg. to indicate possible problems with personal rights). For Wikipedians this offers the chance to explain their idea of „Free Knowledge“ and the work of the Wikimedia projects. In addition these contacts give Wikipedia photographers access to places that are not accessible to the public in order to produce free images. We now have the opportunity to visit the European Parliament in Strasbourg in February and perform a photography and editing project for the 764 MEPs there. In particular as the next elections for the European Parliament are upcoming in May, these new articles and photos are under a strong focus of the public. Volunteers should sign up on our Google form - note the section on the Commons project page about selection. I would be happy to have a supporting voice from you for the Grant request on Meta: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:PEG/Olaf_Kosinsky/Wikipedians_in_European_Parliament --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cat january 2009-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 08:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa December 2013-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please remove dust spot. --NorbertNagel 16:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)  Done -- Thanks, removed several... Alvesgaspar 16:41, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa December 2013-3a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elvas September 2013-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:13, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glebionis May 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and the flower is perfectly within the DOF! --Cccefalon 09:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centaurea July 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:01, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flower May 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:01, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convento Cristo December 2008-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 26 December 2013 (UTC)