User talk:Allforrous/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
some GIFs are Animations
You keep to miss-categorizing animations File:AnalogClockAnimation1 2hands 12h in realtime.gif (as an example) is an animation. When you look at the file page you can see:
AnalogClockAnimation1_2hands_12h_in_realtime.gif (250 × 250 pixels, file size: 2.73 MB, MIME type: image/gif, looped, 720 frames, 12 h 0 min 0 s); (request rotation)
It has 720 frames! The file is realtime. This means the minute handle moves ... every minute. Please check if files are animations before you recategorize them. --Jahobr (talk) 18:38, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
|
Videos of information technology has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
41.115.20.28 15:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Allotropes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
DMacks (talk) 05:12, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Sulfur_forms has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
DMacks (talk) 15:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Antagonists by role has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
IagoQnsi (talk) 20:03, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Concepts in physics has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Jochen Burghardt (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Audio_files_of_Yoga_styles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Estopedist1 (talk) 15:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Your reversion of my edit now means that the cat is no longer listed in Category:Cooper (surname) in alphabetical order by given name ie J (as it should be), but under C (which is incorrect). My edit was to make it correct. This problem appears to be caused by the Wikidata Infobox and is recurring in hundreds of cases. Please fix the Infobox or revert to my edit please. Ardfern (talk) 00:53, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Scholars and academics has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Josh (talk) 18:50, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Individual rooms has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Josh (talk) 18:04, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Physical objects has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Josh (talk) 17:22, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Academic works about mathematics has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Works about mathematics has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:31, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Graph (discrete mathematics) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Jochen Burghardt (talk) 20:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Brombya
Es un raro género monotípico de la familia category:Rutaceae creado por F.Muell. según Fragmenta Phytographiæ Australiæ 5: 4. 1865.[1] & [2]. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 07:48, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Category:National flag of Turkey
Please stop adding unrelated categories to this category (and any others for that matter) Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Allforrous,
A while ago you created Category:Tautomer as a subcat of the pre-existing Category:Tautomerism, with a manual interwiki link to en:Tautomer, which is the same as where that existing parent points via wikidata. What is the difference in scope or meaning between these two cats? DMacks (talk) 21:36, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Languages and alphabet reform
Your RD that can be seen at the revision history of Category:صورة شخصية makes me think your knowledge of Turkish culture is minimum. The text is not Turkish, the Turks made a reform and quitted the Arabic alphabet by the end of 1928 (almost a hundred years ago) and just like the Latin alphabet they use today, the Arabic-alphabet-based script that they used to use was "adopted" to the needs of the Turkish language. As I see your interest in Turkish culture due to your excessive contributions on that area, for your information in Turkish we have sounds like p that does not exist in Arabic, we have the letter and sound ç (ch) that does not exist in Arabic etc. If you meet any paisanos in your country with the surname Pichara you may be sure in fact their surname was Bishara, but the Latin American official that registered them thought "they cannot pronounce P, the name must begin with P (when it fact it was B)" and took the "sh" in Bishara as "ch", as you people do not have the sound sh in Spanish and therefore Bishara turned into Pichara. Whatever. I'm trying to tell you that you're trying to swim in water(s) that you do not know well. Have you ever seen me editing something Chinese, Korean or Japanese? I have no idea about those water(s). It is good to swim in water(s) that one knows more or less. Cheers. --E4024 (talk) 00:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Tautomer has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
DMacks (talk) 04:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Dear Allforrous,
Do you still need this empty category you created in 2017? (I'm working on Spinoza and his circle on Commons, the Dutch and English wikipedias, and Dutch wikibooks, to be translated in English.)
- As for me, this category might be removed as i am not aware of any files to put in this category.
If you intend to put files here, please do so, i would welcome them, thanks, cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 12:27, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Natural_Scenery_in_Bangladesh has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Estopedist1 (talk) 04:50, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Music_pedagogues_by_country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 23:27, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Reverted category fix
Hello. My removal of Category:Water supply and sanitation from Category:Sanitation was because Category:Water supply and sanitation are in the categories Category:Water and Category:Sanitation thus creating an infinite loop. How would you like us to solve it? Ainali (talk) 07:44, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Logos of movies
Hello. I un-did your revert. Last time I checked movies are products, but last time I checked not all of them are "associated" with the "film industry." Whatever either of those words mean. So, unless your going to argue that they aren't products I think it's the best way to do it. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:22, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Mar del Plata
Hi, I'm creating content on historic buildings in Mar del Plata (like Villa Devoto) on itwiki. If you can, could you please add images about these buildings or do you know anybody who could be interested and capable of doing that? Thank you very much in advance!--Plumbago Capensis (talk) 14:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Por favor, ayuda
Me han metido un montón de plantillazos en imágenes subidas. Yo no estoy muy ducho en Commons, soy más de wikipedia y referencias, pero no veo bonito que me metan una plantilla y para justificar la retirada me obliguen e enviar emails y hacer cosas en las que no estoy ducho, ni tengo tiempo para ello. He intentado añadir las plantillas adecuadas y explicaciones en las páginas de discusión, rascando bajo las piedras y copiando de otras imágenes parecidas, pero no sé si va a ser suficiente. Por otro lado, los logos son creaciones mías... pedir que "demuestre que son mías", es lo mismo que pedir que "demuestre que no lo son". Parece un contubernio, y no sé como enmendar la situación. Es mucho trabajo, y no tengo tiempo, bastante aportación hago manteniendo 2200 artículos en Wikipedia. Muchas gracias por tu atención.--Gilwellian (talk) 17:22, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Dime si están bien las aportaciones, es que ya no sé que hacer, y es una "putada" (perdón los el vulgarismo), cargarse todo el trabajo.--Gilwellian (talk) 17:41, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Déjalo, después de las últimas respuestas me dicen que las plantillas son incorrectas o que demuestre yo que sé. ¿Cómo voy a demostrar que algo es mío si ellos no demuestran tampoco que no lo es? Ya les he dicho que son imágenes que ni aparecen en Google. No es la primera vez, así que estoy agotado de tantos palos en las ruedas. Me retiro del proyecto. Un abrazo y siento la lata que te he dado, pero es muy frustrante y se me hace muy cuesta arriba. --Gilwellian (talk) 21:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Dime si están bien las aportaciones, es que ya no sé que hacer, y es una "putada" (perdón los el vulgarismo), cargarse todo el trabajo.--Gilwellian (talk) 17:41, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Samma dynasty
Hi there, [3] how exactly is the tomb on picture related to Samma dynasty? --A.Savin 18:35, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:PK_Thatta_asv2020-02_img25_Makli_Necropolis.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=517951515){kind=link}
Diaspora football clubs
Hi. If you are interested in this topic, there are so many in your area! For example in Chile Audax Italiano, Palestino, Unión Española etc. Probably there are more in Argentina, country of D10S. --E4024 (talk) 23:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
|
|
People by setting by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 14:05, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Tells (archaeology) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Mike Peel (talk) 13:48, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Category:Female lawyers by country
Hi Thanks for opening Category:Female lawyers by country. I am sure you must have noticed that I initiated Category:Female lawyers and I know that there were several Turkish female lawyers in there; but when you made the by country cat, you did not deign to open one for Turkey. Does it serve anything if I ask you why? Probably not. However these details do not go unnoticed. Nothing more for now. Have a good year. --E4024 (talk) 01:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- No me gustan los hombres. Por favor no insista. Dejeme en paz. Allforrous (talk) 00:40, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I’ve noticed that you’ve added a lot of player categories and images to Category:Women's association football players from Argentina. However, this is unnecessary and counters Commons guidelines on categorization. Since the national team player category and "women’s association football (position) from Argentina” category are both subcategories of the Category:Women's association football players from Argentina, adding the parent category is redundant. For more, please see COM:OVERCAT. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 06:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Titles and occupations in Hinduism has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 17:49, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Oil on copper paintings has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
BriefEdits (talk) 00:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Dear Allferrous,
I have just removed this category from Category:Benedictus de Spinoza, the general connection was not clear to me. I hope you don't mind and agree, or otherwise can explain to me how Spinoza fits in. Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 17:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Fixed?
Hello, Allforrous. Could you tell me why you think ethicists should be separated from logicians and sceptics in Category:Philosophers from the Netherlands? Or from philosophers of science in the United States, for that matter? Etcetera. Greeting, Eissink (talk) 03:07, 14 March 2021 (UTC).
|
File:Naresh I Technologies Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Euro know (talk) 10:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Scientific laws has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |