User talk:Allforrous/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
Scholars by religion has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Muslim scholars has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 03:03, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Muslim writers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 03:06, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Muslim poets has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 03:07, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
|
|
University teachers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Roy17 (talk) 14:04, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Old_World_rats_and_mice has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Auntof6 (talk) 06:45, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Slavery in Asia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 22:46, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Finite automata
Hi! Why did you turn the redirect Category:Finite automata-->Category:Finite state machine into an own category? I don't see any difference between both notions. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 13:29, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
This all relocated perfect. Thank you.--Allforrous (talk) 15:48, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Images_of_nature has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 08:06, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Religious studies scholars by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 13:43, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
First, thanks for some of the tags in son jarocho and fandango videos, but I believe, one of to cnahge aren ot good. You create a tapdance page to group videos of zapateado jarocho (already there is a page about it) the problems I saw is tap dance is a very specific kind of dance (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tap_dance) and son jarocho zapateado is little or nothing related with tap dance. --Koffermejia (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
About the category Fandango the main problem we have is the word means diferent things in different context. In flamenco is a specific dance but in Veracruz fandango is the party of Son jarocho is a more broad term. So I believe could be better to add a Fandango jarocho category to add multimedia material related with fandango in this context. Gracias! --Koffermejia (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Human activities has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 04:37, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Early Birds of Aviation
Hi, having tried to clean up Commons Category:Early Birds of Aviation, I have now found some problems in what I have done. I have used the list at en:wp article Early Birds of Aviation, but I now see conflicts with the en:wp Category:Members of the Early Birds of Aviation. eg Reuben Fleet and others. I'll go and sleep on it now, but I would welcome any advice you might have on how to verify the true members. MTIA, PeterWD (talk) 00:04, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Una cerveza para usted!
|
¡Un monstruo de la cultura compartida! Hermano! ¡Cuántas contribuciones! Espléndido! Más una presencia de gran fuerza y estabilidad para el desarrollo de la humanidad! Ahlan.dias (talk) 01:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC) |
- Muito obrigado.--Allforrous (talk) 01:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Category:Arthur Murray
Hi! This is not that person! User:Arthur Murray is not en:Arthur Murray!!! --Микола Василечко (talk) 17:18, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Acerca de medicina
Hola!. Veo que muchas veces agradeces mi trabajo. Te escribo la presente para informarte que practicamente he terminado la implementación de la caja de navegación de enfermedades y problemas de salud {{DiseasesNav}} en más de 7000 páginas. Estoy aprovechando mi baja laboral para diseñar, programando en Lua el módulo correspondiente, y implementando la plantilla. Como podrás ver, la caja de navegación permite saltar a la subcategoria de al lado de entre las "estandarizadas". Seguramente la hubiera tenido que hacer un poco más sofisticada (no teniendo que introducir parámetros, pero se me ha ocurrido demasiado tarde al aprender un poco más de Lua). Jmarchn (talk) 16:22, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Hola! He añadido el enlace a Wikidata de Category:Sertoli cell nodule que faltava. Con lo que puede ver que conducen a artículos de la Wikipedia en inglés que son diferents para Category:Sertoli cell nodule y Category:Sertoli cell tumor. Hasta otra!. Jmarchn (talk) 15:44, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Marbot
Bonjour, pour ne pas infecter des catégories avec des souscatégories impropres, on a séparé les catégories Inscriptions on the Arc de Triomph et People inscribed on the Arc de Triomph, C'est la raison que les photos des inscriptions ne passent plus dans les catégories des personnes inscrits. Merci pour votre compréhension. --Havang(nl) (talk) 07:24, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- Je suis d'accord.--Allforrous (talk) 00:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Food product brands has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 10:48, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Allforrous/Archive 5,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Dominican scholars has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 07:19, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Please use sub-categories
––Apalsola t • c 14:52, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
I don't want to unnecessarily revert you, but if "Category:Christian apologetics" is appropriate then it should be added to the general category (Category:Shield of the Trinity), not just to one image in the category... AnonMoos (talk) 07:26, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Allforrous/Archive 5,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Monsters
Hello! The differents categories you just created about monsters are just duplicates of Category:Mythological creatures, existing historically. Could you please use them instead? Thank you. Triton (talk) 03:50, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks! Triton (talk) 23:40, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Scientists_by_speciality has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Chromium(III) picolinate has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Meekrab2012 (talk) 16:10, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Allforrous/Archive 5,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
not all GIFs are Animations
Hi, you moved of GIFs into animation caterories, many of them wrongly. GIF is a general image format, which allows for animation. But not all GIFs are animations! Many are just normal static images. You can check this on the file site. This is the line under an animation:
(500 × 500 pixels, file size: 1.01 MB, MIME type: image/gif, looped, 200 frames, 10 s)
As you can see it has several (200) frames and can therefore "move". These files however are not animations: File:Zertifikat.gif, File:UNECE Germany 2010.gif, File:Precursory.gif. Greetings --Jahobr (talk) 10:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Tank you--Allforrous (talk) 14:36, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Yoga / Yoga as exercise categories
Hi, please do not add these general (parent / grandparent) categories to individual image articles. Any article which is categorised to the name of an asana is automatically in the yoga tree (hierarchy) of articles, so additional links are redundant and confusing. E.g. if an image is in "Category:Tadasana", that is part of "Category:Standing Asana" which is in "Category:Asana", which is part of "Category:Yoga". I'll delete the additions now but would be very grateful if you'd stop! All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:01, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- The template must be placed:
. --Allforrous (talk) 14:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
This category has become too crowded. It should list very few images directly. Files should be moved to subcategories where appropriate. New subcategories can be created. Some files need to be moved elsewhere. Search for more categories: fulltext, Main Page, topics, meta categories. Please remove or replace this tag afterwards.- Not exactly. The categories Yoga, Yoga as exercise, and Asana are designed to contain sub-categories, of which there are several, and ALL the images should go into the subcategories. It isn't exactly a matter of crowding, but if that's the template that people like, then we can try it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Now you are doing major damage, leaving uncounted images without adequate yoga categories and no way of locating them other than looking through User:Allforrous's edit history! This is a terrible mess: on Wikipedia you would be on Administrators' Noticeboard for disruptive editing. I have no idea what if any equivalent there is over here but I wish you'd stop - it will take hours undoing the damage you are doing now.
To give you a concrete example, and for any administrators there may be who will one day read this, you took the file File:Integral Yoga Meditation.jpg and removed the category Yoga styles, which was the image's ONLY link to the yoga category hierarchy. Not too clever, eh? Think about it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:42, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
