User talk:Allforrous/Archive 11
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Erythrina schliebenii? Or just Erythrina corallodendrum from Ra'anana?
You have removed the Category:Erythrina and added the Category:Erythrina schliebenii for File:Erythrosfrom raanan 01.jpg (diff), File:Erythrosfrom raanan 02.jpg, File:Erythrosfrom raanan 03.jpg and File:Erythrosfrom raanan 04.jpg. As far as I can see, back then user:Daniel Ventura has been uploaded images from en:Ra'anana (cf. here, that means: from Israel (e.g.: File:Shevet Achim Synagogue Raanana 04.jpg, File:Erythrina corallodendrum raanana 01.jpg). How does it come, that you identified the above mentioned images of Erythros as en:Erythrina schliebenii instead of en:Erythrina corallodendrum? --Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 07:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
CfD notification
Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/12/Category:Cobblers; you have edited the related Category:Shoemakers. - Jmabel ! talk 04:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. I discuss on Wikipedia. Allforrous (talk) 15:55, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Also, similarly Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/12/Category:Taken with SMC PENTAX DA 14 mm f/2.8 ED IF. - Jmabel ! talk 03:26, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'm not interested.--Allforrous (talk) 15:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Does "I'm not interested" mean "don't notify me on things like this" or "I'm not interested in this particular one"? - Jmabel ! talk 19:45, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not interested in this particular one. Allforrous (talk) 22:22, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Does "I'm not interested" mean "don't notify me on things like this" or "I'm not interested in this particular one"? - Jmabel ! talk 19:45, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
|
Nautical fiction has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 10:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
All the best
Thanks for your thanks, wish you all the best in 2024, and... keep rocking my dear! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 21:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. It's a great pride for me to have colleagues like you. Congratulations dear friend. Allforrous (talk) 22:15, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Madonna–whore_complex has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 07:13, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Do not use Category:Technical terminology anymore, nor similar ones
Please stop adding Category:Technical terminology and other categories with "Terminology" in the name!! This category has been deleted, the others will be deleted, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/10/Category:Terminology. Use instead the correct subcategory of Category:Categories by topic. JopkeB (talk) 14:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Islamic jurisprudence has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 05:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Video game genres has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Оранге (talk) 00:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Erythrina erythrina has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 19:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Flickr streams of North Korea has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
A1Cafel (talk) 09:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Stop adding categories to Category:Neologisms
Please stop adding subcategories to Category:Neologisms!!! This category is only for media ABOUT neologisms, like those describing the concept of neologism, a voiced version of the article about Neologism, an information graphic showing the use of neologisms over time or depicting the life-cycle of a word.
This category is NOT for subcategories that ARE a neologism, like the ones you added since yesterday; Commons is NOT for creating glossaries, therefor we have Wikipedia and Wictionary. JopkeB (talk) 05:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
AND stop creating categories that were just deleted because of Commons:Categories for discussion/2024/01/Category:Neologisms. This is not helpful. --JopkeB (talk) 05:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
If you do not agree with the conclusions of Commons:Categories for discussion/2024/01/Category:Neologisms, then start a new discussion about the subject. That is a better way and far more constructive than acting against the outcomes. --JopkeB (talk) 05:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Boca
Why this useless revert? 1. No need for lead, we're Commons, not Wikipedia and 2. No need for template "categorize", the mother cat has already been well subcategorized. -- Blackcat 
19:02, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Retailing_by_products_and_services_sold has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 03:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Aristotle
The works of Aristotle are not limited to philosophy in the sense of that category here on Commons. His works cover science, literature, and other topics as well. --EncycloPetey (talk) 17:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 | Category:Videos of science policy is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Prototyperspective (talk) 10:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
| Category:Animations of epistemology is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Prototyperspective (talk) 13:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Antarctica research agencies has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
200.111.227.105 20:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
| Category:Videos of special is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Prototyperspective (talk) 00:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Moravia vs. Moravian-Silesian Region
Hi, this 2017 edit was completely mistaken. Most of contended images are from another Moravian regions than the Moravian-Silesian (South Moravian Region, Olomouc Region, Zlín Region, and small eastern parts of South Bohemian Region and Pardubice Region also belong to Moravia). You probably mistaked the Moravian-Silesian Region (which includes part of the northern Moravia and the Czech part of Silesia) for the historical Moravian-Silesian Land which contained whole Moravia and whole Czech part of Silesia. ŠJů (talk) 01:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Tanks Allforrous (talk) 16:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Military food by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |