User talk:Alexis Jazz/Archives/2018/July

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Paul Fearn

Interesting essay, thanks for responding to my initial post at the Village Pump.

One thing I would ask is, are you 100% sure that the Paul Fearn whose own site you link to is definitely the same "Paul Fearn" at Alamy? I agree that there's a very good chance that it is, but I don't see any clear evidence confirming this.

All the best,

Yottanesia (talk) 15:29, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

@Yottanesia: No, I am not. I will clarify this in the essay. - Alexis Jazz 15:38, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, Yottanesia (talk) 18:04, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
You may want to contribute to COM:BAD.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:02, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: What can I contribute to that? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Something from your essay, perhaps?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:29, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: COM:BAD is about sites offering nonfree content as if it was free. Paul Fearn offers free content as if it was nonfree. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:32, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 14:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

 Comment I only adjusted the white balance for that, not my photo. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Mila Kunis at Backstage Billboard Music Awards 2018.jpg

Do you know at what time interval this image occurs. I cannot find it. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:24, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: I added the time (8:12) to the link. You can ask me this kind of questions again in the future (if it's not for hundreds of videos), I can just play the video 5x-10x faster than normal to find it more quickly. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Scoring points is for soccer, dear.

Greetings: Since we are all on the same page [1] scoring points on each other over trivia wastes time, diminishes both yourself and the process as well as raising the probability that some of it will be mistaken not for the COM:AGF playful spirit which I assume you have, but in some other way and then we're off to the races with unnecessary yack. Please remember we have people with all ability levels of numerous languages and some ;)p simply does not translate. Thanking you in advance because I know you get it. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Not much of a sense of humor here.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:30, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

You fucking retarded bitch....

Conweb pussy ass Niyaxm (talk) 21:31, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

The conweb is right next to the covfefe, right? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:27, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Noooo....

You wanted to call me a retard but deleted my comment go play with your pussy. You need some release bitch😂 Niyaxm (talk) 21:36, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

@Niyaxm: I didn't, that was someone else who figured I wouldn't be interested. But this interests me very much, so I restored your message! Did you know you can also reply at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections#User:Niyaxm? (wait imma grab some popcorn!) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:46, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

You want to have me deleted...

Bitch for what it’s fucking Wikipedia get a life. You don’t even know what was going on when I was talking to him about the picture. I didn’t know it came from fucking Getty because it didn’t have a watermark (I got it from tumblr) retarded😂🖕🏽 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niyaxm (talk • contribs) 21:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

@Niyaxm: Does Tumblr have options for Creative Commons? That's new for me. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:46, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

OTRS

From your user page:

First of all, OTRS can't contact right holders. So either right holders need to contact OTRS all by themselves (sure..) or a user needs to ask them to contact OTRS. I did that a couple of times, I've never seen anyone else doing that. You would get a lot more response if OTRS could actively contact right holders, but for some stupid legal reason they can't. WMF is afraid it would look like WMF is contacting them and OTRS is somehow legally not WMF.

The WMF lawyers isn't as far as I know (as an OTRS agent) stopping us from reaching out to rights holders, it is just that it is not done, and that unspoken guidelines are not to use OTRS emails for other things than to respond to things, but I have sent emails to some people and asked for permissions for some images in a DR discussion, using the OTRS emails. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:30, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

@Josve05a: Interesting. I wrote that part because someone (I think an administrator) told me just that. I'll try to remember who said it in what discussion. - Alexis Jazz 18:38, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
I might be wrong, but I have not been told off directly by WMF legal yet. Only been in IRC-discssions where we've discussed if it is our place to do so - pointing out copyvios on our projects to the copyright owners. We've also not been given that as an assignment from the Commons-community, only to act as a permissions handling service (and responding to information enquiries and questions). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:57, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
@Josve05a: I found it! (that took a while) It was Green Giant (OTRS volunteer and administrator), so that much I remembered correctly. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Naomi Campbell and Anatoly Evdokimov (Evdokimov show).jpg:
"OTRS cannot initiate the email chain because that is not its purpose and because it might give the impressio that the WMF are contacting them. In fact, every email sent by OTRS clearly states that it is sent by volunteers on behalf of the community but not on behalf of the WMF."
I hope you're not in trouble now? - Alexis Jazz 14:05, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Well, there are no set rules, just common sense not to do so (in most circumstances) - hence why we normally don't do so. But in highly unusual circumstances, some of us do so anyway.. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:10, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
@Josve05a: yes, I've noticed OTRS volunteers (and administrators) are not all following the same rules or even the same policies. It's confusing sometimes. - Alexis Jazz 14:16, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
I was an OTRS volunteer for a couple of years around 2010-2011 (I think?). I initiated a few tickets (i.e. contacted people first to ask about clearance) but it was definitely not standard procedure. I didn't hear of it being frowned upon, however. I also stopped by to say that your user page is a good assessment of Commons, for the most people. It was interesting to read. Killiondude (talk) 19:51, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Country Fire Authority logo.svg

Australia has a strict copyright act that most simple logos (such as the File:Country Fire Authority logo.svg) that they have to be uploaded as Fair-Use on English Wikipedia. So the license of the logo must be used from the country of origin (per source), not what it might be in the US. See COM:TOO and scroll down to Australia. Bidgee (talk) 23:27, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Sofia Reyes.jpg

Dear Alex,

Does this video seem like own work to you? This youtube account only has 4 videos--and feels suspicious but I don't know if it means anything. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:44, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: It could be, since it's amateur footage. Someone who understands Spanish may be able to tell. The vlogger seems to be criticizing the video/Sofía Reyes, so I'm guessing she didn't create it. The quality is really poor anyway, she has already won some MTV awards so sooner or later she'll probably appear on MTV International. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:09, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
For re-reviewing a number of files that looked quite good at the beginning; but some of which turned out not so good. GRuban (talk) 15:51, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Another barnstar

No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man

English: Happy Scaling the Reichstag discussion

I don't normally make predictions, especially about the future, but i sure hope that DR is not in it.

happy prognosticating. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 15:27, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Guanaco (talk) 00:38, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:500px maintenance

Hi there, I'm wondering about the purpose of this new category. Did you create this because 500px stopped offering CC licences? As far as I can see, many images in there have been reviewed, so the original licenses can be considered valid. De728631 (talk) 14:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

@De728631: I'm working on it, I will make you happy. I make little miracles in the basement. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Oooh, now I'm curious! And it's not even Xmas yet. De728631 (talk) 14:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
@De728631: Commons:500px licensing data - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Great! De728631 (talk) 17:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
However, your table is bugged. Please compare the licenses and ID numbers with the actual uploads at Commons. Example: File:Cruise ship Queen Mary 2 in Flam Norway (99262299).jpg has the ID 99262299 and not 256344669. The licence is CC-by-sa-3.0 and not CC0 which is confirmed by source code. De728631 (talk) 17:43, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Apparently this was only a single line that got botched. All other entries seem to be correct. Thanks a lot for your work. De728631 (talk) 17:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
@De728631: Where do you see 256344669?
I should be able to create tables for many photos, but this won't work forever, so this is the time to import some. There is also another issue: I am not trusted. So it would be best if several admins would spot-check some entries to make sure I'm not evil. (or made a buggy table..) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
I think De728631 is talking about Special:Diff/311444779/311445292. Storkk (talk) 18:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
I think I already know what went wrong. The 500px link was correct and so was the license, only the filename was wrong. Cruise ship Queen Mary 2 in Flam Norway is in there twice, the other entry is correct, which is why I didn't see the problem initially. This just happens when you work this fast. This is not a complete showstopper anyway, you can just search search Commons for the 500px link and find the right image. I'll fix it though so you won't have to. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:05, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
There may be one or two more wrong links and licenses (just fixed another). And I also added a "Reviewed" column where the current status can be marked. De728631 (talk) 18:29, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
@De728631: This is just a bug, I'll make a new table. I would actually prefer if you just blanked either the filename or the 500px link. Don't bother spending time fixing them, I will. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:35, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
This was not my fault. (and there is nothing I can do about it, users have to enter the correct source) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:13, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Natalia París 2016.jpg

Dear Alexis,

I'm sorry to complain buts its really unfortunate that the uploader here can upload a clip of an image which is probably 2-4 seconds from a 10 minute clip...and never give a time interval. The Salvator has been warned on his talkpage not to upload any more copyright violations. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:38, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: he actually did say when this time! "Premios Tv y Novelas 2016 Especial #2 / Moda 2016 9:06". 9:06. Seems legit. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:52, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment: He did! I guess I just missed it. Normally he doesn't give the time and I assumed this was the case here also. I was also tired last night. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:05, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Votex

Things you should know:

  • Over at en:wp CheckUser Bbb23 imposed a Checkuserblock on 150.143.48.3 after (s)he reported an editor at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for vandalism [2]. CheckUser Zzuuzz identified the reporter as "Vote (X) for Change" [3]. Now, "Vote (X) for Change" has not edited since 2011. How was Bbb23 able to run CheckUser when CheckUser data is only stored for three months?
  • The administrators at en:wp regularly vandalise articles. When they are reported at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents the discussions descend into farce. Example:

What about April?

1) Favonian did no such thing to the article 1664. 2)the article in question hasn't been edited since May. 3)Even if Favonian had made the edit as presented, it isn't vandalism, and we don't block for a single error. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 13:47, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

He's just added the following to our article 1664:

References

  1. ↑ Lord, Walter (1955) A Night to Remember, Category:New York: Holt
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

If it's not vandalism what is it? 2A00:23C4:5D1F:9500:903B:C7D0:1366:E608 (talk) 13:49, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

It is non-existent, you are making it up. No such edit took place. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 13:51, 2 July 2018 (UTC
Good grief yes. Look at the penultimate edit in the revision history made by ... "Favonian". 2A00:23C4:5D1F:9500:903B:C7D0:1366:E608 (talk) 13:53, 2 July 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.5.88.70 (talk) 08:59, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
@78.26: I must be seeing shit? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:14, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Alexis JazzI would recommend you read [4]. Why would someone take what happens at English Wikipedia and bring the drama over here? Except to create drama. I stand by my comment. That statement, and that edit, is taken completely out of context, as is the norm for Vote X. I have no further comment. 78.26 (talk) 16:55, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: re-pinging because of malformatting on initial response. 78.26 (talk) 16:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
@78.26: I have no idea about what this case is and if that edit was appropriate or not. But you said: "No such edit took place". My eyes must be deceiving me because I do see an edit, from Favonian, adding the information cited in that report. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:16, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
I said I wouldn't reply, and I shouldn't, but out of respect for your many contributions I will anyway. Context, context, context. Vote X very selectively picks and chooses what they share. If you think the whole story, presented in an honest manner then I have several bridges in my collection for sale. When I wrote that, if you go back to the original conversation, you'll see that in context what I meant was that the edit did not exist as presented by Vote X. Sure, Favonian edited that page. But they did not do what they were accused of, namely vandal ize the page. Vote X made that accusation up. Good day. I truly will not be wasting any more of my volunteer time on this, and I truly suggest you also not waste time on behalf of one of the most abusive editors on this project. 78.26 (talk) 05:12, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
@78.26: The original conversation was nowhere to be found.. Turns out it was removed without archiving. So here it is. The reporter indeed appears to be doing strange things, but you replied clearly: "1) Favonian did no such thing to the article 1664.". I see the context now and while I'm pretty sure this was not vandalism, Favonian did make that edit. (and it was corrected by Power~enwiki) If they are as bad as you say they are, I wouldn't even be surprised if this was a revert-trap specifically set up for this. (I described this kind of revert-trap a while ago, but it was probably invented years before that) But when a user is abusive like this, you have to be extra careful. Don't deny the existence of an edit that clearly does exist. Don't use more words than needed. That report could have been closed with "Normal administrative action, no proof of vandalism", ideally linking the edit that was being referred to. That would give her considerably less ammunition. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:26, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

I patiently waited for days when do you realize at last that Incnis Mrsi has no relation at all to this stuff about Vote X and Favonian’s warring against her in English Wikipedia. Please, bring the dispute wherever you deem reasonable and stop spamming my user_talk. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:44, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Done. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:50, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

sorry

please let me know if i can revert any of my actions - noted the info JarrahTree (talk) 07:13, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Page Edit Summary

Dear Alexis, thank you for your latest contribution on the page category:Alessio Di Zio. I've noticed that you've made a lot of edits and since there's no edit summary I was just curious to know the reason behind this different changes and why you think this new page set up and formatting is better. In my original version the short biography was featured in three different languages, are they totally gone? - I can see that there's still something when I look into the edit section, but now it all seems very messy in terms of formatting, the bio is fragmented etc... I would really appreciate it if you could provide some explanation. Also you cropped the polaroid image I uploaded, why do you think it's better without the white frame? Please just keep in mind that this portrait has always been uploaded and reproduced like it is around the web, it has this pretty distinctive aesthetic, and somehow it is by now pretty typical and representative of that artist, why change it only here on wiki? Thank you --Howardlovy (talk) 21:30, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

@Howardlovy: if you are using Commons in German or Spanish (you can change the language in your preferences) you will see the other one. For the English description, all the information from the short description was duplicated in the long description, so I kept the long description. Category pages should not be very long because their main purpose is to provide an overview of images in that category. It is not a Wikipedia page. In its original form, it would have been deleted sooner or later just like Alessio Di Zio. And on Wikipedia, I'm not sure they would meet notability requirements. The original is still here: File:Alessio Di Zio - Portrait.jpg. For something like infobox use, it is preferred to crop large pictures so it's easier to make out a face in the small infobox picture. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:26, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: Perfect, I guess it all makes sense, thank you very much for your answer, I appreciate it. I'll check about the notability requirements that you mentioned, and as soon as I can I'm gonna add a couple details to the category page just to fine tune it. all the best. --Howardlovy (talk) 01:36, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
@Howardlovy: w:WP:NOTABLE (and w:WP:BLP) should take you to the right page. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:43, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: Perfect, thank you! --Howardlovy (talk) 18:38, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Why you tagging maps which I created with tag "Files from Photobucket"?

I noticed that you tagged a certain number of maps which I created and uploaded with tag/category "Files from Photobucket" (for example this one: [5]). I never uploaded any of maps to Photobucket website. I always uploaded them to Wikimedia Commons after I made them and Wikimedia Commons is a web site where these maps firstly appeared on the Internet. If they later appeared at Photobucked it is because some other people took them from Wikimedia Commons and uploaded them to Photobucket. But these maps are not "from Photobucket". So, please stop tagging wrongly maps which I created with that tag. Thank you. PANONIAN (talk) 18:51, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

@PANONIAN: This was the reason. Citing anything on photobucket as a reference is a really bad idea anyway. The files to go into that category were not hand-picked, feel free to move them to Category:Files that mention Photobucket. Check them carefully though, I've also seen some user (who was not the uploader) adding photobucket spam to a file page. Even someone who inserted a photobucket link into the "source" field, seemingly thinking it would magically be uploaded that way. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:06, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
I am careful with my references. This image from Photobucket actually originating from this book: Istorijski atlas, Geokarta, Beograd, 1999. That is why I listed it as one of my references. I have that book in my home. However, one thing is usage of Photobucket image in list of additional secondary references (not primary ones) and another thing is if someone took some image from Photobucket and upload it to Wikimedia. With your categories you implied that I "simply took my maps from Photobucket and uploaded them to Wikimedia Commons" which is totally incorrect. I am author of maps which I uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and I made these maps from empty layer in Photoshop software. So, there is no even a single dot in these maps which is not originally drawn by me. I also do not see a reason to use "Category:Files that mention Photobucket" for my maps. As I said, in example which you mentioned, the reference image is in fact image from Serbian history atlas which was uploaded to Photobucket. If I used images from Photobucket as secondary references for some other maps which I uploaded, you can mention these examples as well, and I can clarify the correct origin of these images. PANONIAN (talk) 12:54, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
@PANONIAN: this is nothing personal. Photobucket as a source is often poorly indicated, so it's inevitable some files will be selected that are mentioning Photobucket for other reasons. You could kick your maps both out of Category:Files from Photobucket and Category:Files that mention Photobucket, but next time I scan for them I will re-add them to Category:Files from Photobucket. I will exclude files that are in Category:Files that mention Photobucket, but if you don't want your maps there I have no way of excluding them. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:08, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Maybe it is not personal, but there is serious problem with your methodology here. What is the issue with Photobucket any way? Are you opposing or proposing usage of Photobucket as a source? (Just, please, clarify this, so that we can discuss this issue properly). In both cases, my maps are not a proper address for these issues. In my last edits, I clearly clarified that I used Photobucket images only as a secondary references for files which I uploaded (for example here). I have very standardized way of usage of references for my maps. My primary references are always reliable historical books and atlases and then I also list secondary references which are maps from various web sites, which serve only as illustration to readers who are not able to see books which I used as primary references, since these books are mostly in Serbian language and published in Serbia. Now, if you are in fact proponent of Photobucked and you somehow advertising that website, I repeat that files that I uploaded are not a proper place for such "business". I neither directly moved files from Photobucket to Wikimedia neither used them as a main or primary references. So, please, "next time you scan for files" be so kind to check the exact nature of usage of word "Photobucket" on each page before you conduct further actions. PANONIAN (talk) 14:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Aside from all that, if I understood correctly, you simply scanning Wikimedia for word "Photobucket" and then you adding all file pages where you find that word into category "Files from Photobucket" without checking are these files really from Photobucket or that word there is used for other reason? Correct? Do you realize that by such action you wrongly indicating origin of some images? I am quite sure that this is against Wikimedia policies. PANONIAN (talk) 14:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
I moved about a 1000 files into that category right after creating it. This isn't about your maps. Category:Images from websites contains many things, it's not advertising or anything.
"be so kind to check the exact nature of usage of word "Photobucket" on each page before you conduct further actions"
Seriously, no fucking way am I going to look at 1000 files individually before moving them. The way you mention photobucket on your maps, I have no way of filtering them out. I'm cleaning up the category a bit now, but if you don't want your files in Category:Files that mention Photobucket while still mentioning photobucket.. well, they will just end up right back in Category:Files from Photobucket.
"you simply scanning Wikimedia for word "Photobucket" and then you adding all file pages where you find that word into category "Files from Photobucket" without checking are these files really from Photobucket or that word there is used for other reason? Correct?"
So report me on COM:AN/U. Go ahead, make my day! - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:42, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Fine. I will move these files to "Category:Files that mention Photobucket", but simply because if I would waste too much of my free time here it would delay some projects which I am currently working on. Few years ago, I would probably open discussion about this at COM:AN/U. PANONIAN (talk) 14:54, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Alexis

Please go right ahead, can you add a link to my website: http://don.logan.com & http://www.mediadev.net into the page too? --Don (talk) 06:12, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

@WPPilot: I would actually recommend you to put a link to MDI in a prominent place on don.logan.com. The migration is complete, for changes see Category:D Ramey Logan (Wikidata infobox and link to glam added), any file page and d:Q55754145. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
WOW, I am truly impressed and grateful for your efforts, thank you. Drop me a e mail if you have a moment, I have some things I would like to privately share with you. --Don (talk) 18:03, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Professora Ivanete Silva - PSOL 2012.jpg

Does Filipo Tardim own the rights to this youtube video? Its not 100% clear. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:05, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: I'm not sure either. It's an ad for a political party and the about page says he deals with all kinds of stuff. He does have original content though: Eleições do SEPE 2018 - Chapa 1 - Prof Filipo Tardim. (that's him) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tQqG1Df1KY is a different style and not marked as Creative Commons (so that's good). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjIIRC1LtUA is a similar style, older and marked Creative Commons (so again, that's good, he is selective about what he marks as Creative Commons). But https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nbc1IEHu2vI is probably not his work, yet marked as Creative Commons.
I'm really not sure. Maybe someone at the Portuguese village pump who knows PSOL can give a better answer. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:00, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: should I ask the Esplanada? (I will just ask them in English) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Tasnim low-res photos

Hi Alexis. Thanks for you works on Tasnim photos. Is there any easy way to find Tasnim works which have not been uploaded with the highest-resolution available? For example, look at File:Al-Asakari Mosque 4.jpg which had been uploaded with low-res, and I replaced it with a hi-res version. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:56, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

@4nn1l2: there may be something on wmflabs, but I'm not sure. I'll probably glue something together myself for this purpose. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Alexis Jazz si te crees tan bueno

Si te crees tan bueno porque no consigues una foto para el artículo https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danilo_Carrera en vez de andar queriendo eliminarimágenes,use sus habilidades como editor y consiga una foto paraese artpiculo por favor,en vez de andar denunciando fotos--W2288 (talk) 20:24, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

I have no idea why people think I speak Spanish, but this message was more helpful than W2288 could have ever imagined. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:29, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexis_Jazz/Archives/2018/July&oldid=319535106"