User talk:Alexander-93/Archive 2

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Renault Twin'Run - rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:46, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Renault Twizy Z.E. Sport F1.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Smart Fourjoy - front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:47, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Smart Fourjoy - rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:47, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Suzuki iV-4 - rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opel Monza Concept - rear, Gull-wing door.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose, sorry I think we need an image with the doors closed for this scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support, now I see the scope has changed - useful and best in the new scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support (but only to cancel out the other vote; i don'think the scope deserves a VI) the winged doors is what makes this car special, with closed doors you woudnt notice. --C.Suthorn (talk) 10:12, 17 February 2018 (UTC) --C.Suthorn (talk) 19:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment You're both right. A photo with scope of just the rear usually should have the doors shut. With this photo and VI a scope change noting the doors open and I would probably support. I'm open but I think the doors do make this car unique so the doors should be in the scope. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Just change scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment I changed the scope to "Opel Monza Concept - rear, Gull-wing door"-- Alexander-93 (talk) 14:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyundai Vision G Concept Coupé.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:41, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mercedes-Benz Concept GLC Coupé.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - Is this truly unique in scope for Commons, as it appears to be in its category? If so, I think it's useful enough to be a VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment - In the german article for concept vehicles of Mercedes-Benz there was asked for a picture of this car. And I also created a new category within 2015 concept automobiles for this vehicle. I also didn't find another image for this car in Wikicommons.

• Thank you and  Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:26, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wey VV7.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:27, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wey VV7 - rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:09, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wey P8.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:09, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mazda Koeru.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Seems best in scope of the 2 photos in the category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 718 Cayman S back IMG 0704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments chromatic aberrations need fixing, otherwise good.--Peulle 15:35, 19 February 2018 (UTC)  Done Uploaded a new pic. Hope it is better.--Alexander-93 16:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Support--Peulle 22:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chopard Mille Miglia 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 22:50, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halo Formel E Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 17:36, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Microlino Red Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 15:56, 11 March 2018 (UTC)  Comment Ich unterstelle, dass kein größerer Abstand möglich war, um ein besseres Bild zu machen. Andererseits scheinen stark verzerrte Fotos von Fahrzeugen bei QIC an Beliebtheit zu gewinnen (siehe kürzlich Fendt-Traktor). -- Spurzem 16:12, 11 March 2018 (UTC)  Comment Gutes Foto, aber sicher nicht realistisch und auch nicht sachlich. Mir zu krass (Hintergrund verbogen trotz Korrektur) und kurz unter 30mm ist sicher kein extremes WW Bin aber lieber leise.-) --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 16:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC) Kleiner Text  Comment BTW: So schlimm verzerrt wie der Trecker vor ein paar Tagen ist das Bild aber nicht. Dank der netten Autoform auch bei weitem nicht so nachteilig. Und sicherlich könnte man die Perspektive ein wenig korrigieren, siehe im Hintergrund links. Nicht optimal, aber akzeptabel. --XRay 16:40, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rupert Stadler Audi Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 10:45, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW X4 Back Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christian Strube II Skoda Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:56, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoda Kodiaq LK 1 Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 23:52, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hennessey Venom F5 Back Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments WB might be warmer but I know what it's like taking pictures at auto shows. Love the guy in the rear left getting ready to take a picture. --Daniel Case 19:27, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morgan 4-4 Front Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Another acceptable auto-show pic --Daniel Case 19:27, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW X4 M40d Presentation Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 18:25, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Super Levêque Back 1911 Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice car and QI -- Spurzem 14:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volvo V60 Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Super vehicles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment New nominations should be placed at the bottom of the list. No big deal, I took care of it for you. Other then I agree it is the best photo in the category but the scope; is there any model number or other specification that should belong with this? -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for changing the sequence. Here they say, that it is the last remaining car of the brand. Also the brand produced just one model.--Alexander-93 (talk) 07:26, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope IMO Voltmetro 08:35, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:21, 24 March 2018 (UTC)