User talk:Ahonc/Archives/November 2012

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Would you please revert this file back to this version?
(Although the dictum says "be bold", apparently I was a little too bold in assuming that even though the two symbols have the same meaning it would be acceptable to substitue one for the other.)
However, all the international uses of BSicon_TRAIN.svg have been replaced with BSicon_BAHN.svg. Global usage has dropped from over 800 to approximately 70. (There is still some server lag for a few transclusions.) I only left BSicon_TRAIN.svg in place where the diagram refers to an (North) American railroad—with one notable exception: one Russian editor (Туча (talk · contribs)) is refusing to use the original German name, and in fact has made some rather nasty remarks (here and here) that suggest he is not interested in coming to any sort of consensus on the issue.

Thank you. Useddenim 04:51, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Ask Putnik, he had renamed image as widly used.--Anatoliy (talk) 10:29, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Железнодорожный вокзал Симферополя 011.jpg

Hi Ahonc, I noticed you had undeleted File:Железнодорожный вокзал Симферополя 011.jpg back in 2011, despite a DR decision to delete. Could you explain the reasoning for that action? If I understand correctly, the building is not yet public domain because the architect died in 1977 (see my comments in a previous DR). Regards, Jafeluv (talk) 15:56, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

I do not remember now the reason. User:NickK ask me to undelete it.--Anatoliy (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Ok, I'll ask NickK about it. Thanks! Jafeluv (talk) 21:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
File:Станція метро «Іподром» 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:01, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Алегорія Трагедії.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Алегорія Трагедії.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 00:12, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Честно говоря, я не совсем понимаю, что Вам там не понравилось. Моя фотография, сам снимал, оформлено всё по правилам. Сейчас бОльшую версию загружу, раз уж вспомнили.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:11, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Послушайте, у меня, конечно, есть флаг откатывающего, но я не вижу необходимости помечать все 5000 или сколько там моих фотографий, учитывая, что они все верно оформлены.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:14, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Если вы автор, у вас должно быть фото в большом разрешении. Загрузив его, вы подтвердите авторство. Если не хотите загружать в большом разрешении, то пришлите его в OTRS.Anatoliy (talk) 22:15, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
С какой стати? Что хочу, то и загружаю.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
В низком разрешении может загрузить кто угодно, найдя где-то в Интернете.Anatoliy (talk) 22:19, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
I reported your behavior to the administrators, I hope somebody could explain you the basic policies of this project.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:28, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Церква Варвариї Капитолівка Ізюм рн Харків обл дзвіниця.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Церква Варвариї Капитолівка Ізюм рн Харків обл дзвіниця.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anatoliy (talk) 21:52, 24 November 2012 (UTC)