User talk:Adbar/Archives

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LOU - Stade Montois, Lyon, 2005.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak support, the quality are not really convincing, but great moment and difficult conditions.--ArildV 16:58, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historic center of Castiglione del Lago.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : I think you have to link the scope to the category where your picture has been uploaded... and to add (old town) or (old city), please. --JLPC (talk) 20:41, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

• I added the info you requested. As the picture shows the city center I think the category Castiglione del Lago is relevant (no need for "old town"). I can add ii though if you think it is necessary. --Adbar (talk) 19:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
  • I think it is : "old town" it written in the category captions and I suppose some parts of the town has been built recently. So this only picture can't represent the whole town. -- I hope you won't find my opninon too pricky ! Regards. --JLPC (talk) 14:55, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
    • I hear you, I narrowed the scope. --Adbar (talk) 12:56, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

 Support : all criteria met, imo. --JLPC (talk) 13:58, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Truyère Grandval.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Center of Cariño, Spain..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I think you'd better add "view from West" (or North) to the scope. --JLPC (talk) 07:22, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

• I see what you mean, there are panoramas and aerial views of the whole town, so let's say "center". --Adbar (talk) 23:38, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 16:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vineyards and wineries of Tuscany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 07:23, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort of El Kef.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 18:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ujué, Spain.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:58, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerial view of Cáceres.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I also found File:Cáceres visto desde la montaña.jpg, but as it doesn't have much focus on the old town, I support the current photograph nominated. Jolly Janner (talk) 00:41, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tozeur-Nefta International Airport.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:57, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CA 1 north of Jenner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 17:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glen Canyon Dam front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:38, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Crescent spring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 18:37, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Umpqua River Lighthouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Viewing formatting scope changed. There is a perspective distortion that can be easily modified. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:50, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 Done I tried to correct it. --Adbar (talk) 19:33, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Is better. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cape Sebastian looking north.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 10:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Myeong-dong street by night.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective not done. Can you provide the country within the description section? --Cccefalon 11:30, 22 March 2014 (UTC)  Done Both corrected --Adbar 15:35, 22 March 2014 (UTC)  Not done Unfortunately, it is not done. See my annotations. --Cccefalon 19:54, 23 March 2014 (UTC)  CommentI saw them and I uploaded a new version, the right side of the image seems okay to me now --Adbar 10:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC) yes, it's ok now and QI for me --Cccefalon 21:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Namdaemun Market.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : OK. --JLPC (talk) 17:59, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:58, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interstate 15 in the Virgin River Gorge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:58, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cape Disappointment and Cape Disappointment Light.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JOAQUIND 18:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Night Market Chiang Mai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 16:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dubai Metro Al Ras station.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:14, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabo Ortegal (Spain).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Arctic Kangaroo 18:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tea plantation Haputale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --JLPC 17:37, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cape Blanco looking south.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not absolutely sharp but QI. --JLPC 20:59, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astoria-Megler Bridge heading north 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:15, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Honeyman Memorial State Park Cleawox Lake.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mouth of the Lielupe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment I am sorry, I forgot the geocode, I just added it (it is the same for the picture nominated next to this one) --Adbar (talk) 18:47, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support No problem, very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thailand AH1 AH2 Route 32 Ayutthaya.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:34, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frank Bartlett House Port Townsend.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just ok --Poco a poco 19:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South Aspromonte.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:22, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aquatic Cove Cityscape San Francisco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astoria-Megler Bridge heading north 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:56, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guadalupe Dunes County Park beach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:48, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nicotiana obtusifolia (desert tobacco).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the English vernacular name in parenthesis.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
  •  Done It's corrected --Adbar (talk) 17:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! War Memorial of Korea main building.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Magenta CA, Perspective not properly done. --Cccefalon 09:15, 14 April 2014 (UTC)  Done It's corrected --Adbar 17:50, 16 April 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Cccefalon 20:28, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jangdokdae Gyeongbokgung.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:49, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cape Blanco looking north.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tilted. Easy to fix. --Halavar 11:19, 12 April 2014 (UTC)  Done Perspective corrected --Adbar 19:34, 14 April 2014 (UTC)  Comment The line between sky and water is not straight. --Halavar 18:38, 17 April 2014 (UTC)  Done You were right, it should be ok now. --Adbar 06:57, 18 April 2014 (UTC) Support Good now. --Halavar 09:07, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Paul's Church Port Townsend.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SD-CR-S3 CA-78 junction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larrea tridentata Anza-Borrego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality though a little bit more denoising for the sky would have been a good idea.. --Cccefalon 22:09, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of a traditional Korean house.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok imo.--ArildV 18:10, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CA-1 Little Sur River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 13:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Entrance of Kataragama temple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment: two problems imo : a/isn't the crop at the top a bit tight ? b/ shouldn't you addd "entrance" in scope ? --JLPC (talk) 15:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 Comment Scope modified. I am sorry for the crop but I have no better view --Adbar (talk) 17:15, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 Support : OK, then. --JLPC (talk) 15:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:47, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sol Duc River in the Olympic National Park, view towards source.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : maybe you should modify the scope like this : "Sol Duc River in X... (place where the picture was taken), SW (or NE) view"... --JLPC (talk) 16:00, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 Comment I modified the scope --Adbar (talk) 17:12, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 Support Good now. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 19:24, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:47, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Mattala Rajapaksa International Airport Terminal Building.JPG

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mattala Rajapaksa International Airport, terminal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 04:08, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerial photographs of Sri Lanka, Southern Province.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is too broad here, IMO. Adding "Southern Province" would be better. Yann (talk) 04:10, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment You are right, I modified it. --Adbar (talk) 08:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
    •  Support OK now. Yann (talk) 11:03, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inspiration Point Laguna Mountains.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --A.Savin 09:49, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King County Water Taxi Downtown Seattle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I will support it as QI after removal of two blurry spots in the sky. --Cccefalon 11:46, 29 April 2014 (UTC)  Done I removed them --Adbar 08:15, 2 May 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:42, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
California State Route 86.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:14, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:29, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Washingtonia filifera Anza-Borrego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I'd wish more crispness, but imo, still QI. --A.Savin 10:55, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hoh River in Olympic National Park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. Yann (talk) 09:09, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:55, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Entrance of the War Memorial of Korea.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support, despite the upper crop. --JLPC (talk) 13:18, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schneebälle in Korea.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mammillaria tetrancistra Anza-Borrego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:02, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Beach of Cadavedo, SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Could you add "NW (os SE) view", as we usually do here , please ?" --JLPC (talk) 18:13, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 Done It's done. --Adbar (talk) 19:45, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 Best in Scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 14:14, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian CA SR 78 & 79.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No way to get QI for an image with pixelated car plates. --Cccefalon 10:46, 13 May 2014 (UTC) Comment I'd suggest to retouch the numbers and letters --Moroder 11:56, 13 May 2014 (UTC) No need to retouch. The cars are in public space where no privacy can be expected. --Cccefalon 11:57, 13 May 2014 (UTC)  Done You are right, it is a public space, so I uploaded a new version with all the details --Adbar 16:28, 14 May 2014 (UTC) Tis version is ok. --Cccefalon 04:11, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Train station of Torrijos, view of the tracks towards SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : could you, please, add "looking towards NW (or SE)", as we usuallu do here ? --JLPC (talk) 13:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 Done sorry I thought that it was not necessary this time, I'll do it systematically from now on --Adbar (talk) 21:35, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 Support : OK now, thanks. --JLPC (talk) 11:42, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:39, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Honeyman Memorial State Park and Cleawox Lake.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Malchen53 09:39, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Orhan Gazi Mosque, Bursa, SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:20, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bristol Lake after a rainfall, E view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:30, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:01, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Humboldt State University Entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Humphrey's Peak, NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:39, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:14, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
California State Route 12 in Sonoma, northward view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:40, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 16:15, 23 May 2014 (UTC)