User talk:ولاء/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RE: Conocer el tipo de una estrella de mar

El nombre de esa estrella de mar es Luidia ciliaris (Philippi, 1837) y suele presentar dos patrones de coloración como el del enlace anterior o este y su área de distribución la puedes observar aquí --Veronidae (talk) 14:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Please do not recreate deleted content

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  sicilianu  svenska  suomi  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  +/−
Your image or other content, Third Celebration Conference, Egypt- October 2013, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

If you have questions, you may ask them at the Village Pump in any of 42 languages or on my talk page. I will also watch for questions here on your talk page for at least a week. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:38, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

File:View of Alhambra at night003.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 21:26, 26 October 2013 (UTC)


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear ولاء,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

File source is not properly indicated: File:Octoberportal.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Octoberportal.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 09:41, 2 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear ولاء,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 01:10, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

تسجيلات صوتية

مرحبا.بما أنك خبيرة في اللغة الإسبانية، أقترح عليك تسجيل ملفات صوتية لنطق أسماء مقالات إسبانية (بصوتك أو بأصوات تلاميذك)، واستخدامها في ويكيبيديا الإسبانية وويكيبيديا العربية (وهذا مثال لتسجيل صوتي لنطق اسم مقالة).شكرًا --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 16:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Swan goose 005.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Swan goose 010.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Swan goose 009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Swan goose 003.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Swan goose 008.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Swan goose 007.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:39, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Fatir 009, Lion Village.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Fatir 015, Lion Village.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Building, Alex 025.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luidia maculata, Ras Sedr, Egypt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Minor overexposed areas, but IMO still QI. --XRay 08:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santiagobernabeupanoramav45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Its QI for me now. --Hubertl 13:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

FPC nomination

Not sure if you know, but just in case you didn't, if you want to support your featured picture candidate nomination of File:Egyptian Grains.jpg, you need to vote for it explicitly. The nomination itself doesn't count as a support. -- KTC (talk) 14:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Temple of Artemis, Jerash.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 13:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Temple of Hercules. Amman.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citadel of Qaitbay 014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments the picture is tilted. and needs correct perspective--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:51, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
@Milseburg: ✓ Done review it now.--لا روسا 19:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC))
Good quality for me--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:37, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pillars at Jerash.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:45, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nutmeg ready.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. subject is in focus. --Hubertl 19:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girls cleaning coffee.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me, please add template for personal rights warning --Isiwal 16:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done--لا روسا 05:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MaliCuisine.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spicy dreams.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Sharpness is not perfect, but though QI for me --Hubertl 14:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Egyptian Grains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment I see some compression artifacts which are mostly visible on the red beans. --Ximonic 04:51, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
@Ximonic: i uploaded new one, review it please.--لا روسا 10:21, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Good Now . --Ercé 10:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lemon Boy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Egyptian Food.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dead Sea beach 00.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments thin QIThe sky seems to me, blown out.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dead Sea Salt 00(1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  weak Somewhat unsharp for the size, but okay. --Crisco 1492 03:33, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dead Sea Salt 00.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Weak support OK for me. --C messier 20:14, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Umm Qais00 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments it's better. Good quality for me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roman ruins at Jerash 00.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Cccefalon 05:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Umm Qais00 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Cccefalon 05:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Umm Qais000 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Shadow needs brightening. --Hockei 15:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
@Hockei: i uploaded a new one, review it please.--لا روسا 20:20, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 Support Looks better. --Hockei 10:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Napoleon, Soumaya Museum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Not excellent but acceptable.--Jebulon 15:25, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chac Mool, Teotihuacán.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:15, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huehueteotl, Teotihuacán.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Jean11 16:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mexican Sombrero 00 (8).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seller, rubber hoops 004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pink Flower. Alex 005.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Seller, rubber hoops 004.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seller, rubber hoops 004.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 17:07, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (21).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I´m not sure about the white balance, but its ok for me. --Hubertl 14:41, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acacia in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (87).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Category too unspecific. As there is a tree as central motif, it should be identified.--Cccefalon 04:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
@Cccefalon: ✓ Done Name y categorization.--لا روسا 09:18, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Good quality. Could be even better when rotated slightly counterclockwise to make the wells walls more vertical. --Cccefalon 18:20, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camel Nuweibaa 00 (22).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camel Nuweibaa 00 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acacia in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis(91).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (137).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK, IMHO. --C messier 08:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (111).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, IMO. I believe, that the rocks are really that reddish --Hubertl 08:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (22).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think this one is ok --Hubertl 07:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (27).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This one is ok for me to, even when weak. --Hubertl 07:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camel Nuweibaa 00 (12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camel Nuweibaa 00 (13).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imam Hussein Hadith inscription 00 (4 B).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cultural Fashion and Adornment, El Moez St., 00 (40).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:06, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cultural Fashion and Adornment, El Moez St., 00 (26).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cultural Fashion and Adornment, El Moez St., 00 (55).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cultural Fashion and Adornment, El Moez St., 00 (70).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Acacia in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (87).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Acacia in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (87).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cultural Fashion and Adornment, El Moez St., 00 (70) - NV.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--باسم 22:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear ولاء,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Fusilamientopiar (1817).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

The Photographer (talk) 19:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Simón Bolívar y Simón Rodríguez en el Monte Sacro en Roma (1805).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

The Photographer (talk) 19:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Male mallard (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:41, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:The Tomb of the Unknown SoldierDam.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:18, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 15:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC)


File:Colosseum Roma13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 22:11, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Colosseum Roma02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:28, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

File:Colosseum Roma23.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

File:Colosseum Roma30.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:46, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Colosseum Roma42.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:48, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Colosseum Roma46.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:50, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Colosseum Roma60.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:52, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Colosseum Roma68.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:53, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:إعلانات. محور يوليو 00 (1).JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 15:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

File:إعلانات. محور يوليو 00 (37).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 13:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Cultural heritage monuments in Egypt, need to check

Hola Walaa. Por favor ¿Puedes ayudar a añadir a las imágenes de la categoría Cultural heritage monuments in Egypt, need to check, otra categoría mas específica? Gracias. Un cordial saludo desde Madrid, --JMCC1 (talk) 13:20, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

File:WMCON18 90.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ViraMotorko (WMUA) (talk) 15:02, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

File:WMCON18 100.jpg and any other files

User:Cornelius Kibelka (WMDE) wrote: "It doesn't make sense to have photographed slides on Commons, when the slides themselves." These files were deleted by me. Your sincerely. Hystrix (talk) 20:39, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:42, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

File:WMCON18 209.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:23, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, B dash (talk) 02:26, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Museum of Islamic Art, Doha 00 (88).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Museum of Islamic Art, Doha 00 (92).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Museum of Islamic Art, Doha 00 (95).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Museum of Islamic Art, Doha 00 (1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Museum of Islamic Art, Doha 00 (102).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Museum of Islamic Art, Doha 00 (78).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Museum of Islamic Art, Doha 00 (79).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Museum of Islamic Art, Doha 00 (84).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Museum of Islamic Art, Doha 00 (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 05:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Museum of Islamic Art, Doha 00 (76).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 05:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (14).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goéry Valance (talk) 05:55, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (16).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goéry Valance (talk) 05:57, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (17).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goéry Valance (talk) 05:57, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (18).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goéry Valance (talk) 05:57, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (19).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goéry Valance (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (20).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goéry Valance (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (22).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goéry Valance (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Idw/layout Goéry Valance (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:09, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:09, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:09, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Goéry Valance ([[User talk:Goéry Valance|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Your photo on MSN

Your photo File:Montaza Palace 017.JPG was used on [1] without attribution. Nemo 19:27, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate P 1 9 9   14:54, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tylwyth Eldar ([[User talk:Tylwyth Eldar|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:50, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic ([[User talk:Yuraily Lic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:57, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:29, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Template:Autotranslate

Wiki Loves Africa 2019

Dear BASEPAGENAME,

You have contributed in the past to the Wiki Loves Africa competition. Your images have helped people learn more about Africa and see Africa more clearly from an African perspective. Overall, nearly 5000 people like you have contributed to this photo contest, and contributed nearly 40000 images about Africa. Pictures from Wiki Loves Africa illustrate more than 7000 Wikipedia articles and they received... 278.859.973 views between 2015 through the end of 2018. WOW ! How does it feel to be part of this and really make a difference when it come to Africa representation on Wikipedia ?

This February, you have another opportunity to create beautiful photographs on the theme of "play" that could change how the world understands people and culture in your part of Africa.

Wiki Loves Africa is a annual public contest where people across Africa can contribute media (photographs, video and audio) about their environment to Wikimedia Commons for use on Wikipedia and other project websites of the Wikimedia Foundation.

When does it take place?
The 2019 competition will start on 1st February 2019 and close on 1st March 2019.

What should we contribute?
Pictures ! audios ! videos ! The theme for the 2019 contest is... Play.
This theme encompasses a host of approaches and is intentionally open to interpretation. The theme Play! encourages the submission of visual representations of joyful and serious games, sport, and recreation in the form of board or mental games, physical fun or contests, playful interactions, theatrical and musical performances, etc.

In addition to the value your photos contribute to human understanding and african visibility on the Internet, there are several prizes on offer – including two separate prize categories for photos and media that encompass

  • (a) capture Women in sport or
  • (b) culturally specific and traditional formal forms of play, recreation or events.

For rules and information about how to participate, or to join the contest, click on: Contribute to the Wiki Loves Africa photo contest.

Warmest,

Anthere, for the Wiki Loves Africa Team

++++++++++

Cher ou chère BASEPAGENAME,

Par le passé, vous avez participé au concours photographique Wiki Loves Africa. Vos photos ont aidé de nombreuses personnes à mieux comprendre l'Afrique et à la voir sous un autre angle, l'angle des africains eux-même. Depuis sa création en 2014, près de 5000 personnes ont contribué au concours photo, en ajoutant près de 40000 photos relatives à l'Afrique. 5000 personnes, dont vous, qui ont fait une vraie différence sur la représentation de l'Afrique sur Wikipédia et en ligne. Mieux encore... ces photos illustrent aujourd'hui près de 7000 articles Wikipédia et totalisent 278.859.973 vues entre 2015 et fin 2018 !

Ce mois de février vous avez à nouveau l'opportunité de proposer de fabuleuses illustrations sur le thème du "Jeu", qui participeront à changer la façon dont les êtres humains à travers le monde comprennent les habitants et la culture de votre région..

Wiki Loves Africa, c’est un concours public annuel où chacun est invité à partager des illustrations via Wikimedia Commons, en rapport avec le thème de l’année, illustrations qui pourront être utilisées sur Wikipédia ou les autres sites de la Wikimedia Foundation.

Quand le concours se déroule t-il?
Le concours 2019 démarre le 1er février 2019 et cloture le 1er mars 2019.

Quelles sont les contenus attendus?
Des photos ! Des enregistrements audio ! Des vidéos ! Le thème du concours 2019 est ... Jouer.
Ce thème englobe de nombreuses approches, il est aussi intentionnellement ouvert à l’interprétation. Le thème Jouer ! encourage à proposer des représentations de jeux de détente et sérieux, du sport et des divertissements sous la forme de jeux de société ou de jeux intellectuels, d'activités physiques de divertissement ou de compétitions, d'interactions ludiques, de performances théâtrales ou musicales, etc..

En plus de la valeur intrinsèque que vos photos apporteront à la compréhension et à la visibilité du monde africain sur Internet, il y a de nombreux prix à gagner. Dont deux prix spéciaux pour les photos qui représentent

  • a) femmes et sport ou
  • b) formes de jeux, de divertissements ou d’évènements culturellement spécifiques ou traditionnels.

Pour plus d'informations, règles de participation et pour participer au concours, cliquez sur Contribuer au concours photo Wiki Loves Africa.

Bien à vous,

Anthere, pour l'équipe Wiki Loves Africa