User talk:Эрманарих
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Эрманарих - you reverted several coat of arms containing the Fess of Mark. To ensure that your work is in accordance with the German heraldic rules, please reduce the number of squares per line to 5-8 each and surround them with a stroke. Additionally resize them in a way that only complete squares are shown. Thank you for your cooperation. - --Maxxl2 - talk 13:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. --Эрманарих (talk) 13:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Coronation of Bokassa I.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Coronation of Bokassa I.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Coronation of Bokassa I.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
NBS (talk) 14:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Coat of Arms of Canada(1994).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fry1989 eh? 18:22, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Flag of the Confederation of the Rhine.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Antemister (talk) 20:16, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- This file is an hoax image, I know it, I am from Germany. I also know stateworld.ru - it is not a reliable source.--Antemister (talk) 20:17, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Afrique Equatoriale Française 1910.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Antemister (talk) 17:48, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Afrique Équatoriale Française 1910.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Antemister (talk) 19:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Flag Afrique-Équatoriale française.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
moyogo (talk) 08:45, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Coat of Arms Shield of Canadian.svg[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Coat of Arms Shield of Canadian.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Voloshin.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Voloshin.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Voloshin.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Túrelio (talk) 15:54, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Laurent Nkunda.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:16, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Alfredo Stroessner Matiauda.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Ирина Яровая.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:20, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Jean-Pierre Bemba.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:21, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Sri Aurobindo Ghose.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:22, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
File:World Bank-Logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Coat of arms of Batavian Republic.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Arch (talk) 01:58, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
You made an incorrect derivative, without mentioning the author of the original file. This is a combination of copyright violation and adding of incorrect content. Stop that. Jcb (talk) 12:31, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- He didn't do this file turned to the right. Therefore it is my work. It has such file? Then I am ready to specify authorship. --Эрманарих (talk) 15:06, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- No, you obviously copied the file and just mirrored it, without mentioning its origin. And you did it twice. Don't do it a third time. Jcb (talk) 15:14, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Coat of arms of Batavian Republic.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
86.195.75.21 00:43, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Coat of arms of the Congo Free State(2).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
86.195.75.21 00:48, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Greater Coat of arms of the Netherlands.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
86.195.75.21 00:52, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Blason Comte Flandres avec ornements belges.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
86.195.75.21 00:58, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Gazprom-Neft-Logo rus.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Aga (d) 23:37, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Moek.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
86.195.122.52 18:34, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Winston Churchill.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yours sincerely, 80.215.174.25 13:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Photo of George Orwell.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yours sincerely, 80.215.174.25 13:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Photo of George Orwell.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yours sincerely, 86.195.84.118 22:15, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Kathisma (talk) 23:07, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
You have been reported for ownership behaviour and violating COM:Overwite. Fry1989 eh? 01:39, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
File:COA New South Wales.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fry1989 eh? 03:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
File:The Lumiere brothers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 12:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Voloshin.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 12:42, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violations[edit]
Hello Эрманарих.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 12:58, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
I have reported you for continued edit warring and overwriting of files. Fry1989 eh? 18:44, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Coat of arms of the Congo Free State(2).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fry1989 eh? 21:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Please do not edit war[edit]
Please consider this the final warning. You will be blocked next time. Taivo (talk) 13:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Ulivo Logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Wdwd (talk) 21:01, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Liberal Democratic Party (Japan) Logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 12:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Liberal Democratic Party (Japan) Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 14:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Hallo - why did you revert this flag image which was ok for years? Any new evidence or sources for the older colour? --Maxxl2 - talk 14:19, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- As you didn't give any useful answer, I reverted your change and hope this was your last nonsense edit. --Maxxl2 - talk 09:50, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
File:General Manuel Antonio Noriega.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 12:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
File:General Manuel Antonio Noriega.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Flags of Ireland[edit]
Please stop your reverting to old versions of the flag of leinster etc, you are editing warring and not giving any valid reasoning, If you continue to do so i will report you to an administrator. Setanta Saki (talk) 01:46, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- There is a duplication.--Эрманарих (talk) 02:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- I have reported you. There is no duplication, once again stop reverting files you clearly know nothing about simply to attention seek, there is substantial differences and improvements between the old file and the update in question.Setanta Saki (talk) 03:02, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Caucasus envsec baseb.png[edit]
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Caucasus envsec baseb.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 09:38, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Gazprom-Neft-Logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yours sincerely, 80.215.167.123 11:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
You have been reported for edit warring and reverting images without proper reasonings. Fry1989 eh? 19:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a duration of 3 months[edit]
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 3 months for the following reason: {{{2}}}.
If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.
|
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:28, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Update: Allowing use of user talk page and email feature. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:49, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- The reason why it was banned before? --Эрманарих (talk) 02:26, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Вы были заблокированы за войну правок, как указано в журнале блокировок (Ваши действия, связанные с File:Flagge_Herzogtum_Nassau_(1806-1866).svg). Поскольку это не первая Ваша война правок, считаю применение блокировки справедливым. С уважением, --George Chernilevsky talk 15:37, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Не считаю что пару возвратов, к тому же с обоснованием, можно назвать войной правок. Вдобавок не было никаких предупреждений и указаний на якобы войну правок, что выглядит странным перед установлением аж трёхмесячного бана. --Эрманарих (talk) 06:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Блокировка абсолютна верна. Вас несколькими темами выше спрашивали, зачем вы залили новую версию, но ответа не было. Даже в комментариях к правкам их не было. Так что это крайне деструктивное поведение. С учетом множественных нарушений прежде срок блокировки вполне адекватен. --Gruznov (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Ответ был. И именно в коментарии к правке. Просто заблокировавший админ зачистил историю правок. А вот предупреждений о блокировке не было. --Эрманарих (talk) 05:52, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Блокировка абсолютна верна. Вас несколькими темами выше спрашивали, зачем вы залили новую версию, но ответа не было. Даже в комментариях к правкам их не было. Так что это крайне деструктивное поведение. С учетом множественных нарушений прежде срок блокировки вполне адекватен. --Gruznov (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Не считаю что пару возвратов, к тому же с обоснованием, можно назвать войной правок. Вдобавок не было никаких предупреждений и указаний на якобы войну правок, что выглядит странным перед установлением аж трёхмесячного бана. --Эрманарих (talk) 06:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Вы были заблокированы за войну правок, как указано в журнале блокировок (Ваши действия, связанные с File:Flagge_Herzogtum_Nassau_(1806-1866).svg). Поскольку это не первая Ваша война правок, считаю применение блокировки справедливым. С уважением, --George Chernilevsky talk 15:37, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- The reason why it was banned before? --Эрманарих (talk) 02:26, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Coat of arms of Flanders.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lemmens, Tom (talk) 18:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Coat of arms of Flanders(2).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lemmens, Tom (talk) 18:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Your email[edit]
Hello Эрманарих! Regarding todays email: You have been blocked for the reasons given above. You received ample warnings but you didn't change your behavior. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:32, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- I wasn't warned about ban. --Эрманарих (talk) 13:21, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Not true. March 2nd you've been warned. And: Please stop sending me 3 word emails. If you have something to say, do it here. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:00, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- And now you are a sockmaster as well. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:19, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- What does that warning has to this topic while that ban was April, 13? --Эрманарих (talk) 13:56, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- And now you are a sockmaster as well. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:19, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- Not true. March 2nd you've been warned. And: Please stop sending me 3 word emails. If you have something to say, do it here. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:00, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
[2] --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Please do not recreate deleted content[edit]
—LX (talk, contribs) 08:34, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
File:CSU-logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 08:39, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
File:AKP-logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 08:39, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
The SVG files was made by me, therefore everything is fine. --Эрманарих (talk) 07:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- No, reproducing someone else's copyrighted work, including vectorising a raster image, does not make it your own work, does not make you the copyright holder, and does not mean that you can issue a valid license. You cannot magically liberate a copyrighted non-free logo by vectorising it. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:27, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Then why other users post vectorising image under their own licenses? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Sodacan https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Heralder --Эрманарих (talk) 06:00, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Those users do not appear to be uploading derivatives of other people's proprietary logos. Instead, they are creating and uploading original renditions of heraldic blazons. See Commons:Coats of arms for more details. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:43, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Then why were deleted these files, under the reason that they have the author? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:%D0%AD%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%85#File:Winston_Churchill.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:%D0%AD%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%85#File:Photo_of_George_Orwell.jpg --Эрманарих (talk) 15:40, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- The reason File:Winston Churchill.jpg and File:Photo of George Orwell.jpg were deleted is stated in the deletion log: Copyright violation. I can't see what the file descriptions looked like, but I'm guessing you lied and claimed that you were the author and copyright holder of someone else's work, as seems to have been your habit. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- I didn't say that I am the author. I published the photo into the public domain. --Эрманарих (talk) 16:07, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- The reason File:Winston Churchill.jpg and File:Photo of George Orwell.jpg were deleted is stated in the deletion log: Copyright violation. I can't see what the file descriptions looked like, but I'm guessing you lied and claimed that you were the author and copyright holder of someone else's work, as seems to have been your habit. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Like I said, it was just a guess based on what I've seen you do numerous times. My second guess would be that you claimed that the photos are in the public domain even though they're not. UK photographs are typically protected by copyright until the photographer has been dead for 70 years. Churchill and Orwell both died less than 70 years ago, so many of those who photographed them died much less than 70 years ago, and some of them may still be alive. Therefore, many photographs of Churchill and Orwell are still protected by copyright. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Then why, under the same reason, was deleted photo 1895? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:%D0%AD%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%85#File:The_Lumiere_brothers.jpg --Эрманарих (talk) 16:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Like I said, it was just a guess based on what I've seen you do numerous times. My second guess would be that you claimed that the photos are in the public domain even though they're not. UK photographs are typically protected by copyright until the photographer has been dead for 70 years. Churchill and Orwell both died less than 70 years ago, so many of those who photographed them died much less than 70 years ago, and some of them may still be alive. Therefore, many photographs of Churchill and Orwell are still protected by copyright. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. Try reading the deletion discussion. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'm aware of the deletion discussion. The image was deleted because someone allegedly manipulated it. And these manipulations making him an author of the image. Why in some cases editing of the image makes you an "author", and in other cases -not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Эрманарих (talk • contribs) 13:30, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. Try reading the deletion discussion. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- A work can have multiple authors. If you take someone else's original work and modify it in an original way, you are both authors of the derivative work. If the original work is protected by copyright, you need the original copyright holder's permission to publish the derivative under a free license. Conversely, the author of the original work can publish his or her original work under a free license if they want to, but they cannot publish your derivative without your permission. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:51, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Indefblockeduser[edit]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you. Per request and per my statement here.
|
Natuur12 (talk) 10:07, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Netherlands Coat of Arms.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Tom-L (talk) 17:09, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Coat of Arms of the Kingdom of Holland (1808-variant).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Tom-L (talk) 13:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Tom-L (talk) 13:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
File:Flag of the Confederation of the Rhine.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nick Mitchell 98 (talk) 07:33, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Tn-11.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Tn-11.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tn-11.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Smooth O (talk) 19:11, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Flag of the Muslim Brotherhood (2).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ibrahim.ID ✪ 09:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Flag of the Muslim Brotherhood (2).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |