User:Martinvl/Promotions 2017

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bayeux Tapestry depicting the death of Harold II.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful per given reasoning and wide usage. lNeverCry 08:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historic arsenal, Stellenbosch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 23:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NationalTrustPlaque Glyderau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

River Kwai Bridge photo

I've added the geo data. PumpkinSky talk 18:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cricket Umpires Equipment 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ElephantsTrunkWrestling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice action shot and sharp enough for one. -- Ikan Kekek 11:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC) Also well composed. -- Ikan Kekek 12:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Inside The Vyne temporary roof cover (2017 restoration).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, I think the category linked to the scope should by Category:The Vyne rather than Category:Temporary roof covers as any other images of this renovation are more likely to be placed in the former than the latter. DeFacto (talk). 21:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

 Info Any other images of this restoration should be placed in both categories. Martinvl (talk) 07:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your nomination; your call. I'll abstain though and leave it for others to decide. DeFacto (talk). 18:19, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Interesting workmanship. -- Mathieu MD (talk) 14:05, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eelmoor Flash from Eelmoor Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 21:12, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exbury House 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exbury House from the south-west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - As a thumbnail, its only competition is File:Exbury House - Exbury, England - DSC04009.jpg, which is a lot less beautiful but shows some of the back of the building. However, I'm guessing your photo is a more faithful representation of how the building actually looks; is that the case? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:24, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Info The other photo is equally accurate - the photographer in that case stood a few metres from where I stood. If you look carefully at my photo, you can see one of the window ledges and also that the guttering has an angle of about 135 degrees rather than 90 degrees. Martinvl (talk) 09:41, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment, Martinvl I think the scope needs to be narrowed to include the aspect, to avoid excluding VIs of the same house from other angles. DeFacto (talk). 09:46, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Exbury House to Exbury House from the south-west --Martinvl (talk) 19:18, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support, useful and best in scope now. DeFacto (talk). 20:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaulieu River mudflats.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Western aspect of the former South Phoenix Mine engine house, now heritage centre, Minions, Cornwall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, this is a nice image Martinvl, but as there is not a very good category discipline covering this building, with several different images of it appearing all over the place - in Category:Mines in Cornwall, Category:Minions, Cornwall, Category:Tin mining in Cornwall, Category:Beam engine houses and probably other places too, it is really difficult to compare it. Do you fancy moving all of those into a new sub-category (Category:South Phoenix Mine Engine House, or similar) and then simply adding that to all the other related categories? That would not only make the job here easier for us, but it would improve access to the images of this important heritage building at the same time. I can help if you like. DeFacto (talk). 21:16, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Done Martinvl (talk) 07:13, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

 Comment, Martinvl, looks good - you just need to link the new category to the scope and also add the view direction, to allow views from other directions for this interesting heritage building. DeFacto (talk). 08:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment@DeFacto:  Done — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinvl (talk • contribs) 14:25, 18 August 2017‎ (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Former engine house, now heritage centre, Minions, Cornwall to Western aspect of the former South Phoenix Mine engine house, now heritage centre, Minions, Cornwall --Martinvl (talk) 14:13, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 14:54, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fire engine built on a Volvo FL6-11 chassis - three-quarters front view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support This is a good image of this, and illustrates the subject clearly. That category (categorization in the category) could use a bit of clean-up. But I see no reason this doesn't merit a VI. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:20, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:40, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Portail d'Amont, Faugères.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 21:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
French roadsign in both French and Occitan languages..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support You're right. I've looked through the category you linked and I have not found a sign that illustrates the scope as well as you did. And I don't think we need such a narrow scope of "French roadsign in both French and Occitan languages in city X", so I'll say the scope is alright, but I would respect if someone disagreed with me about the scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pont Vieux, Carcassone from the south..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I agree that this is the best image for illustrating the subject in the scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:04, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marseillan Harbour viewed in a north-westerly direction..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Of all images in the category this is best in scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Flottes de Sébasan, Pézenas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I agree, clearly the best. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
War Memorial, Bezier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:06, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tribunal de les Aigües de València (Water Court of Valencia)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Interesting; used and useful. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I won't oppose, but it is debatable whether this is the best image in the gallery, and it is such a poor composition with the heads in the foreground. Charles (talk) 12:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fontaine du Titan à Béziers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and best in scope -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:32, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Puerta de Felipe V, Ronda, Spain from inside the town wall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, the linked scope contains pictures from both sides of this arch, so I think you need to add direction to allow scopes from each side. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:31, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
  • @DeFacto: Done

---

Scope changed from Puerta de Felipe V, Ronda, Spain to Puerta de Felipe V, Ronda, Spain from inside the town wall --Martinvl (talk) 19:31, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support, good now - useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Generalife from the Alhambra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Nothing else in scope appears to be better so I'll go with your choice. Best in Scope and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:03, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:10, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alhambra from Generalife (2017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 00:14, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre del Oro, Guadalquivir, Sevilla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:39, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weathervane, Seville Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2018, Martinvl! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:06, 25 December 2017 (UTC)