User:Frank C. Müller/Discussion 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rueckseite-Notgeld-Eppelborn-Dirmingen-1921-10-Pfennig-Bergarbeiter-vor-Bergwerk-Kaisereiche-zu-Eppelborn.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rueckseite-Notgeld-Eppelborn-Dirmingen-1921-10-Pfennig-Bergarbeiter-vor-Bergwerk-Kaisereiche-zu-Eppelborn.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 11:52, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rueckseite-Notgeld-Eppelborn-Dirmingen-1921-25-Pfennig-Bergarbeiter-vor-Bergwerk-Kaisereiche-zu-Eppelborn.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rueckseite-Notgeld-Eppelborn-Dirmingen-1921-25-Pfennig-Bergarbeiter-vor-Bergwerk-Kaisereiche-zu-Eppelborn.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 11:52, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

taken on...[edit]

Hello Frank As there an lot of images of these screwdriver bits I created a category called "Category:Photographs taken of Screwdriver bits on 2016-11-02" within the "Category:Photographs taken on 2016-11-02" which made the use of {{taken on| an unnecessary duplicate category for your files. If you object to this I will not continue with this transfer. Regards Kolforn (talk) 08:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Kolforn!
Thanks for this explanation. For me it's ok!
regards, fcm. --13:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Kolforn!
Now, where your new Category:Photographs taken of Screwdriver bits on 2016-11-02 was characterized as vandalism and deleted, could you please restore all that "taken ons" in my files?
regards, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 10:29, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Frank

I have left a message on the page of User:Achim55 asking him to do as your request and asking him for an explaination of his action over this matter. Regards Kolforn (talk) 10:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello Frank

Your screwdriver bit files have now been restored to the original day date category. Regards Kolforn (talk) 07:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Kolforn! Thanks! gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 12:16, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Ringsgwandl 01 fcm.jpg[edit]

File:Ringsgwandl 01 fcm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)


Danke[edit]

Da man dem Danken keinen Text anfügen kann, möchte ich mich hier für deine Korrekturen meiner Fehler und für die geschichtlich korrekte Schreibweise der Kategorien bedanken --2003:72:8F66:B500:65AA:7B74:46BC:281E 22:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Not logged in

p.s. was war das mit dem Bild obendrüber --Jörgens.Mi Talk 22:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Jörgens.Mi!
Vielen Dank für den Dank!
Und dann hätte ich da noch ne Frage an Dich: Du hast doch ganz viele Aufnahmen gemacht von drei Äpfeln im Korb mit Namenszettel davor. Sieht für mich nach einer Ausstellung aus. Ich würde mir sowas auch mal gerne in natura anschauen. Kannst Du mir sagen, wo und bei welcher Gelegenheit das war?
Das Ringsgwandl-Bild von obendrüber war ein Porträt-Foto, nur das Gesicht mit der großen Nase und einem Hut. Es war ganz unscharf, ohne Details; wer Ringsgwandl nicht kennt, sieht nur ein verschwommenes Foto von einem Männerkopf; kennt man ihn aber, kann man ihn auf dem Foto sofort wiedererkennen, weil das für ihn Charakteristische trotz der Unschärfe immer noch da ist. Das Foto hat das Spezifische betont, indem es die Details weggelassen hat. Aber es ist sicher auch kein großer Verlust für die Menschheit, wenn das Bild hier auf Commons nicht verewigt wird.
gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 12:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi fcm, das war hier loakl eine Ausstellung bei einem Obstbauern in Staufen der alte Sorten (http://obstparadies-staufen.de/) sammelt. An der Zahl drei in nicht ich shuld sondern der Obstbauer, er hat es so präsentiert. Ob das mit den Sorten jetzt ein einmaliges Ereignis oder alle Jahre wieder kommt, weis ich noch nicht, kann ich aber gerne in Erfahrung bringen. Ich würde gerne mal im Frühjahr bei ihm die Obtsbäume begehen und photographieren und im Herbst zwei Äpfel längs und quer geschnitten leicht gesäuert, damit sie nicht braun sind und dann formatfüllend den Schnitt. Man müsste auch mal rauskriegen was er sonst noch so hat. Gruß --Jörgens.Mi Talk 16:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Joergens.mi! Danke für die Info und weiterhin viel Freude beim Fotografieren von Äpfeln und anderem! gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 12:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Hallo fcm, die Äpfel waren ein Zufallstreffer, ich stehe eigentlich mehr auf Kirchen und Konzerte - Aber so was nimmt man gerne mit 2 große Tischreihen mit Obst, wann kommt man an so eine Auswahl. Mir tat anschließend der Auslösefinger weh :). Alles ohne Stativ, freihand und mitten im Besucherandrang - Muss mal schauen ob ich noch ne Übersichtsaufnahme im Archiv habe.

Frohes Fest.

--Jörgens.Mi Talk 14:01, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion requests[edit]

Hi, if you do this, then the file will appear in Category:Other speedy deletions, not the redirect. Please make sure you break the redirect while adding such a nomination. Jcb (talk) 15:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Jcb. Thanks for the info. I corrected the files in this sense. regards, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 15:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Frank_C._Müller/Discussion_2016&oldid=350100841"