User:Böhringer/Archive 1

Welcome to the Commons, Böhringer!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Compliments[edit]

Fantastic images. Thank you for your contributions! Siebrand 13:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

... ganz tolle Bilder! Viele Grüße Orchi 20:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

daaaaaaaanke für das Lob --Böhringer 21:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Oberfallenberg 11.jpg, which was nominated by Glasnost at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Oberfallenberg 11.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 12:41, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations for your excellent work! As a featured picture, it will now be seen by thousand of peoples all over the world... Including a lot of people who don't speak german. And I don't. Sorry. Is it possible to have either a french or english description? I will take care of the french to english or english to french translation. Thank you! Berrucomons 19:28, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

de: Nebel; Blick vom Oberfallenberg Dornbirn zu den Schweizer Bergen / en: Fog; View from Oberfallenberg Dornbirn towards the Mountains of Switzerland

thank you for compliment - I hop the description is ok.--Böhringer 20:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

That's perfect, thanks very much. I have just added a French description. Is it possible to have an english description for your most recent featured picture Image:Schleienloecher2-1- C.jpg ? --Berrucomons 08:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Schleienloecher2.jpg[edit]

I like this picture very much, but I've proposed two edits according other users opinions. I hope that you agree. Yours sincerely. Vassil 16:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

that's ok, no problem --Böhringer 19:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image: MosaikJungferExuvie09.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image: MosaikJungferExuvie09.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 07:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Schleienloecher2-1- C.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Schleienloecher2-1- C.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Glückwunsch! --Simonizer 07:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

File:0627BgMosaikJungf3A.JPG

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:0627BgMosaikJungf3A.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:0627BgMosaikJungf3A.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

May I request you change the name of the file now? Thanks -- Lycaon 05:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Kategorien[edit]

Hallo,

wie du vielleicht bemerkt hast, habe ich eine ganze Menge deiner Bilder kategorisiert, was aber nichts mit dir zu tun hatte. Ich habe nur die Category:Austria aufgeräumt.

Diese Kategorie ist die Oberkategorie zu allem, was mit Österreich zu tun hat. Sie sollte bitte nicht mit Bildern direkt gefüllt werden, sondern dient als Sammelkategorie für weitere Kategorien. Diese spezifizieren das Thema, so z.B.: Natur in Österreich, Personen aus Österrich, usw. Mit den Bundesländern verhält es sich genauso.

Weiter sind Kategorien hierachisch, d.h. die Kategorie Vorarlberg ist eine Unterkategorie von Österreich oder die Kategorie Natur von Vorarlberg ist eine Unterkategorie von Vorarlberg und Natur von Österreich. Artikel und Dateien sollte nur in die genaueste Kategorie eingeordnet werden und nicht z.B.: in die Kategorie Vorarlberg und in die Kategorie Österreich.

Wenn wie bei deinen Fotos von der Weltgymnaestrada 2007 so viele Bilder zum gleichen Thema existieren, kannst du problemlos eine neue Kategorie angelegen und alle Bilder in diese Kategorie eingeordnen. Bei der Weltgymnaestrada 2007 habe ich das einmal erledigt. Die Kategorie ist Category:Sports in Austria und Category:Gymnastics untergeordnet.

Ich bitte dich, dass bei der Einordnung deiner Mediendateien zu beachten. Alles nachzulesen gibt es bei Commons:Kategorien. Falls du Fragen hast, kannst du auch mich fragen.

PS: Hast du das Hochladen deiner Bilder irgendwie automatisiert? Bei deinen Bildbeschreibungen fehlt nämlich regelmäßig die geschwungene Klammer zu (}}). -- ChristophT 22:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

danke für das "Aufräumen", ich bin noch rel. neu hier und bin froh um jeden Tipp. Habe alle anderen Bilder von mir aus der Category Austria entfernt.Bezüglich der fehlenden Doppelklammer ebenfalls danke für den Hinweis. Nein ich lade nicht automatisch aber oft nachts, und dann kann so was schon mal passieren. Nochmal DANKE --Böhringer 19:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Kommentare in Commons:Featured picture candidates[edit]

Hallo Böhringer,

ich bitte dich deine Kommentare und Abstimmungsbegründungen auf Commons:Featured picture candidates in Englisch zu verfassen, damit sie auch alle User verstehen können. Die Wikimedia Commons ist eine internationale Datenbank mit Benutzern aus allen Ländern der Erde, und deshalb finde ich sollte hier Englisch standard sein.

MfG --Christoph Leeb 10:58, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lienz SG8.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mittlist Gfaell 02.JPG[edit]

Hallo Böhringer, du hast für oben genannte Bild abgestimmt. Ich hab ne neue Version hochgeladen. Was hälst du davon? --Simonizer 19:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Simonizer für mich ist das "Edit (middle)" Bild eindeutig schöner, da sich das Licht wesentlich interessanter ins Szene setzt und die Farben dadurch variantenreicher als Bild 1 und Bild 3 hervorbringt. lg. --Böhringer 20:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC) nichts für ungut -:)

Image:Noe vorderwaelder.jpg[edit]

Was genau soll das denn? Bitte lasse die Kategorien in den Bildern, sie sind hilfreich! --Flominator 07:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Das stimmt, sie sind hilfreich, aber dann sollten sie auch richtig zugeordnet werden. In deinem Falle wäre dies dann die Category:Bregenzerwald und nicht Vorarlberg. lg --Böhringer 18:41, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Neue Bildbeiträge[edit]

Wow - vielen Dank für die neuen Bildbeiträge! Habe gerade die Bilder bei Schruns entdeckt und auch die ganze Gallerie bei der Pfarrkirche. Tolle Bilder - danke!

Category:Au (Vorarlberg)[edit]

Hi, why did you empty this category? Not that I know anything about Vorarlberg... just curious as the images on page Au (Vorarlberg) seems to show that a category would be helpful. Should the category redirect to a new category with images from Au? It is sitting empty at the moment. Kind regards, Deadstar 15:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

dann sind die Seiten 2x im Commons - 1x in Category:Au (Vorarlberg) und 1x in Au (Vorarlberg)

ist das egal? wenn ja, mache ich wieder die Sache retour. OK? --Böhringer 19:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Ah :) It's the old "page vs. category" discussion... My opinion: I think they are equally useful, so I use them side by side.

Reason: A category will update itself (someone who has uploaded an image, and puts it in the right category is done), a page needs the extra step of that person finding the page and then manually updating to include the new image. And sometimes a page is used to "showcase" the best pictures of a particular category too, and would NOT include every single picture in the category.

I can help put the categories back if you agree with me? Deadstar 10:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Danke, habe ich schon erledigt --Böhringer 10:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Cool - Didn't even see that... :) Deadstar 13:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Mite[edit]

Please reconsider your vote on this nomination as to avoid compromising our guidelines. Regards. Lycaon 15:55, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:ImageHofsteigerGemeindezentrum4.JPG[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 19:58, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Hello, I adapted a few of your requests for deletion because of bad names. The template to be used is Bad name|Image:fill here in the title of the good file to be put in double brackets {{ }}. You must write Bad name and not fill in the bad name there. You must only fill in the good name exactly as it stands above the image, including Image and the extension (.png or .svg or .jpg etc.). Good luck. Havang 15:07, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Bist du sicher...[edit]

...dass dieses Bild den geplanten Untertitel hat? Ich seh nur ein Lämmchen... :o) Grüßle, --Wildfeuer 01:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

verstehe nicht wie der Titel so hinkam !? könnte schwören, dass nicht ich .... --Böhringer 19:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

... :o} ! --Wildfeuer 20:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Psst, hab grade deine Bilderseiten angesehen und wollt dir erstens sagen: schööööööön! und zweitens: sie sind exzellent mit zwei ll, ähem. --Wildfeuer 20:29, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

das ist aber lieb - vielen Dank --Böhringer 20:30, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LaubBlätter06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

white snow[edit]

Hi. I did a slight white balance correction on Image:Diedamskopf1.JPG. If you don't agree, please revert. And a pictureful 2008 wünsche ich dir. Lycaon 16:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

sehr schön, ist OK; D A N K E Lycaon und für dich auch ein glückliches neues Jahr --Böhringer 20:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Schmetterling[edit]

Ahoi Friedrich, frohes Neues und hier eine kleine Bitte ... ich habe nochmal eine neue Version von meinem Schmetterling nominiert. Vielleicht magst ja nochmal drüberschauen ? :-) Danke Richard --Richard Bartz 11:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diedamskopf1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Österreichische Briefmarken[edit]

Ich finde immer wieder unterschiedliche Infos zur Darstellung der Briefmarken – du hast da ja auch Ersttagsbriefe fotografiert und hochgeladen. Ich habe hier auch schon nachgefragt. Weißt du, wie hier die Regelung ist? Habe das Gefühl, auf Commons wird das toleranter gehandhabt. Danke und Gruß, 217.91.15.252 17:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Die Permission ist so nicht richtig. Ich weiss das auch. Wer jedoch meine hochgeladenen Ersttage für sich kommerziell nutzen will, kennt vermutlich das Urheberrechtsgesetzt sehr genau. Ich bin im Besitz diser und noch sehr viel mehr Ersttagsausgaben und werde, wenn ich genaueres weiss diese ebenfalls hochladen. Vielleicht kann ich eine gemeinfreie Permission auf den Scan angeben. Denn diese Scans erreichen sowieso nicht die Schöpfungshöhe zumal die Farben nicht naturgetreu sind. Mal sehen.... l.g. --Böhringer 19:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SprüngeDamüls12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Merci pour la photo[edit]

Danke für das Foto "Image:LippenStudium3.JPG" in Wikimedia Commons. I cropped your beautiful picture for text illustration, cf "Image:LippenStudium3 (close-up).JPG". Merci. PRA 10:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

gerne :-)) --Böhringer 11:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Images in Werdenberg and Buchs SG[edit]

Thank you for the numerous contributions in this category.

Just a question, haven't some of these images been taken in Grabs rather than Buchs? I already removed some of the duplicated categorization, but the image descriptions should probably been corrected as well. -- User:Docu

welche Bilder sind denn in der falschen Kategorie ?

wenn ich es weiss, korrigiere ich dieses auch. --Böhringer 19:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

I thought Image:StGallerstrBuchs.JPG was in Grabs, but it's just at the border. Never mind. -- User:Docu

das Bild mit diesen Häusern befindet sich eindeutig in Buchs (siehe die Koordinaten) :-) --Böhringer 20:14, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:AtelierAlbertWinsauer1.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright

Image:AtelierAlbertWinsauer1.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

ChristophT 12:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

werde glücklich mit deiner nicht begründeten "Sofort"-Löschung--Böhringer 20:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:AtelierAlbertWinsauer.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright

Image:AtelierAlbertWinsauer.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

ChristophT 12:44, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

werde glücklich mit deiner nicht begründeten "Sofort"-Löschung--Böhringer 20:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Anfrage und Bitte[edit]

Hast du was dagegen, wenn ich die Bilder zu Silvretta Nova in eine Subkat von Category:Silvretta zu verschieben. Etwa Category:Silvretta Nova (skiing area)? Macht die Überkats übersichtlicher und lässt sich mehrfach verwenden. lg --Herzi Pinki 23:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

überhaupt kein Problem - du hast sogar Recht - ich find die Subkategorie sogar gut. Danke :-)) --Böhringer 08:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

done --Herzi Pinki 22:35, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Category:Rivers in Vorarlberg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Category:Rivers in Vorarlberg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Túrelio 13:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

das ist schon gut so !!! war ein Fehler von mir --Böhringer 15:07, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

jetzt heisst das Ding halt ==category:Rivers of Vorarlberg==

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LaubBlätter10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice colours, technically fine. Lycaon 07:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Bitte. :-) It's a lovely photo, with warm colors. Cheers, Arria Belli | parlami 22:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

What do you think ...[edit]

about this ? --Richard Bartz 20:01, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

gibt es das auch auf deutsch? ich spreche nur zwei Sprachen: Ösi & DE --Böhringer 20:12, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:FMR_Areal1.JPG[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:FMR_Areal1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

dvdb 16:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WeilerVlbg1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CommentCould you provide a description in English in the description page ? -- Stephanemartin 10:11, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Comment done [x] --Mbdortmund 10:34, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Meets QI requirements --LC-de 20:20, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PfarrkircheMöggers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well chosen Point of view. Very sharp. --Ikiwaner 21:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FraxernVlbg1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice view, good photograph. --Stefan Vladuck 20:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi! Is it possible to have an english caption?--Berru 19:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Libellula quadrimaculata 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nicely done --Richard Bartz 17:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Libellula quadrimaculata 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wow, one of the best of the series! -Alvesgaspar 00:04, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GirgentanaZiegen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Of course! A delicious composition -- Alvesgaspar 23:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pusteblume im Morgentau1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice, no complaints. --Dilaudid 16:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:VierfleckLibellen 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:VierfleckLibellen 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 22:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Libellula quadrimaculata 3.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Libellula quadrimaculata 3.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 10:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HufeisenAzurjungfernEiablage1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments For the rare shot --B.navez 06:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Heh, the one on the left seems to be saying "Wachya lookin at?" -- carol 07:33, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A Gaenseblume1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Simple, delicate and well done --B.navez 18:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:GirgentanaZiegen 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:GirgentanaZiegen 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 23:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Is it possible to have an Englsh caption? thanks. --Berru 19:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

done --Böhringer 19:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haflinger Fohlen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like it. --Mbdortmund 21:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello Böhringer,[edit]

you have implemented the pictures taken yesterday in Fontanella pretty quickly. They turned out well. Send our best regards to your wife an especially to your son. Lisi David and Franz

Danke für die lieben Grüsse; es sind noch nicht alle Bilder geladen; ebenfalls liebe Grüsse an Euch - Fred (--Böhringer 11:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC))

Ich schau sie mir dann an, sobald sie oben sind. BTW: Der Vogel sitz immer noch im Nest! Gruss aus dem Walgau.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Persischer Ehrenpreis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think that having the focus just on the stamen and stuff is really effective in this photograph. If some lens blur could be applied to the leaves I will support this image. -- carol 15:40, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
I think the original is better than the edit (no offense). Lycaon 09:32, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
None taken, which edit, btw? -- carol 13:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Haflinger Fohlen 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Haflinger Fohlen 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Congratulations! :-) --Richard Bartz 10:50, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:FraxernVlbg1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FraxernVlbg1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Und gleich noch einmal ! :-) --Richard Bartz 10:50, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altstadt Lindos.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CommentMaybe tiltet 1.2 degrees? --Berthold Werner 14:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC),
Ooops, you're right, I didn't notice. --Dschwen 16:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Adjusted and promoted --Berthold Werner 18:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altstadt Lindos04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

FP promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Segelfalter04.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Segelfalter04.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 09:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Komplimente[edit]

Grüße Sie, Ihre Fotos sind von ganz wunderschöner Art - schön, dass sie in Wikipedia zu finden sind. Gerne würde ich von einigen Ihrer Motive Postkarten für den Verkauf drucken lassen - wäre das möglich? Darüber würde ich mich sehr freuen Uta

kein Problem - auf der Rückseite der Postkarte "Foto by Böhringer" drucken - und dann viel Erfolg. Würde mich freuen, wenn ich 1 Exemplar von jeder Postkarte erhalte. Adresse: Böhringer, Bahngasse 15B-15 A-6850 Dornbirn --Böhringer (talk) 19:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:BMI Polizeihubschrauber1.jpg und Image:BMI Polizeihubschrauber2.jpg[edit]

Hi, woher haste die Angabe, das es sich um eine Bell handeln soll? Ich hoffe mal das hat man dir dort nicht so erzählt. Da hat sich nämlich auch schon einer auf der Bildbeschreibung drüber beschwert, ist nämlich ein Eurocopter ;) MfG, D.W. (talk) 17:27, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Das weiss ich heute auch nicht mehr. Ich habe keine Beschwerde auf einer Diskussionsseite oder auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite gesichtet. Das Schöne an Wikipedia ist, dass eingeschlichene Fehler, durch User wie du und ich, behoben werden. So zu sagen eine "Selbstreinigende" Wirkung nicht wahr ? :-)) --Böhringer (talk) 20:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:LZH_Vorarlberg.JPG[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:LZH_Vorarlberg.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-Nard 03:33, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LindosAcropolis1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems OK to me. --JDrewes 20:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marienkäferpuppe 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good one. --Lestath 13:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Triticum polonicum L 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great colours, and the backlight works well here. Lycaon 11:14, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Triticum polonicum L 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Barely enough stuff in focus. --Dschwen 00:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Triticum polonicum L 8.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dschwen 00:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heteroptera nymphs eggs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Often on your photographs of varmits and their eggs, you mention the plant name -- do you know this one? -- carol 22:03, 19 July 2008 (UTC) * found on a leaf underside of a privet.
More could have been in focus but this photograph is really cool. -- carol 23:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Ameisenpuppe[edit]

Hi, can I ask where you took these excellent pictures ? It would be good to be able to identify the species. Sean.hoyland (talk) 07:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

What images? Do you have a link to the "ants"? --Böhringer (talk) 19:55, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

This one for example Image:Ameisenpuppe5.JPG Sean.hoyland (talk) 07:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

ok, in the garden will nachshauen whether the ant nest is still inhabited.

sorry for my english; --Böhringer (talk) 18:58, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aeshna cyanea freshly slipped Q1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good and useful --Mbdortmund 21:44, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Bitte nehmen Sie doch umgehend mit mir Kontakt auf...[edit]

Hallo Herr Böhringer, ich habe eine dringende Frage: Könnten Sie mich bitte anmailen?! t.ruddat@medienteam.biz DANKE ;-)

FP promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Aeshna cyanea freshly slipped Q1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Aeshna cyanea freshly slipped Q1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 09:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cygnets Portrait.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Kategorie für Medien Ortsteile/Fraktionen von Feldkirch[edit]

Hallo Fred,

Danke für die Begrüssung und Infos. Hätte da gleich Fragen: Gilt der Wunsch bei Vorarlberg, Medien nicht der Hauptkategorie, sondern einer Unterkategorie zuzuordnen auch für die Städte?
prinzipiell ja Konkret gefragt: Sollten Bilder der Stadtteile Feldkirch (z.B. Nofels, Gisingen, ..) statt der COMMONS Category:Feldkirch besser der (englischen!) Unterkategorie Category:Districts of Feldkirch zugeordnet werden?
nein, sondern z.B. in die Category:Nofels Ich bin etwas verunsichert, da in der Commons Category:Districts of Feldkirch momentan noch kein einziges Bild ist. Würde dann auch Bilder von Dir betreffen z.B. die von Bangs (Zollhäuser, GH Stern, etc.), welche Nofels aber eben auch Feldkirch (nicht Districts of Feldkirch) zugeordnet sind. Sollte das geändert werden, würde ich es für die Bilder in Category:Nofels machen und auch noch für die wenigen Bilder der anderen Fraktionen z.B. Gisingen, Levis, etc. Soll ich? --Sums (talk) 12:07, 22 August 2008 (UTC) Die Links zu Commons haben mir nicht funktioniert, deshalb wieder entfernt

welche Links ?

Eine Vorlage siehst du bei Dornbirn. Die Unterseite von Nofels gehört zur Category:Nofels

auf die Seite Category:Districts of Feldkirch gehören mE keine Bilder, ausser es betrifft alle Ortsteile gleich wie z.B. eine Bezirkskarte - aber diese gehört widerum auch gleichermaßen zur Category:Feldkirch. l.G. --Böhringer (talk) 19:23, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für die prompte Antwort - die ich leider nicht gesehen habe!! Drum habe ich heute weiter unter nochmals gefragt. Ich verstehe jetzt aber, dass "Districts of ..." weder für Bilder noch für Commons-Bilderseiten (=Galerien) verwendet werden sollen.

Dass der Ortsteil zur Category: Ortsteil zugeordnet wird ist mir klar. Ein klarer Entscheid (siehe auch Diskussion weiter unten) fehlt mir aber noch bzgl. zusätzlicher Zuordnung auch zu Überkategorie z.B. Nofels-Bilder auch in Feldkirch. --Sums (talk) 18:08, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Lienz SG8.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Lienz SG8.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 16:49, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Meet our photographers[edit]

I hereby award to Friedrich Böhringer the **Photographer's Barnstar** providing wikimedia commons with wonderful pictures and his admission to the restricted club of Meet our photographers --Simonizer (talk) 16:58, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

thank you, it gives me great pleasure to belong to the club --Böhringer (talk) 20:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

vielen Dank für die Aufnahme in den Club der Fotografen und der Auszeichnung von Simonizer --Böhringer (talk) 20:15, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Du mußt nun einfach ein Profil erstellen ähnlich wie z.B. meins und es dann unter Commons:Meet_our_photographers/People einfügen (Form: {{User:Böhringer/Profile}}) Gruß --Simonizer (talk) 15:28, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

ich werde dies bei Gelegenheit machen. Herzlichen Dank für deine Hilfe --Böhringer (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Congrats from me too. Lycaon (talk) 15:55, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

danke Lycaon für die Anerkennung --Böhringer (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JohannStrauss 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough. Crapload 03:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Kategorisierung Teil von Ortsteil[edit]

Hallo Fred,

Unterkategorie Category:Districts_of_Feldkirch ist, wenn ich's richtige verstehe, für die Ortsteile von Feldkirch gedacht. Galerien, falls vorhanden, gehören da sicher rein. Z.B. Nofels.

Frage 1: Soll ich aber Galerien (Bilder-Seiten) der PARZELLEN des Orteiles Nofels (z.B. Bangs, Fresch, ..) auch der Über- Category:Districts_of_Feldkirch zuordnen oder nur dem Ortsteil Category:Nofels ? Ich würde dies nur bei Nofels zeigen--Böhringer (talk) 15:26, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Frage 2: Wie sieht's analog dazu mit Bildern aus? Aktuell ist keine einzige Mediendatei der Category:Districts_of_Feldkirch zugeordnet. Die Bilder der Ortsteile finden sich inmitten der Bilder von Category:Feldkirch. Ist das so gewollt oder soll man vielleicht auch die Bilder der Ortsteile zu Category:Districts_of_Feldkirch umkategorisieren? Genau genommen müsste man umkategorisieren aber für den Betrachter, der z.B. nur bei Vorarlberg reinschaut ist es angenehmer, wenn er nicht zu weit verlinkt wird. --Böhringer (talk) 15:26, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Zusammenfassende Frage: Seiten und Medien (durchgängig) der Category:Districts_of_Feldkirch zuordnen ja oder nein? Bitte um deine Meinung. --Sums (talk) 15:06, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

ich würde sagen, das hängt von der Menge der Bilder ab. Zuerst beginnt man mit einer Category :

Category:Lakes of Vorarlberg

Category:Lakes of Austria

Category:Lakes by country

Category:Lakes

--Böhringer (talk) 15:26, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Hallo Fred,

Zu 1. Die Galerien der Ortsteile werde ich "entkategorisieren", damit sie nicht mehr unter Feldkirch, sondern nur noch in der Kategorie Ortsteil Nofels aufscheinen.

Zu 2. Ich verstehe, die Bilder der Ortsteile sollen in den Bildern von Feldkirch bleiben. Hat natürlich den von Dir genannten Vorteil, dass weniger gelinkt werden muss, hat aber auch den Nachteil, dass nicht nur Feldkirch selbst angezeigt wird. Dass Category:Districts_of_Feldkirch eine reine Übersichtsseite bleibt (keine Bilder zugeordnet werden), gefällt mir gut. Man müsste diese Unter-Kategorie aber gar nicht für Bilder verwenden.

Mein Vorschlag wäre gewesen, bei Bildern der Ortsteile die Zuordnung zu Category:Feldkirch rauszunehmen und (wenn nicht Districts) ausschliesslich die Kategorie des Ortteils zu nehmen. Das wäre dann auch analog zu 1.: Wenn ein Kunde kommt, erreicht er - wenn er möchte - die einzelnen "Districts" (Ortsteile) via Category:Districts_of_Feldkirch. --Sums (talk) 17:39, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

also, so sieht das schon sehr gut aus. Ein paar Bilder aus Nofels dürfen durchaus in Feldkirch auftauchen. Ein Fremder kennt nicht gleich alle Ortsteile und Bezirke. So ordnet er vielleicht die Nofler Burg bei Feldkirch zu u.ä.

So habe ich auch bei Category Vorarlberg Bilder eingestellt, die ein Querschnitt durch alle Categorien zeigen und das Land Vorarlberg ein bisschen schmackhaft machen. --Böhringer (talk) 19:29, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Alles klar. Bilder in jedem Fall in entsprechende (Orts-)Kategorie, in Einzelfällen aber ggf. auch zusätzlich in übergeordnete Kategorie. Was mir aber nicht klar ist: Wo ist die Nofler Burg? (Hast du mit Tosters verwechselt. Macht aber nix, passiert öfters :-))

Apropos Bilder von Ortsteilen: Deine Bilder von Levis-Altenstadt sind toll, doch zeigen sie eigentlich nur Levis. Altenstadt beginnt erst am Horizont bzw. am rechten Bildrand. Da musst du, glaube ich, nochmals mit deiner Digicam auf den Weg :-)) Mach halt nur ein neues Sommerbild - da ist es weniger kalt (wobei der CCD-Chip bei niedrigeren Temperaturen natürlich noch weniger Farbrauschen erzeugen würde). LG --Sums (talk) 22:30, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

siehst du, sogar ich bin ein Fremder in Vorarlberg. Bei den Bildern steht sicher Tostner Burg. War eben ein wenig schlampig. Und für Korrekturen bin ich froh, wenn es mehr Wikipedianer gibt, die da mitmachen. Du könntest aber von Altenstadt auch Bilder reinstellen?! Ich bewege mich derzeit mehr auf den Alpen als im Tal. :-)) --Böhringer (talk) 07:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kajak 2mWasserfall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It is a wellmade sequence even if it is somewhat spoiled because the kayaker had noted the photographer and sticked out his tongue ;) --AFBorchert 20:09, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klausenpass19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition, good depth of field. Meets requirements. TimVickers 19:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MittagjochHochjochSchwarzsee1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenblume Helianthus 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. TimVickers 16:26, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vorderkapell42 c.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems OK. --Nevit 12:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zygaena filipendulae Sechsfleck Widderchen02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --Mbdortmund 21:11, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Picture of the Year/2008/Preparation[edit]

We are starting the discussion on POTY 2008. Would you like to join? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:56, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klesenzatal Hutlabach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good with no flaws!!! Mrmariokartguy 23:36, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

User Profil[edit]

Test Test die ist nur ein Funktionstest --Böhringer (talk) 13:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RombergOberdorf1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good composition, good colours --Mbdortmund 18:29, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia Photo-Workshop[edit]

Hallo Friedrich (darf dich doch so nennen, oder?). Ich würde dich gerne auf den Photo-Workshop_Berlin_2009 hinweisen. Vielleicht hast ja auch Du Lust dabei zu sein. Gruß --Simonizer (talk) 13:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

gerne, darfst du mich so nennen - ist ja mein Vorname. Nachdem ich selbst Berliner bin (leider nur auf dem Papier) und nur mal geschäftlich dort war, würde ich selbstverständlich gerne einmal dahin gehen. Ich müsste das dann auch für meine Familie so organisieren, dass wir gleich ne Woche uns das "reinziehen". Hab ein Onkel in Berlin, der mich schon oft eingeladen hat. Den könnte ich beim Wort nehmen. Und ein oder zwei Tage auf einen Workshop wäre für mich sehr interessant. l.g. Friedrich --Böhringer (talk) 19:57, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergahorn Marul.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition with appropriate technical realisation. --Ikiwaner 16:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juppentracht 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. Very good DOF usage! --Berthold Werner 17:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melkende ameisen honigtau4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SpitzAhorn Acer platanoides 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good. --Calandrella 19:15, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juglans regia Echte Walnußfrucht 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Raising the bar[edit]

Hi Fred,

You might want take a look at this discussion -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Alpstein Pano.jpg[edit]

Morgen Böhringer.
Ich hab bei den QIs nominiert. Bitte füge noch eine englische Beschreibung hinzu.
Danke --D-Kuru (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

kann nicht englisch - müsste jedoch so hinkommen wie ich es beschrieben habe. Ansonsten gibt es sicher jemand, der ..... --Böhringer (talk) 15:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Hl Franz Xafer Sulzberg Thal 6.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 11:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Hl Franz Xafer Sulzberg Thal 5.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 11:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Hl Franz Xafer Sulzberg Thal 4.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 11:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Hl Franz Xafer Sulzberg Thal 3.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 11:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Hl Franz Xafer Sulzberg Thal 2.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 11:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Hl Franz Xafer Sulzberg Thal 1.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 11:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bödele Bregenzerwald Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wow! - Till.niermann 11:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SilvrettaNova 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good exposure and composition. --Dschwen 01:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion to add heading to location[edit]

I just happened to see your nice photo Image:Dorfstraße_4_Kennelbach.JPG. I suggest to add the direction to the location info. For example to use {{Location|47|28|49.75|N|9|45|40.01|E|header:SE}}. Regards, Wouter (talk) 21:08, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Böhringer/Archive 1!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 09:37, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:StJodokBezau3.JPG is uncategorized since 27 November 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 09:37, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Image:JupidentSchlins5.JPG is uncategorized since 10 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Image:JupidentSchlins2.JPG is uncategorized since 10 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Image:JupidentSchlins4.JPG is uncategorized since 10 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Image:JupidentSchlins1.JPG is uncategorized since 10 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Image:JupidentSchlins3.JPG is uncategorized since 10 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Image:0627BgMosaikJungf6.JPG is uncategorized since 16 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Image:0627BgMosaikJungf1.JPG is uncategorized since 16 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Image:0627BgMosaikJungf4.JPG is uncategorized since 16 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Image:0627BgMosaikJungf2.JPG is uncategorized since 16 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Image:0627BgMosaikJungf5.JPG is uncategorized since 16 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

the image is proposed for deletion! The correct name is Image:StJodokBezau3.jpg --Böhringer (talk) 22:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Bödele Bregenzerwald Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bödele Bregenzerwald Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Congrats ! Benh (talk) 19:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fensterdetail Pfarrhof 4 Egg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like composition of this photo. --Lestath 21:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DamülserMittagspitze3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice --Pudelek 23:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwarzenberg Bregenzerwald Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks very good to me. Good details, sun+flares look ok. --Eusebius 15:57, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Dear Friedrich

I want to use one of more of your pictures from the Sonnenkoenigin in our company brochure Headway 2009.

I will add your name in the pictures.

With kind regards,

Yolande Verschuren-Pijl
PR & Communication
yverschuren@vdvelden.com

Marifin Beheer B.V.
Holding company of all allied companies of Van der Velden® Marine Systems
Dorpsstraat 67a
P.O. Box 2061
NL-2930 AB Krimpen aan de Lek
The Netherlands
C.o.C.: 29037984
T: +31 (0)180 51 15 77
F: +31 (0)180 51 15 78
www.vandervelden-marinesystems.com

The information in this e-mail message, including attachment(s), is confidential and only intended for the addressee. It is not permitted to copy the contents of this message or make it public, unless written permission has granted. If you have received information by mistake, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.

Link between photographers page[edit]

Hello.

I have made a topic called "More good photographers" on my user page. You could create a similar topic on your user page and you could include me in it. --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:19, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lienz1Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice work. --Dschwen 15:54, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

sehr schöne Fotos

vielen Dank --Böhringer (talk) 22:31, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AchenseeWinter06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gaschurn Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Super --Berthold Werner 08:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LindosCastle6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I'm not sure about the enzyclopedic value, but the light is beautiful. --Berthold Werner 16:48, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schröcken1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Correct exposure and colors. --ComputerHotline 10:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Alpstein Pano.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Alpstein Pano.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 11:19, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HittisauPano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice result, good DOF I would suggest next time approach the location from a different direction to avoid your foot prints, might even be worth a run at FP Gnangarra 12:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artist La Rambla 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Its a nice composition with a soft focus, definitely QI. Personally I'd like to see the background people engaged in the performance rather than facing away Gnangarra 12:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

The image has been promoted to Featured picture

The image File:Kopie von Gaschurn edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Kopie von Gaschurn edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Lycaon (talk) 21:36, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Greetings[edit]

Laterne[edit]

Apropos: [1]. Du weisst schon was eine Laterne ist? Laterne = Ein windgeschützes Licht. Nichts mehr und nicht weniger. Weshalb heissen die Kürbisse wohl Jack'o'lantern? Dies ist also sehr wohl eine Laterne! Bitte also keine Kategorien entfernen, wenn es sich nur um eine Privatmeinung handelt. ... Micha L. Rieser (talk) 21:57, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh, habs erst jetzt gesehen, dass es sich um eine Falschschreibung handelte... Nichts für ungut ;-) --Micha L. Rieser (talk) 21:58, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

ja, ja ist schon recht - wichtig ist nur: gleich voll einschenken bevor man nachdenkt - nicht wahr? --Böhringer (talk) 08:49, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, wenn ich dich auf dem falschen Fuss erwischt habe... Ich bin einfach gegen Kategorienschubserei allergisch und das sah im ersten Moment eben danach aus... --Micha L. Rieser (talk) 10:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

alles in Ordnung Micha L. Rieser, danke für die Rückmeldung und viel Spass mit der Wiki im neuen Jahr --Böhringer (talk) 11:22, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Danke! Dasselbe wünsche ich dir auch ;-) --Micha L. Rieser (talk) 13:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schoppernau 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Meets QI requirements IMHO. --Leyo 01:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Hochtannbergpass Höferspitze 2131m.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 12:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eiskristall Pfosten 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Correct exposure, DoF and details. --ComputerHotline 19:24, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 360°Gipfelpanorama Gapfohl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Featured Picture Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:SilvrettaNova_11.jpg, which was nominated by JalalV at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SilvrettaNova_11.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Please read[edit]

Bohringer, please read proposal for FPC gudelines in the discussion page #REDIRECT [[2]]. I believe that concensus could and should be built in order to improve quality of the page, project, etc. It is clear that there are disagreements on the personal level for some, but I believe that everybody agrees that there is definitely room for improvement. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Featured Picture Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Eichenberg 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eichenberg 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Promenade Insel Lindau 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gorgeous. I don't know about qualifying for QI, but I think that a small cw rotation would improve it. -- carol 10:03, 9 January 2009 (UTC) Info Precisely because it is gorgeous. Rotation is done --Böhringer 22:48, 10 January 2009 (UTC) Comment FP material? Gnangarra 14:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Bildanfrage[edit]

Hallo Herr Böhringer, leider habe ich keine E-Mail-Adresse von Ihnen gefunden. Wir sind ein deutscher Schulbuchverlag und würden gern Ihr Foto einer melkenden Ameise in einem Chemie-Lehrbuch verwenden. Bitte geben Sie uns kurz Bescheid, ob Sie der Verwendung zustimmen können. Mit freundlichen Grüßen susanne.finke@cornelsen.de

das dürfen Sie gerne machen. Sie haben sicher am Schluss des Buches einen Bildquellen - Nachweis. Dort soll z.B. stehen Bild Seite 25: Böhringer cc-by-sa-2.5 --Böhringer (talk) 12:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taraxacum sect R1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Everything seems fine to me. I like the use of DOF. --JuliusR 21:23, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krippe Wolfurt 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me --Berthold Werner 14:50, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheintal Warmblutpferde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice picture with very clearly build perspective and horizon. --Kirq 18:06, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juppentracht 08a.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Unstimmigkeit[edit]

Hallo Böhringer, die zwei Bilder rechts haben dieselbe Beschreibung und denselben Aufnahmestandort (Location), zeigen aber den See von ganz unterschiedlichen Perspektiven. Beide können nicht von der Freiburger Hütte aufgenommen worden sein (wie im Text angegeben). Könntest du das bitte richtig stellen, danke --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

jep - wird in Kürze gemacht --Böhringer (talk) 20:38, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

da willst du es aber genau wissen. Der Kamerastandort ist ca.100m vom anderen Bild entfernt. Der Text hatte beim anderen Bild den Zusatz: Blick auf den "Formaletsch"! und das ist korrekt so. --Böhringer (talk) 20:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Danke, lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Panos zefix[edit]

Danke für die Tipps. Was ist mit dem Nodalpunkt, die Paralaxensau ? Da gibts doch bestimmt Fehler --Richard Bartz (talk) 12:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

g. Sack findest wohl die besten Nüsse.

für diesen N-Punkt habe ich mir einen eigenen Montagewinkel konstruiert, damit die Kamera vertikal und in der Flucht des sogenannten Nodalpunkt am Stativ montiert werden kann.

Für Testaufnahmen (ich habe Panos geschossen, da habe ich die Kamera sogar um mich gedreht (das sind in etwa 15cm vom N-Punkt)) reicht ein Landschaftsbild, wo im Vordergrund nichts Dominantes, steht mehr als aus.

Eine Möglichkeit ist auch, dass Du die Kamera vertikal auf einen Ski- oder Wanderstock hältst und dort drehst.

Ich stelle mal ein Bild von dem Winkel hier ein. Hab ihn im Karren liegen. --Böhringer (talk) 21:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 300° Diedamskopf Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Very nice picture, makes me want to be there... :) --Siipikarja 23:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Question How did you manage to shrink a picture with 9,559 × 1,362 resolution to only 1.89 MB? The QI lower limit is 2MB, but I think it doesn't matter here. --Siipikarja 23:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment I do not know --Böhringer 14:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment Could we have an English description also? --Siipikarja 23:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Done sorry for my google-english --Böhringer 14:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment Thanks. Comment The QI lower limit is 2MPX not 2 MB --Richard Bartz 02:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment Richard Bartz, you're right. My bad. :) --Siipikarja 10:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Eiskristall Pfosten 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eiskristall Pfosten 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Best regards.--Mywood (talk) 11:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schleienlöcher Hard 360° Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very good --Richard Bartz 12:59, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Support Very good indeed. You're a master of panoramas. --Siipikarja 13:19, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Comment There is no need for using the {{Support}} or {{Oppose}} template here. It's for consensual review. -Richard Bartz 15:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment OK. But is it forbidden to use them? I like using them. --Siipikarja 15:59, 6 February 2009 (UTC) When using them all your pictures will be deleted :-) </joke> --Richard Bartz 17:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hl Anna Faschina 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good, but please geocode it -- Dmottl 21:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment Please see again, I have georeference the location is under Camera! :-) --Böhringer 08:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment Thank you --Dmottl 16:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Schule am Jagsberg 1.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 20:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Schule am Jagsberg.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 20:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AnaxImperator 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gekauft --Richard Bartz 17:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

VI promotion[edit]

File:0627BgMosaikJungf3A.JPG

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aeshna cyanea (Southern Hawker).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Cheers. Lycaon (talk) 13:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brüggelekopf Kanisfluh.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Neutral Beautiful. I'm not a fan of the composition though. --Siipikarja 10:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Very nice.--Mbz1 15:17, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berchtoldshöhe 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support I like it. Nice composition and good control on exposure. The focus is a bit undefined. The image could improved by removing the noise from the sky. English description would be a bonus. --Siipikarja 23:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC) English description Done --Böhringer 19:12, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

I like your photos.[edit]

Hello, I saw your photos, and I like them very much. I'm interested in photography as well. I have a few questions about your photo in Silvretta Nova. Could you tell me the details about this photo? For example, what kind of camera did you use, and which aperture did you choose, and other technical parameters... I hope with your help, I can make fine photos like yours.

Thanks a lot!!!

hier [[3]] sind ganz unten die "Metadaten" über alle Parameter Kameratyp u.a. angeführt. Hoffe du kommst mit diesen Informationen weiter. --Böhringer (talk) 13:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwarzenberg Bersbuch Panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Absolutely beautiful. Mattbuck 22:44, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Two in the fog.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I count at least five, but I like it, so I'll forgive that. Mattbuck 22:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haflinger Jungtier.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Total wieherliches Bild --Richard Bartz 13:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gewöhnliche Löwenzahn Taraxacum sect Ruderalia 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments eindrucksvoll --Mbdortmund 22:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karlsplatz Karlstor Stachus München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments erstaunliche Details --Mbdortmund 00:27, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

File:AKMuseum8.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:39, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

your image[edit]

Hi, Böhringer. I adjusted colors a litlle bit at your image: File:Au Lebernau edit 1.jpg. If you like it better than original we could add it to the nomination. If you like original better, we could ask my edit to be deleted. Best wishes.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

it's very good; thanks --Böhringer (talk) 06:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Schloss Forstegg Salez Panorama.jpg[edit]

Ich hab das Bild bei FP nominiert. Obwohl Chicken February 2009-1.jpg (für mich unverständlicherweise) auch ein FP geworden ist stören sich einige daran, dass die Freileitung nicht durchgängig ist, sonder kleine Knicke enthält. Wenn du genug Zeit hast könntest du eine neue Version davon hochladen wo das nicht mehr der Fall ist. Dann steht einem neuen FP in deiner Gallerie sicherlich nichts mehr im Wege :-)
--D-Kuru (talk) 12:41, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

ich habe es schon versucht, aber ich schaffe es nicht die Leitung sauber zu korrigieren. Danke für die Nominierung. Du kannst sie aber auch gerne zurücknehmen. Da habe ich keinen Stress damit. :-)) --Böhringer (talk) 13:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Forstegg Salez 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good! --Pudelek 21:26, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

Hey, do you wanna make some friends?...if you want so...I'll be here, waiting for you.right?..

wer bist du, Freund? --Böhringer (talk) 21:47, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rehetobel Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality image of a beautiful place.--Mbz1 15:30, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frühlings Knotenblume und Schneeglöckchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nett und nützlich --Mbdortmund 21:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavillon Bregenz Uferpromenade.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition and atmosphere. -- MJJR 22:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Au Lebernau.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hinterhopfreben 146.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Schöne Farbabstufungen.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SulzbergVlbg0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Composition is good, but Quality.. (unsharp in the corners?) -- Pro2 14:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Support The place is very beautiful, the composition is great and the sharpness is good enough.--Mbz1 03:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

i need a visa to go there in austria. i like it so much and i would wish to visit but i need visa and visa the embessy can't give me.what can i do pls to visit austria?

I would be glad to help you. you have the visa in your country. Information about you get here: [4] --Böhringer (talk) 06:46, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Important proposal[edit]

I wrote a proposal for equalizing the different picture formats on FPC Please have a look. Best regards --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Danke für dein positives Interesse, kannst du es bitte auch supporten damit wir es auch bald umsetzen können. Lg --Richard Bartz (talk) 22:42, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yulan-Magnolie Magnolia denudata.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good!--Mbz1 17:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Achensee Pertisau.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful!--Mbz1 16:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trichterspinne01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Nomination[edit]

G'day Böhringer, one of your many pictures caught my eye, and I've nominated it for FP status. Best of luck!

Yours, Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 17:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Böhringer (talk) 08:40, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Sir, it's an honour to be nominating images of such quality and beauty. With your permission, I've picked a few of the very many amazing and touching pictures that caught my eye, and plan to nominate these in future. Believe me when I say that more than two thirds of these images could become Featured. (Only 2, because the others are the same picture, from a different angle :P) Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:37, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for that. There are some good compositions in the process but the quality is not as good I think. Nevertheless, it is nice if you and perhaps others like my pictures. --Böhringer (talk) 10:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innsbruck Panorama Nordkette 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice view. Yann 10:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

New proposal for the FP candidates voting process[edit]

Hello! I've written a proposal to bring more impartiality in the voting process of FP candidates. Could you please give your comment on that here? Regards -- Tiago Fioreze (talk) 20:55, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

das is aber ganz ein lieber :-)) D A A A A N K E Richard --Böhringer (talk) 20:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Gerne --Richard Bartz (talk) 23:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:LindosCastleMap.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:LindosCastleMap.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:LindosCastleMap.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ferengi (talk) 01:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergschaf tiroler 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent composition. TimVickers 19:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fitness Böhringer 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergiselschanze Hadit 9.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments All photographic requirements fulfilled and it is additionally an interesting composition -- there is something very elating about a snowless ski lift in the Northern hemisphere in April also.... -- carol 11:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Juppentracht 08a.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Juppentracht 08a.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LOVE Liebe.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments great composition, quality is good --Ianare 01:58, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

FP Nomination[edit]

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:Maschendrahtzaun.JPG, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maschendrahtzaun.JPG. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

oh, das ist schön. Danke --Böhringer (talk) 18:31, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Herr Böhringer,

habe Ihr schönes Panorama Photo (Batholomäberg) hier gefunden. Ich bin begeisterter Modellflieger und würde es gerne für den Modellflugsimulator Aerofly Professional Deluxe aufbereiten (auf eine Größe von 8192x4096). Man kann dann, wie in echt damit bzw. darin fliegen. Auch denke ich daran für meine Fliegerfreunde die 3D-Szenerie unter www.RC-Sim.de zu veröffentlichen. Das alles selbstverständlich kostenlos und mit Angabe Ihres Namens. Sie finden dort unter AFPD Scenery bereits ein paar Beiträge von mir Bitte um Ihre Erlaubnis das tun zu dürfen.

Gruß Johannes

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frühlings Enzian Gentiana verna 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good! Lycaon 21:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

FYI...[edit]

COM:AN#Template. Wknight94 ^talk 11:23, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. I was getting to it. - ALLST✰R▼^echo _{wuz here @} 11:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Another nomination...[edit]

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:AchenseeWinter01.JPG, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AchenseeWinter01.JPG. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:Mercat de la Boqueria Sant Josep 01.JPG, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mercat de la Boqueria Sant Josep 01.JPG. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

danke dafür --Böhringer (talk) 18:28, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 360° Hoher Freschen Panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful subject, good exposure and stitching. --Iotatau 21:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwarze Apollo, Parnassius mnemosyne 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments High documentary value, sharp, good subject isolation. --Iotatau 08:05, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:AchenseeWinter01.JPG, which was nominated by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AchenseeWinter01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

I have a question about this picture (I am about to add English and French descriptions to it) : Is the guy skiing by the lake, on the surrounding fields, or on the (frozen) lake ? --Berru (talk) 15:56, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

on the surrounding fields --Böhringer (talk) 10:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Bitte kleine Korrektur![edit]

Hallo, bitte bei File:Vorderhopfreben_Üntschenspitze.jpg noch die linke untere Ecke aufräumen, siehe Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Vorderhopfreben_Üntschenspitze.jpg Das Panorama ist ansonsten zu schön, um abgelehnt zu werden! Danke! --Iotatau (talk) 16:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC) Done & Danke --Böhringer (talk) 19:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Misumena vatia auf Scabiosa columbaria.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting combination of spider and flower. --Iotatau 16:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Your pictures are too good not to nominate.[edit]

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:BallonKathedrale01.JPG, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:BallonKathedrale01.JPG. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry to clog up your page with these.
this is no problem thank you --Böhringer (talk) 19:01, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Türkenbund Lilie, Lilium martagon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 00:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleine Moosjungfer, Leucorrhinia dubia copula 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Iotatau 21:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vorderhopfreben Üntschenspitze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vorderhopfreben Üntschenspitze 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very, very nice.--Mbz1 22:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyright status: Image:Hl Johann Nepomuk Lorüns2.JPG[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hl Johann Nepomuk Lorüns2.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Wikipeder (talk) 18:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

wenn du alle Bilder, die in Innenräumen von Kirchen, zwecks "Panoramafreiheit" löschen willst, dann viel Spass bei der Arbeit. --Böhringer (talk) 10:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyright status: Image:Hl Johann Nepomuk Lorüns1.JPG[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hl Johann Nepomuk Lorüns1.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Wikipeder (talk) 18:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

wenn du alle Bilder, die in Innenräumen von Kirchen, zwecks "Panoramafreiheit" löschen willst, dann viel Spass bei der Arbeit. --Böhringer (talk) 10:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Böhringer!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Image:Gashaus Stauberen.JPG is uncategorized since 9 July 2009.