Template talk:Diagrams

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Commons:Categories for discussion[edit]

See discussion at Commons:Categories for discussion where this template is discussed:

--Timeshifter (talk) 08:15, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See agreement concerning this template at the bottom of Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/09/Category:Diagrams by subject. --Timeshifter (talk) 21:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The linked discussion was not properly closed yet, this your template contains obvious untruths and mistakes and seriously undermines the current long-standing consensus, correspoding to the en:Diagram article definition. --ŠJů (talk) 18:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This template was agreed to in August 2020. Please stop the edit war, and continue discussion if you wish, at Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/09/Category:Diagrams by subject. --Timeshifter (talk) 18:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion was not closed, the template was agreed by one user only. Its wording disrupt the long-standing consensus and definition contained and used in all related Wikipedia articles, and Commons categorization structure. It is a hasty and ill-conceived attempt to disrupt the established and consistent structure of the Commons categorization structure. --ŠJů (talk) 19:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Multiple people (including 2 admins) agreed in August 2020 about Template:Diagrams at Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/09/Category:Diagrams by subject. Closure about the Category:Diagrams by subject is separate from the template agreement. --Timeshifter (talk) 19:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, in the factual discussion, it is above all essential how the discussants dealt with the problems, with the facts and with the evidence and whether a consensus was found. Whether any of the discussants has any technical privileges to administer the project is not relevant and I do not investigate it. Rather, it can play a role which of the discussants has a real knowledge of the structure of categories and work with it and the ability to discuss factually. Who of the alleged two administrators dealt with the arguments in the discussion and with the contradiction between your new definition and the long-standing consensus on Wikipedia and Commons? --ŠJů (talk) 12:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop edit warring. Multiple people (including 2 admins) agreed with the template in August 2020. User:Themightyquill, an admin who agrees with this template, and who initiated the category discussion, no longer wants to "merge Category:Diagrams by subject with Category:Information graphics by subject." That was his initial proposal (see the original proposal at the top of the category discussion). Instead he prefers this template. As I said this template agreement is a separate agreement. So no one remains who wants the initial category proposal passed. The other admin is User:Royalbroil.
Please continue discussion at Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/09/Category:Diagrams by subject where the discussion is ongoing concerning the template. And please stop edit warring. --Timeshifter (talk) 13:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]