File:Average scores of foods for nutritional quality based on positive food components, negative food components, and a combination of positive and negative food components under the suggested procedure in food categories.pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(1,239 × 1,752 pixels, file size: 380 KB, MIME type: application/pdf)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

Description
English: Average scores of foods for nutritional quality (nutritional value) based on positive food components (to reach sufficient intake of any positive food component), negative food components (to restrict intake of any negative food component), and a combination of positive and negative food components (to reach sufficient intake of any positive food component and to restrict intake of any negative food component) under the suggested procedure in food categories. Each food is given a numeric score from 0 to 100 to demonstrate the nutritional quality for each of those three aspects. A higher score is preferred to a lower score. A higher score for nutritional quality based on positive food components demonstrates a specified amount of food contains suitable levels (source and high levels) of many positive food components, and a lower score demonstrates it contains suitable levels of few positive food components. A higher score for nutritional quality based on negative food components demonstrates a specified amount of food contains suitable levels (free, very low, and low levels) of many negative food components, and a lower score demonstrates it contains suitable levels of few negative food components. Positive food components such as vitamins, minerals (excluding sodium), dietary fiber, and protein should be encouraged in the diet, and negative food components such as cholesterol, energy, fat, saturated fat, sodium, and sugars should be restricted in the diet.

Breakfast cereals, baby foods, legumes and legume products, pork products, American Indian/Alaska Native foods, lamb, veal, and game products, finfish and shellfish products, beef products, and poultry products had the highest average scores for nutritional quality based on positive food components (to reach sufficient intake of any positive food component) and a combination of positive and negative food components (to reach sufficient intake of any positive food component and to restrict intake of any negative food component). In contrast, fats and oils, sweets, baked products, spices and herbs, snacks, and sausages and luncheon meats had the lowest average scores for nutritional quality based on a combination of positive and negative food components.
Fruits and fruit juices, vegetables and vegetable products, beverages, spices and herbs, cereal grains and pasta, legumes and legume products, American Indian/Alaska Native foods, and breakfast cereals had the highest average scores for nutritional quality based on negative food components (to restrict intake of any negative food component). In contrast, fast foods, restaurant foods, meals, entrees, and side dishes, sausages and luncheon meats, and baked products had the lowest average scores for nutritional quality based on negative food components.

Suggested citation: Forouzesh, Abed; Forouzesh, Fatemeh; Samadi Foroushani, Sadegh; Forouzesh, Abolfazl. Critical vulnerabilities of food selections based on nutrient content claims and reference amounts of food and creating a reliable procedure. Food Production, Processing and Nutrition 2024;6:43. DOI: 10.1186/s43014-023-00219-z
Date
Source Own work
Author SSamadi15

Licensing[edit]

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution share alike
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current10:47, 8 May 2024Thumbnail for version as of 10:47, 8 May 20241,239 × 1,752 (380 KB)SSamadi15 (talk | contribs)Uploaded own work with UploadWizard

There are no pages that use this file.

Metadata