User talk:SSamadi15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, SSamadi15!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:53, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of the chemical structure File:ADDNC (A 65485).svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:ADDNC (A 65485).svg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Files in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users, and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 16:08, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you click on the chemical structure, you will see that no part of the chemical structure is overlapped. SSamadi15 (talk) 20:29, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Chemical structure of bensultap.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 05:56, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Food analytical charts[edit]

By my count, you've now uploaded over 400 different charts and visualizations all covering the same nutritional data from Food Analytical Methods in slightly different ways. This seems a little excessive. Can you explain what educational use case you have in mind for these files? Omphalographer (talk) 01:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of the files repeat the information of another file. For example, foods containing appropriate levels of riboflavin and vitamin E in food groups help people who need to know sources of riboflavin and vitamin E. For example, foods containing appropriate levels of riboflavin and zinc in food groups help people who need to know sources of riboflavin and zinc. SSamadi15 (talk) 09:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What are these specific combinations relevant to, though? Surely not all 400+ combinations of nutrients you've enumerated are individually significant. Omphalographer (talk) 20:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]