Commons talk:Valued image candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

This image was promoted in 2020, but doesn't have the valued template and category. As far as I remember, normally it happened automatically? Should I try to do it by hand, or is there a procedure?

Commons:Valued image candidates/Laguna de Gallocanta, Aragon, Spain - endorheic lake.jpg - Tupungato (talk) 14:52, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Best scope for museum antique restorer at work[edit]

I consider nominating this image. Some categories in Commons are in need of serious rethinking and maintenance, so there are certain subjects that have no perfect category. This image is in the Category:Furniture restoration, but I'm not so sure whether mirror is furniture. Should I use "Antique restoration" as scope? There is no such category AFAIK. There is also Category:Restorers which would probably benefit from some dilution. Anyway, in Category:Furniture restoration I think it's the only eligible image showing person at work. - Tupungato (talk) 15:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Best scope for vineyard irrigation sprinklers in Italy[edit]

This image is used in 23 Wiki pages. I think it might be best in a few scopes.

  • Irrigation in Category:Vineyards in Trentino-South Tyrol - wouldn't this be too narrow?
  • Irrigation sprinklers in Category:Vineyards in Italy - I would consider this a good scope. It's a useful image and probably only of this scope in category tree of 600+ files, but there are many subcategories to inspect to properly review whether it's best in scope.
  • Irrigation sprinklers in vineyards - no such category, but also probably best in scope. There are a few files imported from Flickr that are also in this scope. I would say it's a useful file in good scope, but as there is no such category, it's difficult to properly review whether it's best in scope.

Tupungato (talk) 15:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Pending Most Valued Review Candidates[edit]

More participation in Pending Most Valued Review Candidates is needed. Some candidates have to wait many months for a decision. --Milseburg (talk) 12:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]