Commons talk:Questionable Flickr images/Archive 7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 →

Abhi VAN

{{Edit request}} Please add {{qfi|sarveshsaravanan092005|196516081@N02|196495733|4=Clear flickrwashing}}. It's a zero-follower account created this weekend to upload images of Indian celebrtities, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with 196516081@N02. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Do Not Speak As Loud As My Heart

{{Edit request}} Please add {{qfi|Do Not Speak As Loud As My Heart||196100879@N08|4=Flickrwashing of Justin Trudeau photos}}

This account is similar to a few other already-blocked accounts incl "Lovers Lane". Their photos generally credit a professional photographer and/or agency, e.g. https://www.flickr.com/photos/196100879@N08/52399637122/ credits Sean Kilpatrick and some searching leads to a clearly copyrighted source https://www.cpimages.com/CS.aspx?VP3=DamView&VBID=2RLQ2JIKKROI8&SMLS=1&RW=1352&RH=792. -M.nelson (talk) 09:20, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Yun_Q

{{Edit request}} Please add https://www.flickr.com/photos/138224835@N02/, a k-pop fan account. This photo was used as the source for File:Min Yoongi.png. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:18, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Wall Boat

{{Edit request}} {{qfi|Wall Boat|151415985@N06|151370663|Appropriating 3rd party works}} Flickr user is re-posting other people's works as their own. They appear to be public domain works File:Redwood national park, California (37466086246).jpg is a LOC photo by Carol M. Highsmith (not sure if it's the right one, but it's from the same collection) and I changed the attribution on another photo. Even if all the images in the photostream are PD or CC-zero, we should be sourcing the original. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:04, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Nase Lino

{{Edit request}}

{{qfi|naselino_|196409742@N02|196389394|Flickrwashing}}

Blatant Flickrwashing account for StephenMas0 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log. [1] and [2] are both Getty Images photos, uploaded as File:Angelothy Preciado.jpg and File:Kevin Rodríguez.jpg. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:57, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Cath Montgomery

{{Edit request}}

{{qfi|make--me--smile|75634852@N08| 75542039 |Derivative works of adult photos presented as original photos}}

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Me-having-fun-outside.jpg, all the photos on this account are derivative works of photographs found at this adult website: (link NSFW): http://www.metartnetwork.com/model/vera/gallery/20040101/VERA_1/ The user has pasted clothes onto a nude model and presented them as their profile photo at en:User:CathMontgomery/Sandbox. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:11, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

LeRoy Bryant

{{Edit request}}

{{qfi|imyoungb23|194081919@N03| 194058865 |Flickrwashing agency photos}}

The user is reposting agency photos of athletes and marking them as public domain. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:DevontaSmithplaying.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:DevontaSmithplaying (cropped).jpg. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

footpicshd

{{qfi|footpicshd|130393879@N06|130348557|Flickrwashing}}

An account that posts copyrighted photographs. This Getty Images photo was licensed public domain so it could be uploaded as File:23, Matchday 3 - Manchester United 2-1 Liverpool - Old Trafford, Manchester - August 22, 2022.jpg. @Victuallers, please don't upload images when the description clearly says "Photo by Tom Purslow/Manchester United via Getty Images" and the Flickr user explicitly says "I don't claim ownership over any of these pictures, except if otherwise specified." Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

thanks for noting the issue.@Adeletron 3030: But calling out mistakes? It has no effect obviously, We will all? continue to make errors. (and just to undermine your 20:20 afterthought ... they Did claim ownership of that very image. Victuallers (talk) 12:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
@Victuallers Sorry, I wasn’t trying to call you out, but simply to point out things to look for when you’re uploading from Flickr. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

no copyright picture

{{edit request}} {{qfi|no copyright picture|144657682@N06| 144612360 |Flickrwashing celebrity photos}}

File:Teagan Croft.jpg sourced to https://www.flickr.com/photos/144657682@N06/52773865380 is a Getty Images photo and the other photo is a modeling headshot. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

 Not done Flickr account no longer exists. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Flickr washing

{{qfi|henrique binho dos santos|henriquejp444|193816009@N06|Flickr washing}}
Images from henriquejp444 can be traced to news agencies. Today I made several COM:SPEEDY requests with this account as source. An example is this photo that was initially published here. Günther Frager (talk) 01:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Agência Brasília

It is requested that an edit or modification be made to this protected page.
Administrators: Please apply <nowiki> or {{Tl}} to the tag after the request is fulfilled.

SpBot

https://flickr.com/people/agenciabrasilia/ - User ID 64586261@N02

Agência Brasília is a governmental news agency from Brasília. Although most of their photos are posted on Flickr under a CC BY 2.0 license, they explicitly state, both in their cover photo and about section linked above, that their content cannot be used for commercial or advertising purposes. –guttitto(talk · contribs · uploads) 20:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

A relevant update about this - I contacted the government of Distrito Federal through Participa DF, because on this page they said that commercial use is permitted. They responded - according to SECOM (Communication Secretariat), they changed their policy in 2019, and now both their website's and Flickr photos and videos should not be used commercially. –guttitto(talk · contribs · uploads) 01:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
yep i remember when they changed this, even have a template for their updated licensing but because people will still be able to add images from their flickr here, I'd be ok with their flickr page getting blacklisted here so that our servers will not upload from their flickr feed again, we have a lot of flickr mass uploaders here who will just upload to commons with zero knowledge on policies and create a huge mess (if they haven't already), may need a human/bot to check to see if people haven't already.. Stemoc 02:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
That's a different agency, Agência Brasil, while this one I'm talking about is Agência Brasília. But it's understandable that you thought it was the former since the names are pretty similar. As far as I know, there isn't a template for Agência Brasília, but it's also understandable that users went just by the license in the images themselves, since they mark them as CC BY while the compatible license with their current policy would be CC BY-NC. –guttitto(talk · contribs · uploads) 16:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

india_7

{{qfi|india7network|india_7|110780129@N03|4=Flickrwashing phone and laptop press renders}}

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by AnVuong1222004 (7) 0x0a (talk) 16:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

✓ DoneRed-tailed hawk (nest) 03:18, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Gbawden (talk) 06:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

hans_castorp2010

{{Edit request}}

{{qfi|hans_castorp2010|52827465@N02| 52807117 |Flickrwashing other Flickr users' images}}

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with hans castorp2010. Some of the user's uploads might be original, but there is obvious Flickrwashing for some of the beach photos. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Gbawden (talk) 06:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

beezlebubba

{{Edit request}} {{qfi|beezlebubba|9677916@N03| 9654862 |Flickrwashing celebrity photos and "Magic: the Gathering" cards}}

Pretty obvious Flickrwashing account of Henry Rollins and Paris Hilton pohtos, tattoo designs and Magic the Gathering cards. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:27, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Gbawden (talk) 06:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

jill47

{{Edit request}} |- | jill570641 | jill47 | 44362794@N02 | search | Flickr washing

https://www.flickr.com/photos/jill47/ - the profile has some nice-looking science equipment, advertisements for handbags, press photos of people carrying handbags, a bizarre photoshop of a Burger King ad, some Michelle Obama photos, some company logos, and various other unrelated things. There's no reason to believe this person is the author of any of it. One photo from this person was uploaded here as File:Industrial solid potassium sodium silicate.jpg --B (talk) 15:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done as a precaution Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Gbawden (talk) 06:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

brazilinmaps

{{Edit request}} Please add this account to the blacklist. See:

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Gbawden (talk) 06:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Ian smith3

{{Edit request}} please add ian smith3/53269523@N04 to the bad authors list. It’s a Flickrwashing account with web photos and screenshots of Japanese politicians. Please refer to the following deletion discussions:

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 05:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Gbawden (talk) 06:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)