Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Peru

•  Info At Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sotil Cubillas Challe 1973.png was discussed a case which eventually could light up "It is unclear whether that also applies to works where previous shorter terms had already expired". Gunnex (talk) 12:07, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

About coins and bills in Peru

Comment: Reproduction of bills and coins is banned in peruvian law only if that has the purpose to use the reproduction as if it were the genuine currency. It is obvious that a picture of a coin taken with a camera and placed in Wikipedia will never produce that effect. So, the picture does not violate copyrigth rules.--Elelch (talk) 17:07, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Comment 2: I think that if the currency is small in quantity and that it is expressed as "No value" or "Specimen", it will not violate the law of counterfeiting, which is not related to piracy. In addition, the museum pages show the image of the coin for academic purposes.--DSan (talk) 23:55, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Coment 3: I believe that the reverse of the 1 sol coin could be free if the laurel stems are blurred. This leaves the numeral 1 as a series of patterns that lacks individuality, the Peru brand logo and the MA text also does not pass the threshold of originality and the patterns are simple and rectilinear for the case of the coin. What do you think?--DSan (talk) 00:38, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Repealed law 13714 and copyright rules in Peru

Law 13714 from 1961 was repealed by Legislative Decree No. 822, (published on 24 April 1996), implies that what is written in this project page in reference to that law is not valid. So, in consequence, I'm going to delete it, because it's causing confusion.

To anyone who wants to write about copyright rules in Peru, you need to use the official source of the government, which is INDECOPI, the subject is called "OBRAS": https://www.indecopi.gob.pe/marco-normativo-pi

Saludos, se está confundiendo. Si bien la ley se basa en la actual, hay un apartado llamado "Retroactividad de la antigua ley" en que las obras publicadas con mucha anterioridad no gozan de la protección actual. La constitución no ofrece retroactividad y por lo tanto no hay confusión sobre el tema de derechos de autor. Además, hay tablas que explican con mucha atención sobre la protección de las obras. (Está en español para evitar malas interpretaciones). Gracias.--DSan (talk) 22:10, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Hola DSan, sucede que no es así, el texto contenido en el apartado Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Peru#Government_and_legal_entities_works está fundamentado en la ley 13714 (1961) la cual fué derogada en 1996, por tanto, dicho texto solo podría ser aplicable a obras previas a su derogación.Jjrt (talk) 01:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Pues tú mismo ya respondiste a esa respuesta. En otras palabras si un trabajo del gobierno se publicó antes de 31 de diciembre de 1975 ya no recibe la protección de la vigente ley ni está sujeta a la fecha URAA y, por ende, está en el dominio público en Perú y Estados Unidos. Como sea, actualicé la sección para que solo resalte a trabajos antiguos del gobierno y evitar confusiones innecesarias. Saludos.--DSan (talk) 16:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)