Commons talk:Administrator permission for statistics

I think it's a good thing that we have the page - i think it's problematic however that it does not clearly state what type of statistics may be published. For example, some people may be perfectly ok with numer of blocks/protections/etc per month or week, but not per time of day... So, what am I actually agreeing to here? Is this a blanket waver to allow anyone to publish any statistics?

Note that i'm not personally very concerned about this. But I can already hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth... -- Duesentrieb^(?!) 17:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Well the wailing and teeth-gnashing people won't sign at all, I suppose.

Since I wrote the statement in a very broad way, I guess it is a blanket waiver to allow anyone to publish any statistics from the logs which are already publicly available. So they can choose to break up the stats however they like. Why, OTOH, we would care how many deletions any person did at any hour of the morning, is a whole other matter. :) Per month is about the most fine-grained I personally could get interested in. pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

---

Not that this makes much sense, but for the fun of it, here's the top 50 of admins acc. to the number of deletions. And where is the real statistics page?

	user	no. of deletions (15.11.2006)
1	Thuresson	10910
2	Shizhao	7658
3	Nilfanion	7444
4	Samulili	4803
5	Zirland	4464
6	Raymond_de	3893
7	Pfctdayelise	3024
8	EugeneZelenko	2259
9	AndreasPraefcke	2226
10	WarX	1777
11	Rüdiger_Wölk	1672
12	Bastique	1666
13	Fred_Chess	1647
14	JeremyA	1560
15	Barcex	1500
16	Dodo	1412
17	Arnomane	1393
18	Eloquence	1352
19	Angr	1210
20	Sanbec	1201
21	Mormegil	1105
22	Crux	1078
23	Darkone	1037
24	Klemen_Kocjancic	978
25	Kjetil_r	964
26	Saperaud	851
27	Panther	840
28	Anna	808
29	Cnyborg	785
30	Duesentrieb	731
31	Avatar	724
32	Stan_Shebs	710
33	Matt314	623
34	Ejdzej	563
35	Drini	558
36	Lmbuga	525
37	Bouncey2k	504
38	Jcornelius	504
39	Lumijaguaari	479
40	Lestath	437
41	Odder	415
42	Spangineer	343
43	Franz_Xaver	340
44	Raul654	327
45	Tsca	299
46	UED77	274
47	Martorell	253
48	Alphax	236
49	Yug	235
50	Zscout370	217

---

That's so cool! It was a good idea to only list to top 50. Maybe top 40 would suffice.

I am mainly interested in, who is doing the core work of Commons here. Some admins do a lot of work without getting any recognition whatsoever only a lot of complaints.

So I'm only 20 deletions after Bastique? Hmmm... that's not too bad...

Fred Chess 20:29, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

What do you mean, "real statistics" page?

This is cool, but some people have been admins longer than others, so it's a bit unfair. We really need a rate. :)

But anyway congrats to Nilfanion, amazing result!!! --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 04:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Umm thanks I guess.--Nilfanion 15:21, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

as some ppl have been admins longer than others...

(Ppl who have been admins for less than 5 weeks or have less than 200 deletions aren't counted).

*	user	del.per week	weeks	dels
1	Nilfanion	715.64	11	7872
5	Samulili	228.90	21	4807
6	Zirland	187.62	24	4503
7	Shizhao	182.38	42	7660
11	Thuresson	129.88	84	10910
13	Dodo	74.84	19	1422
14	Pfctdayelise	70.33	43	3024
16	Barcex	63.33	24	1520
17	Cnyborg	61.85	13	804
18	Panther	57.07	15	856
20	Drini	50.73	11	558
21	Angr	50.42	24	1210
22	WarX	49.13	38	1867
23	JeremyA	47.42	33	1565
25	Bastique	39.69	42	1667

I don't think it makes sense to remove nicks from this chart, as this information is publicly available at editcounter and Special:Logs/Rights anyway... / tsca @ 22:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Tsca, the whole point of this page is that some people aren't comfortable with such information being collected and collated about them. Please remove any people who haven't signed. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 01:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

They've already been removed by Fred. / tsca @ 02:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

I have to agree that I don't see any problem with a list that simply lists admins by total deletions. The arguments were against listing them by deletions during a specific period of time, which is what the second list here does. I can also see that people might object to having the full list posted if they are listed at the bottom of it. However, a list of the 40 admins with most deletions on Commons is not something I can see anyone object to. On what grounds? I'd appreciate if someone showed me on what grounds.

If I could, I would recreate the first list on this page to include the top 40 admins regardsless whether they signed or not.

Fred Chess 15:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Actually I'm a little surprised that I even made the list (#48). A good incentive to delete more images! Alphax (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Category:Commons maintenance

{{editprotected}}

Please remove Category:Commons maintenance. The page is just clutter there. Rd232 (talk) 00:26, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done! Killiondude (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)