Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2017-12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Night of shenzhen experimental school.png

Please forgive my poor english first and I am new to wiki. I, sparktour(also signed as sparkcyf，Qingyuan.Fan`, is the photographer of this image. I shot it with my canon eos 600d and edited it by the adobe photoshop, however I incorrectly set the copyright settings in the camera and left the "All Rights Reserved." in the exif of the image. I'm sure that I'd like to publish this photo with CC BY SA 3 License. I am glad to upload the photo again to meet the regulations of the Wikimedia commons. Above all, I am sorry for the mistakes that I I've made. wish my application could meet your favorable consideration. --Sparktour (talk) 14:32, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

 Support I think we can assume good faith here. This is a big image (5,184 × 3,456px) and therefore unlikely to have been found copied from somewhere. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Here: File:Night of shenzhen experimental school.jpg. --Yann (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Precious Chikwendu Fani Kayode.jpg

Dear Sir,

Kindly restore the photo Precious Chikwendu Fani Kayode.jgp. There is no copy right issues here. Infact it was directly given to me by the owners from www.femifanikayode.org ie it was obtained by permission from them.

I therefore urge you to undelete the photo immediately.

Regards

Seiperi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seiperi (talk • contribs) 14:31, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose As noted in the deletion comment, the source site has a clear copyright notice, "© 2017 Femi Fani Kayode". Therefore, policy requires that the actual copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per Jim, the actual copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:40, 30 November 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MariaJastrzebska.jpg

The photo was deleted by Jon Colbert on the grounds of being a selfie. It is not a selfie. It was taken by Deborah Price and I have permission from her to use the photo on wiki. I think my mistake was to give the picture a title which I assume you interpreted as a photographer credit. This was my first attempt at putting a pic on to wikicommons. Can you help? Eg remove the name? Thanks - Wikinovice in hope ~ ~ ~ ~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by DamesnetB (talk • contribs) 16:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC) (The four tildes should not have spaces between them).

 Oppose Actually, it was deleted on the ground that it was not s selfie and, therefore, the actual photographer must give a free license using OTRS. Note also that "permission from her to use the photo on wiki" is insufficient both here and on WP:EN. We require that images be free for use by anybody anywhere for any purpose, including commercial use and derivative works.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs)

 Not done: per Jim, the actual copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:48, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AOLF MGL LOGO.jpg

--ArtoflivingMN (talk) 05:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)ArtoflivingMN
File:AOLF MGL LOGO.jpg
Art of Living in Mongolia
it is the logo of Art of living in Mongolia, so i request you not to delete.ArtoflivingMN (talk) 05:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Pleasing you

ArtoflivingMNArtoflivingMN (talk) 05:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Not deleted. We need more concrete information about the artist and how you acquired the right to license the image. Please read your user talk page.   — Jeff G. ツ 08:47, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: It is not clear that the logo is in scope, but it is clear that the source page has an explicit copyright notice. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:GGPFC 2017 Club Crest.svg

I am the designer of this club badge and own the copyright. Nobody else should be claimning rights to it

KJMCLARK1966 --KJMClark1966 (talk) 00:48, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose On its web site, Glasgow Gladiator claim to own the copyright. According to en:Glasgow Gladiators Powerchair FC two people created this logo. Please see the instructions at Commons:OTRS if you are the copyright owner. If you are not the only copyright owner, the other party/parties must verify its copyright status. Thuresson (talk) 02:10, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 21:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Frontier Poetry Logo.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This image is free use and authorized by Frontier Poetry Lordjeff20 (talk) 18:24, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ 18:37, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 21:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jennifer French Photo.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: We are the owners of the image currently used on the Legislative Assembly of Ontario's profile page for MPP Jennifer French. We use the image throughout all the advertising for MPP French and would like to keep our brand consistent on Wikipedia. Corvair-corsair (talk) 21:03, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

@Corvair-corsair: For a case such as this, we require an email to be sent to our permissions team at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. This can take some time for us to respond as we have a backlog, but it is required to verify that you're authorized to license the image. Guanaco (talk) 21:48, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 21:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Sparktour

There may came a misunderstanding of these photos. I, sparktour(sparkcyf) had taken these photos by myself. The canon egos 5d &Sony ilce-7s are my own camera I also has a canon eos 600d, 80d , Sony alpha-5000 and Nikon d3300 (some of those are my relative’s) I’d like to publish these photos according to the cc by sa license. By the way, the photos taken by Nikon d3s are not my work. I copied it from my school’s website, I’ll ask my workmates whether these photos could be published here according to cc by sa license later and I really get the approvement from them to publish these photos. I’m sorry for the ignorance of the copyright regulations of the commons. I would appreciated if the mark of the copyright problem mark removed. (I've send the email to the OTRS mailbox and the current ticket is [Ticket#: 2017113010005654] )--Sparktour (talk) 14:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Convenience link: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sparktour.   — Jeff G. ツ 14:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Not deleted yet. --Yann (talk) 21:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Imperial College London and its Campus Location.png

I made this file, I do not know why it is being deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikecurry1 (talk • contribs) 00:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:03, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Flag_Matese_legion.jpg

This picture was taken from a book written in 1988. We have a signed document from the author of the book, allowing us to use the picture for wikipedia. --G1ulvia (talk) 09:57, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose There are several problems with this request.

First, "allowing us to use the picture for wikipedia" is not sufficient. Both Commons and WP:EN require that an image be free to use by anyone anywhere including commercial use and derivative works.

Second, policy requires that the actual copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS.

Third, the image is a photograph of a framed paper photograph or poster. It seems unlikely that the author of the book actually holds the copyright to the work shown and therefore probably does not have the right to freely license it.

In order to have the image restored to Commons, the actual copyright holder of the work shown in the photograph must send a free license using OTRS.

Finally, please note that re-uploading an image that has been deleted from Commons is a serious violation of our rules. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:02, 2 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Francescaludikarphotographer-sumocyco-smoke-promoshot-01-web.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am the photographer of this photo, and own the copyright... and give permission for it to be used on Wikipedia. 67.71.130.115 15:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose It appears at http://res.cloudinary.com/dx9uyi7ld/image/upload/v1510868422/jyahhr8oo5kgrvli90lr.jpg with an explicit copyright notice.

Also note that "give permission for it to be used on Wikipedia" is not sufficient. Both Commons and WP:EN require that images must be free for any use by anyone anywhere, including commercial use and derivative works. Are you sure you want to give away the right for others to make and sell tee-shirts and posters of this image? If so, policy requires that you send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:03, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1977 Autoportrait Ecully Jacques Revon.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent ( verify ) request: Ticket:2017091810022832 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, and ping me. If the permission looks good for me, I'll remove {{Temporarily undeleted}} and add {{PermissionOTRS}}, otherwise, {{OTRS received}}. Thanks ! Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 11:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Temporarily undeleted. @Framawiki: please proceed. De728631 (talk) 17:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Passerelle-des-Portes-de-l-enfer-2.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent ( verify ) request: Ticket:2017091910021706 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, and ping me. If the permission looks good for me, I'll remove {{Temporarily undeleted}} and add {{PermissionOTRS}}, otherwise, {{OTRS received}}. Thanks ! Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 11:15, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Temporarily undeleted. @Framawiki: please proceed. De728631 (talk) 17:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Roger noel babar 20.11.1980.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent ( verify ) request: Ticket:2017101310005705 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, and ping me. If the permission looks good for me, I'll remove {{Temporarily undeleted}} and add {{PermissionOTRS}}, otherwise, {{OTRS received}}. Thanks ! Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 11:38, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Temporarily undeleted. @Framawiki: please proceed. De728631 (talk) 17:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Guy.lebegue 1986.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent ( verify ) request: Ticket:2017092410005474 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, and ping me. If the permission looks good for me, I'll remove {{Temporarily undeleted}} and add {{PermissionOTRS}}, otherwise, {{OTRS received}}. Thanks ! Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 11:43, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Temporarily undeleted. @Framawiki: please proceed. De728631 (talk) 17:39, 3 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Anne Lauber dirigeant l'orchestre symphonique national (Mexique).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent ( verify ) request: Ticket:2017092410017032 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, and ping me. If the permission looks good for me, I'll remove {{Temporarily undeleted}} and add {{PermissionOTRS}}, otherwise, {{OTRS received}}. Thanks ! Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 12:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Temporarily undeleted. @Framawiki: please proceed. De728631 (talk) 17:37, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bleu comme la mère.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission provided with Ticket:2017103110014573. Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:37, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done @Arthur Crbz: please adjust the OTRS template. De728631 (talk) 17:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PREMIER JOUR.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission provided with Ticket:2017103110014591. Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done @Arthur Crbz: please adjust the OTRS template. De728631 (talk) 17:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Marie-Ange Guilleminot. Oursin, 2014 par Michel-Ange Seretti à Kyoto, Japon.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent ( verify ) request: Ticket:2017110610000651 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, and ping me. If the permission looks good for me, I'll remove {{Temporarily undeleted}} and add {{PermissionOTRS}}, otherwise, {{OTRS received}}. Thanks ! Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 09:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Temporarily undeleted. @Framawiki: please proceed. De728631 (talk) 18:17, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MDM in Manege.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017100310008034 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{Temporarily undeleted}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ 05:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Temporarily undeleted @Jeff G.: Thuresson (talk) 12:26, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
@Thuresson and Rusdesign: It looks awfully derivative of File:Moscow manege facade.jpg, what do you think?  — Jeff G. ツ 12:39, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Agreed, they photoshopped the truck and the poster into the original image. This should be deleted as an artificial situation of a probably non-notable event. Out of scope. De728631 (talk) 18:25, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Also note that the original file is CC-BY-SA. This file is marked CC-0, without any attribution. That is a clear violation of the license on the original file and calls for a {{Speedy}} which I have done. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:10, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done per the above reasons. Thank you all.   — Jeff G. ツ 21:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Colombia Campesina.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017080210013561 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{Temporarily undeleted}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ 07:15, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done @Jeff G.: there is no licence yet on the file page so please fill it in if the permission is valid. Otherwise please mark as "OTRS received". De728631 (talk) 18:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

@De728631: ✓ Done, thanks.   — Jeff G. ツ 21:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mitra Hajjar.jpg

Hello, This image has no copyright! It will be used for Mitra Hajjar's wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramyareye (talk • contribs) 01:30, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ 01:57, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 Not done Please read Commons:First steps before making additional contributions. Thuresson (talk) 01:48, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files of Dauntentry

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017080310021149 alleges permission for these files. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{Temporarily undeleted}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ 09:48, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done @Jeff G.: I've restored all uploads by this user. Please note though that many of these do not yet have proper source descriptions, but instead of the copyright holder's name you'll find the OTRS ticket ID or nothing at all. Please let me know if any of them need to get deleted again. De728631 (talk) 18:15, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
@De728631: Thank you. Category:Ms. America is now a reality, but Category:Duplicate is backlogged.   — Jeff G. ツ 02:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Resolved
De728631 (talk) 19:51, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logoavito.png

this what i get from Wikimedia email :

Bonjour El fahim Badr,

Merci pour votre courriel.

Cette permission n'est pas nécessaire, en effet, « Cette image, ou le texte inclus, comprend seulement des formes géométriques simples et du texte. Le seuil d'originalité nécessaire pour la protection du droit d'auteur n'est pas atteint, et le fichier est donc dans le domaine public. »

Cordialement,

Badr --Badr.el (talk) 00:01, 2 December 2017 (UTC)--Badr.el (talk) 00:01, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

I agree with Jcb that it is not OK for an OTRS volunteer to decide all by himself that an image is below the ToO when a DR has decided otherwise. While the image may actually be below the ToO, since we apparently have a free license in OTRS, please give the ticket number here and we can use it in the image's file description to eliminate any question of its status. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 2 December 2017‎ (UTC)

✓ Done: OTRS permission - ticket found by searching "Avito" on OTRS. --Guanaco (talk) 20:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Family crest Vallot (Wallot).png

File was created by myself. Please restore.

Leshugenottes77 (talk) 18:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose The fact that it would be good to have this image in an article is irrelevant here. There are many images that it would be good to have, but we cannot keep them if they violate copyright.

The question here is how did you create the file? The rules on coats of arms may seem a little strange, but you must follow them. If you created this from a blazon -- a text description of the crest -- then it is OK. If, on the other hand, you took it from another image of the crest, then it is a copyright violation unless the crest you took it from is PD. That is true whether you scanned an image, copied a file, or redrew it yourself using a Paint program. If you claim the source is PD, you must be able to prove it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

  • Thank you for further clarification. Please see below how I created the file:
  1. I have created the file based on a blazon published in Nobiliaire et armorial de Bretagne, Band 2.. The blazon provides info on content and colour of the crest: "D'azur au chevron accomp. en chef de deux etoiles et en pointe d'un rameau de chene englante, le tout d'or", literally translated (Google Translate): "Azure chevron acc. in chief of two stars and in base of a branch of oak englante, the whole of gold". The link is also provided in the Wallot (Familie) article.
  2. I have inferred the shape based on the desription "D'azur au chevron". Chevron is a classic crest form in French heraldic, please s. the Wikipedia France article Liste de pièces héraldiques and scroll down to "chevron". Leshugenottes77 (talk) 14:29, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Original design by the uploader. De728631 (talk) 22:36, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Goni Aug 22 2015 Precipitation Daily Accumulated.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Under {{PD-ROC-exempt}}, suitable for commons. B dash (talk) 02:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose I don't think item (2) applies. That item refers to the previous item, so for these to be PD, they would have to be one of "constitution, acts, regulations, or official documents". They are clearly none of the first three and it would be a long stretch to call them "official documents". Of course, we are reading the law in translation -- it is possible that the original Mandarin could be read to include these, but that would have to be proven. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Except for my comment, the last action on this was a month ago.There is no consensus for restoration. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lacey Sculls.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017092710000562 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{Temporarily undeleted}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ 01:24, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done @Jeff G.: Temporarily undeleted. Thuresson (talk) 02:20, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

@Thuresson: Thanks, I have tagged it {{subst:OR|2017092710000562}} for the time being. A CU might want to look at the upload history.   — Jeff G. ツ 13:49, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Restored and checked. Either the "OTRS received" countdown or a valid permission will eventually do the rest. De728631 (talk) 15:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:theodore Boborol.jpg

The image I uploaded is owned by Theodore Boborol who is a close friend of mine. I have permission to use this photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arisanthonee (talk • contribs) 19:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

They will need to use the COM:OTRS system to e-mail in confirmation of the permission they gave you to use this file. You will also need to explain your conflict of interest regarding the article you created on English Wikipedia. Nick (talk) 19:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Please note also that owning a copy of a photograph does not automatically make Mr. Boborol the copyright holder. Copyright is almost always held by the original photographer, so we need a permission coming directly from the photographer. De728631 (talk) 20:23, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
It's likely two separate photographers, as the user uploaded two different photographs under the same file name. The first photo was taken from IMDb and the second, from a newspaper. My guess is that Mr Boborol has told Arisanthonee just to take a photograph from the internet, which is why getting a copy of the permission they sent Arisanthonee is the first step - I wouldn't complicate things with mention of photographers and the like at this early stage. Nick (talk) 22:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Not done - please contact OTRS to provide evidence of permission - Jcb (talk) 23:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Skinlayers_(labeled).svg

I didn't receive any warning before the deletion of this derivative work of a picture already on commons File:Skinlayers (italiano).svg . I used FX derivative tools for the upload but I may have been done a mistake in the licensing. May I ask an undeletion and correction of the license rather than a speed deletion? Thanks--Chandres (talk) 23:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

@Chandres: You uploaded it with no information at all and no license. Please fix the images description page. For future uploads, please always check them after upload and fix them if needed, so that you don't cause unnecessary maintenance work. Jcb (talk) 23:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Restored, will be deleted again if not fixed. Jcb (talk) 23:24, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Fixed don't know what happened during the initial upload. Thanks--Chandres (talk) 23:30, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, everything seems fine now. Jcb (talk) 23:52, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ainu Woman of Frishikobets, on the Tokachi River.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I took that image from LANDOR, A. H. S. (1893). Alone with the Hairy Ainu, or, 3,800 miles on a pack saddle in Yezo and a cruise to the Kurile Islands ... With map, etc. London: J. Murray. The author died in 1924, that is: he has been dead for more than 70 years. So it is in the public domain according to UK law. Also, more than 100 years have passed since the publication of the book Silva Selva (talk) 23:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Restored - it's unclear whether Landor is the author of the drawing. Based on the date in the date field, it was just too new for {{PD-old-assumed}}, but this date seems to be incorrect. I have also fixed the license. Jcb (talk) 00:09, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Judensau_magdeburg_magdeburger_dom_ernstkapelle.jpg

Hello, i've forwared a second mail of the author to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. He agreed to release the picture under a CC license. Please restore the file and the description. The ticket is de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judensau#/media/File:Judensau_magdeburg_magdeburger_dom_ernstkapelle.jpg (siehe: Ticket#2017112510007153). New ticket: [Ticket#2017120710006543]. --KaterBegemot (talk) 12:51, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. ツ 15:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello Jeff, thanks for the kind reply and the big red oppose sign. I've sent the (second) permission today. Have a nice day. --KaterBegemot (talk) 17:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
@KaterBegemot: That is the normal 15px wide File:Symbol oppose vote.svg symbol used in all template-based oppose !votes on this project, nothing personal, your tickets will just have to wait their turns.   — Jeff G. ツ 23:22, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: As noted, must wait for its turn in the OTRS queue. User:KaterBegemot, please note that forwarded permissions are not usually accepted because they are too easy to forge. The license must come directly from the actual photographer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JamesMacDonaldDirector.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: new article in wikipedia. please undelete, and move to wiki, if licensing is an issue at commons. Aunva6 (talk) 18:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Since you created en:James MacDonald (actor) you presumably mean English Wikipedia. A photo of a living person will not be acceptable under en:Wikipedia:Non-free content unless something exceptional. Thuresson (talk) 20:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Requested action is not possible because WP:EN will not take it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:28, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Goni Aug 22 2015 Precipitation Daily Accumulated.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Under {{OGDL}}, see File:Khanun Oct 11-15 2017 Precipitation Accumulated in Taiwan.jpg as an example. No consensus in previous discussion. B dash (talk) 02:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Copy of closed NDR with no new information. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:26, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: If you mean Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2017-12#File:Goni Aug 22 2015 Precipitation Daily Accumulated.jpg, that was a COM:UDR, not "NDR".   — Jeff G. ツ 12:45, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Divine Brown mug shot.jpg

....."Officer Duhn informed me that all "mug shot" type photos from the L.A. Sheriff's dept. are public domain."Source. Mutter Erde (talk) 14:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

They are public records, but we would need a stronger statement about disclaiming copyright than that. The term "public domain" could be easily misconstrued -- Commons means that strictly in terms of copyright, but that may not be the understanding for others (especially in a public record context). However, {{PD-CAGov}} may suffice in this case. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 Support {{PD-CAGov}} is correct for all images of this sort from California. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Restored with {{PD-CAGov}} - Jcb (talk) 21:15, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ritratto di Gerolamo Martinengo.png

hi, I would like to ask for the restoration of the following portrait made by an unknown artist of the XVIIth Century. the file was deleted from the sock Daphne Lantier, although the file did not present any problems with the information added about the copyright --87.5.4.24 20:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

How sarcastic, a sockpuppet of a LTA uploads files, to see them deleted by another sockpuppet. Jcb (talk) 21:09, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: LTA A3cb1. --Guanaco (talk) 02:40, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lenovo-IdeaPad-720s-14-hero.png

This image was used to create a page for the new laptop model Lenovo IdeaPad 720s. It is meant to illustrate the laptop as it is & I am not using it to depict anything other than the mentioned brand & model. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satyajeet3987 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Commons does not accept fair-use images (see Commons:Fair use). The copyright to works must be licensed by the copyright owner. The best way is to take your own photos; photos you find on the Internet cannot be uploaded here under most circumstances. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:01, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 Not done “Copyright 2017 Lenovo. All rights reserved.” Thuresson (talk) 05:46, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Die Verwandlung.jpg

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren

Ichbon von Frau Tatjana Hauptmann beauftragt worden ihre Buchcover auf Wikipedia zu veröffentlichen. Da alle Bildrechte bei ihr liegen, wurde das Copyright nicht verletzt.

Dies gilbt auch für alle anderen Bilder, welche ich für Frau Tatjana Hauptmann hochgeladen habe.

Mit freundlichen Grüssen S.Daniel — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.Daniel (talk • contribs) 14:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ 15:21, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 Oppose In solchen Fällen benötigen wir eine Freigabe direkt durch die Künstler. Zur Wiederherstellung der Datei müsste uns Frau Hauptmann selbst eine E-Mail schicken, in der sie sich als Urheberin der Zeichnung legitimiert und die freie Lizenz bestätigt. Eine Anleitung dazu findet sich unter COM:OTRS/de. Merke: eine Creative Commons-Lizenz ist auch über Wikipedia hinaus gültig und gibt jedermann das Recht, die Zeichnung abzuändern und ggf. auch kommerziell zu verwerten. De728631 (talk) 15:22, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Requires free license from the artist using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gary Libby at the Stetson University Florida School of Art Exhibition.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017081910009124 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{Temporarily undeleted}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ 05:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: tagged OR. --Guanaco (talk) 08:21, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

@Guanaco: Thanks, no permission from the photographer or painter yet...   — Jeff G. ツ 11:16, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Isabella Garcia-Shapiro.png

This is edited and screenshot by me. I cropped this picture to make an avatar of a character of Phineas and Ferb. I will insert this on a page where it was created by an anonymous user. So how I violated its copyright? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuntukanTayo (talk • contribs) 20:50, 10 December 2017‎ (UTC)

 Oppose @SuntukanTayo: Phineas and Ferb are characters which are "© Disney, All Rights Reserved". You may not license derivative works of them.   — Jeff G. ツ 21:12, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Infringes on Disney copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

gb muzik wikipedia

--Gb muzik (talk) 15:13, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done Deletion request at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gb muzik pic.jpg is still open, image not deleted. Thuresson (talk) 22:12, 11 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Executive Judge Voltaire Antonio Y. Rosales.JPG

File photo is taken by me and i gave the license to the photo to the public for free. The painting itself is open to public for viewing.--Servicesacrifice (talk) 15:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. We need permission from the painter or reasons it qualifies for {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}.   — Jeff G. ツ 15:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose There are two copyrights here -- one for the photograph and one for the painting itself which is dated 2014. While the copyright for the photograph probably falls under Bridgeman, the copyright for the painting will be in force until fifty years after the death of the painter which would be 2064 if he or she died immediately after finishing the painting. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done Artist Vic Manansala Balilo born in 1965. Thuresson (talk) 22:08, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Mapa_Tampico_-_Muelle_Fiscal_a_Fuerte_Iturbide_-_1919.jpg

Please undelete this image: Mapa_Tampico_-_Muelle_Fiscal_a_Fuerte_Iturbide_-_1919.jpg

Also, this other one in the same situation: Mapa_-_Río_Pánuco_en_Tampico_-_1919.jpg

I realize that I was ignorant and careless and made many mistakes. I am doing my best to learn from those experiences and do this properly; thus, I got in touch with the publishers of the original map.

My message:

  • I wish to adapt a section of the map "Rí­os de Tabasco y Tampico 1919" from "A Handbook of Mexico, Great Britain. Naval Intelligence Division, 1919 " and use such adaptation in Wikipedia. Can I do that without infringing copyright? Please advise.

Their reply:

  • Yes, you can. We request that HathiTrust be attributed as the source of the digital images with the addition of "courtesy of HathiTrust" to the citation, and that links to the digital images be included where possible.

I may need your help in figuring out what edits I need to do.

Thanks, --Wkboonec (talk) 18:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Policy requires that the actual copyright holder must send a free license directly to OTRS. Note also that permission to use a work in Wikipedia is insufficient -- the license must allow use by anyone anywhere for any purpose, including commercial use. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Fine with me. Please cancel my request to undelete. Thanks.--Wkboonec (talk) 02:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done due to request cancellation (withdrawal) by Wkboonec.   — Jeff G. ツ 03:34, 12 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Germany, Music, Inc is authorized to represent this artist

File:Frasigan 2017.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Germany,Music,Inc (talk • contribs) 22:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done Nothing deleted, nothing to be undeleted, move along, nothing to see here, these are not the droids you are looking for.   — Jeff G. ツ 03:53, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:GreatMovieRideMarquee.jpg

There is no copyright violation here. I took the photo. It's my own work, and I grant permission to use it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick99nack (talk • contribs) 20:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose See COM:DW. Yann (talk) 21:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
May be OK, as per Jim below. Yann (talk) 17:04, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 Oppose This is the entrance to The Great Movie Ride, a discontinued ride at Disney's Hollywood Studios. There are two issues here.
First. is this utilitarian? Is it architecture? If the first, it does not have a copyright. If the second, it is pre-1990 US architecture and, therefore, also not copyrighted. I am inclined to think that it is architecture and therefore OK.
Second, we have several other versions of the marquee. File:The Great Movie Ride indoor marquee.jpg, is a similar image which is in use and shows that marquee in a better way without as many people in the way.
Therefore, while I think this is OK, I think it is inferior to the other version and should not be restored. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Ten days has passed with no further comment and no support for restoration. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:09, 12 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpgmy pics for dermatology educational purpose,it scientific

Mohammad mahmoud 13:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC) My pics for dermatology learning, with different positions for diagnosis and choice of the treatment,it been for educationally purpose,you shouldn't delete because many people benefit from,my price educational,scientific form,my prices current,more updates every day, interactive I think my pics it the most scientific educational form in wiki competition,I offer real learning for people and medical students — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masryy (talk • contribs) 13:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

The only file from that user's contributions that was deleted is File:Scleroderma new page.jpg, for being a copyright violation. There are otherwise a large number of current uploads. seb26 (talk) 14:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Masryy for the remainder of his uploads. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose This image has an explicit copyright notice in a watermark. In order for it to be restored, an authorized official of Blackwell Science Ltd. must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: A week has passed with no further comment. All of the remainder of this user's uploads have also been deleted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:09, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg Soy propietario de esta fotografía.

Me han borrado una foto diciendo que no soy el propietario intelectual y si lo soy. Figuran los datos de mi cámara Canon y las personas que aparecen en la fotografía yo las conozco. En una de ellas figuro yo mismo: Marcio Suchowolski. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 168.194.206.183 (talk) 11:41, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done Users without account can not upload images. Thuresson (talk) 12:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Frasigan 2017.jpg

(The image is licensed under a Creative Commons license for more information here is the artist's email info@FrasiganMusic.com | Facebook@FrasiganMusic.com) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michelle San (talk • contribs) 17:16, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done File is not deleted, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Frasigan 2017.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 17:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chaisson's figure.jpg

I believe I have obtained all necessary permissions for posting this figure in Wikipedia. I obtained written permission from the author and the journal in which it was published. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wagersmith (talk • contribs) 02:30, 6 December 2017‎ (UTC)

 Oppose In order for this to be restored to Commons, the author, Eric J. Chaisson, must send a free license directly to OTRS. Note also that "all necessary permissions for posting this figure in Wikipedia" is insufficient. Both WP:EN and Commons require that images be free for any use by anyone anywhere, including commercial use, and not just in Wikipedia. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jim. Please get in touch with Wikimedia volunteers via email after reading COM:OTRS and COM:ET. Green Giant (talk) 20:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

This is my pics — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saeedkhanbozdar786 (talk • contribs) 04:39, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose First, all three of your images have appeared on the Web without a free license, so policy requires that in ordeer to keep them, the actual photographer, not the subject (unless it is a selfie), must send a free license using OTRS.

Second, While we allow a limited number of personal images for the user pages of active contributors, "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. See COM:SCOPE.. Even if the photographer were to send a free license, they would not be restored unless and until you become an active contributor of images useful for educational purposes. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jim. Green Giant (talk) 20:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:leven and his girls.jpg

This picture was tagged with proper licence and has been in use in multiple sites on Wikipedia. Since when is "personal picture" a reason for deletion. If the title is 'sexist' - rename it.--Lamilli (talk) 14:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per Jeff and Jcb. Green Giant (talk) 10:36, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vaporis.jpg

This is a photo of Rev. Dr. Nomikos Vaporis (deceased) taken at his place of employment, Hellenic College, which has provided the photo and the permission to publish it. I have a copy of the permission letter but see no place to upload it. I will copy it below. Please allow it to be published as part of the biography.

Thank you,

CNV


November 3, 2017


To Whom it may Concern,

Hellenic College Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology (HCHC) grants permission to Dr. Constantine N. Vaporis to use/distribute/post the attached picture.

The referenced picture is a photograph of his father, Rev. Dr. Nomikos M. Vaporis. The original picture is the property of HCHC, resides here on our campus, and was taken during his time here.


Thank you.


Kosta E. Alexis Vice President, Institutional Advancement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cvaporis (talk • contribs) 21:26, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

@Cvaporis: Please have them send it via OTRS. I think this was regarding File:Rev. Dr. Nomikos Michael Vaporis.jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ 21:45, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 Oppose Cvaporis please note that the fact that the college may own a paper copy of a photo says nothing about their owning the right to freely license it. That right is almost always held by the photographer or his heirs. If the college sends a free license using OTRS as requested above, they must include proof that they actually own the right to freely license the image. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per Jim. Green Giant (talk) 10:37, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pixel 2 Box & Phone Photo .jpg

This photo was taken in my studio with my equipment under my business. The screen saver is original work by me as well. Why is this being flagged?--Idallas (talk) 00:40, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

@Idallas:  Oppose as COM:DW unless you also designed the phone and packaging.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
@Idallas: I am the one who marked that image for speedy deletion because it's a photo primarily depicting the copyrighted product by Google. Please see Commons:Derivative works. Unless you have somehow gotten permission from Google to take pictures of their products, I'm afraid it'll have to stay deleted, whenever it was shot by a studio or not. theinstantmatrix (talk) 03:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose I disagree with my two colleagues above. The phone itself is a utilitarian object and does not have a copyright in the USA. However, there are two photographs in the image -- the one on the phone and the one on the box. Both of them have copyrights and this is a DW of them. While it is possible that the photograph shown on the phone was taken by Idallas, the one on the box is obviously from Google. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per the copyright status of both photos in the image. Green Giant (talk) 10:39, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ib logo copy.jpg

با سلام تصویر آپلود شده با لوگو شرکت که برای مناسبات اداری استفاده میشود متفاوت است لوگو مذکور جهت شبکه های اجتماعی و ویکی پدیا تهیه شده و از طرف طراح و شرکت تامین سرمایه نوین اجازه تکثیر دارد در ضمن حذف کل صفحه منطقی به نظر نمی آید با توجه به لینک های ارائه شده از منابع معتبر لطفا در بازیابی صفحه همکاری لازم را انجام دهید. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karimishadi (talk • contribs) 06:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, the image uploaded with the company logo that is used for office administration is different. The logo is for social networking and Wikipedia, and it is authorized by the designer and the company to provide new capital, while removing the whole page does not look logical. Pay attention to the links provided by the authoritative resources.
translator: Google
@Karimishadi:
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Image has been reuploaded. Uploading an image that has been deleted is a serious violation of Commons rules and wastes your time and ours.   — Jeff G. ツ 10:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per Jeff. Green Giant (talk) 10:39, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ESCUDO_ANTIGUO_HUÉTOR.jpg

Este escudo pertenece a un club de balonmano desaparecido en 1995. Así que no tiene ningún derecho de autor. --Jompy (talk) 19:13, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

This shield belongs to a handball club that disappeared in 1995. So it does not have any copyright.
translator: Google Translate

 Oppose The fact that the club is no longer in existence does not mean that there is no copyright. It may be owned by the designer of the logo, one of the people or companies who participated in the closure of the club, or it may be an Orphan Copyright. We do not host copyrighted works, even if they are orphans. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:40, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per Jim. Green Giant (talk) 10:40, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Edwina Rogers - 2017.jpg

I have permission from Edwina Rogers to upload the file. She sent the necessary Creative Commons Attribution email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org from her email address at the organization (healthspanpolicy.org) where the image appears online. Nathan Wailes (talk) 00:51, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. ツ 07:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per Jeff. Unfortunately OTRS queues are long, and volunteers few and far between. Green Giant (talk) 10:41, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nude on a Red Chair, by Alasdair Gray (1964).jpg

Hello,

This deletion was requested on the grounds that Alasdair Gray had not approved its use. I relayed this to Alasdair last week, and he has since written to Wikipedia permissions to OK this usage. The photographer of the image, Peter McNally, has also written Wiki permissions to approve the use of his photograph (that is, he has granted it CCA status).

Can someone please restore this photograph to the gallery? I have tried (unsuccessfully) to undo the deletion.

Thanks.

Heartoftheworld88 (talk) 11:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.:Permission was sent via OTRS per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nude on a Red Chair, by Alasdair Gray (1964).jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ 13:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Must wait for license to reach the head of the OTRS queue in two months or so. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:32, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS requests: 14:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Request temporary undeletion to evaluate the following files with their respective tickets:

seb26 (talk) 14:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Seb26: please let me know the outcome of your investigation. Green Giant (talk) 10:26, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

[🎅COACH Z⚾] (talk) 16:28, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose No file specified. Thuresson (talk) 17:20, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Thuresson. We cannot speculate which file was intended. Green Giant (talk) 10:30, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Idlenomore2012ottawa.jpg

This is a photograph that I took myself and uploaded to wikipedia. Why was this image deleted? Now the article for "idle no more" has no images and is lacking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve348 (talk • contribs) 02:46, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. @Steve348: Please read Commons:Deletion requests/File:Idlenomore2012ottawa.jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:15, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 Not done Photo by David Akin while the uploader presents himself as "Steve". Thuresson (talk) 20:41, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nothing Without What And Love.jpg

--Theolwrnc (talk) 23:15, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

The file has not yet been deleted; you can still prevent that from happening by providing evidence that the original work is actually yours or that you have permission from the copyright owner.—Odysseus1479 (talk)

 Not done: per Odysseus1479. Green Giant (talk) 09:40, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Deletion of File:Hyderabad Bengali Film Festival.png

The file belongs to us and has no way violated the terms & policy of Wikimedia Commons. Please restore the file.

--Rahulbasu16 (talk) 07:10, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Policy requires that since we do not know who you actually are, an authorized official of the film festival must send a free license using OTRS. Alternately, the film festival can change http://hbff.in/

"© HBFF 2016"

to

"© HBFF 2016, HBFF logo is CC-BY"

The OTRS e-mail will take several months to reach the head of the queue there, while the change to the web site can result in immediate restoration of the image. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:47, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done No change of copyright status at the web site yet. Uploader has received information about OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 21:57, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SirTheBaptist-8 (002).png

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017091210020247 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{Temporarily undeleted}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ 12:57, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done @Jeff G.: Thuresson (talk) 21:57, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: temp undeletion expired. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:לוח שנה מודפס.jpg

Also:

Hi,

Please undelete this file, and other files deleted from this draft. I have the owners (WOW) permission to use said images in the page, and they were sent to me by them. They are original files from the company.

Many thanks :) Limor 13.12.17 Lem4 (talk) 14:24, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose First, "permission to use said images in the page" is not sufficient. Images for Commons and WP must be free for any use anywhere by anyone, not just in WP. Second, in order to restore the images, the actual copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:30, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ 21:13, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JacquesPrado.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I have new information about this rejected image in 2016. The person represented died in 1928. The author is unknown, but this photograph was published on March 30, 1928 in a French newspaper "Le Petit Parisien". http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6071641/f1.item.r=jacques.prado.zoom

Can you confirm that this 96-year-old publication authorizes the use of this document under the Public Domain license for France (and the European Union?)

In this case, how to reactivate this document. Which license to use? PD-France PD-old PD-EU Costemane (talk) 15:55, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Not eligible for Template:PD-old-assumed. Thuresson (talk) 16:56, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pottersville album cover.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This is the album cover for the content described in the article. The appropriate permissions have been granted by the record label. Besides, aren't all album images copy written? LaCroizy (talk) 16:22, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Information for copyright owners is available at Commons:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 19:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DBU - Colombo.jpg

The image is a photo taken by me in February 2014 when I visited the Dutch Burgher Union of Ceylon in Colombo. The nominator stated in their request for deletion that the image was taken from http://bombaywalla.org/the-dutch-burgher-union-of-ceylon-1908/, (which was published in October 2015) if you examine both images alongside each other you will clearly see that whilst it is the same subject that they are two completely different photos. I took the photo when I visited the DBU in February 2014, which I included on my personal travel blog]. I am fairly certain that I have since deleted the image from my camera's digital memory card given that it is almost 4 years ago now, but I will be checking to see whether I still have the image details. It should be noted that I did include a brief comment in the talkpage before the image was deleted however the administrator, Jcb either did not read the comments or choose to ignore them before proceeding with the deletion of the image. On the basis of the above I am seeking the image be restored. Dan arndt (talk) 03:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

 Comment why does the resolution of the photo make it unlikely to be mine? This comes from the same individual who believes that two different photos are exactly the same. Dan arndt (talk) 13:26, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
have placed notice of free licence on my travel blog. Dan arndt (talk) 13:26, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: I restored the image now, if someone is concerned about DW please raise a regular DR. --JuTa 09:23, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Andrew Lerios.png

Image was provided by owner with permission. Permission was simply not tagged. Please reinstate.

Tigg08 @ 12.13.2017 @4PM PST — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiggs08 (talk • contribs) 23:54, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Please see instructions at Commons:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 06:40, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. Ruthven (msg) 11:16, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Monikko.jpg

This photo is taken in a public place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merimiesei (talk • contribs) 15:17, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose No copyright license. Also published previously with a much higher quality at monikkosali.fi. Thuresson (talk) 09:43, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. Ruthven (msg) 11:16, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Poster-film-la-notte-che-verra.jpg‬

Con la presente dichiaro di essere l'autore e il solo possessore dei diritti d'autore esclusivi dell'opera [‪File:Poster-film-la-notte-che-verra.jpg ]. Acconsento alla pubblicazione dell'opera con la licenza libera Creative Commons Attribution 4.0]. Riconosco di concedere a chiunque il diritto di usare l'opera anche per scopi commerciali e di poterla modificare secondo le proprie necessità a condizione di rispettare i termini della licenza e tutte le altre leggi applicabili. Sono cosciente che la licenza libera riguarda solamente il copyright e mi riservo il diritto di intraprendere un'azione legale contro chiunque utilizzi l'opera in modo diffamatorio o in violazione delle leggi sulla persona, sui marchi, ecc. Riconosco che non posso ritirare questo accordo e che l'opera potrebbe essere permanentemente conservata in uno dei progetti Wikimedia. [14/12/2017 LUCA MARTINELLI] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucamartinelli1966 (talk • contribs) 15:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: @Lucamartinelli1966: Devi inviarci l'autorizzazione a permissions-it@wikimedia.org dall'email indicato nella sezione contatti del sito http://www.lucamartinelli.com/nottefilm/. Altrimenti non abbiamo modo di verificare l'autorizzazione. Ruthven (msg) 11:12, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cisne en Zürichsee - panoramio.jpg

It was deleted, but was used in the article Цифровой шум изображения at ru-wiki. In scope. --Insider (talk) 08:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose You cannot save one of your uploads from being deleted for poor quality by inserting it into an article after the DR was initiated. That does not make it "in use" for the purpose of deciding whether it has educational value.

Also note that COM:SCOPE explicitly forbids this sort of "in use". Using it as an example in Цифровой шум изображения (Digital Image Noise) is exactly what this forbids:

" the fact that an unused blurred photograph could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Common mistakes in photography does not mean that we should keep [it]".

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done From Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cisne en Zürichsee - panoramio.jpg. Added to an article about "Digital image noise" after nomination. Thuresson (talk) 14:04, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sayedabdelaziz.jpg

We are the owners of this content and agree to use it in Wikipedia according to your policy .

Why are they being omitted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sayabel (talk • contribs) 14:13, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for you help @Jeff G.: --Alaa :)..! 12:57, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per Jim, Jeff and Alaa. Green Giant (talk) 12:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Haze in Mosque, Pekanbaru.jpg

Request to undelete:

Reason for undeletion: alamy.com has these pictures in their website, but it is very likely that they copied them from Wikipedia or from Commons. I don't know alamy.com and how reliable it is, but I know people who took those photos and gave me permission to upload to Wikipedia, and they have nothing to do with alamy.com and none of them are called "Paul Fearn" as alamy.com claimed. The images were deleted very quickly after nomination (just 3 hours), giving me almost no time to respond. It was a couple of years ago and I don't remember all the details, but if you restore the files so that I can read the file history and the description I added when I uploaded them, I'll be able to corraborate my story. RedaolPku (talk) 08:43, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Pinging Jcb and B dash who deleted these files (or proposed their deletion). RedaolPku (talk) 08:45, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
As mentioned before, you have to provide the link from Facebook and the given permission from the authors. --B dash (talk) 08:46, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
They're in whatsapp and facebook messages from a couple of years ago. It will be hard to find them, but even if I do they're private conversations, I need to have their permission to share. Also, in File:Haze Pontianak Mosque 2015.jpg you said it's from alamy.com, but I didn't see you provided any evidence? RedaolPku (talk) 08:52, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
http://c8.alamy.com/comp/KJ3DTY/haze-pontianak-mosque-2015-KJ3DTY.jpg. --B dash (talk) 08:58, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
B dash: Another evidence in my favor: your "Paul Fearn" guy who uploaded these pictures liked to copy from commons e.g. see [1] and [2] and [3] and [4], [5] and [6] on totally unrelated subjects, with very different quality and uploaded to Commons by a different user than me. How likely is it that this guy is active in the USA, Israel, and Singapore, Indonesia on vastly different topics, very widely different photo quality and got his pictures stolen by multiple Commons users? RedaolPku (talk) 09:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
In fact if you see Paul Fearn's uploads to alamy.com [7], browse images at random, and search the file name in Commons, you'll find them all here uploaded by different users. Do you still believe his claims? RedaolPku (talk) 09:18, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Completely aside from the question of their appearance on alamy.com, these files are not acceptable for Commons. All of them have

"Source=The author sent it to me and told me it's ok to upload to the public domain."

That is not an acceptable source. The actual photographer must be named and must send a free license using OTRS.

There is also the question of their poor quality -- they illustrate the SE Asia haze, so that is not an issue, but they are all poorly composed and cropped. Two of them show a mosque with a large bush in the foreground, blocking the view. Just because the haze degrades their quality does not mean that they should be poor images otherwise. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:38, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

comment - do you have any better pictures to offer, to illustrate the subject? because otherwise/until/unless you do, the observation about their quality is, irrelevant; if not, as you would say "out of order". #justsaying Lx 121 (talk) 19:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Jim: Thanks for your pointing to OTRS. According to it, looks like I need to ask the photographers to explicitly grant permission using a boilerplate template. I can try to do that, but can the pages please be undeleted first? I need the original pages to find out the author's name so that I can contact them (they're named in the description), and so that I can point them to the page instead of just saying "remember that haze picture you took 2 years ago?". According to Commons:Deletion requests, discussions are normally done for seven days to allow for the uploader to show evidence, but in this case the pages were deleted 3 hours after nomination, so I didn't have time to find/collect evidence and respond. RedaolPku (talk) 17:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
@RedaolPku: just to clarify, these were not standard deletion requests (which should last a minimum of seven days). Instead these were nominated as speedy deletions, which can be deleted instantly if the deleting admin is satisfied that there is doubt about the copyright status of the file. Green Giant (talk) 20:11, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Jim. Unacceptable source. However, re the bush, I suppose it could be in frame to show that the lens was not fogged over and there was no mechanical reason for the apparent haze.   — Jeff G. ツ 13:12, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
@RedaolPku: I have temporarily restored these five files. You have 48 hours to download them to your computer/phone/device to help your with tracking the authors. This is a strict limit - the files will be deleted again in two days unless licences are forthcoming. Obviously they will be restored if licenses arrive after re-deletion. Please be aware of our burden of proof policy, which means YOU must demonstrate why the files should be kept rather than other users having to prove they should not be kept. So please focus on contacting the people you state are the photographers. Green Giant (talk) 20:11, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
@Green Giant: Thanks for the restore. I am contacting the photographers right away. Hopefully they get my message and respond to OTRS in time, but I'm a bit worried as it's been two years. As background, when the 2015 SE Asia haze happened I felt bad because natural disasters in third world countries often don't have much coverage, including in terms of pictures in the Wiipedia pages. So I used social media to ask people in the affected area if they were willing to volunteer their photos to the public domain. Because many don't know how to use Commons I offered to upload for them. I specifically confirmed with them that they were the photographers, and that they agreed to release the photos to the public domain. I didn't realize that this means there has to be an OTRS process, I thought it would be similar to uploading one's own photo where one doesn't have to do any OTRS. Had I known this I guess I should have ask them to learn how to use Commons. But anyway, thanks for the restore. RedaolPku (talk) 04:59, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I have added the {{OTRS received}} tag to those four files. Having looked at the links provided by RedaolPku, I am not confident that Paul Fearn is the copyright holder for any of these images. He has some 22,000 images to his credit on Alamy including numerous old photos which cannot be his work unless he is over 100 years old (unlikely but not impossible). I suggest leaving this section open for a bit longer but the 48-hour limit remains on the last file. Green Giant (talk) 23:32, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Four files restored with OTRS received but one deleted because no email received yet. Green Giant (talk) 12:09, 18 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Oficina de edição no IAT 02.jpg

These files were deleted today by JuTa for not having permission since September. They actually have permission: see this ticket. I thought the ticket had been resolved as the ticket was closed, but it seems the pages weren't updated. Please, tell me if anything is missing. Thanks.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Teles: please amend the file pages as appropriate. Green Giant (talk) 12:43, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Palembang Administrative Map.png

I don't think this file has low or inconsistent resolution. The reason this file should been kept because this is the only map of Palembang that contains administration division. Bondguevara (talk) 04:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose The fact that it is "the only map of Palembang that contains administration division" is irrelevant if it is a copyright violation. Given your record, the fact that the map is small suggests that it is a copyright violation. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:47, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

an observation - instead of "talking this to death", why doesn't some clever admin, who can access the deleted file, just trace/copy/whatever the information onto a wiki-standard map? that would seem to be the most useful & helpful thing to do here, no? Lx 121 (talk) 21:45, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jeff and Jim. If anyone wants to try to recreate it and needs to see it, drop me a note and I’ll get you a copy. Green Giant (talk) 01:21, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:K._Kumar;_Travanvore_Kumar_;_Elanthoor_Gandhi_during_his_last_days_-4.jpg

Dear Ju Ta, this file deleted is owned by PhotoReq which is this editor. He is its absolute owner (NOT any other third party) and has alreay and unambiguously declared it. He ("I", if you wish it to be referred so for clarity) can officially and legally enetr into a binding agreement on this right if so required! Kindly de-delete the files affected. (File: K. Kumar, Travancore Kumar.......). Thanks and kind regards... — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhotoReq (talk • contribs) 05:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose I doubt very much that User:PhotoReq is the actual photographer of this 1973 image as claimed in the file description. The photograph is still under copyright. While PhotReq may own a paper copy of the original photograph, the copyright and the right to freely license the image almost certainly remains with the photographer of the original 1973 image. In order for it to be restored here, PhotoReq must either (a) prove (using OTRS) that he actually owns the copyright to the 1973 image or (b) get the 1973 photographer or his heirs to send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jim. Green Giant (talk) 12:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:تندیس مادر چرام.jpg

similare case, wase created in 1965 and public presentationmore more than 50 years. but removed by this delete rquest for COM:FOP in iran. --Mr.Polaz (talk) 19:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose The image infringes on the copyright for the sculpture. Copyright in Iran lasts for fifty years after the death of the sculptor, so unless the sculptor of this 1965 work died within two years after its creation, it is still under copyright. It can be restored only if you can prove that the sculptor died before 1967 or if the sculptor sends a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jim. Green Giant (talk) 12:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:قحطی بنگال.jpg

its old photo. older than 50 years — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saboor63 (talk • contribs) 21:02, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Fifty years is far too recent to assume that it is out of copyright. In most countries, copyright lasts for seventy years after the death of the author. Also note that "Source=Internet" is unacceptable" -- the actual page of the source must be named. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jim. Green Giant (talk) 12:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Muay Thai Fight.jpg

I am the copyright holder, as I stated in my reply. I don't understand why it was deleted in the first place. Nanorsuaq (talk) 07:17, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose As noted at the deletion request, policy requires that when the image has been used elsewhere that the actual copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jim. Green Giant (talk) 12:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Artist Pen Dalton's Painting M10 30 on display at Huddersfield Art Gallery, 2014.jpg

Please undelete this image as it is a photograph taken by myself at the exhibition in situ and I wish to use it as an example of Pen Dalton's work. Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ipingalex (talk • contribs) 13:37, 19 December 2017‎ (UTC)

 Oppose The photograph infringes on Pen Dalton's copyright for his work and cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from Dalton via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done Need permission from en:Pen Dalton. Thuresson (talk) 14:29, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:David Blaine performs a card trick for Barack Obama at the White House, 2016.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017092110027152 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{Temporarily undeleted}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ 05:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: Undeleted and tagged OR. --Guanaco (talk) 06:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Misterdc

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS Permission Confirmed via Ticket 2017121210012661 under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. Clarkcj12 (talk) 06:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Images undeleted and I've tagged them as well. --Guanaco (talk) 06:39, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

"Plano francés" - Revista Jarocha (1966) - L'Illustration (1914)

Please undelete this image: File:PLANO_FRANCES_-_Pasquel,_Rev_Jarocha,_Abr-1966,_p30_Prairie_en_amarillo,_Florida_y_Utah_en_rojo.jpg

It is my adaptation of the "plan" that is now in Wikisource Plano francés

The "plan" was originally published by "L'Illustration" in 1914. I used the copy that was published in 1966 by "Revista Jarocha".

I have both of these magazine issues. I took the five photos that are now in Wikisource and uploaded them, as I remember, to Wikimedia.

Thanks,--Wkboonec (talk) 19:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

  • Hm. Is this the image of the map alone, or the entire article ? It sounds like the article was written by a Louis Botte, whose date of death has not been determined. If the map was done by someone else at the newspaper, it would seem to have been published anonymously, and thus PD-anon-70-EU (and PD-1923). If the map was authored by Mr. Botte, it gets more difficult, as the copyright would last 70 years after death. It's fine for the U.S. part of policy, so we would just need to determine what the French copyright term would be. Hrm... he wrote a book in 1913, Au cœur du Maroc. Ooh -- per this 1918 publication, he died fighting for France in WWI (Louis Botte, qui raconta son voyage au Maroc et mourut depuis А l'ennemi, sur le front de France). While that would add the 30-year extension for "dying for France", plus the two wartime extensions of 14 years and change, to the original 50pma term (not shortened by the EU copyright), I think that would be expired by now (though just in the last few years).  Support Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Per here, Botte died for France on April 19, 1918, and is buried at Verdun. His copyright would have expired in 2014 then, probably. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:00, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Per Carl’s reasoning. @Wkboonec: . Green Giant (talk) 18:19, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tradiciones peruanas 1893.jpg

(Tengo entendido que para que un archivo sea de contenido libre tiene que tener más de 100 años, o que el autor haya fallecido hace mas de 70 años. Pues esta obra fue publicada en 1893, con lo cual el archivo cumpliría con todos los criterios para poder estar en Commons. Saludos!)

I understand that for a file to be free content must have more than 100 years, or that the author has died more than 70 years ago. Because this work was published in 1893, with which the file would meet all the criteria to be in Commons. Regards!
--Miguel Alan Córdova Silva (talk) 07:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Deleting Admin was Ronhjones.   — Jeff G. ツ 08:35, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Miguel Alan Córdova Silva: . This is a scan of an 1893 book cover by an author who died in 1919. Green Giant (talk) 18:36, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Головной офис Башкомснаббанка в Уфе.jpg

Добрый день! Данный файл не нарушает авторских прав, т.к. я сама сделала фото на фотоаппарат. как можно решить данную проблему? (

Good afternoon! This file does not infringe copyrights. I myself took a photo on the camera. How can this problem be solved? ( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timelrika (talk • contribs) 08:48, 19 December 2017‎ (UTC)

@Timelrika: This file was allegedly grabbed from https://i3.photo.2gis.com/images/branch/17/2392537324628043_dbe9.jpg - can you explain?   — Jeff G. ツ 09:02, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
  • I took this photo, as well as other photo offices as a private (free) photographer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timelrika (talk • contribs) 09:24, 19 December 2017‎ (UTC)
  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 09:35, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ 09:34, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Ok. I will sign my comments. Do not block and my photos, please, I'm just learning =)Timelrika (talk) 09:45, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
  • How do I send a free license directly using OTRS. What must I wil do?Timelrika (talk) 09:51, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
@Timelrika: Please click on the link OTRS and read there.   — Jeff G. ツ 09:56, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jim. Please ask the copyright holder to contact Wikimedia with a license after reading COM:ET. Green Giant (talk) 03:00, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Enchiridion.jpg

This was deleted for lacking a license. However, it may be a slavish copy that falls under {{PD-Art}}, per Jim at the deletion discussion. Pinging also User:Ellin Beltz who suggested deletion prior to Jim's {{Vk}}. Storkk (talk) 11:23, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

 Support Trinity College, Dublin, claims copyright. This is a photo of an old manuscript book, taken straight on, using a copy stand with clamps for the book. Although the book is, of course, 3D, the photo is clearly intended to be a "slavish copy" of the 2D manuscript and therefore qualifies for Bridgeman. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: 1524 manuscript. PD-old-100-1923 . CropTool seems to be unresponsive at the moment so I will try cropping later today, unless someone beats me to it. Green Giant (talk) 02:57, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by User:IPhone 9

--IPhone 9 (talk) 17:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose The files you've listed are not screenshots, but are photographs of objects with captions and visual art (wallpapers) overlaid. We don't know who created this art or where it came from. Without a source, we can't verify any license. The examples you listed may also be candidates for deletion, because we don't know where the wallpapers came from. It's possible they're included in the Android Open Source Project, but I doubt it. Google and Samsung bundle other works on their phones, which generally aren't freely licensed. Guanaco (talk) 02:01, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Note in the licensing template you included above: "If the screenshot shows any work that is not a direct result of the program code itself, such as a text or graphics that are not part of the program, the license for that work must be indicated separately." Guanaco (talk) 02:02, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Guanaco and ViperSnake151. Green Giant (talk) 04:37, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Miyonse Amosu.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I published the original image (File:Miyonse Amosu.jpg) on Wikimedia. The other copy of this image that is online was crawled by google bots from a youtube video. Adetokunbohs (talk) 15:09, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Uploaded to WikiCommons on December 10, 2017. Uploaded to Twitter August 26, 2017. Thuresson (talk) 18:21, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Thuresson. Green Giant (talk) 04:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Photo-timeline-1953.jpg

Hi,

Would it be possible to restore this image - Photo-timeline-1953.jpg? It is owned by us (La Cordée) so this is why we used it on our La Cordée wikipedia page.

Thanks

--David Royy (talk) 16:30, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose You say "it is owned by us". Are you the actual photographer? Do you have a formal written transfer of the copyright or license from the photographer or his heirs? Owning a paper or digital copy of a photograph does not give you the right to freely license it any more than owning a book gives you the right to make and sell copies of it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jim. Green Giant (talk) 04:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files of User:Laramie1960 for fair use in Wikipedias

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017081710018172 alleges permission for these files sufficient for fair use on Wikipedias with UDRs. Request temporary undeletion for transfer to such Wikipedias, mark as {{Temporarily undeleted}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ 17:39, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: . Please let me know when the files are no longer needed. Green Giant (talk) 04:32, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fastcom 12 login.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: http://www.fastcom.fors.ru/web_files/Info/Pictures (The images synthesized by Fastcom 12, do not contain confidential information and can be freely copied and distributed (whole / fragments) - based on the Creative Commons license.

http://www.fastcom.fors.ru/web_files/Info/Pictures#FLOGIN TRustRust (talk) 07:53, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ 14:41, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
WEB archive from 2014: images are synthesized by Fastcom, do not contain confidential information and can be freely copied and distributed as a whole, or fragments: http://web.archive.org/web/20140119202743/http://fastcom.fors.ru:80/web_files/Info/Pictures. TRustRust (talk) 11:54, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 Support This looks like a PD-author type of licence or at least a custom free licence. Copying, and distributing and the making of derivatives (which is included in distribution "in fragments") are covered by the archived statement. De728631 (talk) 23:25, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Permission is on software manufacturer web site. I don't see a problem that it appeared later then files were uploaded. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
This: http://www.fastcom.fors.ru/web_files/Info/Pictures. (see the first sentence - an indication of Creative Commons by attribution 4.0). Do you need more? TRustRust (talk) 08:40, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Source has CC-BY-SA-4.0 link. @TRustRust: . Green Giant (talk) 10:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Иван_Рудской_как_всегда_(cropped).jpg

Есть связи с Иваном и он не против, чтобы в Википедии были бы использованы какие-либо его фото. Как я могу это доказать? Aristocrat2008 (talk) 16:31, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Commons:OTRS or ru:Википедия:OTRS Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:47, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Carl Lindberg. Green Giant (talk) 10:41, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo Radio Campus Angers.png

Bonjour,

J’aimerais comprendre pourquoi ce fichier a été supprimé ?

J’en suis le créateur, et faisant parti du CA de Radio Campus Angers, j’en possède pleinement les droits. Les autres radios ont leur logo (ou n’importe qu’elle Asso ou entreprise), qu’elle est la différence ici ?

Merci

PS : je suis allé voir dans les logs d’effacement, je ne l’ai pas trouvé...

Shiwut (talk) 07:24, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Bonjour Shiwut,
Tout d'abord, non, la plupart des radios, entreprises ou associations n'ont pas leur logo sur Commons ; seulement celles sont dont le logo est très simple (du texte uniquement par exemple) ou celles dont l'auteur du logo a libéré les droits d'auteur.
Si vous possédez les droits d'auteur sur ce logo, vous pouvez les abandonner pour pouvoir placer le logo sous une licence libre compatible avec Wikimedia Commons. Dans ce cas, vous pouvez envoyer un courriel à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org avec un message comme celui-ci Commons:Messages type#Déclaration de consentement
Pour notification : @Christian Ferrer: .
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 08:32, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Bonjour VIGNERON,
Merci pour votre réponse, j'avoue que cette histoire de droit est très obscure pour moi, mais je comprend le bienfondé de la démarche.
Le logo n'étant déposé nul part, il est donc libre de droit par défaut, non ? Quand je signalais en posséder les droits, c'était simplement du fait que j'en suis le créateur.
Cordialement
Shiwut (talk) 09:09, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Bonjour Shiwut,
Malheureusement (ou heureusement pour les créateurs), par défaut tout création est automatiquement et comlètement protégée sans que la moindre démarche soit nécessaire (ou comme le dit le code de la propriété intellectuelle, art 111-1 « L'auteur d'une oeuvre de l'esprit jouit sur cette oeuvre, du seul fait de sa création, d'un droit de propriété incorporelle exclusif et opposable à tous. »).
Du coup pour libérer une création, une démarche est par contre nécessaire. Ici, un simple mail reprenant le texte donné en exemple et envoyé à l'adresse indiqué suffira pour libérer et donc faire restaurer le logo.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:28, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Comme l'a trés bien indiqué mon collègue, le fichier sera automatiquement restauré si une permission est envoyé. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:나인뮤지스 'Love City' 4K 직캠 by DaftTaengk.png

File source # license ({{Youtube}}) looks good, have no idea why this was deleted as no permission when the License review passed? If user was directly uploading the full video - yes, it needs permission from copyright owner of the music, but it isn't. Of course I can undelete it right away, but maybe I'm missing something here, so UDEL. — regards, Revi 05:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Per above and cc-by-3.0 at source. Green Giant (talk) 21:11, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Yaalon_Award_-_front.jpg

the picture is original! they appear elsewhere in the web because it was sent to other places as well — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam0707 (talk • contribs) 06:05, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose In that case policy requires that the actual copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose. The default assumption that we make on Commons is that every image found on other websites is copyright-protected unless there is evidence to the contrary. The photo is on the Internet because it is on the website of the organisation that makes the Award (iuss.org/index.php?article id=631), which would naturally be the original source of the photo. That doesn’t mean anyone can upload it here as their own work with a license of their own choice. That right belongs, by default, to:
  • the person(s)/organization who designed/made/commissioned the award; and
  • the person who took the photo of the award, and
  • the person who took the original photo that forms the core of the award.
We will need at least one and quite possibly three separate licenses in order to host this photo and it’s counterpart (the reverse side which you also uploaded). The onus to prove that the photo should be kept on Commons is on the uploader and/or users supporting retention of the photo. Green Giant (talk) 11:58, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 Not done See Commons:Derivative works. Thuresson (talk) 06:43, 22 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Roberto Maidana periodista Telenoche Canal 13.jpg

Please restore the following page:

Reason: The picture that I included in the biography page, is MY OWN JOB because I have enhanced and cropped and retouched for over the original picture, and since it is not the same as the original picture in more than 60% I consider it as MY OWN JOB and it should be just the picture should be restored to the biography page. 186.136.35.100 16:08, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done See Commons:Derivative works. Thuresson (talk) 06:46, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Geneviève Guilbault.jpg

It seems the photos I uploaded for Quebec MNA Genevieve Guilbault (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genevi%C3%A8ve_Guilbault) has been removed for copyright issues. The photo is owned by the political party that I work for and we want our photos to be used by Wikipedia on our MNAs pages. This photo was uploaded without any copyright violation (The author Émilie Foster specified on the file description gave her agreement). Actually, when you Google "Geneviève Guilbault" in french there seems to be a picture of someone else with the same name attached to her Wikipedia page. That's why it is important for us to have this photo published here. Thank you. - shadowloud — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shadowloud (talk • contribs) 20:35, 20 December 2017‎ (UTC)

Since user accounts are anonymous, and people constantly upload material from the Internet, we typically require that works which are already available on the Internet go through the COM:OTRS process, where the author confirms the license in a private email. Images get undeleted at the end of that process. The email makes sure there are no misunderstandings as to the rights which need to be licensed, etc. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:25, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Requires a free license via OTRS from the actual copyright holder, which is usually the photographer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:27, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Obama Taliban.jpg

Was deleted as no permission but all art from Carlos Latuff is free to use, confirmed by OTRS. See tag at File:Latuff che.png --Denniss (talk) 19:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Denniss is correct -- the OTRS permission from Latuff is very general. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:TheKingHusker Games' Logo.png

The image was was in violation of copyright as presumed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.147.91.32 (talk • contribs) 14:52, 22 December 2017‎ (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. @GreyHusky: please login.   — Jeff G. ツ 15:03, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: No reason given why we should restore this image. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo La Cordée.png - We own this image, thanks

This image is owned by us (La Cordée)

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Royy (talk • contribs)

 Not done: Needs a free license via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Srinath Singh.jpg

I hereby affirm that I, Pushpendra Singh, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the media https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Srinath_Singh.jpg. I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drpschauhan (talk • contribs) 13:38, 27 December 2017‎ (UTC)

 Not done The Uploader couldn't be the creator, it's a scanned photo, we need an OTRS authorization as mentioned Ezarateesteban 19:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MIIT Logo large.png

MIIT owns the copyright to this image and on behalf of MIIT, I am releasing it under a public license. It is freely available.

I am a faculty at MIIT, in case that helps. The logo needs to go on the MIIT Wikipedia page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddhartha.lal (talk • contribs)

 Oppose "Copyright © 2015, Myanmar Institute of Information Technology" at miit.edu.mm. Thuresson (talk) 18:18, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Yes, but I am a faculty member at MIIT and we have decided to make the logo freely available! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddhartha.lal (talk • contribs) 18:24, 26 December 2017‎ (UTC)

 Oppose First, there is no reason to have two versions of the same logo. Only the larger of the two can be kept in any case.
Second, faculty members rarely have the authority to give away university property. Policy requires that for university logos to be hosted on Commons, an authorized official of the university must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 Comment If it's just for en:Myanmar_Institute_of_Information_Technology then I suggest have it as a non-free image at en-wiki. Ping me if you can't upload at en-wiki, and we'll sort it out. Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:34, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
As it's Xmas, I've copied it to en-wiki for you and added it to the article. Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:59, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: per Ronhjones' upload at English Wikipedia. --Green Giant (talk) 20:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Anuja gangan

FBMD in Metadata, seems to be copyvio Anuja gangan (talk) 12:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC) ==

This is a image of Indian singer Mickey Singh Narula & I have a copyrights to use this images in my article. And please remove the article from & the name is Mickey Singh Narula — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anuja gangan (talk • contribs)

 Not done: These are the subject of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Anuja gangan. They have not yet been deleted, so there is nothing to do here. Please make your comments at the DR. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lauren Drain Flexing.jpg

I am the copyright holder of the image that was deleted. I took the photo and also uploaded it to wiki for Lauren's profile. I also gave Lauren permission to use the image in any way she sees fit, be it on her website or anywhere else. Please un-delete this file as I am perfectly ok with it being used for her profile photo here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingnothing3rd (talk • contribs)

This photo was published elsewhere more than one month before uploaded to Wikicommon, and with the photographer credited. Please use Commons:OTRS to verify that you are the copyright owner. Also, please read en:Wikipedia:Conflict of interest before making additional edits to the subject's Wikipedia article. Thuresson (talk) 23:06, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Needs a free license from the actual photographer via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:28, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Golden Yorkshire Terrier.jpg

Dieses Foto ist ebenfalls wiederherzustellen. Please restore this photo as well. It is my dog [8] [9] The advertisment an Admin found in Quoka is mine [10]. I have the right to use my own photos for other purposes too. I have sent an Email to wikimedia-permissons to confirm this. Why are the letters black and not red, if the image is deleted? [11] Sciencia58 (talk) 20:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

 Info File:Golden Yorkshire Terrier.jpg deleted December 27, 2017. Thuresson (talk) 20:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

The "copyright" claimed by Quoka means, that other people are not allowed to take and use the images from the advertisments. The photographer himself/herself is allowed to do so, which means he/her is allowed to use his/her photo in other places for other purposes too. By putting an own photo in an advertisment the photographer, the owner, does not give his/her copyright away. Sciencia58 (talk) 06:59, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose However, because people dishonestly take photographs from advertisements and other places on the Web and post them here as "own work", Commons policy requires that when an image has appeared elsewhere on the Web without a free license, the actual copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS. In this case, the image appears on the Web with an explicit copyright claim. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The Copyright Quoka generally claims for all images in their advertisements means, that other people are not allowed to use them. This is a protection for the people who upload their own photos in order to offer or to sell something. By putting an advertisement into Quoka, the owner of the photo, the photographer himself/herself, does not give his/her copyright away. If this was the case, it wouldn't be possible to make more advertisements on other websites. Here you find me too: [12]. I have the right to put my photos in different websites who have advertisments. None of them is the Copyrightholder. The websites only prohibit other people to take them and use them. If you find a photo elsewhere on the Web this does NOT automatically mean, the Wikimedia-Uploader took it from there. This is a common fallacy. The image can be his/her own and he/she put it there himself/herself. The advertisement in Quoka is my own advertisement showing my own photos of my own dog. In my experience OTRS usually answers very soon. The fact that you found my photo elsewhere on the Web was NO reason for an immediate deletion. I am here, if something is unclear to you, you can't first write a message to me, tell me what you found, so a can answer and give you the information you need for a decision. A respectful manner of treating the other person can make things a lot easier and more enjoyable for both sides.

https://puu.sh/yPspU.JPG

https://puu.sh/ynBR7.jpg

https://puu.sh/yPlta.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Golden_Yorkshire_Terrier_Welpe.png

https://puu.sh/yPsr0.png

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Heimtierausweis_Hund.png

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eigent%C3%BCmerin.jpg

https://puu.sh/yPs60.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:User_Sciencia58.jpg

https://puu.sh/yPui2.JPG

Sciencia58 (talk) 15:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Please see my comment above. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Restored by @Krd: per OTRS ticket:2017122710008316. --Green Giant (talk) 15:18, 29 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:TwistHeadshot.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017110310011706 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{Temporarily undeleted}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ ping or talk 04:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: I’ve added OTRS received so there’s 30 days to verify. --Green Giant (talk) 15:22, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Busty and the Bass - 2017.png

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017110910015086 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{Temporarily undeleted}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ ping or talk 06:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: . --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:18, 29 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1976.07.09 Liban-Beyrouth-Palais-Justice Laisser-Passer-Tirat.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Need to assess permission sent with Ticket:2017122710008156. Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:18, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: I’ve tagged them with OTRS received so there are 30 days to process the ticket. --Green Giant (talk) 15:27, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo Nijmeegse Federatie van Muziekverenigingen.jpg

This is a copyright-free logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XSilke (talk • contribs) 10:12, 26 December 2017‎ (UTC)

  • @XSilke: That filename never existed. I think you meant File:Logo Nijmeegse Federatie van Muziekverenigingen.gif, for which I !vote
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ ping or talk 14:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jeff. --Green Giant (talk) 01:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aerob 4D (Made in Skolkovo logo).jpg

Please undelete the stated files with the following Copyright tag: {{PD-author|Aerob LLC}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Breakinlogic (talk • contribs) 12:44, 26 December 2017‎ (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ ping or talk 13:51, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jeff. --Green Giant (talk) 01:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SINN Power Wellenkraftwerk und Wellenkraftwerks-Modul.png

I am associated with the company SINN Power and can assure you that there is the full right to use the referred image on Wikipedia and in Commons. While there might be some need to complete the copyright information, I had no way of reacting due to the Christmas holidays.

Please undelete the file and give me the chance to provide the necessary information to prevent this problem again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adorenarin (talk • contribs) 16:14, 26 December 2017‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Policy requires that for corporate logos to be hosted on Commons, an authorized official of the corporation must send a free license using OTRS. Note also that "the full right to use the referred image on Wikipedia and in Commons" is insufficient. Commons and WP require that images be free for any use anywhere by anybody, including commercial use and derivative works. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:34, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jim. --Green Giant (talk) 01:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Popscreenshot

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017110610012987 alleges permission for the artwork underlying these files. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{Temporarily undeleted}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: - marked as OTRS received; gives 30 days to process the ticket. --Green Giant (talk) 01:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:4th St. Nicholas Charity Night.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent. Need to verify permission used in Ticket:2017122910004316. Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Tagged with OTRS received. --Green Giant (talk) 13:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Geny Laffitte - Giselle Acte II.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent. Permission provided with Ticket:2017122710003946. Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:49, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: tagged with {{OTRS received}}. --Green Giant (talk) 14:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:HH-Portrait2017NB.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent. Need to verify permission sent with Ticket:2017121910008224. Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: tagged with {{OTRS received}}. --Green Giant (talk) 14:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo-ufas1.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent. Permission provided with ticket:2017122010005019. Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: tagged with {{OTRS received}}. --Green Giant (talk) 14:48, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Adonis Ratoavinirina.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent. Need to verify permission sent with Ticket:2017122110009648. Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: tagged with {{OTRS received}}. --Green Giant (talk) 14:49, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kaiser Ferdinand I Von Österreich.jpg

hi, I ask the following ripristinodel portrait by Eugen Hummel (1812-1845) around the thirties of the nineteenth century--87.8.55.226 21:30, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

 Info A3cb1 upload. Thuresson (talk) 03:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Is this the image you are looking for? Lotje (talk) 06:39, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
no the source of the painting is this:

the original source of the file can no longer be visible due to damage to the site, so if by chance the file was restored this is one of the few sites to be helped for the following information concerning the painting and the artist's file --87.15.94.158 10:27, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I would like to say that the name of the artist and the date of death are present in the source, and therefore it seems obvious to me that, seeing that the artist died more than two hundred years ago, he is able to declare that it is a PD license (excluded from copyright), mr Jeff, I do not understand his strong opposition, I just say that the file goes SEEN before firing the justifications in sight, look at the file and check if it is all in order with the copyright, ok? :)--87.15.94.158 14:38, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

 Support The uploader has been blocked as an abuser. I don't know and don't care about the circumstances which caused that. Notwithstanding that, this painting is clearly PD and does not appear among those in Category:Paintings of Ferdinand I of Austria, so why shouldn't we restore it? .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

 Support Copyright status seems obviously OK. Identity of uploader shouldn't matter in a case where we don't need to assume good faith on their part -- if they made *some* helpful uploads, then by all means keep those. No reason to deprive the other projects of such files. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Per Jim and Carl. If we avoided hosting PD images just because a blocked user uploaded them, then theoretically they could prevent us from hosting a whole bunch of images just by their presence. I have restored the file and hidden the username from public display. I think this is the best approach to take in these circumstances. --Green Giant (talk) 15:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Carlos-Enrique Ruiz.jpg File:Carlos-enrique-ruiz.jpg

/Users/carlos-enriqueruiz/Desktop/carlos-enrique-ruiz (foto en Wikipedia).jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlos-Enrique Ruiz (talk • contribs) 12:38, 28 December 2017‎ (UTC)

 Oppose The image has appeared elsewhere on the Web without a free license, so policy requires that the actual copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS. There is no reason given above why we should restore this image without that free license.

Policy also requires that users whose username is that of a famous person must confirm their identity by sending an image of an official identification (passport or driver's license, for example) using OTRS. This is true whether or not you are actually the Colombian poet, Carlos-Enrique Ruiz. see Commons:Username_policy#Usernames_requiring_identification. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jim. --Green Giant (talk) 16:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Métallique Est A3B4D.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent. Need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2017122010003226. Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: tagged with {{OTRS received}}. --Green Giant (talk) 20:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

De Minimis Files in Category:One Piece

Somes files were deleted

I am quoting the closure:

"DM does not apply if everything in the image is copyrighted. The test is that you must be able to remove the copyrighted item and the average observer would not notice. If you removed the copyrighted works from the last four of these, you would have a large white wall. .

There is no such 'test'. DM is about the subject, not about the fact someone consider as copyrighted sub-elements of the image. Subject is the subject, tables and supports are not copyrighted, so you'd get an empty stand / poster less and not a wall... Esby (talk) 22:35, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose I closed the DR and wrote the words above. The essence of de minimis is that the copyrighted item or items must not matter to the image as a whole -- that, as I said, you could remove the copyrighted item(s) and still have an image that was useful for the same purpose as if they were present. That is clearly not the case when the image is filled with copyrighted items, some of them large. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:15, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done From Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:One Piece. No new arguments have been presented why these files are acceptable. Thuresson (talk) 23:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Felix von Sassen.jpg

File:Felix von Sassen.jpg Das Bild von Felix von Sassen wurde von Christoph Mannhardt <studio@christophmannhardt.com> geschossen. Er hat der Nutzung des Bildes ausdrücklich zugestimmt. Die Freigabe liegt mir als E-MAil vor. --Philcomputing (talk) 14:33, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose In order for the image to be restored, Mr. Mannhardt must send a free license using OTRS. Note that he must do this himself -- if you forward the email you have, it probably will not be accepted. The reason for that is that we have too many bad actors here who will forge permissions in order for images to appear on Commons..     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:40, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jim. --Green Giant (talk) 03:05, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete Keith A. Noreika.jpg it was a public domain image from the U.S. federal Government

Is a federal government image in the public domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hubbardbk (talk • contribs) 18:12, 28 December 2017‎ (UTC)

 Oppose It may be a PD image, but you did not provide the information necessary to determine that. You showed:

Source=Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Author=Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

You must, instead, show the URL of the actual page from which the image came -- not the URL of the image, but the URL of the page on which it appears. Since Noreika is no longer acting Comptroller, the image has been taken down, so it is up to you to find it to find out who the photographer actually was. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:06, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jim. A cursory Google search revealed this photo was not from a DotGov website, such as OCC.gov. It did however appear on newspaper websites, suggesting it is not free to reuse. --Green Giant (talk) 03:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kusumo Fitra Ismu.jpg i request undeletion, i have copyright for this photo

i have copyright for this foto permission [Ticket#: 2017122910006691]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marde1980 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 30 December 2017‎ (UTC)

An OTRS agent will take care of undeletion if they think that the permission would be in order. Please patiently wait instead of reuploading the files. Jcb (talk) 17:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the image will be restored automatically when and if the e-mail is received, processed, and approved. If the e-mail has been properly received there, then the sender should receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 27 days before the e-mail is processed and the image is restored. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cover buku 7.jpg i have copyright , registered in INDAUTOR ( mexican copyright authority ) that grant me the right of this cover book

i request please the undeleting of this photo i have copyright , registered in INDAUTOR ( mexican copyright authority ) that grant me the right of this cover book permission [Ticket#: 2017122910006691]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marde1980 (talk • contribs) 17:04, 30 December 2017‎ (UTC)

An OTRS agent will take care of undeletion if they think that the permission would be in order. Please patiently wait instead of reuploading the files. Jcb (talk) 17:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the image will be restored automatically when and if the e-mail is received, processed, and approved. If the e-mail has been properly received there, then the sender should receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 27 days before the e-mail is processed and the image is restored. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Indra swara museo nacional.jpg

i request undeletion i have copyright of this photo permission [Ticket#: 2017122910006691]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marde1980 (talk • contribs) 17:05, 30 December 2017‎ (UTC)

An OTRS agent will take care of undeletion if they think that the permission would be in order. Please patiently wait instead of reuploading the files. Jcb (talk) 17:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the image will be restored automatically when and if the e-mail is received, processed, and approved. If the e-mail has been properly received there, then the sender should receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 27 days before the e-mail is processed and the image is restored. . .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Beate Schroedl-Baurmeister Porträt.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The permission from the photographer is sent to permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org DERBA (talk) 13:54, 29 December 2017 (UTC)


  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply..     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jim. --Green Giant (talk) 14:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2013ML-cd-400.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent. Need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2017101310005072. Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Tagged with {{OTRS received}}. --Green Giant (talk) 14:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2008ML-couvCD800.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent. Need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2017101310005125. Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Tagged with {{OTRS received}}. --Green Giant (talk) 14:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Theatre-en-direct.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent. Need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2017101610009885. Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Tagged with {{OTRS received}}. --Green Giant (talk) 14:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:17-27-47TM.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent. Need to verify permission provided with Ticket:2017102310009488. Please ping me when it's done. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: the file was renamed as File:Coralie Demay - Championnat de France Piste 2017.jpg. Note this appears to have had a previous email at ticket:2017102310009497 . --Green Giant (talk) 14:16, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2017-12&oldid=296808974"